The historical roots of right-wing populism in Turkey: a spatial examination of the DP, ANAP, and AKP governments

References

• Acar, F. 2002. Turgut özal: Pious agent of liberal transformation. In Political leaders and democracy in Turkey, ed. M. Heper and S. Sayarı, 163–80. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 1996. Mapping politics: How context counts in electoral geography. Political Geography 15, no. 2: 129–46. doi:10.1016/0962-6298(95)00076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, F. 1993. The making of modern Turkey. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akarca, A., and C. Bașlevent. 2011. Persistence in regional voting patterns in Turkey during a period of major political realignment. European Urban and Regional Studies 18, no. 2: 184–202. doi:10.1177/0969776411399342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkaya, A.H. 2020. The PKK’s ideological odyssey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 22, no. 6: 730–45. doi:10.1080/19448953.2020.1801241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1995. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis 27, no. 2: 93–115. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, E., A. Çarkoğlu, and E. Elçi. 2021. Partisanship, elite messages, and support for populism in power. European Political Science Review 13, no. 1: 23–39. doi:10.1017/S1755773920000314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, E., and Z. Öniș. 2014. Varieties of populism in a changing global context: The divergent paths of Erdogan and Kirchnerismo. Comparative Politics 47, no. 1: 41–59. doi:10.5129/001041514813623137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakıner, O. 2018. A key to Turkish politics? the center-periphery framework revisited. Turkish Studies 19, no. 4: 503–22. doi:10.1080/14683849.2018.1438846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 1997. Macroeconomic determinants of electoral support for incumbents in Turkey, 1950-1995. New Perspectives on Turkey 17: 75–96. doi:10.1017/S0896634600002764.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 2012. Economic evaluations vs. ideology: Diagnosing the sources of electoral change in Turkey, 2002–2011. Electoral Studies 31, no. 3: 513–21. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 2017. Voting behavior. In The Routledge handbook of modern Turkey, ed. M. Heper and S. Sayarı, 160–70. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A., and E. Aytaç. 2015. Who gets targeted for vote-buying? Evidence from an augmented list experiment in Turkey. European Political Science Review 7, no. 4: 547–66. doi:10.1017/S1755773914000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A., and M.J. Hinich. 2006. A spatial analysis of Turkish party preferences. Electoral Studies 25, no. 2: 369–92. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A., and E. Kalaycıoğlu. 2009. The rising tide of conservatism in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, A.B., and E. Balta. 2020. Explaining the micro dynamics of the populist cleavage in the ‘new Turkey.’. Mediterranean Politics 25, no. 2: 160–81. doi:10.1080/13629395.2018.1507338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çınar, K. 2016a. A comparative analysis of clientelism in Greece, Spain, and Turkey: The rural–urban divide. Contemporary Politics 22, no. 1: 77–94. doi:10.1080/13569775.2015.1112952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çınar, K. 2016b. Local determinants of an emerging electoral hegemony: The case of Justice and Development Party (AKP) in Turkey. Democratization 23, no. 7: 1216–35. doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1077228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çınar, K. 2019. The decline of democracy in Turkey: A comparative study of hegemonic party rule. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Çınar, K., and M. Uğur-Çınar. 2015. Building democracy to last: The Turkish experience in comparative perspective. Mediterranean Politics 20, no. 3: 342–63. doi:10.1080/13629395.2015.1042246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çınar, K., M. Uğur-Çınar, and A. Açıkgöz. 2022. Turkey’s republican people’s party (CHP): A Longue Durée analysis. Turkish Studies: 1–27. 10.1080/14683849.2022.2119849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon, C., M. Desai, and C. Tuğal. 2009. Political articulation: Parties and the constitution of cleavages in the United States, India, and Turkey. Sociological Theory 27, no. 3: 193–219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01345.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel, T. 2004. Soldiers and civilians: The dilemma of Turkish democracy. Middle Eastern Studies 40, no. 1: 127–50. doi:10.1080/00263200412331301927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elçi, E. 2019. The rise of populism in Turkey: A content analysis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 19, no. 3: 387–408. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1656875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and Ş. Gümüşçü. 2016. Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly 37, no. 9: 1581–606. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülalp, H. 2001. Globalization and political Islam: The social bases of Turkey's welfare party. International Journal of Middle East Studies 33, no. 3: 433–48. doi:10.1017/S0020743801003051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, W. 2011. The Turkish republic and its army, 1923-1960. Turkish Studies 12, no. 2: 191–201. doi:10.1080/14683849.2011.572628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., and C. Pattie. 2006. Putting voters in their place: Geography and elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. 1994. Elections and party preferences in Turkey: Changes and continuities in the 1990s. Comparative Political Studies 27, no. 3: 402–24. doi:10.1177/0010414094027003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. 2008. Attitudinal orientation to party organizations in Turkey in the 2000s. Turkish Studies 9, no. 2: 297–316. doi:10.1080/14683840802012058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. 2012. Kulturkampf in Turkey: The constitutional referendum of 12 September 2010. South European Society & Politics 17, no. 1: 1–22. doi:10.1080/13608746.2011.600555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpat, K. 1991. The republican people’s party, 1923-1945. In Political parties and democracy in Turkey, eds. J. Landau and M. Heper, 42–64. London: I.B Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Kasaba, R. 1993. Populism and democracy in Turkey: 1946-1961. In Rules and rights in the middle east: Democracy, law and society, eds. E. Goldberg, R. Kasaba, and J. Migdal, 43-68. Seattle: University of Washington Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kasaba, R. 1997. Kemalist certainties and modern ambiguities. In Rethinking modernity and national identity in Turkey, eds. S. Bozdoğan and R. Kasaba, 15-35. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kayhan-Pusane, Ö. 2015. Turkey’s military victory over the PKK and its failure to end the PKK insurgency. Middle Eastern Studies 51, no. 5: 727–41. doi:10.1080/00263206.2014.979801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumbaracıbaşı, A.C.A.F. 2021. Spatial diffusion and geographical patterns in the Turkish vote for pro-Islamist parties. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 21, no. 1: 1–30. doi:10.1080/14683857.2020.1868816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. “Effective” number of parties. Comparative Political Studies 12, no. 1: 3–27. doi:10.1177/001041407901200101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Laebens, M., and A. Öztürk. 2021. Partisanship and autocratization: Polarization, power asymmetry, and partisan social identities in Turkey. Comparative Political Studies 54, no. 2: 245–79. doi:10.1177/0010414020926199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and J. Loxton. 2013. Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the andes. Democratization 20, no. 1: 107–36. doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardin, Ş. 1973. Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics? Daedalus 102, no. 1: 169–90.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwassers. 2017. Populism: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 2004. Turgut özal and his economic legacy: Turkish neo-liberalism in critical perspective. Middle Eastern Studies 40, no. 4: 113–34. doi:10.1080/00263200410001700338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniș, Z. 2009. Conservative globalism at the crossroads: The Justice and Development Party and the thorny path to democratic consolidation in Turkey. Mediterranean Politics 14, no. 1: 21–40. doi:10.1080/13629390902747376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2013. Party politics and social cleavages in Turkey. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2014. AKP at the crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian drift. South European Society & Politics 19, no. 2: 1–13. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.920571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özen, İ.C., and K.O. Kalkan. 2017. Spatial analysis of contemporary Turkish elections: A comprehensive approach. Turkish Studies 18, no. 2: 358–77. doi:10.1080/14683849.2016.1259576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogenhofer, J.M., and A. Panievsky. 2020. Antidemocratic populism in power: Comparing Erdoğan’s Turkey with Modi’s India and Netanyahu’s Israel. Democratization 27, no. 8: 1394–412. doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1795135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayarı, S. 2014. Interdisciplinary approaches to political clientelism and patronage in Turkey. Turkish Studies 15, no. 4: 655–70. doi:10.1080/14683849.2014.985809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secor, A.J. 2001. Ideologies in crisis: Political cleavages and electoral politics in Turkey in the 1990s. Political Geography 20, no. 5: 539–60. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00011-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selçuk, O. 2016. Strong presidents and weak institutions: Populism in Turkey, Venezuela and Ecuador. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 571–89. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1242893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepe, S. 2005. Turkey’s AKP: A model “Muslim democratic” party? Journal of Democracy 16, no. 3: 69–82. doi:10.1353/jod.2005.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, İ. 1988. Political parties and the party system in post-1983 Turkey. In State, democracy and the military: Turkey in the 1980s, eds. M. Heper and A. Evin, 63–80. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, İ. 2015. Turkey’s difficult journey to democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uğur-Çınar, M. 2022. Populism and collective memory. In Making sense of populism: Interviews with the experts, ed. L. Manucci, 164-169. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B., and J. Leib, eds. 2011. Revitalizing electoral geography. Surrey, UK & Burlington, US: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• West, W.J. 2005. Regional cleavages in Turkish politics: An electoral geography of the 1999 and 2002 national elections. Political Geography 24, no. 4: 499–523. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. 1996. Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development 31, no. 3: 3–31. doi:10.1007/BF02738987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. 2020. Populism’s threat to democracy: Comparative lessons for the United States. Perspectives on Politics 18, no. 2: 389–406. doi:10.1017/S1537592719003955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuthrich, M. 2015. National elections in Turkey: People, politics, and the party system. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yabancı, B. 2016. Populism as the problem child of democracy: The AKP’s enduring appeal and the use of meso-level actors. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 591–617. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1242204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardımcı-Geyikçi, Ş.A.H.Y. 2022. Party (de)institutionalization in times of political uncertainty: The case of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey. Party Politics 28, no. 1: 71–84. doi:10.1177/1354068820960010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürcher, E. 2007. Turkey: A modern history. London and New York: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar