The impact of Codevelopment Action Learning on work self-efficacy, based on the results of a mixed-methods longitudinal study

References

• Adams, M. 2010. “The Practical Primacy of Questions in Action Learning.” In Action Learning and its Applications, edited by R. L. Dilworth, and Y. Boshyk, 119–130. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy : The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, C. 2021. Le Groupe de Codéveloppement : La Puissance de L’intelligence Collective. Québec: Presses de L’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., and T. Marshall Egan. 2009. “Action Learning Research: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework.” Human Resource Development Review 8 (4): 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309345656.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, M., and N. Sabourin. 2022. “Trois pôles dans l’animation de groupe de codéveloppement.” In Le groupe de codéveloppement en pratique : L’expérience des codéveloppeurs, edited by M. Desjardins, F. Vandercleyen, and P. Meurens, 279–300. Montréal: JFD Éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J. 2016. “Identifying Single Necessary Conditions with NCA and fsQCA.” Journal of Business Research 69 (4): 1516–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duşa, A. 2019. QCA with R: A Comprehensive Resource. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. 2011. “Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research.” Academy of Management Journal 54 (2): 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaesser, J., and B. Cooper. 2014. “Exploring the Consequences of a Recalibration of Causal Conditions When Assessing Sufficiency with Fuzzy Set QCA.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 17 (4): 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.769782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., C. L. Jackson, J. C. Shaw, B. A. Scott, and B. L. Rich. 2007. “Self-efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Integral Role of Individual Differences.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (1): 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafortune, L., C. Lepage, and F. Persechino. 2008. Compétences professionnelles pour l’accompagnement d’un changement : Un référentiel. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Lafranchise, N., and M. Paquet. 2020. “Accompagner des animateurs de groupes de codéveloppement professionnel, dans des milieux de la santé au Québec, dans une visée d’optimisation du rôle.” In Formation des professionnels de santé, partenariat patient. Vers une perspective humaniste, edited by M. Saint-Jean, and V. LeBlanc, 123–147. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Lafranchise, N., M. Paquet, M.-J. Gagné, and K. Cadec. 2019. “Accompagner les animateurs pour optimiser les groupes de codéveloppement.” In Former à l’accompagnement de stagiaires par le codéveloppement professionnel : Conditions, défis et perspectives, edited by F. Vandercleyen, M.-J. Dumoulin, and J. Desjardins, 155–182. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Legewie, N. 2013. “An Introduction to Applied Data Analysis with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14 (3): 15.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, M. J. 2004. Optimizing the Power of Action Learning : Solving Problems and Building Leaders in Real Time. 1st ed. Palo Alto: Davies-Black Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, I. O., M. N. Giannakos, and D. G. Sampson. 2019. “Fuzzy set Analysis as a Means to Understand Users of 21st-Century Learning Systems: The Case of Mobile Learning and Reflections on Learning Analytics Research.” Computers in Human Behavior 92: 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquet, M., and N. Lafranchise. 2014. “La Recherche sur les Groupes de Codéveloppement Professionnel : Un Objet en émergence.” Magazine Effectif 17 (1): 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Paquet, M., N. Lafranchise, M.-J. Gagné, and K. Cadec. 2017. “La rétroaction. Une manière de développer une posture de leadership d’accompagnement chez des personnes animatrices de groupes de codéveloppement.” In Regards croisés sur la rétroaction et le débriefing : Accompagner, former et professionnaliser, edited by M. Saint-Jean, N. Lafranchise, C. Lepage, and L. Lafortune, 57–76. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Paquet, M., N. Sabourin, N. Lafranchise, R. Cheshire, and J. Pelbois. 2022. “Codevelopment Action Learning During the Pandemic – Findings from Two Online co-Learning and Co-creation Events.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 19 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2022.2026761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payette, A., and C. Champagne. 1997. Le groupe de codéveloppement professionnel. Ste-Foy: Presses de L’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., and C. Abbott. 2013. Facilitating Action Learning : A Practitioner’s Guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perusso, A., P. van der Sijde, R. Leal, and M. Blankesteijn. 2021. “The Effectiveness and Impact of Action Learning on Business Graduates’ Professional Practice.” Journal of Management Education 45 (2): 177–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. A. 2010. The Work Self-Efficacy Inventory. Sampler Set; Manual; Instrument; Scoring Guide. Menlo Park: Mind Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. A., and J. D. Raelin. 2006. “Developmental Action Learning: Toward Collaborative Change.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 3 (1): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330600574615.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2006. “Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage.” Political Analysis 14 (3): 291–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry : Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. 1982. The Origins and Growths of Action Learning. Malabar: Krieger Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sabourin, N., and F. Lefebvre. 2017. Collaborer et agir : Mieux et autrement : Guide pratique pour implanter des groupes de codéveloppement professionnel. Montréal: Éditions Sabourin Lefebvre.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. 2019. “Becoming a Midwife to Wisdom: A Retrospective Account of Practice of an Action Learning Facilitator.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 16 (2): 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2019.1611037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, V. J. 2011. “Digging Deeper : Foundations of Revans’ Gold Standard of Action Learning.” In Action Learning in Practice, 4th ed, edited by M. Pedler, 71–80. Farnham: Gower.
   Google Scholar