Student Perception of the Level of Development of Complex Thinking: An Approach Involving University Women in Mexico

References

• Adiastuty, N., Summarni, S., Riyadi, A., & Nisa, A. (2020). Neuroscience study: Analysis of mathematical creative thinking ability levels in terms of gender differences in vocational high school students. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1933(1), 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Arredondo, F., Vázquez, J. C., & Velazquez, L. (2019). STEM and gender gap in Latin America. Revista de El Colegio de San Luis, 9(18), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.21696/rcsl9182019947
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Martínez, I. M., & Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Validation of an instrument to measure research and academic literacy skills in university students. Relieve, In press.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Torres Delgado, G. (2022, In evaluation). Reasoning-for-complexity competency instrument (e-complexity): Content validation and expert judgment. Education in the Knowledge Society, In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chetkovich, C. (2019). How non-binary gender definitions confound (already complex) thinking about gender and public policy. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 226–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Sandoval, M., Roca, E., & Ortego, M. I. (2020). Compositional data analysis approach in the measurement of social-spatial segregation: Towards a sustainable and inclusive city. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10), 4293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., Zhu, Y., Qu, J., Tie, L., Wang, Z., & Qu, B. (2021). Psychometric properties of the critical thinking disposition assessment test amongst medical students in China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02437-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmanji, D., Agus, D., Astalini, A., & Setiya, E. (2022). Science processing skill and critical thinking: Reviewed based on the gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.35116
   Google Scholar
• DiTullio, I. (2019). Gender equality in STEM: Exploring self-efficacy through gender awareness. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2019-3-13
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, K. R. (1971). The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.3.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heybach, J., & Pickup, A. (2017). Whose STEM? Disrupting the gender crisis within STEM. Educational Studies, 53(6), 614–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janusz, B., Józefik, B., & Peräkylä, A. (2018). Gender-related issues in couple therapists’ internal voices and interactional practices. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 39(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassenboehmer, S., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). University education and non-cognitive skill development. Oxford Economic Papers, 70(2), 538–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpy002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodayar, E. (2021). The effect of cultural capital on systemic thinking emphasizing the role of education. Journal of Cultural Management, 15(52), 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., & Osterhaus, C. (2019). Individual differences in early scientific thinking: Assessment, cognitive influences, and their relevance for science learning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 20(4), 510–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lising, A., Chang, M., Hakuta, K., Kenny, D., Levin, S., & Milem, J. (2004). Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science, 15(8), 507–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00710.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmo, C., & Célica, E. (2017). Women, the cultural labyrinth, and the assumption of critical thinking. UPGTO Management Review, 2(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Massart, D. L., Smeyers-Verbeke, J., Capron, X., & Schlesrer, K. (2005). Visual presentation of data by means of box plots. LC GC Europe, 18(4), 215–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., Sun, D., Zhu, L., & Yang, Y. (2021). Evaluating scientific reasoning ability: Student performance and the interaction effects between grade level, gender, and academic achievement level. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturana, I. (2018). Internationalization and multiculturalism: Natural and unaware partners. In E. L. Rumbley & H. Wit (Ed.), Innovative and inclusive internationalization: Proceedings of the WES-CIHE summer institute (pp. 9–10). WES.
   Google Scholar
• Meza, R. (2020). The seven fundamental aspects for 21st-century education according to Edgar Morin. A view from complexity and systems theory. Revista Enfoques Educacionales, 17(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.5354/2735-7279.2020.60599
   Google Scholar
• Monterroso, O., Bailey, C., Peñate, L., García, J., & Véliz, R. (2017). Systemic thinking to strengthen professional competencies of analysis and synthesis in environmental and agricultural sciences curricula. Cultura de Guatemala, 1(38), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Nadiroh, U., Hasanah, U., & Zulfa, V. (2019). Behavioral geography: An ecoliteracy perspective and critical thinking skills in men and women. The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 51(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.36784
   Google Scholar
• Nagahi, M., Ibne, N., & Jaradat, R. (2019). Gender differences in practitioners’ preferences for systems-thinking skills. In Proceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management. American Society for Engineering Management.
   Google Scholar
• Nagahi, M., Jaradat, R., Davarzani, S., Nagahisarchoghaei, M., & Goerger, D. (2020). The impact of systems thinking skills and proactive personality on academic performance of engineering students abstract. ASEE’S Virtual Conference. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–34084
   Google Scholar
• Onditi, F., & Odera, J. (2021). Women in contemporary developmental thought. In F. Onditi & J. Odera, Women in contemporary developmental thought (pp. 35–55). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71095-8_3
   Google Scholar
• Osa, C., Palma, M., Martín, N., & Díaz, C. (2018). Evaluation of critical and scientific thinking in student teachers at a Chilean university. Revista Electronica Educare, 22(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.22-2.12
   Google Scholar
• O’sullivan, D., & Unwin, D. (2002). Reducing the number of variables: Principal component analysis. In D. O’sullivan (Ed.), Geographic information analysis (pp. 343–355). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2022). RStudio: Integrated development for R (2022.2.2.485). RStudio, PBC. http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Said, S., Van, W., & Barbot, B. (2021). Torrance test of creative thinking-verbal, Arabic version: Measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender, year of study, and academic major. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanabria-Zepeda, J., Molina-Espinoza, J., Alfaro-Ponce, B., & Vycudilikova-Outla, M. (2022). Threshold for citizen science projects: Complex thinking as a driver of holistic development. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.33052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargot, M. (2017). Feminism, critical thinking, and alternative proposals in Latin America. Centro de Investigación en Estudios de la Mujer. Universidad de Costa Rica. http://repositorio.ciem.ucr.ac.cr/jspui/handle/123456789/226
   Google Scholar
• Shah, B., & Gustafsson, E. (2020). Exploring the effects of age, gender, and school setting on children’s creative thinking skills. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C. (2020). Art education for the development of complex thinking meta competency: A theoretical approach. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(1), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C., & Iturra, C. (2021). A conceptual proposal and operational definitions of the cognitive processes of complex thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syafrial, S., Ashadi, A., Saputro, S., & Sarwanto, S. (2022). Trend creative thinking perception of students in learning natural science: Gender and domicile perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 701–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabo, L., Greenberg, D., Haviv, Y., Riesenberg, K., & Nesher, L. (2021). The impact of gender on early scientific publication and long-term career advancement in Israeli medical school graduates. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02598-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2019). Reasoning for complexity. In Tecnologico de Monterrey (Ed.), Tecnologico de monterrey, transversal competencies. A vision from the Tec21 educational model (pp. 62–76).
   Google Scholar
• Tobón, S., & Luna, J. (2021). Complex thinking and sustainable social development: Validity and reliability of the COMPLEX-21 scale. Sustainability, 13(12), 6591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez, J., & Ortiz, V. (2018). Educational innovation as an element of the dual social responsibility of universities. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 9(17), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v9i17.157
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Parra, J., Castillo-Martínez, I., Ramírez-Montoya, M., Amézquita-Zamora, J., & Cruz-Sandoval, M. (2023). Gender gap in the perception of mastery of reasoning-for-complexity competency: An approach in Latin America. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, In Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Parra, J., Castillo-Martínez, I., Ramírez-Montoya, M., & Millán, A. (2022b). Development of the perception of achievement of complex thinking: A disciplinary approach in a Latin American student population. Education Sciences, 12(5), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Parra, J., Castillo-Martínez, I., Ramírez-Montoya, M., & Millán, A. (2022b). Disciplinary boundaries in the perception of reasoning for complexity competency: Approaches from Latin America. Educational Research Review, In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Parra, J., Ortiz-Meillón, V., & Estrada-Briseño, R. (2022a). Educating for diversity. Model of implementation of the sexual and gender diversity perspective in educational institutions. Estudios, 44(1), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, D. F. (1989). The box plot: A simple visual method to interpret data. Annals of Internal Medicine, 110(11), 916. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, C., & Tuliao, M. (2019). Soft skill development for employability: A case study of stem graduate students at a Vietnamese transnational university. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 9(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-03-2018-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q. (2021). Development of creative thinking skills through aesthetic creativity in middle school educational music course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar