Professional farmer collectives for effective agri-environmental management: an assessment

References

• Bareille, F., Zavalloni, M., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2021). Cooperative management of ecosystem services: Coalition formation, landscape structure and policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 79(2), 323–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00563-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barghusen, R., Sattler, C., Berner, R., & Matzdorf, B. (2022). More than spatial coordination – How Dutch agricultural collectives foster social capital for effective governance of agri-environmental measures. Journal of Rural Studies, 96, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.023
   Google Scholar
• Barghusen, R., Sattler, C., Deijl, L., Weebers, C., & Matzdorf, B. (2021). Motivations of farmers to participate in collective agri-environmental schemes: The case of Dutch agricultural collectives. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 539–555. DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2021.1979098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobanoglu, C., Warde, B., & Moreo, P. (2001). A comparison of mail, fax, and web-based survey methods. International Journal of Market Research, 43(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530104300401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moor, T. (2021). http://www.collective-action.info/introduction.
   Google Scholar
• de Snoo, G. R., Melman, T. C. P., Brouwer, F. M., Weijden, W. J. V. D., & Udo de Haes, H. A. (2016). Agrarisch natuurbeheer in nederland. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, J. R., Van der Zee, E., Beunen, R., Kat, R., & Feindt, P. H. (2019). Trusting the people and the system. The interrelation between interpersonal and institutional trust in collective action for agri-environmental management. Sustainability, 11(24), 7022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, S. A. M. (2013). Beschrijving van het nieuwe stelsel agrarisch natuurbeheer. Tweede Kamer/kamerstuk 33576-3.
   Google Scholar
• Dik, L., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2022). Farmer collectives for more effective agri-environmental schemes? An assessment framework based on the concept of ‘professionalisation’. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(4), 543–557. doi:10.1080/14735903.2021.1950389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dik, L., Westerink, J., van der Linde, A. W., & Olieman, A. (2020). Zijn de agrarische collectieven voorbereid op de Toekomst?
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2017). The promise and challenge of pushing respondents to the web in mix-mode surveys. Survey Methodology, 43(1), 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, M., Edwards, J., & Washington, M. (2014). Understanding the concept of professionalisation in sport management research. Sport Management Review, 17(4), 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2014.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & McDonald, G. (2005). The role of the board in building strategic capability: Towards an integrated model of sport governance research. Sport Management Review, 8(3), 195–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3523(05)70039-5
   Google Scholar
• Franks, J. R. (2019). An assessment of the landscape-scale dimensions of land based environmental management schemes offered to farmers in England. Land Use Policy, 38, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.044
   Google Scholar
• Franks, J. R., & McGloin, A. (2007). Joint submissions, output related payments and environmental co-operatives: Can the Dutch experience innovate UK agri-environment policy? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(2), 233–256. DOI: 10.1080/09640560601156482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, J. (2021). https://statisticsbyjim.com/basics/measures-central-tendency-mean-median-mode/.
   Google Scholar
• Heylen, F., Willems, E., & Beyers, J. (2020). Do professionals take over? Professionalisation and memebership influence in civil society organisations. Voluntas, 31(6), 1226–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00214-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefsson, J., Lokhorst, A. M., Pärt, T., Berg, Å, & Eggers, S. (2017). Effects of a coordinated farmland bird conservation project on farmers’ intentions to implement nature conservation practices – evidence from the Swedish volunteer & farmer alliance. Journal of Environmental Management, 187, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laasonen, V., & Kolehmainen, J. (2017). Capabilities in knowledge-based regional development–towards a dynamic framework. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1673–1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1337727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. (2015). Which nonprofit gets more government funding? Nonprofits’. organizational Attributes and Their Receipts of Government Funding. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21124
   Google Scholar
• Maya-Jariego, I., Holgado-Ramos, D., González-Tinoco, E., Muniz-Alvis, A., & Ortega, M. (2020). More money, more problems? Resource dependence and professionalization of non-governmental social services organizations in southern Spain. Voluntas, 31(6), 1212–1225. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1007s11266-020-00256-z. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00256-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, S., Schlesinger, T., Bayle, E., & Giauque, D. (2015). Professionalisation of sport federations – a multi-level framework for analysing forms, causes and consequences. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(4), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2015.1062990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., Attwood, S., Bawden, R., van den Berg, H., Bharucha, Z. P., Dixon, J., Flora, C. B., Gallagher, K., Genskow, K., Hartley, S. E., Ketelaar, J. W., Kiara, J. K., Kumar, V., Lu, Y., MacMillan, T., Maréchal, A., Morales-Abubakar, A. L., Noble, A., Prasad, P. V. V., … Yang, P. (2020). Assessment of the growth in social groups for sustainable agriculture and land management. Global Sustainability, 3, E23. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.19
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H. A. C., Melman, T. C. P., Boonstra, F. G., Erisman, J. W., Horlings, L. G., de Snoo, G. R., & Arts, B. J. M. (2017). Promoting nature conservation by Dutch farmers: A governance perspective. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(3), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2016.1232015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomers, S., Meyer, C., Matzdorf, B., & Sattler, C. (2021). Facilitation of public payments for ecosystem services through local intermediaries: An institutional analysis of agri-environmental measure implementation in Germany. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(5), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Serrat, O. (2017). Building a learning organization. In Knowledge solutions: Tools, methods, and approaches to drive organisational performance (pp. 57–67). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2011). Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing Leisure, 16(2), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2011.559090
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, D. (2010). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research, 21(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. K. (2000). Research Methods Knowledge Base. http://www.anatomyfacts.com/research/researchmethodsknowledgebase.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, E. W. K. (1997). Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 50(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016905516867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, J., Jongeneel, R., Polman, N., Prager, K., Franks, J., Dupraz, P., & Mettepenningen, E. (2017a). Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management. Land Use Policy, 69(Supplement C), 176–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Westerink, J., Opdam, P., van Rooij, S., & Steingröver, E. (2017b). Landscape services as boundary concept in landscape governance: Building social capital in collaboration and adapting the landscape. Land Use Policy, 60, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, J., Pleijte, M., Schrijver, R., van Dam, R., de Krom, M., & de Boer, T. (2021). Can a ‘good farmer’ be nature-inclusive? Shifting cultural norms in farming in The Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, J., Termeer, C., & Manhoudt, A. (2020). Identity conflict? Agri-environmental collectives as self-governing groups of farmers or as boundary organisations. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 388–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar