Data in movement: the social movement society in the age of datafication

References

• Ackland, R., & O’Neil, M. (2011). Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement. Social Networks, 33(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atton, C. (2004). An alternative internet: Radical media, politics and creativity. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barassi, V., & Zamponi, L. (2020). Social media time, identity narratives and the construction of political biographies. Social Movement Studies, 19(5–6), 592–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1718489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreneche, C., & Lombana-Bermudez, A. (2023). Another infrastructure is possible: Grassroots citizen sensing and environmental data justice in Colombia. International Journal of Communication, 17, 3638–3659. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18821/4193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2016). Metric power. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beraldo, D. (2020). Dividing by zero. Tautology and paradox in the self-descriptions of anonymous. Journal of Sociocybernetics, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_jos/jos.202014246
   Google Scholar
• Beraldo, D. (2022a). Movements as multiplicities and contentious branding: Lessons from the digital exploration of #Occupy and #Anonymous. Information, Communication & Society, 25(8), 1098–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1847164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beraldo, D. (2022b). Unfolding #Anonymous on twitter. The networks behind the mask. First Monday, 27(1–3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i1.11723
   Google Scholar
• Beraldo, D., & Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buyukozturk, B., Gaulden, S., & Dowd-Arrow, B. (2018). Contestation on reddit, gamergate, and movement barriers. Social Movement Studies, 17(5), 592–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1483227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (2013). Occupy wall street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B., Mattoni, A., & McCurdy, P. (Eds.). (2013). Mediation and protest movements. Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K., & Hackett, R. A. (2006). Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory. Media, Culture & Society, 28(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706059289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charitsis, V., & Laamanen, M. (2022). When digital capitalism takes (on) the neighbourhood: Data activism meets place-based collective action. Social Movement Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2123314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. (2012). Mic check! Media cultures and the occupy movement. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, 11(3–4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.710746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2020). Recovering critique in an age of datafication. New Media & Society, 22(7), 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, M., Paris, B., Pasquetto, I., & Pierre, J. (2016). The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles County. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 205395171666356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Data for Black Lives. (n.d.). About data for black lives. http://d4bl.org/about.html
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements. An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Pavan, E. (2017). Repertoires of knowledge practices: Social movements in times of crisis. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 12(4), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-01-2017-1483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M., & Mische, A. (2015). Network approaches and social movements. In D. D. Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), The oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 306–325). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, U., & Schrape, J.-F. (2016). Masses, crowds, communities, movements: Collective action in the Internet age. Social Movement Studies, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2015.1055722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Hester, C. (2014). Low power to the people! Pirates, protest, and politics in FM radio activism. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• El-Nawawy, M., & Khamis, S. (2012). Political activism 2.0: Comparing the role of social media in Egypt’s “facebook revolution” and Iran’s “twitter uprising”. CyberOrient, 6(1), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.cyo2.20120601.0002
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Extinction Rebellion Present: How To Start A Revolution + Q&A. (2019, August 27). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngBMg-jKaG4
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. G. (2017). The rise of big data policing: Surveillance, race, and the future of law enforcement. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2010). Collective identity in social movements: Central concepts and debates. Sociology Compass, 4(6), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00287.x
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C., & Gillan, K. (2017). Navigating the technology-media-movements complex. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1338943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. (2006). Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600630773
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets. Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2022). From individual affectedness to collective identity: Personal testimony campaigns on social media and the logic of collection. New Media & Society, 14614448221128523. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221128523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011). The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific Reports, 1(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gutiérrez, M., & Milan, S. (2019). Playing with data and its consequences. First Monday, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i1.9554
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. (2017). Multiple temporalities of the movements. tripleC: Communication, capitalism & Critique. tripleC: Communication, capitalism & critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 390–392. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.888
   Google Scholar
• Heawood, J. (2018). Pseudo-public political speech: Democratic implications of the Cambridgeanalytica scandal. Information Polity, 23(4), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, U. K. (2002). Unnatural ecologies: The metaphor of the environment in media theory. Configurations, 10(1), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2003.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. (2016). Undone science. Social movements, mobilized publics, and industrial transitions. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., & Brown, I. (2017). Enabling digital citizenship? The reshaping of surveillance policy after Snowden. International Journal of Communication, 11, 782–801. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5522/1931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Iliadis, A., & Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716674238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2017). Virtual, visible, and actionable: Data assemblages and the sightlines of justice. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 205395171772447. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717724477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. (2015). Information politics. Liberation and exploitation in the digital society. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karanasiou, A. P. (2014). The changing face of protests in the digital age: On occupying cyberspace and distributed-denial-of-services (DDoS) attacks. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 28(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2014.870638
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., & Uldam, J. (2018). Digital activism: After the hype. New Media & Society, 20(6), 2099–2106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavada, A. (2016). Social movements and political agency in the digital age: A communication approach. Media and Communication, 4(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazansky, B. (2021). ‘It depends on your threat model’: The anticipatory dimensions of resistance to data-driven surveillance. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 2053951720985557. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720985557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Advocacy networks in international policy. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, B. (2021). Data science for social good volunteer motivations and limitations: An exploratory survey. Chance, 34(3), W86–W95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2021.1981055
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 205395171452848. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 4(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.4.2.d7593370607l6756
   Google Scholar
• Kordzadeh, N., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2022). Algorithmic bias: Review, synthesis, and future research directions. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, C., & Chan, N. K. (2022). Datafication and implicated networks of demobilization: Social movement demobilization in datafied societies. Social Movement Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2128326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. http://dss-edit.com/plu/Latour_Reassembling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leistert, O. (2013). From protest to surveillance—the political rationality of mobile media. Modalities of neoliberalism. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y.-T., & Whitworth, K. (2023). Coordinating and doxing data: Hong Kong protesters’ and government supporters’ data strategies in the age of datafication. Social Movement Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2178404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, J. (2020). Experimentando con la pobreza: El Sisbén y los proyectos de analítica de datos. Fundación Karisma. https://web.karisma.org.co/wp-content/uploads/download-manager-files/Experimentando%20con%20la%20pobreza.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Madison, N., & Klang, M. (2019). Recognizing Everyday Activism: Understanding Resistance to Facial Recognition. Journal of Resistance Studies, 2(5), 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A., & Pavan, E. (2018). Politics, participation and big data. Introductory reflections on the ontological, epistemological, and methodological aspects of a complex relationship. Participazione & Conflitto, 11(2), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p313
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A., & Treré, E. (2014). Media practices, mediation processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Theory, 24(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the internet. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present. Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Hutchinson Radius.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, A., & DiSalvo, C. (2018). Grassroots resource mobilization through counter-data action. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 2053951718796862. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718796862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (Eds.). (1998). The social movement society. Contentious politics for a new century. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2013). Social movements and their technologies: Wiring social change. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015a). From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015b). When algorithms shape collective action: Social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 205630511562248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115622481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & Barbosa, S. (2020). Enter the WhatsApper: Reinventing digital activism at the time of chat apps. First Monday, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i12.10414
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & Gutiérrez, M. (2017). Technopolitics in the Age of Big Data. In F. S. Caballero & T. Gravante (Eds.), Networks, Movements & Technopolitics in Latin America: Critical Analysis and Current Challenges (pp. 95–109). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S., Treré, E., & Masiero, S. (2021). COVID-19 from the margins: Pandemic invisibilities, policies and resistance in the datafied society. Institute of Network Cultures. https://networkcultures.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Covid19FromTheMargins-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. (2021). #deletefacebook: From popular protest to a new model of platform capitalism? New Political Economy, 26(5), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1858777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mische, A. (2003). Cross-talk in movements: Reconceiving the culture-network link. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks. Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 258–280). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mortesen, M., Neumayer, C., & Poell, T. (Eds.). (2019). Social media materialities and protest: Critical reflections. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muravyov, D. (2022). Doubt to be certain: Epistemological ambiguity of data in the case of grassroots mapping of traffic accidents in Russia. Social Movement Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2128327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, C., & Rossi, L. (2016). 15 years of protest and media technologies scholarship: A sociotechnical timeline. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 2056305116662180. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116662180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noakes, J. A., & Johnston, H. (2005). Frames of protest: A roadmap to a perspective. In H. Johnston & J. A. Noakes (Eds.), Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective (pp. 1–30). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. E., & Marwell, G. (2001). Whatever happened to critical mass theory? A retrospective and assessment. Sociological Theory, 19(3), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private self: Democracy in a digital age. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. (2006). United yet autonomous: Indymedia and the struggle to sustain a radical democratic network. Media, Culture & Society, 28(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706061685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard, V., & Yang, G. (Eds.). (2017). Media activism in the digital age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poell, T. (2020). Social media, temporality, and the legitimacy of protest. Social Movement Studies, 19(5–6), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1605287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., Abdulla, R., Rieder, B., Woltering, R., & Zack, L. (2016). Protest leadership in the age of social media. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 994–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1088049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, M. (2024). Achieving organizationality through authorship affordances — a communicative episode of telegram polling from 2019 Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2296868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajão, R., & Jarke, J. (2018). The materiality of data transparency and the (re)configuration of environmental activism in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Movement Studies, 17(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1459297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., Isin, E., & Bigo, D. (2017). Data Politics. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717717749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., & Jeffreys, K. (2019). Beyond prime time activism. Communication activism and social change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing process, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380–412). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suk, J., Abhishek, A., Zhang, Y., Ahn, S. Y., Correa, T., Garlough, C., & Shah, D. V. (2021). #metoo, networked acknowledgment, and connective action: How “empowerment through empathy” launched a social movement. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. (2014). China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society, 16(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Yin, S. (2022). Opening up mediation opportunities by engaging grassroots data: Adaptive and resilient feminist data activism in China. New Media & Society, 146144482210968. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221096806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement. Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Törnberg, P. (2022). How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(42), e2207159119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207159119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, G. (2019). Institutional resistance to transparency: The quest for public sector information in Mexico. Journal of Resistance Studies, 5(2), 68–96.
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2016). The dark side of digital politics: Understanding the algorithmic manufacturing of consent and the hindering of online dissidence. IDS Bulletin, 41(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid media activism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E., & Bonini, T. (2022). Amplification, evasion, hijacking: Algorithms as repertoire for social movements and the struggle for visibility. Social Movement Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2143345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trottier, D., & Fuchs, C. (Eds.). (2014). Social media, politics and the state: Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2011). Faster is different. Technosociology. Our Tools, Ourselves. http://technosociology.org/?p=424
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2013). “Not this one”: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
   Google Scholar
• van Es, K., & Schäfer, M. T. (Eds.). (2017). Introduction. New brave world. In The datafied society. Studying culture through data (pp. 13–22). Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vera, L. A., Dillon, L., Wylie, S., Ohayon, J. L., Lemelin, A., Brown, P., Sellers, C., Walker, D., & the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative. (2018). Data resistance: A social movement organizational autoethnography of the environmental data and governance initiative. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 23(4), 511–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, L. A., Walker, D., Murphy, M., Mansfield, B., Siad, L. M., & Ogden, J. (2019). When data justice and environmental justice meet: Formulating a response to extractive logic through environmental data justice. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 1012–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1596293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, J., Looney, S., Reed, A., & Votta, F. (2021). Recommender systems and the amplification of extremist content. Internet Policy Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissenbach, K. R. (2020). Accounting for power in transnational civic tech activism: A communication-based analytical framework for media practice. International Communication Gazette, 82(6), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519832779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. (2020). Protests decentralised: How technology enabled civil disobedience by Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protesters. 8th Asian Privacy Scholars Network Conference. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/efvwn
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. M. (2022). “The future of the internet hangs in the balance”: The perception and framing of political opportunity and threat in the contentious politics of data. Social Movement Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2123313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalnieriute, M. (2021). Protests and public space surveillance: From metadata tracking to facial recognition technologies. Thematic Report to the 50th Session of the UN Human Rights Council. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3882317
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar