183
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Climate change curriculum for children – generative learning across multiple intelligences

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Baker, C., Clayton, S., & Bragg, E. (2021). Educating for resilience: Parent and teacher’s perceptions of children’s emotional needs in response to climate change. Environmental Education Research, 27(5), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12525
  • Breitwieser, J., & Brod, G. (2021). Cognitive prerequisites for generative learning: Why some learning strategies are more effective than others. Child Development, 92(1), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13393
  • Brod, G. (2020). Generative learning: Which strategies for what age? Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1295–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09571-9
  • Chadwick, A. E. (2017). Climate change communication. https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10 .1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-22.
  • Cheng, L., & Beal, C. R. (2020). Effects of student-generated drawing and imagination on science text reading in a computer-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09684-1
  • Cornejo-Rodriguez, del, P. M., Borbor-Cordova, M. J., Ochoa, D., Quispe-Prieto, S. C., Paucar-Caceres, A., Ruiz, V., V., Haley, D., Espinoza-Molina, J., Osco., & Mamani, E. (2021). Enhancing self-determined/socio-ecological resilience to flooding in marginalized communities of Ecuador and Peru. In J. M. Luetz & D. Ayal (Eds.), Handbook of climate change management (pp. 4279–4296). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57281-5_249
  • Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding [Kindle]. Cambridge University Press.
  • Fiorella, L., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Drawing boundary conditions for learning by drawing. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 1115–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9444-8
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. BasicBooks.
  • Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st Century. Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New Horizons [Kindle]. Basic Books.
  • Hajian, S. (2019). Transfer of learning and teaching: A review of transfer theories and effective instructional practices. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(1), 2019. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.1.06
  • Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2015). Environmental visual communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.1.06
  • Hellenbrand, J., Mayer, R. E., Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2019). How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(6), 1147–1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3559
  • Jaeger, A. J., Velasquez, M. N., Dawdanow, A., & Shipley, T. F. (2018). Sketching and summarizing to reduce memory for seductive details in science text. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000254
  • Klingenberg, S., Jørgensen, M. L. M., Dandanell, G., Skriver, K., Mottelson, A., & Makransky, G. (2020). Investigating the effect of teaching as generative learning strategy when learning desktop and immersive virtual reality: A media and methods experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2115–2138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13029
  • Lin, L., Lee, C. H., Kalyuga, S., Wang, Y., Guan, S., & Wu, H. (2017). The effect of learner-generated drawing and imagination in comprehending science text. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143796
  • Makransky, G., Andreasen, N. K., Baceviciute, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). Immersive Virtual Reality Increases Liking but Not Learning with a Science Simulation and Generative Learning Strategies Promote Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality. American Psychological Association, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000473
  • Marshall, J., & Erickson, D. M. (2014). Climate change: Engaging audiences, prompting action, measuring change. International Zoo Educators Journal, 56–60. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=f7fee898- dd8c-4a46-a1e1-e89e99d431dd%40pdc-v-sessmgr02.
  • Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463939
  • McLeod, S. (2021). Piaget’s Theory and Stages of Cognitive Development. https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html.
  • Meya, J. N., & Eisenack, K. (2018). Effectiveness of gaming for communicating and teaching climate change. Climatic Change, 149(3–4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2254-7
  • Ministerio de Educación. (2019). Currículo de los niveles de educación obligatoria: Subnivel Medio (2da. Ed.). https://educacion.gob.ec/wp- content/uploads/downloads/2019/09/EGB-Media.pdf.
  • Ministerio del Ambiente. (2023). Plataforma sobre adaptación al cambio climático del Ecuador. https://www.adaptacioncc.com/informacion-general/politicas.
  • Minitab. (2016). Minitab Statistical Software. https://www.minitab.com/fr-fr/products/minitab/.
  • Muñoz-Pico, H. P., & Viteri-Mancero, F. (2022). Del ver al compartir: El rol de las emociones en la propagación de contenidos sobre cambio climático en YouTube. Palabra Clave, 25(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2022.25.2.6
  • Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241
  • Petersen, G. B., Klingenberg, S., Mayer, R. E., & Makransky, G. (2020). The virtual field trip: Investigating how to optimize immersive virtual learning in climate change education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2099–2115. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12991
  • Pilegard, C., & Fiorella, L. (2016). Helping students help themselves: Generative learning strategies improve middle school students’ self-regulation in a cognitive tutor. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.020
  • Ponce, H. R., Mayer, R. E., López, M. J., & Loyola, M. S. (2018). Adding interactive graphic organizers to a whole-class slideshow lesson. Instructional Science, 46(6), 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9465-1
  • Radzi, S. N. F., Osman, K., & Mohd Said, M. N. (2022). Progressing towards global citizenship and a sustainable nation: Pillars of climate change education and actions. Sustainability, 14(9), 5163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095163
  • Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2019). A systematic review of climate change education: Giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change. Children’s Geographies, 2019, 1614532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532
  • Ruiz-Ballesteros, E., & Ramos-Ballesteros, P. (2019). Social-ecological resilience as practice: A household perspective from Agua Blanca (Ecuador). Sustainability, 11(20), 5697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205697
  • Scheiter, K., Schleinschok, K., & Ainsworth, S. (2017). Why sketching may aid the learning from science texts: Contrasting sketching with written explanations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 866–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12261
  • Schroth, O., Angel, J., Sheppard, S., & Dulic, A. (2014). Visual climate change communication: From iconography to locally framed 3D visualization. Environmental Communication, 8(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.906478
  • Shearer, B. (1994). The MIDAS: A professional manual. MI Research and Consulting.
  • United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. Special Edition. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals- Report-2023.pdf.
  • Viteri, F. (2021). Environmental educommunication: EdTech’s media trends for environmental visual learning. In B. Takahashi, J. Metag, J. Thaker, & S. Evans Comfort, (Eds.). ICA handbook of international trends in environmental communication. Routledge.
  • Viteri, F., & Takahashi, B. (2019). Use of learning frames in climate change communication: A study of organizations in Latin America. International Communication Gazette, 82(8), 726–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519827728
  • Viteri, F., & Urresta, D. (2019, November 3–7). The integrated approach: Learning principles for climate change visual design [Paper presentation]. 10th World Environmental Education Congress. https://weec2019.org/e-proceedings/
  • Wibeck, V. (2013). Enhancing learning, communication, and public engagement about climate change – Some lessons from recent literature. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.812720
  • Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527409529129
  • World Bank Group. (2021). Climate risk country profile. https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/country- profiles/15988-WB_Ecuador%20Country%20Profile-WEB.pdf.
  • Wu, J. S., & Lee, J. J. (2015). Climate change games as tools for education and engagement. Nature Climate Change, 5(5), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2566

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.