1,189
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Doubt to be certain: epistemological ambiguity of data in the case of grassroots mapping of traffic accidents in Russia

ORCID Icon
Pages 338-354 | Received 18 Jan 2021, Accepted 21 Jul 2022, Published online: 05 Oct 2022

References

  • Baack, S. (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715594634
  • Beraldo, D., & Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967
  • Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.
  • Casas-Cortés, M. I., Osterweil, M., & Powell, D. E. (2008). Blurring boundaries: Recognizing knowledge-practices in the study of social movements. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(1), 17–58.
  • Chesters, G. (2012). Social movements and the ethics of knowledge production. Social Movement Studies, 11(2), 145–160.
  • Cox, L. (2014). Movements making knowledge: A new wave of inspiration for sociology? Sociology, 48(5), 954–971.
  • Crooks, R. (2017). Representationalism at work: Dashboards and data analytics in urban education. Educational Media International, 54(4), 289–303.
  • Crooks, R., & Currie, M. (2021). Numbers will not save us: Agonistic data practices. The Information Society, 37(4), 1–19.
  • Currie, M., Paris, B. S., Pasquetto, I., & Pierre, J. (2016). The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles County. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663566
  • Della Porta, D., & Pavan, E. (2017). Repertoires of knowledge practices: Social movements in times of crisis. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 297–314.
  • Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Harvard University Press.
  • Ermoshina, K. (2014). Democracy as pothole repair: Civic applications and cyber-empowerment in Russia. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(3), 24–37.
  • Ermoshina, K. (2019). For code and country: Civic hackers in contemporary Russia. In M. Biagioli & V. A. Lépinay (Eds.), From Russia with code: Programming migrations in post-Soviet times (pp. 87–109). Duke University Press.
  • Erpyleva, S., & Magun, A. (Eds.). (2014). Politika Apolitichnyh: Grazhdanskiye Dvijeniya v Rossii 2011–2013 godov [Politics of the apolitical: Civic movements in Russia in 2011 2013]. Novoye Literaturnoye Obozreniye.
  • Esteves, A. M. (2008). Processes of knowledge production in social movements as multi-level power dynamics. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1934–1953.
  • Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., & Barratt, B. (2016). Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677
  • Gray, J. (2018). Three aspects of data worlds. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, (1), 3–17.
  • Gutiérrez, M., & Milan, S. (2019). Playing with data and its consequences. First Monday, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i1.9554
  • Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kazansky, B., Torres, G., van der Velden, L., Wissenbach, K., & Milan, S. (2019). Data for the social good: Towards a data-activist research agenda. In D. A. K. Devitt & M. Mann (Eds.), Good data (pp. 244–259). Institute of Network Cultures.
  • Kennedy, H., Hill, L., Aiello, G., & Allen, W. (2016). The work that visualisation conventions do. Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 715–735.
  • Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
  • Lehtiniemi, T., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). The social imaginaries of data activism. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718821146
  • Lokot, T. (2018). Be safe or be seen? How Russian activists negotiate visibility and security in online resistance practices. Surveillance & Society, 16(3), 332–346.
  • Lokot, T. (2020). Data subjects vs. people’s data: Competing discourses of privacy and power in modern Russia. Media and Communication, 8(2), 314–322.
  • Lonkila, M., Shpakovskaya, L., & Torchinsky, P. (2021). Digital activism in Russia: The evolution and forms of online participation in an authoritarian state. In Gritsenko, D., Wijermars, M., Kopotev, M. (Eds.),The Palgrave handbook of digital Russia studies (pp. 135–153). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Meng, A., & DiSalvo, C. (2018). Grassroots resource mobilization through counter-data action. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718796862
  • Milan, S., & Gutiérrez, M. (2015). Citizens’ media meets big data: The emergence of data activism. Mediaciones, 11(14), 120–133.
  • Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the South (s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335.
  • Milan, S., & Van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57–74.
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs (2018, November 12). Мурманская область присоединяется к федеральной кампании «культура на дорогах» [The Murmansk region joins the federal program “Culture on the Road”]. https://мвд.рф/news/item/14947221
  • Molyarenko, O. (2019). Formirovanie gosydarstvennoy statistiki: Vzglyad snizy [Generating state statistics: а view from «below». ЭКО [EKO], 10(544), 8–34.
  • Pavan, E., & Felicetti, A. (2019). Digital media and knowledge production within social movements: Insights from the transition movement in Italy. Social Media+ Society, 5(4), 1–12.
  • Pavan, E., & Mainardi, A. (2020). At the roots of media cultures. Social movements producing knowledge about media as discriminatory workspaces. Information, Communication & Society, 23(12), 1738–1754.
  • Porter, T. M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking, 1820-1900. Princeton University Press.
  • Rajão, R., & Jarke, J. (2018). The materiality of data transparency and the (re) configuration of environmental activism in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Movement Studies, 17(3), 318–332.
  • Rossiyskaya Gazeta (2018) Стратегия безопасности дорожного движения в российской федерации на 2018 - 2024 годы [Road safety strategy in the Russian federation for 2018- 2024]. https://rg.ru/2018/01/24/strategiya-site-dok.html
  • Schrock, A., & Shaffer, G. (2017). Data ideologies of an interested public: A study of grassroots open government data intermediaries. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717690750
  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
  • Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious politics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Ustinov, S. (2019), February 3 Карта ДТП [DTP Map]. Habr. https://habr.com/ru/post/438700/
  • Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208.
  • Weiser, T., & Yudin, G., Eds. (2020). The public sphere in Russia between authoritarianism and liberation [special issue]. Javnost - the Public, 27(1), 1–96.
  • Zhelnina, A., & Tykanova, E. (2019). Formal’nyye i neformal’nyye grazhdanskiye infrastruktury: Sovremennyye issledovaniya gorodskogo lokal’nogo aktivizma v Rossii [Formal and informal civic infrastructure: Contemporary studies of urban local activism in Russia]. Zhurnal Sotsiologii I Sotsialnoy, 22(1), 162–192.