Responses to Mental Health Care Posts by Social Media Influencers: The Moderating Effects of Previous Experience and Follower Involvement

References

• Bandura, A. (1999). A sociocognitive analysis of substance abuse: An agentic perspective. Psychological Science, 10(3), 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, J. B., Triệu, P., & Ellison, N. B. (2020). Social media elements, ecologies, and effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman, R., & Kavka, M. (2018). Crying on YouTube: Vlogs, self-exposure and the productivity of negative affect. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 24(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocarnea, M. (2007). Celebrity-persona parasocial interaction scale. In R. Reynolds, R. Woods, & J. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 309–312). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-792-8.ch039
   Google Scholar
• Bond, B. J. (2016). Following your “Friend”: Social media and the strength of adolescents’ parasocial relationships with media personae. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 19(11), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. J. (2015). Examining four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship. Communication Theory (1050–3293), 25(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Devendorf, A., Bender, A., & Rottenberg, J. (2020). Depression presentations, stigma, and mental health literacy: A critical review and YouTube content analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 78, 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social media influencers in strategic communication: A conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1620234
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, K., & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. B. (2018). Young black men’s information seeking following celebrity depression disclosure: Implications for mental health communication. Journal of Health Communication, 23(7), 687–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1506837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaenssle, S., & Budzinski, O. (2021). Stars in social media: New light through old windows? Journal of Media Business Studies, 18(2), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2020.1738694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, N. A. (2020). Young women’s mental illness and (in-)visible social media practices of control and emotional recognition. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 2056305120963832. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120963832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C., & Cohen, E. (2012). Responses to obsessive compulsive disorder on monk among series fans: Parasocial relations, presumed media influence, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 650–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The commercialization of social media stars: A literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudders, L., Lou, C., & de Brabandere, M. (2022). Understanding the impact of influencers’ responses to negative follower comments on the persuasiveness of sponsored Instagram posts. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 178–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1963554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, P., Pandey, U. S., & Roy, E. (2017). Perceived efficacy and intentions regarding seeking mental healthcare: Impact of Deepika Padukone, a bollywood celebrity’s public announcement of struggle with depression. Journal of Health Communication, 22(8), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1343878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Harwood, J. (2020). Facebook contact: The effect of an outgroup member’s language proficiency on desire for future intergroup contact. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 77, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2020). How does a celebrity make fans happy? Interaction between celebrities and fans in the social media context. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krcmar, M. (2020). Social cognitive theory. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 100–114). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kresovich, A. (2022). The influence of pop songs referencing anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation on college students’ mental health empathy, stigma, and behavioral intentions. Health Communication, 37(5), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1859724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H. (2020). YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H., Yuan, C. W., & Wohn, D. Y. (2021). How video streamers’ mental health disclosures affect viewers’ risk perceptions. Health Communication, 36(14), 1931–1941. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1808405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, T. (2018, October 12). YouTube stars are being accused of profiting off fans’ depression. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/10/youtube-stars-accused-of-profiting-off-depression-betterhelp-shane-dawson-phillip-defranco-elle-mills/572803/
   Google Scholar
• Lou, C. (2021). Social media influencers and followers: Theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & Daly, J. A. (2006). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00281.x
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2021). Predictors of parasocial interaction and relationships in live streaming. Convergence, 27(6), 1714–1734. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211027807
   Google Scholar
• Mo, P. K. H., & Mak, W. W. S. (2009). Help-seeking for mental health problems among Chinese. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44(8), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0484-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2009). Cosmetic surgery makeover programs and intentions to undergo cosmetic enhancements: A consideration of three models of media effects. Human Communication Research, 35(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., & Clark, S. (2008). Exploring the limits of social cognitive theory: Why negatively reinforced behaviors on TV may be modeled anyway. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newberry, C., Kwok, E., & Martin, N. (2022, November 9). Social media algorithms: A 2023 guide for every network. https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-algorithm/#:~:text=A%20social%20media%20algorithm%20is,it%20and%20interact%20with%20it.
   Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Myrick, J. G., Zeitany, A., Kelley, D., Morales-Pico, B., & Thomas, N. E. (2015). Testing a social cognitive theory-based model of indoor tanning: Implications for skin cancer prevention messages. Health Communication, 30(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott, S., Billings, A. C., Hakim, S. D., & Gentile, P. (2020). From# endthestigma to# realman: Stigma-challenging social media responses to NBA players’ mental health disclosures. Communication Reports, 33(3), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2020.1811365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavelko, R. L., & Myrick, J. G. (2020). Muderinos and media effects: How the my favorite murder podcast and its social media community may promote well-being in audiences with mental illness. Journal of Radio and Audio Media, 27(1), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2019.1638925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2019). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1609965
   Google Scholar
• Quintero Johnson, J. M., Yilmaz, G., & Najarian, K. (2017). Optimizing the presentation of mental health information in social media: The effects of health testimonials and platform on source perceptions, message processing, and health outcomes. Health Communication, 32(9), 1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1214218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-Aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’ – Parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158709386664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, M., Wong, Y. J., Nguyen, K. K., & Gonzalez, P. D. (2019). College students’ barriers to seeking mental health counseling: Scale development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(5), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Social Bluebook. (December 15, 2021). Ultimate guide to start your creator business 2022. https://home.socialbluebook.com/start-your-creator-business/
   Google Scholar
• Tukachinsky, R. (2010). Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3(1/2), 73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., Wester, S. R., Larson, L., & Hackler, A. H. (2007). Seeking help from a mental health professional: The influence of one’s social network. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. L., & Wester, S. R. (2003). To seek help or not to seek help: The risks of self-disclosure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangenheim, F. V., & Bayón, T. (2004). The effect of word of mouth on services switching: Measurement and moderating variables. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1173–1185. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410548924
   Google Scholar
• Wong, N. C. H., Lookadoo, K. L., & Nisbett, G. S. (2017). “I’m Demi and I have bipolar disorder”: Effect of parasocial contact on reducing stigma toward people with bipolar disorder. Communication Studies, 68(3), 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1331928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar