Preventing Youth Pregnancy: Dialogue and Deliberation in a Science Museum Exhibit

References

• Albe, V., & Pedretti, E. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on courting controversy: Socioscientific issues and school science and technology. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 13, 303–312.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2014). What is public engagement. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/page/what-public-engagement
   Google Scholar
• Bell, L. (2008). Engaging the public in technology policy: A new role for science museums? Science Communication, 29, 386–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodmer, W. (2010). Public understanding of science: The BA, the Royal Society and COPUS. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 64, 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. (1998). Parâmetros curriculares nacionais 5ª a 8ª Séries [National curricular parametres 5th to 8th grades]. Brasilia, Brazil: Author. Retrieved from http://portal.mec.gov.br/par/195-secretarias-112877938/seb-educacao-basica-2007048997/12657-parametros-curriculares-nacionais-5o-a-8o-series
   Google Scholar
• Brotman, J. S., Mensah, F. M., & Lesko, N. (2010). Urban high school students' learning about HIV/AIDS in different contexts. Science Education, 95, 87–120. doi:10.1002/sce.20405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubela, T., Nisbet, M. C., Borchelt, R., Brunger, F., Critchley, C., Einsiedel, E., & Jones, S. A. (2009). Commentary. Science Communication Reconsidered, 27, 514–518.
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M. (2008). Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 57–76). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2004). The museum, a temple or the forum. In G. Anderson (Ed.), Reinventing the museum (pp. 61–73). New York, NY: Altamira Press. (Original work published 1971)
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J. (2012). Reflexive engagement? Actors, learning, and reflexivity in public dialogue on science and technology. Science Communication, 35, 283–310. doi:10.1177/1075547012454598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittenden, D. (2011). Commentary: Roles, opportunities, and challenges—Science museums engaging the public in emerging science and technology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13, 1549–1556. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0311-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J., Luke, J. J., & Uttal, D. H. (2009). Practical evaluation guide: Tools for museums & other informal educational settings (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinis, N. F. (2006). Educação, cidadania e as minorias sexuais e de gênero [Education, citizenship and sexual minorities]. In M. A. Schmidt & T. Stoltz (Eds.), Educação, cidadania e inclusão social [Education, citizenship and social inclusion] (pp. 130–135). Curitiba, Brazil: Aos Quatro Ventos.
   Google Scholar
• Dinis, N. F., & Asinelli-Luz, A. (2007). Educação sexual na perspectiva histórico-cultural [Sexual education through an historical–cultural perspective]. Educar em Revista, 30, 77–87. doi:10.1590/S0104-40602007000200006
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel, A. A., & Einsiedel, E. F. (2004). Museums as agora: Diversifying approaches to engaging publics in research. In D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo & B. V. Lewenstein (Eds.), Creating connections: Museums and the public understanding of current research (pp. 73–86). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gascoigne, T., Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B., & Shi, S. (2010, September). Is science communication its own field? Journal of Science Communication, 9, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2013). Don't be nervous, don't be flustered, don't be scared. Be prepared. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13, 313–331.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2014). Be part of the solution learning about, from activism. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 67–98). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4360-1
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords. (2000). Science and technology. Third report. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Kaplan. (n.d.). Instalação Prevenindo a Gravidez Juvenil [Installation Preventing Youth Pregnancy]. Retrieved from http://www.kaplan.org.br/institucional/sec/instalacao-prevenindo-a-gravidez-juvenil
   Google Scholar
• Lesko, N. (2010). Feeling abstinent? Feeling comprehensive? Touching the affects of sexuality curricula. Sex Education, 10, 281–297. doi:10.1080/14681811.2010.491633
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence?; Studies in Science Education, 46, 69–119. doi:10.1080/03057260903562433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, L. D., Berlin, C., Palen, L.-A., & Ashley, O. S. (2012). A theater-based approach to primary prevention of sexual behavior for early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 730–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Macedo Guastaferro, C. (2013). Adolescência, gravidez e doenças sexualmente transmissíveis (DST): Como os adolescentes enfrentam estas vulnerabilidades? [Teenage, pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases [STD]: How do teenagers face those vulnerabilities?] (Master's thesis). Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Macedo Guastaferro, C., & Cambauva, J. (2010). A experiência transgressiva no trabalho de prevenção com adolescentes [A transgressive experience in the work with prevention and teenagers]. Revista Brasileira de Psicodrama, 18, 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2010). Deficit model. In S. H. Preist (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of science and technology communication (pp. 207–209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moscheta, M. D. S., McNamee, S., & Dos Santos, J. C. (2011). Dialogue and transformation: Embracing sexual diversity in the educational context. Educar em Revista, 1, 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E., & Navas-Iannini, A. M. (2018). Pregnant pauses: Science museums, schools and a controversial exhibition. In R. Gunstone, D. Corrigan, & A. Jones (Eds.), Bridging informal and formal science education (pp. 26–40). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, C. (2009). Using the deficit model, public debate model and co-production of knowledge models to interpret points of view of students concerning citizens' participation in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 49–73.
   Google Scholar
• Sfair, S.C., Bittar, M., & Lopes, R. E. (2015). Educação sexual para adolescentes e jovens: Mapeando proposições oficiais [Sexual education for teenagers and youth: Mapping official propositions]. Saude e Sociedade, 24, 620–632.
   Google Scholar
• Soren, B. J., & Armstrong, J. (2014). Qualitative and quantitative audience measures. In G. D. Lord & B. Lord (Eds.), The manual of museum exhibitions (pp. 58–66). London, England: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public understanding. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trench, B., & Bucchi, M. (2010, September). Science communication, an emerging discipline. Journal of Science Communication, 9, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Trench, B., & Bucchi, M. (2015). Science communication research over 50 years. Patterns and trends. In B. Schiele, J. Le Marec, & P. Baranger (Eds.), Science communication today—2015: Current strategies and means of action (pp. 15–27). Nancy: PUN-Éditions Universitaires de Lorraine. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/14286143/Science_communication_research_over_50_sources_patterns_and_trends
   Google Scholar
• Tushabomwe, A., & Nashon, S. M. (2016). Interpreting teachers' perceptions of contextual influences on sexuality discourses within the school curriculum: Lessons from sex health education teachers in Kampala, Uganda. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16, 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2010). Levers of success: Case studies of national sexuality education programmes. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001884/188495e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1992). Public understanding of science research: New horizons or hall of mirrors? Public Understanding of Science, 1, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). An inclusive view of scientific literacy: Core issues and future directions. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Ericksen, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 171–192). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. (1991). Public understanding of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16, 99–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar