The pandemic in illiberal democracies: challenges and opportunities for social movements in Serbia

References

• A11 Initiative for economic and social rights. 2020. Human Rights in Serbia during the First Wave of Coronavirus: from denial of danger to state of emergency. Accessed 10 July 2021. https://www.a11initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Human-Rights-in-Serbia-during-the-First-Wave-of-Coronavirus-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, E., and Y. Zylan. 1991. “It happened here: Political opportunity, the new institutionalism, and the Townsend movement.” American Sociological Review 56, no. 2: 250–65. doi:10.2307/2095783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal, A. 2021. “The climate and ecological emergency in the era of a state of exceptions.” Graz Law Working Paper No 07–2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3865589.
   Google Scholar
• Babović, M., S. Cvejić, and V. Vuletić. 1997. “Beogradski protest 96/97.” Sociologija 39, no. 1: 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, N., and R. Labonté. 2020. “‘Everything is perfect, and we have no problems’: Detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research.” Qualitative Health Research 30, no. 5: 783–92. doi:10.1177/1049732319889354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethke, F., and J. Wolff. 2020. “COVID-19 und das Schrumpfen zivilgesellschaftlicher Handlungsspielräume: Muster und Konsequenzen.” Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 9, no. 2: 363–74. doi:10.1007/s42597-020-00038-w.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., J. Frankland, M. Thomas, and K. Robson. 2001. Focus groups in social research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I., and M. Deflorian. 2021. “Politicization beyond post-politics: New social activism and the reconfiguration of political discourse.” Social Movement Studies 20, no. 3: 259–75. doi:10.1080/14742837.2021.1872375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. 2009. “How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism.” Democratization 16, no. 2: 399–423. doi:10.1080/13510340902777800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N., and O. Salát. 2021. Parliaments in times of crisis: COVID-19, populism and executive dominance. West European Politics 44, no. 5–6: 1103–28. doi:10.1080/01402382.2021.1930733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. 2012. “Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure.” European Journal of Communication 27, no. 2: 117–34. doi:10.1177/0267323112441007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassani, A. 2014. “Hybrid what? Partial consensus and persistent divergences in the analysis of hybrid regimes.” International Political Science Review 35, no. 5: 542–58. doi:10.1177/0192512113495756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIVICUS. 2019. Serbia’s Civic Space Downgraded. Accessed 11 July 2021. https://www.civicus.org/index.php/media-resources/news/4113-serbia-s-civic-space-downgraded.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, S. 2010. “Nationalist violence in post-miloševic´ serbia: extremist right-wing youth groups as instruments of intimidation of civic-minded individuals and organizations.” In Transnational Terrorism, Organized Crime and Peace-Building. ed. W. Benedek, et al.329–49. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230281479_18
   Google Scholar
• CSO Sustainability Index. 2020. 2019 civil society organization sustainability index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia, 23rd Edition – October 2020. Accessed 12 February 2022. https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/resource-csosi-2019-report-europe-eurasia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Delibašić, B., S. Nikolić, and J. Vasiljević. 2019. “Demokratizacija odozdo: Formiranje i delovanje novih društvenih pokreta u Srbiji i Makedoniji.[Democratization from below: formation and workings of new social movements in Serbia and Macedonia]. ”Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. 1996. Social movements and the state: Thoughts on the policing of protest. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings ed. D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, and M. Zald 62–92. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803987.005
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. 2014. Focus groups. In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research ed. D. Della Porta 289–307. Oxford:Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.003.0012
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. 2020. “Building bridges: Social movements and civil society in times of crisis.” Voluntas 31, no. 5: 938–48. doi:10.1007/s11266-020-00199-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. 2021. Progressive social movements, democracy and the pandemic. In Pandemics, Politics, and Society: Critical Perspectives on the Covid-19 Crisis ed. G. Delanty 209–26. Berlin:De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110713350-014
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and M. Diani. 2006. Social movements: An introduction. 2nd edition) ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and H. Reiter. 1998. Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in Western democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M., and D. McAdam, ed. 2003. Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, E. 2021. “Caring in times of a global pandemic: Introduction.” Historical Social Research 46, no. 4: 7–30. doi:10.12759/hsr.46.2021.4.7-30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebart media archive. 2021. Analysis of the media coverage of the coronavirus pandemic in Serbia. Accessed 12 January 2022. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/e/6/457645.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Edgell, A.B., Lachapelle, J., Lührmann, A., Maerz, S.F., Grahn, S., Kolvani, P., Good God, A.F., Lundstedt, M., Natsika, N., Pillai, S., Bederke, P., Bruhn, M., Kaiser, S., Schaver, C., Alijla, A., Fernandes, T., Tung, H., Wilson, M., Lindberg, S.I. 2020. Pandemic backsliding: Democracy during covid-19 (PanDem), version 3. Varieties of democracy (V-Dem) institute. Accessed 15 January 2022. http://www.v-dem.net/en/our-work/research-projects/pandemic-backsliding.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, T. 2009. “Illiberal resilience in Serbia.” Journal of Democracy 20, no. 1: 128–42. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P.K. 1973. “The conditions of protest behavior in American Cities.” The American Political Science Review 67, no. 1: 11–28. doi:10.2307/1958525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. Serbia 2020 Report. Brussels, 6 October 2020. Accessed 12 July 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/serbia_report_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, A., and M. Ostojic. 2008. “The EU and civil society in Serbia: Governance rather than politics.” Balkanologie 11, no. 1–2: 1–16. doi:10.4000/balkanologie.1393.
   Google Scholar
• Fiket, I., Z. Pavlović, and G. Pudar Draško. 2017. Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: Kartografija nemoći. [Political orientations of citizens of Serbia: Cartography of impotence]. Beograd: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Fiket, I., and G. Pudar Draško. 2021. “Possibility of non-institutional political participation within the non-responsive system of Serbia: The impact of (dis)trust and internal political efficiency.” Sociologija 63, no. 2: 400–18. doi:10.2298/SOC2102400F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2020 “Serbia: Freedom in the world 2020 country report.” Accessed 12 July 2021. https://freedomhouse.org/country/serbia/freedom-world/2020
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2021. Freedom on the net 2021: The global drive to control big tech. Accessed 12 February 2022. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/FOTN_2021_Complete_Booklet_09162021_FINAL_UPDATED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gagyi, A. 2015. “Social movement studies for East Central Europe? The challenge of a time-space bias on postwar Western Societies.” Intersections 1, no. 3: 16–36. doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v1i3.93.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. 2020. The pandemic crowd: Protest in the time of covid-19. Journal of International Affairs 73, no. 2: 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. 1996. “L’etude de l’action collective entre deux traditions sociologiques.” [The Study of Collective Action between two Sociological Traditions]. Swiss Political Science Review 2, no. 1: 1–51. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.1996.tb00163.x.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. 2010. “‘There’s nothing anyone can do about it: ’ Participation, apathy, and ‘successful’ democratic transition in postsocialist Serbia.” Slavic review 69, no. 1: 41–64. doi:10.1017/S0037677900016697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubješić, S. 2022. “Right-wing extremism in Serbia.” Right Wing Extremism: South-East Europe in Focus 71–92. Sofia: Sofia Security Forum. Accessed 27 November 2022. https://api.sofiaforum.bg/storage/files/post-62fb3f1ac4fa08971168c561.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, P. 2020. “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in central and Eastern Europe: The rise of autocracy and democratic resilience.” Democratic Theory 7, no. 2: 47–60. doi:10.3167/dt.2020.070207.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmeier, S., Cole, R., Grahn, S., Kolvani, P., Lachapelle, J., Lührmann, A., Maerz, S. F., Pillai, S., Lindberg, S. I. 2021. “State of the world 2020: Autocratization turns viral.” Democratization 28, no. 6: 1053–74. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1922390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igalla, M., J. Edelenbos, and I. van Meerkerk. 2019. “Citizens in action, what do they accomplish? A systematic literature review of citizen initiatives, their main characteristics, outcomes, and factors.” Voluntas 30, no. 5: 1176–94. doi:10.1007/s11266-019-00129-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilić, V., and G. Pudar Draško. 2022. “2022 elections in Serbia: The return of the opposition?” Contemporary Southeastern Europe 9, no. 2: 1–14. doi:10.25364/02.9:2022.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union. 2019. “World telecommunication/ICT indicators database. ”Harvard Dataverse. V1. 10.7910/DVN/IP5UBV
   Google Scholar
• Jarić, I. 2005. “U kandžama izneverenih očekivanja.” [In the grip of betrayed expectations]. Filozofija i društvo 27, no. 27: 75–87. doi:10.2298/FID0527075J.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J.C., and B. Klandermans. 1995. The politics of social protest: Comparative perspectives on states and social movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapidžić, D. 2020. “The rise of illiberal politics in Southeast Europe.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20, no. 1: 1–17. doi:10.1080/14683857.2020.1709701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 1986. “Political opportunity structures and political protest.” British Journal of Political Science 16, no. 1: 57–85. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmezić, M., and F. Bieber, ed. 2017. The Crisis of Democracy in the Western Balkans. An Anatomy of Stabilitocracy and the Limits of EU Democracy Promotion. Balkans in Europe Policy Advisory Group. Accessed 26 June 2022. https://biepag.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/TheCrisisofdemocracy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. 1999. “Political. Opportunity. Structure. Some splitting to balance the lumping.” Sociological Forum 14: 93–105. doi:10.1023/A:1021644929537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights [YUCOM]. 2020. Human rights and Covid-19: Analysis of the changes in legal framework during a state of emergency and impact on enjoying human rights, April 30. Accessed 12 August 2021. http://en.yucom.org.rs/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/HUMAN-RIGHTS-AND-COVID-19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2020. “The new competitive authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 31, no. 1: 51–65. doi:10.1353/jod.2020.0004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, A., and S. Lindberg. 2019. “A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it?” Democratization 26, no. 7: 1095–113. doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matić, J. 2012. “(Too) high expectations of democracy in Serbia? Interpretation of empirical research results.” Southeastern Europe 36, no. 3: 304–27. doi:10.1163/18763332-03603002.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. 1982. Political process and the development of black insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. 1996. Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings ed. D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, and M. Zald 23–40. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803987.003
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D.S., and S. Staggenborg. 1996. “Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity.” The American Journal of Sociology 101, no. 6: 1628–60. doi:10.1086/230869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikuš, M. 2015. “Indigenizing “civil society” in Serbia What local fund-raising reveals about class and trust.” Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 2015(71). 43–56. doi:10.3167/fcl.2015.710105
   Google Scholar
• Milan, C. 2019. “Refugees at the gates of the EU: Civic initiatives and grassroots responses to the refugee crisis along the Western Balkans Route.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 21, no. 1: 43–60. doi:10.1080/19448953.2018.1532686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S., and E. Treré. 2020. “The rise of the data poor: The COVID-19 pandemic seen from the margins.” Social Media + Society 6 (3). 10.1177/2056305120948233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milić, A., L. Čičkarić, and M. Jojić. 1997. Generacija u protestu: Studentski protest i porodična socijalizacija.” [Generation in protest: Student revolt and family socialization]. Sociologija 39, no. 1: 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Novaković, N. 2020. “Transition, worker protests and blockades of public spaces in Serbia.” Sociološki pregled 54, no. 4: 1152–82. doi:10.5937/socpreg54-27859.
   Google Scholar
• Opratko, B., Bojadžijev, M., Bojanić, S. M., Fiket, I., Harder, A., Jonsson, S., Nećak, M., Neegard, A., Ortega Soto, C., Pudar Draško, G. 2021. “Cultures of rejection in the Covid-19 crisis.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 44, no. 5: 893–905. doi:10.1080/01419870.2020.1859575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paturyan, Y., and V. Gevorgyan. 2021. Introduction. In Armenian civil society. Old problems, new energy after two decades of independence ed. Y. Paturyan and V. Gevorgyan 1–12. Cham:Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-63226-7_1
   Google Scholar
• Pešić, J. 2017. “Political participation of the participants in the protests against dictatorship.” Sociologija 59, no. 4: 452–75. doi:10.2298/SOC1704452P.
   Google Scholar
• Pešić, J., and J. Petrović. 2020. “The role and the positioning of the left in Serbia’s ‘one of five million’ protests.” Balkanologie 15, no. 2: 1–21. doi:10.4000/balkanologie.2576.
   Google Scholar
• Petrović, J. 2020. Ekologijana periferiji Evrope: stvaranje ekološkog pokreta u Srbiji. [Ecology on the Periphery of Europe: The Creation of an Environmental Movement in Serbia]. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja.
   Google Scholar
• Pinckney, J. 2020. Amid Coronavirus, Online Activism Confronts Digital Authoritarianism. United States Institute of Peace. 28 April 2020. Accessed 10 January 2022. https://www.usip.org/publications/2020/04/amid-coronavirus-online-activism-confronts-digital-authoritarianism.
   Google Scholar
• Pinckney, J., and M. Rivers. 2020. “Sickness or silence: Social movement adaptation to covid-19.” Journal of International Affairs 73, no. 2: 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Pleyers, G. 2020. “The pandemic is a battlefield. Social movements in the COVID-19 lockdown.” Journal of Civil Society 16, no. 4: 295–312. doi:10.1080/17448689.2020.1794398.
   Google Scholar
• Pozen, D., and K. Scheppele. 2020. “Executive underreach, in pandemics and otherwise.” The American Journal of International Law 114, no. 4: 608–17. doi:10.1017/ajil.2020.59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodanović, S., G. Pudar Draško, and M. Velinov. ed. 2019.“Otete institucije u Srbiji: Teorija i praksa.”[Sequestrated Institutions in Serbia: Theory and Practice]. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
   Google Scholar
• Pudar Draško, G., I. Fiket, and J. Vasiljević. 2019. “Big dreams and small steps: Comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20, no. 1: 199–219. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkayastha, D., Vanroelen, C., Bircan, T., Vantyghem, M. A., Gantelet Adsera, C. 2021. Work, health and Covid‑19: a literature review. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. Accessed 12 February 2022. https://www.etui.org/publications/work-health-and-covid-19.
   Google Scholar
• Rutzen, D., and N. Dutta. 2020. Pandemics and human rights. Just Security, March 12. Accessed 6 January 2021. https://www.justsecurity.org/69141/pandemics-and-human-rights.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, S. 2004. Too much civil society? Donor-driven NGOs in the Balkans. In Revisiting the Role of Civil Society in the Promotion of Human Rights, ed. L. Dhundale and E.A. Andersen, 197–220. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D., S. Soule, and H. Kriesi. 2004. Mapping the terrain. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements ed. D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi 3–16. Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470999103.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Soares da Silva, D., L.G. Horlings, and E. Figueiredo. 2018. “Citizen initiatives in the post-welfare state.” Social sciences 7, no. 12: 252. doi:10.3390/socsci7120252.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, D. 2001. “How do political opportunities matter for social movements? Political opportunity, misframing, pseudosuccess, and pseudofailure.” The Sociological Quarterly 42, no. 3: 437–60. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2001.tb02409.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surowiec, P., and V. Štětka. 2020. “Introduction: Media and illiberal democracy in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 36, no. 1: 1–8. doi:10.1080/21599165.2019.1692822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 1996. States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings ed. D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, and M. Zald 41–61. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803987.004
   Google Scholar
• Tepavac, T., and L. Glušac. 2019. Narušavanje podele i ravnoteže vlasti: Dominacija egzekutive u Srbiji.” [Violation of the division and balance of power: The dominance of the executive in Serbia. In Otete institucije u Srbiji: Teorija i praksa, [Sequestrated Institutions in Serbia: Theory and Practice], ed. S. Prodanović, G. Pudar Draško, and M. Velinov, 80–102. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, A.M. 2019. “From competition to polarization in Central Europe: How populists change party systems and the European Union.” Polity 51, no. 4: 689–706. doi:10.1086/705704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vibrant Information Barometer [VIBE]. 2021. Serbia. Washington: IREX. Accessed 12 February 2022. https://www.irex.org/sites/default/files/pdf/vibe-serbia-2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vilenica, A., V. Mentus, I. Ristić, and P. Murić. 2021. “Struggles for care infrastructures in Serbia: The pandemic, dispossessed care, and housing.” Historical Social Research 4, no. 1: 189–208. doi:10.12759/hsr.46.2021.4.189-208.
   Google Scholar
• Vladisavljević, N. 2019. Uspon i pad demokratije posle Petog Oktobra. [The Rise and Fall of Democracy in Serbia after Milošević]. Beograd: Arhipelag.
   Google Scholar
• Vráblíková, K. 2014. “How context matters? Mobilization, political opportunity structures, and nonelectoral political participation in old and new democracies.” Comparative political studies 47, no. 2: 203–29. doi:10.1177/0010414013488538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, M., and A. Peterson. 2006. “Between the state and the market.” Acta sociologica 49, no. 4: 363–77. doi:10.1177/0001699306071677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. 2021. Covid-19 and its Impact on the Quality of Democracy and Democratic Progress in Serbia and Montenegro. Master Thesis: Faculty of Social Studies, Masarykova Univerzita. Accessed 14 January 2022. is.muni.cz/th/s82z9/Covid-19_and_its_Impact_on_the_Quality_of_Democracy_and_Democratic_Progress_in_Serbia_and_Montenegro_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Windholz, E.L. 2020. “Governing in a pandemic: From parliamentary sovereignty to autocratic technocracy.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 8, no. 1–2: 93–113. doi:10.1080/20508840.2020.1796047.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. 2020. “We’re not all in this together.” Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements 12, no. 1: 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wunsch, N. 2018. “Civil society mobilisation in Serbia.“In eu enlargement and civil society in the western balkans: from mobilization to empowerment 95–122. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-319-91845-7_5
   Google Scholar