Turkish parliamentary debates about the international recognition of the Armenian genocide: development and variations in the official denialism

References

• Akgönül, S. 2007. Türkiye Rumları. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Aral, F., ed. 2011. İmparatorluğun çöküş döneminde Osmanlı Ermenileri: Bilimsel Sorumluluk ve Demokrasi Sorunları. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Assembly of Turkish American Associations. 1986. Armenian allegations: Myth and reality: A handbook of facts and documents. Washington DC: The Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Atalay, O. 2018. Türk’e tapmak. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Bali, R.N. 2002. Tarz-ı hayat’tan life style’a yeni seçkinler, yeni mekanlar, yeni yaşamlar. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. 2003. Gender and nationalism: The masculinisation of Hinduism and female political participation in India. Women’s Studies International Forum 26, no. 2: 167–79. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(03)00019-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, S. 2015. The grammar of denial: State, society, and Turkish-Armenian relations. International Journal of Middle East Studies 47, no. 4: 801–06. doi:10.1017/S0020743815001014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, D. 2005. The great game of genocide. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, P.R. 1997. Theft of an idol. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2009. Ethnicity, race, and nationalism. Annual Review of Sociology 35, no. 1: 21–42. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K.K. 1998. The discursive performance of femininity: Hating hillary. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1, no. 1: 1–19. doi:10.1353/rap.2010.0172.
   Google Scholar
• Çevik, S.B. 2022. Turkey’s “apology” and image repair on the centennial of the Armenian genocide. Nationalities Papers, 1–11. doi:10.1017/nps.2022.28
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, T. 2015. Great catastrophe; Armenians and Turks in the shadow of genocide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J.M. 2010. Defending the nation? Maintaining Turkey’s narrative of the Armenian genocide. South European Society & Politics 15, no. 3: 467–85. doi:10.1080/13608746.2010.513605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, C. 2010. The history and politics of the cyprus conflict. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Emre, C. 2013. Kırmızı siyah kitab: 1328 Fecayii. İstanbul: Matbaa-yi Hayriye ve Şürekası.
   Google Scholar
• Göçek, F.M. 2015. Denial of violence: Ottoman past, Turkish present, and collective violence against the Armenians 1789–2009. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Göçek, F.M., and R. Grigor Suny. 2011. Introduction: Leaving it to the historians. In A question of genocide, ed. F.M. Göçek and R.G. Suny, 3–5. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J.F. 2020. The Turkish arms embargo: Drugs, ethnic lobbies, and US domestic politics. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Gürpınar, D. 2016. The manufacturing of denial: The making of the Turkish ‘official thesis’ on the Armenian genocide between 1974 and 1990. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 18, no. 3: 217–40. doi:10.1080/19448953.2016.1176397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halaçoğlu, Y. 1988. XVIII. yüzyılda Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun iskan siyaseti ve aşiretlerin yerleştirilmesi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
   Google Scholar
• Halaçoğlu, Y. 1991. XIV-XVII. yüzyıllarda Osmanlılarda devlet teşkilatı ve sosyal yapı. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
   Google Scholar
• İ̇nan, K. 1995. Siyasetin içinden. İstanbul: Milliyet Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• İ̇nan, K. 2002. Cenevre yılları. İstanbul: Timaş.
   Google Scholar
• Koçaş, S. 1967. Tarih boyunca Ermeniler ve Türk-Ermeni ilişkileri. Ankara: Altınok Matbaası.
   Google Scholar
• Kurt, Ü. 2012. “Türk’ün büyük, biçare ırkı”: Türk yurdu’nda milliyetçiliğin esasları (1911-1916). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, H.W. 2003. The institute of Turkish studies and its impact on the field. In Turkish studies in the United States, ed. D. Quataert and S. Sayarı, 135–45. Bloomington: Indiana University, Ottoman and Modern Turkish Studies Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Malsin, J. 2021. Biden, Erdogan meet in attempt to reset U.S.-Turkey ties, The Wall Street Journal, June 14. https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-erdogan-to-meet-in-attempt-to-reset-u-s-turkey-ties-11623685581.
   Google Scholar
• Milliyet. 2000. Serinkanlı olalım. October 20. http://gazetearsivi.milliyet.com.tr/Arsiv/2000/10/20
   Google Scholar
• Nefes, T.S. 2012. The history of the social constructions of Dönmes (converts). Journal of Historical Sociology 25, no. 3: 413–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.2012.01434.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefes, T.S. 2013. Political parties’ perceptions and uses of anti-semitic conspiracy theories in Turkey. The Sociological Review 61, no. 2: 247–64. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefes, T.S. 2015. Scrutinizing impacts of conspiracy theories on readers’ political views: A rational choice perspective on anti-semitic rhetoric in Turkey. The British Journal of Sociology 66, no. 3: 557–75. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefes, T.S. 2021. Explaining negative descriptions of Armenians in Turkish parliamentary speeches (1960-1980) via group position theory. Quality & Quantity 55, no. 6: 2237–52. doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01108-8.
   Google Scholar
• Nefes, T.S. 2022. Using content analysis to study political texts. Mediterranean Politics 27, no. 2: 264–71. doi:10.1080/13629395.2020.1809175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, P. 1999. The holocaust in American life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D.M., and R.A. Paul. 2009. Ethnic lobbies and US foreign policy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, M. 1985. Ankara Üniversitesi Profesörlerinden Dr. Mümtaz Soysal’ın Tanık Beyanı. In Orly saldırısı davası: 19 Şubat-2 Mart 1985: Şahit ve avukat beyanları. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, 7–51.
   Google Scholar
• Radikal. 2000. Ermenileri özel örgüt öldürdü. October 9.
   Google Scholar
• Tambiah, S.J. 1996. Leveling crowds: Ethnonationalist conflicts and collective violence in South Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, Ö., and G. Gürkan Öztan. 2018. Devlet aklı ve 1915. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Üngör, U. 2014. Lost in commemoration: The Armenian Genocide in memory and identity. Patterns of Prejudice 48, no. 2: 147–66. doi:10.1080/0031322X.2014.902210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M.D., and E. Marsh. 2006. Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends 55, no. 1: 22–45. doi:10.1353/lib.2006.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, H.M. 2020. The Turkish-Armenian historical controversy: How to name the events of 1915? Middle East Critique 29, no. 3: 345–65. doi:10.1080/19436149.2020.1770453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarakolu, R. 2009. Sivil toplumda Türk-Ermeni diyaloğu. İstanbul: Pencere Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Zarifian, J. 2014. The Armenian-American lobby and its impact on U.S. foreign policy. Society 51, no. 5: 503–12. doi:10.1007/s12115-014-9816-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar