Pliable Logic as a Practice-Led Research Methodology for Textile Practice

References

• Adamson, Glenn. 2014. “Soft Power.” In Fibre: Sculpture 1960-Present, edited by Jenelle Porter, 143–149, Munich: Prestal.
   Google Scholar
• Albers, Anni. 1944. “We need the Crafts for Their Contact with Materials.” Design 46 (4): 21–22. doi:10.1080/00119253.1944.10742326.
   Google Scholar
• Albers, Anni. 1957. “The Pliable Plane; Textiles in Architecture.” Perspecta 4: 36–41. doi:10.2307/1566855.
   Google Scholar
• Albers, Anni. 1965. “On Weaving.” In Craft Reader, edited by Glenn Adamson, 29–33. London: Berg Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L. Bruce. 1995. “The Nature of Research.” Co-design 1995: 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Pennina, and Pamela Johnson. 1999. Textures of Memory: The Poetics of Cloth. Nottingham: Angel Row Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1993. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. London: The Athlone Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dormer, Peter. 1997. The Culture of Crafts. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dormor, Catherine. 2012. “Material Matrices: Haptics, Scopic & Textile.” PhD diss., Norwich University College of the Arts, University of the Arts, London.
   Google Scholar
• Dormor, Catherine. 2014. “Writing Textile, Making Text: Cloth and Stitch as Agency for Disorderly Text.” Paper presented at New Directions: Examining the Past, Creating the Future. Textile Society of America Symposium, Los Angeles, California, September 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Faith, Kane, and Rachel Philpott. 2013. “Textile Thinking for Sustainable Materials.” Paper presented at Making Futures 2013, Plymouth College of Art, Plymouth, UK, September 25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, Gerd. 1996. “Successful Individual Approaches in Engineering Design.” Research in Engineering Design 8 (3): 151–165. doi:10.1007/BF01608350.
   Google Scholar
• Goett, Solveigh. 2016. “Materials, Memories and Metaphors: The Textile Self Re/Collected.” In The Handbook of Textile Culture, edited by Jenis Jefferies, Diana Wood Conroy, and Hazel Clark, 121–136, London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Guindon, Raymonde. 1990. “Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts.” Human–Computer Interaction 5 (2–3): 305–344. doi:10.1080/07370024.1990.9667157.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, Jessica. 2017. “Out of Hand: Materializing the Digital.” The Journal of Modern Craft 10 (2): 205–209. doi:10.1080/17496772.2017.1351109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, David. 2008. A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlstone, Nigel. 2010. “Drawing and the Chimera of Embroidery.” In Machine Stitch Perspectives, edited by Alice Kettle and Jane McKeating, 34–47, London: A. &C. Black.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlstone, Nigel. 2012. “Speaking up for Silence.” In Hand Stitch Perspectives, edited by Alice Kettle and Jane McKeating, 146–153 London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Igoe, Elaine. 2013. “In Textasis: Matrixial Narratives of Textile Design.” PhD Thesis, Royal College of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferies, Janis. 2000. Selvedges: Janis Jefferies: Writings and Artwork since 1980. Norwich: Norwich Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Jølbo, Marte Danielsen. 2018. “Toward a Soft Logic.” Kunsthallstavanger, March 16. Accessed 4 April 2018. https://kunsthallstavanger.no/en/news/towards-a-soft-logic
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, Stephen, Robin McTaggart, and Robin Nixon. 1988. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kozloff, Max. 1969. “The Poetics of Softness.” In Renderings: Critical Essays on a Century of Modern Art. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, Yve. 1995. “Folds in the Photograph.” Third Text: Third World Perspectives on Contemporary Art & Culture 32: 43–58. doi:10.1080/09528829508576563.
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj, Sarat. 2000. “Optical Voicing: Janis Jefferie s’ Text-Tale-Telling.” In Selvedges, edited by Mitchell, Victoria. 7–9, Norwich: Norwich Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Neill, Thomas, John S. Gero, and James Warren. 1998. “Understanding Conceptual Electronic Design Using Protocol Analysis.” Research in Engineering Design 10 (3): 129–140. doi:10.1007/BF01607155.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Rory. 2001. “An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research.” In Theory and Practice of Action Research, edited by Roberto Richardson, João Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal Da Paraíba.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Paula. 2011. “Fabrication and Encounter: When Content is a Verb.” In Extra/Ordinary: Craft and Contemporary Art, edited by Maria Elena Buszek, 83–96, Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajaczkowska, Clair. 2016. “Making Known: The Textiles Toolbox-Psychoanalysis of Nine Types of Textile Thinking.” in The Handbook of Textile Culture, edited by Jefferies, Janis, Diana Wood Conroy and Hazel Clark, 79–93, London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott, Rachel. 2011. “Structural Textiles: Adaptable Form and Surface in Three Dimensions.” PhD diss., Royal College of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, Michel. 2015. Rome: The First Book of Foundations. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Smelik, Anneke. 2014. “Fashioning the Fold: Multiple Becomings.” In This Deleuzian Century: Art, Activism, Life, edited by Rosi Braidotti and Rick Dolphijn, 47–55, Leiden, NL: Brill I Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, Willemien. 1990. “More or Less following a Plan during Design: opportunistic Deviations in Specification.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 33 (3): 247–278. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(05)80119-1.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, James. 1968. The Double Helix: A Personal account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar