Gender attributions of orgasm non-occurrence in heterosexual relationships and their association with sexual and relationship outcomes

References

• Andrejek, N., & Fetner, T. (2019). The gender gap in orgasms: Survey data from a mid-sized Canadian city. International Journal of Sexual Health, 31(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2018.1563014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annon, J. S. (1976). The PLISSIT model: A proposed conceptual scheme for the behavioral treatment of sexual problems. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614576.1976.11074483
   Google Scholar
• Arcos-Romero, A. I., Granados, R., & Sierra, J. C. (2019). Relationship between orgasm experience and sexual excitation: Validation of the model of the subjective orgasm experience. International Journal of Impotence Research, 31(4), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0095-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcos-Romero, A. I., & Sierra, J. C. (2020). Factors associated with subjective orgasm experience in heterosexual relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(4), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2019.1711273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcos-Romero, A. I., & Sierra, J. C. (2018). [Systematic review of the subjective experience of orgasm]. Revista Internacional de Andrologia, 16(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2017.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. D., Moore, J. M., Woolford, B. A., & Riggs, S. A. (2018). Interest in partner orgasm: Sex differences and relationships with attachment strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, (124), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2004). Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. Applying Qualitative Methods to Marketing Management Research, 141, 156.
   Google Scholar
• Bhutto, Z. H., Zadeh, Z. F., Shahab, A., & Rowland, D. L. (2021). Attribution patterns related to positive and negative sexual experiences in married Pakistani women with differing levels of orgasmic difficulty. Women & Health, 61(2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2020.1824955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, K. L., Cappell, J., & Pukall, C. F. (2018). Not all orgasms were created equal: Differences in frequency and satisfaction of orgasm experiences by sexual activity in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 55(6), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1303437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00369.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buczak-Stec, E., König, H., & Hajek, A. (2019). The link between sexual satisfaction and subjective well-being: A longitudinal perspective based on the German Ageing Survey. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 28(11), 3025–3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02235-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., Gomes, A. Q., Laja, P., Oliveira, C., Vilarinho, S., Janssen, E., & Nobre, P. (2013). Gender differences in sexual arousal and affective responses to erotica: The effects of type of film and fantasy instructions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(6), 1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0076-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalan, J. (1993). Primary male anorgasmia and its treatment: Three case reports. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 8(3), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674659308404974
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, S. B., Francisco, M., & van Anders, S. M. (2019). When orgasms do not equal pleasure: Accounts of “bad” orgasm experiences during consensual sexual Encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2435–2459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01527-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, S. B., & van Anders, S. M. (2017). Do women’s orgasms function as a masculinity achievement for men? Journal of Sex Research, 54(9), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1283484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Z., & Smyth, R. (2015). Sex and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 112, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, A. Y., & Chiang, W. Y. (2016). Behold, I am coming soon! A study on the conceptualization of sexual orgasm in 27 languages. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1187043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conaglen, H. M., & Conaglen, J. V. (2008). The impact of erectile dysfunction on female partners: A qualitative investigation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 23(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990801918680
   Google Scholar
• Coria-Avila, G. A., Herrera-Covarrubias, D., Ismail, N., & Pfaus, J. G. (2016). The role of orgasm in the development and shaping of partner preferences. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 6(1), 31815. https://doi.org/10.3402/snp.v6.31815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., Münkemüller, T., McClean, C., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, D. L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P., & Rupert, D. J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research: How to and why not [doctoral dissertation]. Nebraska University. Digital Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Durtschi, J., Fincham, F., Cui, M., Lorenz, F., & Conger, R. (2011). Dyadic processes in early marriage: Attributions, behavior, and marital quality. Family Relations, 60(4), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00655.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D. (1991). Understanding close relationships: An attributional perspective. In Zelen S.L. (eds) New models, new extensions of attribution theory. Recent research in psychology. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D., & Maass, A. (1985). Relationship factors as predictors of causal attributions about sexual experiences. Sex Roles, 12(7-8), 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, D. A., John, H. K. S., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a US national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, D. A., Lever, J., Gillespie, B. J., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). What keeps passion alive? Sexual satisfaction is associated with sexual communication, mood setting, sexual variety, oral sex, orgasm, and sex frequency in a national U.S. Study. Journal of Sex Research, 54(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1137854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (2011). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, L. T., Cavalie, C., Goins, L., & King, E. (2008). Enjoyment of sexual activities and attributions of enjoyment to the other gender. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 17(4), 173.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiadis, J. R., Reinders, A. A., Paans, A. M., Renken, R., & Kortekaas, R. (2009). Men versus women on sexual brain function: Prominent differences during tactile genital stimulation, but not during orgasm. Human Brain Mapping, 30(10), 3089–3101. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, L. E. (2006). Bringing the U-Haul: Embracing and resisting sexual stereotypes in a lesbian community. Sexualities, 9(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706063118
   Google Scholar
• Handy, A. B., Stanton, A. M., & Meston, C. M. (2018). Understanding women’s subjective sexual arousal within the laboratory: Definition, measurement, and manipulation. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 6(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbenick, D., Eastman-Mueller, H., Fu, T. C., Dodge, B., Ponander, K., & Sanders, S. A. (2019). Women’s sexual satisfaction, communication, and reasons for (no longer) faking orgasm: Findings from a US probability sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2461–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1102-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevesi, K., Miklós, E., Horváth, Z., Sal, D., & Rowland, D. L. (2020). Typologies of women with orgasmic difficulty and their relationship to sexual distress. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17(6), 1144–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2002). Embodying orgasm: Gendered power relations and sexual pleasure. Women & Therapy, 24(1–2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015v24n01_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. C., Robinson, W. D., & Seedall, R. B. (2018). The role of sexual communication in couples’ sexual outcomes: A dyadic path analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(4), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 457–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontula, O., & Miettinen, A. (2016). Determinants of female sexual orgasms. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 6(1), 31624. https://doi.org/10.3402/snp.v6.31624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The Social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States (1st ed.). University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonhardt, N. D., Willoughby, B. J., Busby, D. M., Yorgason, J. B., & Holmes, E. K. (2018). The significance of the female orgasm: A nationally representative, dyadic study of newlyweds’ orgasm experience. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 15(8), 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah, K., & Binik, Y. M. (2001). The nature of human orgasm: A critical review of major trends. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(6), 823–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00069-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah, K., & Binik, Y. M. (2005). Are orgasms in the mind or the body? Psychosocial versus physiological correlates of orgasmic pleasure and satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230590513401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahar, E. A., Mintz, L. B., & Akers, B. M. (2020). Orgasm equality: Scientific findings and societal implications. Current Sexual Health Reports, 12(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00237-9
   Google Scholar
• Mark, K. P., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, J. D., Sanders, S., & Reece, M. (2014). A psychometric comparison of three scales and a single-item measure to assess sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.816261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinko, M. J., & Mackey, J. D. (2019). Attribution theory: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 523–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2020). Quality in qualitative research. In N. Mays & C. Pope (Eds.), Qualitative research in health care (pp. 211–233). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, S. I. (2014). What do you mean when you say that you are sexually satisfied?” A mixed methods study. Feminism & Psychology, 24(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353513508392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, C., & Lee, C. (2011). On his terms: Representations of sexuality in women’s magazines and the implications for negotiating safe sex. Psychology and Sexuality, 2(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2010.534489
   Google Scholar
• Morry, M. M., Chee, K. C., Penniston, T. L., & Sucharyna, T. A. (2019). Relationship social comparisons: Comparison interpretations and attributions as predictors of relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1069–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518755018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piemonte, J. L., Conley, T. D., & Gusakova, S. (2019). Orgasm, gender, and responses to heterosexual casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peixoto, M. M., & Nobre, P. (2016). Automatic thoughts during sexual activity, distressing sexual symptoms, and sexual orientation: Findings from a web survey. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 42(7), 616–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1113583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, D. L., Dabbs, C. R., & Medina, M. C. (2019). Sex differences in attributions to positive and negative sexual scenarios in men and women with and without sexual problems: Reconsidering stereotypes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(3), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1270-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, D. L., Kneusel, J. A., Bacys, K. R., Hamilton, B. D., Bhutto, Z., & Zadeh, Z. (2021). The role of orgasmic difficulty in attributing cause for positive and negative sexual outcomes in women: The importance of cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(4), 368–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2021.1881671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, D. L., & Kolba, T. N. (2018). The burden of sexual problems: Perceived effects on men’s and women’s sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 55(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1332153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, D. L., & Kolba, T. N. (2019). Relationship of specific sexual activities to orgasmic latency, pleasure, and difficulty during partnered sex. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(4), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, C. M., & Fisher, W. A. (2014). "Did you come?" A qualitative exploration of gender differences in beliefs, experiences, and concerns regarding female orgasm occurrence during heterosexual sexual interactions?” Journal of Sex Research, 51(6), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.838934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, T., Renfro, K. J., Lloyd, E., & Wallen, K. (2018). Women’s experience of orgasm during intercourse: Question semantics affect women’s reports and men’s estimates of orgasm occurrence. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(3), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1102-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra, J. C., Ortiz, A., Calvillo, C., & Arcos-Romero, A. I. (2020). Subjective experience of orgasm in the context of solo masturbation. International Journal of Andrology, 19(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2019.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Stelzl, M., & Lafrance, M. N. (2021). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t”: Women’s accounts of feigning sexual pleasure. Feminism & Psychology, 31(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353520963967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2016). Heterosexual women’s causal attributions regarding impairment in sexual function: Factor structure and associations with well-being. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(8), 1989–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0741-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struckman-Johnson, C., Nalan-Sheffield, K., Gaster, S., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (2017). Sexual behavior in parked cars reported by Midwestern college men and women. Journal of Sex Research, 54(8), 1064–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1221881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štulhofer, A., Buško, V., & Brouillard, P. (2011). The new sexual satisfaction scale and its short form. Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures, 3(1), 530–533. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183169
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., & Teddlie, C. B. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (vol. 46). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Terrell, S. R. (2012). Mixed-methods research methodologies. Qualitative Report, 17(1), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1819
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, I. M., Moura, C. V., & Nobre, P. J. (2020). The role of cognitive processing factors in sexual function and dysfunction in women and men: A systematic review. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 8(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. S., & Snyder, D. K. (1986). Attribution theory in intimate relationships: A methodological review. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 14(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926188608250629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, L. D., Kremer, E. C., & Brown, J. (2005). The incidental orgasm: The presence of clitoral knowledge and the absence of orgasm for women. Women & Health, 42(1), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v42n01_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakil, S. (2021). Objectivity and orgasm: the perils of imprecise definitions. Synthese, 199(1-2), 2315–2319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02886-8[Mismatch] [
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2019). Wither attribution theory? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 603–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinfurt, K. P., Lin, L., Bruner, D. W., Cyranowski, J. M., Dombeck, C. B., Hahn, E. A., Jeffery, D. D., Luecht, R. M., Magasi, S., Porter, L. S., Reese, J. B., Reeve, B. B., Shelby, R. A., Wilder Smith, A., Willse, J. T., & Flynn, K. E. (2015). Development and initial validation of the PROMIS(®) Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(9), 1961–1974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongsomboon, V., Burleson, M. H., & Webster, G. D. (2020). Women’s orgasm and sexual satisfaction in committed sex and casual sex: Relationship between sociosexuality and sexual outcomes in different sexual contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 57(3), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1672036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziogas, A., Habermeyer, E., Santtila, P., Poeppl, T. B., & Mokros, A. (2020). Neuroelectric correlates of human sexuality: A review and meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 4(11), 907–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01547-3
   Google Scholar