Security-defence nexus in flux: (De)securitisation of technology in the Netherlands

References

• 2021 Export Control Forum. “'Final Agenda with Link to Webstreaming and to presentations,’ Collaborative and Information Resources Centre for Administration, Businesses and Citizens.” Accessed September 15, 2022. https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/654251c7-f897-4098-afc3-6eb39477797e/library/adc9335a-75c1-4886-8883-b39284bddb4b/details?download=true.
   Google Scholar
• Aben, Jacques. 2014. “What Realms for Defence Economics?” In Contributions to Conflict Management, Peace Economics and Development, edited by Bellais, Renaud, Vol. 23, 3–24. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-832320140000023001.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, John L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baele, Stephane J, and Diana Jalea. 2022. “Twenty-Five Years of Securitization Theory: A Corpus-Based Review.” Political Studies Review 21 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211069499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, Thierry. 2005. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, Thierry, edited by 2011. Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, Thierry. 2015. “The ‘Essence’ of Securitization: Theory, Ideal Type, and a Sociological Science of Security.” International Relations 29 (1): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117814526606b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, Thierry. 2019. “Securitization Theory: Past, Present, and Future.” Polity 51 (2): 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1086/701884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, Thierry, Sarah Léonard, and Jan Ruzicka. 2016. “‘Securitization’ Revisited: Theory and Cases.” International Relations 30 (4): 494–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815596590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, Didier. 2000. “When Two Become One: Internal and External Securitisations in Europe.” In International Relations Theory and The Politics of European Integration. Power, Security and Community Kelstrup, edited by Michael, Morten Williams, 171–204. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, Didier. 2006. “Internal and External Aspects of Security.” European Security 15 (4): 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830701305831.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Calcara, Antonio. 2017. “State–Defence Industry Relations in the European Context: French and UK Interactions with the European Defence Agency.” European Security 26 (4): 527–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2017.1384379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calcara, Antonio. 2020. “Cooperation and Non Cooperation in European Defence Procurement.” Journal of European Integration 42 (6): 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1682567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (Council Regulation). 2009. “No 428/2009 of Setting Up a Community Regime for the Control of Exports, Transfer, Brokering and Transit of Dual-Use Items.” OJ L134/1.
   Google Scholar
• EU (Regulation). 2021 / 821a. “The European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 Setting Up a Union Regime for the Control of Exports, Brokering, Technical Assistance, Transit and Transfer of Dual-Use Items [2021] OJ L206/1.”
   Google Scholar
• EU (Regulation). 2021 /821b. “The European Parliament and of the Council Setting Up a Union Regime for the Control of Exports, Brokering, Technical Assistance, Transit and Transfer of Dual-Use Items: Information on Measures Adopted by Member States in Conformity with Articles 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 22 and 23 [2022] OJ C66/27.”
   Google Scholar
• Fiott, Daniel. 2017. “A Revolution Too Far? US Defence Innovation, Europe and Nato’s Military-Technological Gap.” Journal of Strategic Studies 40 (3): 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1176565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, Rita. 2016. “Extraordinary or Ordinary Emergency Measures: What, and Who, Defines the ‘Success’ of Securitization?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (2): 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1077651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forge, John. 2010. “A Note on the Definition of ‘Dual Use.’.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1): 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9159-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Lene, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. “Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School.” International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00572.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haroche, Pierre. 2020. “Supranationalism Strikes Back: A Neofunctionalist Account of the European Defence Fund.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (6): 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1609570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Lupovici, Amir. 2021. “The Dual-Use Security Dilemma and the Social Construction of Insecurity.” Contemporary Security Policy 42 (3): 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1866845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, Bruno Oliveira, and Neven, Ahmad. 2020. “The security politics of innovation: Dual-use technology in the EU’s security research programme Calcara.” In Emerging Security Technologies and EU Governance: Actors, Practices and Processes, edited by Antonio, Csernatoni, Lavallée Raluca, and Chantal, 58–73. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, Bruno Oliveira, and Jocelyn Mawdsley. 2021. “Sociotechnical Imaginaries of EU Defence: The Past and the Future in the European Defence Fund.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (6): 1458–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. 2013. “User Guide on Strategic Goods and Services for the Netherlands.” https://www.government.nl/binaries/government/documenten/directives/2012/04/12/user-guide-on-strategic-goods-and-services/user-guide-on-strategic-goods-and-services-april-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Defensie. 2022. “The Dutch Ministry of Defence: Protecting What We Value - Tasks and Future - Defensie.Nl.” Onderwerp. Ministerie van Defensie. Accessed September 2, 2022. https://english.defensie.nl/topics/tasks-and-future/corporate-story.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Defensie, and Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat. 2018. “Defence Industry Strategy.” Rapport. Ministerie van Algemene Zaken. Accessed September 2, 2022. https://www.government.nl/documents/reports/2018/11/30/defence-industry-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Pustovit, Svitlana V., and Erin D. Williams. 2010. “Philosophical Aspects of Dual Use Technologies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9086-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid. 2021. “Change of National Export Control Policy with Regard to Turkey Following the Turkish Army’s Incursion into Northern Syria.” Accessed September 23, 2022. https://www.government.nl/topics/export-controls-of-strategic-goods/documents/publications/2021/10/15/change-of-national-export-control-policy-with-regard-to-turkey-following-the-turkish-armys-incursion-into-northern-syria.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, Paul. 2008. “Actor, Audience(s) and Emergency Measures: Securitization and the Uk’s Decision to Invade Iraq.” Security Dialogue 39 (6): 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010608098212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychnovská, Dagmar. 2016. “Governing Dual-Use Knowledge: From the Politics of Responsible Science to the Ethicalization of Security.” Security Dialogue 47 (4): 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616658848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, Mark B. 2008. “Securitization and Desecuritization: A Dramaturgical Analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority.” Journal of International Relations and Development 11 (4): 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sezal, Mustafa Ali, and Francesco Giumelli. 2022. “Technology Transfer and Defence Sector Dynamics: The Case of the Netherlands.” European Security 31 (4): 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2028277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, Roxanna. 2020. “Assessing Securitization Theory: Theoretical Discussions and Empirical Developments.” In Securitization Revisited: Contemporary Applications and Insights, edited by Butler, Michael J, 28–46. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stritzel, Holger. 2007. “Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond.” European Journal of International Relations 13 (3): 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107080128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stritzel, Holger. 2014. Security in Translation: Securitization Theory and the Localization of Threat. Basingstoke: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Munster, Rens. 2007. “Review Essay: Security on a Shoestring: A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Critical Schools of Security in Europe.” Cooperation and Conflict 42 (2): 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836707076694.
   Google Scholar
• Ziliotto, Veronica Mara. 2008. “Expanding Our Notions of Defence.” In Handbook of Defence Politics: International and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Wilson, Ike, III and James Foster III. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar