Actualizing the affordances of seaport smart container terminal system in a developing country

References

• Alghamdi, S. (2019). Monitoring student attendance using a smart system at Taif University. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 11(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2019.11108
   Google Scholar
• Baheti, R., & Gill, H. (2011). Cyber-physical systems. In Tariq Samad, & Anuradha Annaswamy (Eds). The Impact of Control Technology (1st ed., pp. 161–166). IEEE Control Systems Society. https://www.ieeecss.org/impact-control-technology-1st-edition.
   Google Scholar
• Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2008). Progress in information technology and tourism management. 20 years on and 10 years after the internet. The state of etourism research. Tourism Management, 23(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00085-1
   Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones, A., & Volkoff, O. (2017). How can we develop contextualized theories of effective use? A demonstration in the context of community-care electronic health records. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Chan, I. C. C. (2022). Smart cities and quality of life: A quantitative analysis of citizens’ support for smart city development. Information Technology & People, https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2021-0577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimino, M. G. C. A., Palumbo, F., Vaglini, G., Ferro, E., Celandroni, N., & La Rosa, D. (2017). Evaluating the impact of smart technologies on harbor’s logistics via BPMN modeling and simulation. Information Technology and Management, 18(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-016-0266-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2014). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In Vicki Knight, Jessica Young, Kalie Kosielak, & Megan Markinich (Eds.), Research design (4th ed., pp. 1–265. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dini, A. A., & Saebo, O. (2016). The current state of social media research for eParticipation in developing countries: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-49), Koloa, HI, USA (pp. 2698–2707). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dini, A. A., Wahid, F., & Sæbo, Ø. (2016). Affordances and constraints of social media use in eParticipation: Perspectives from Indonesian politicians. In 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2016) (pp. 1–14). http://www.pacis2016.org/abstract/ALL/523.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Drevin, L., & Dalcher, D. (2011). Using antenarrative approaches to investigate the perceptions of information systems’ actors regarding failure and success. Information Systems Development, 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Du, W. D., Pan, S. L., Leidner, D. E., & Ying, W. (2019). Affordances, experimentation and actualization of FinTech: A blockchain implementation study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effah, J., Amankwah-Sarfo, F., & Boateng, R. (2020). Affordances and constraints processes of smart service systems: Insights from the case of seaport security in Ghana. International Journal of Information Management, 58(2021), 102204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102204
   Google Scholar
• Effah, J., & Debrah, E. (2018). Biometric technology for voter identification: The experience in Ghana. The Information Society, 34(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ens, N., Stein, M. K., & Jensen, T. B. (2018). Decent digital work: Technology affordances and constraints. International Conference on Information Systems 2018, ICIS 2018, San Francisco, USA (pp. 1–9).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in Communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1977). A theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hameed, T. (2016). Impact of big data analytics on individuals and the South Korean big data analytics market. Journal of Information Technology Case & Application Research, 18(3), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2016.1220201
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (2010). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education and Information Technologies, 15(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9106-z
   Google Scholar
• Heilig, L., Lalla-Ruiz, E., & Voß, S. (2017). Digital transformation in maritime ports: Analysis and a game theoretic framework. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 18(2–3), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-017-9122-x
   Google Scholar
• Heilig, L., & Voß, S. (2017). Information systems in seaports: A categorization and overview. Information Technology and Management, 18(3), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-016-0269-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, M. (2020). Smart technologies. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1531
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Peng, G., & Xing, F. (2018). Socio-technical challenges of smart fleet equipment management systems in the Maritime Industry. International Conference on Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions, Tashkent, Uzbekistan (pp. 242–252).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., & Hong, B. H. (2010). Maritime logistics and applications of information technologies. The 40th International Conference on Computers & Indutrial Engineering, Awaji, Japan (pp. 1–6).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkotey, W. O., Effah, J., & Boateng, R. (2021). Government workspace digitalization and socioeconomic development outcomes in Ghana. The African Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), 454–475. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ajis/vol13/iss4/2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, D. E., Gonzalez, E., & Koch, H. (2018). An affordance perspective of enterprise social media and organizational socialization. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezzi, M., Lazoi, M., & Corallo, A. (2018). Cybersecurity for Industry 4.0 in the current literature: A reference framework. Computers in Industry, 103, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., & Hung, K. (2019). Understanding self-service technology in hotels in China: Technology affordances and constraints. In J. Pesonen & J. Neidhard (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2019 (pp. 225–236). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05940-8_18
   Google Scholar
• Maglio, P., & Lim, C.-H. (2016). Big data and smart service systems. Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_004.001_0003
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., & Markus, M. L. (2012). Technology affordances and constraints in management information systems. In E. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (pp. 833–834). Sage Publications. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192196
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D., Hirt, R., & Kühl, N. (2019). Service systems, smart service systems and cyber- physical systems — What ’ s the difference? Towards a unified terminology. 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Masiero, S. (2016). The origins of failure: Seeking the causes of design-reality gaps. Information Technology for Development, 22(3), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1143346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, K., & Maiye, A. (2010). The role of institutions in ICT innovation: Learning from interventions in a Nigerian e-government initiative. Information Technology for Development, 16(4), 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2010.498408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina-Borja, A. (2015). Smart things as service providers: A call for convergence of disciplines to build a research agenda for the service systems of the future. Service Science, 7(1), ii–v. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2014.0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D., & Ladkin, A. (2015). Smart technologies for personalized experiences: A case study in the hospitality domain. Electronic Markets, 25(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0182-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkohkwo, Q. N., & Islam, M. S. (2013). Challenges to the successful implementation of e-government initiatives in sub-saharan Africa: A literature review. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 11(1), 252–266. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/585
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owusu-Oware, E., Effah, J., & Boateng, R. (2017). Institutional enablers and constraints of national biometric identification implementation in developing countries: The case of Ghana. AMCIS 2017 Proceedings, Boston, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, A., Herath, T., De, R., & Rao, H. R. (2018). An investigation of affordances and constraints for continued usage of mobile payment technology. Proceedings Annual Workshop of the AIS Special Interest Group for ICT in Global Development, San Francisco, USA (pp. 13).
   Google Scholar
• Papagiannidis, S., & Marikyan, D. (2020). Smart offices: A productivity and well-being perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Paukstadt, U., Eicker, S., & Eicker, S. (2019). Understanding services in the era of the internet of things: A smart service taxanomy. 27th European Conference on Information Systems, Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden, June 8-14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015, October). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review, 93(10), 96–114. https://hbr.org/2015/10/how-smart-connected-products-are-transforming-companies
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., & Vitari, C. (2014). Affordance theory in the is discipline: A review and synthesis of the literature. AMCIS 2014 Proceedings, 2014, Savannah, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Ridder, H. G., Hoon, C., & McCandless, A. (2009). The theoretical contribution of case study research to the field of strategy and management. Research Methodology in Strategy & Management, 5, 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-8387(2009)0000005007
   Google Scholar
• Romero, M., Guédria, W., Panetto, H., & Barafort, B. (2020). Towards a characterisation of smart systems: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 120, 103224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, B. D., & Shankar, R. (2021). Understanding the barriers of port logistics for effective operation in the Industry 4.0 era: Data-driven decision making. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100031
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2013). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. D. (2005). Exploring radio frequency identification technology and its impact on business systems. Information Management & Computer Security, 13(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220510582647
   Google Scholar
• Steenken, D., Voß, S., & Stahlbock, R. (2004). Container terminal operation and operations research-a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum, 26(1), 3–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-003-0157-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, D. M., Johnson, S. A., Tulu, B., Trudel, J., Volkoff, O., Pelletier, L. R., Bar-On, I., & Garber, L. (2014). A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(2), 53–85. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Zhou, X., Jeyaraj, A., Shang, R. A., & Hu, F. (2019). The impact of enterprise social media platforms on knowledge sharing: An affordance lens perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2018-0232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, I. F., & De Koster, R. (2003). Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00293-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2017). Affordance theory and how to use it in is research. The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619361-18
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in is research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Wang, J., & Tang, Q. (2018). A review of Application of affordance theory in information systems. Journal of Service Science & Management, 11(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2018.111006
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., Basker, S., & Ward, N. (2008). E-navigation and the case for eLoran. The Journal of Navigation, 61(3), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308004748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, W., Mehta, N., & Palvia, P. (2020). Value co-creation dimensions and challenges in EHR systems. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 188–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2020.1832647
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. C., Ying, H., Jin, Y., Cheng, H. K., & Liang, T. P. (2021). Special issue editorial: Information systems research in the age of smart services. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Yu, A. (2016). Affordances of social media in collective action: The case of free lunch for children in China. Information Systems Journal, 26(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar