315
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A systematic review of published student question-generation systems: Supporting functionalities and design features

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 172-195 | Received 27 Feb 2022, Accepted 02 Aug 2022, Published online: 13 Sep 2022

References

  • Arruabarrena, R., Sánchez, A., Blanco, J. M., Vadillo, J. A., & Usandizaga, I. (2019). Integration of good practices of active methodologies with the reuse of student-generated content. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0140-7
  • Barak, M., & Asakle, S. (2018). AugmentedWorld: Facilitating the creation of location-based questions. Computers & Education, 121, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.014
  • Bahati, B., Fors, U., Hansen, P., Nouri, J., & Mukama, E. (2019). Measuring learner satisfaction with formative e-assessment strategies. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(07), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9120
  • Barak, M., Asakle, S. (n.d.) AugmentedWorld manual. http://augmentedworld.site/files/AugmentedWorld_User%20guide.pdf
  • Beal, C. R., & Cohen, P. R. (2012). Teach ourselves: Technology to support problem posing in the STEM classroom. Creative Education, 03(04), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.34078
  • Beal, C. R., Strohm, J., Schwindy, L., & Cohen, P. R. (2013). Teach ourselves: A peer-to-peer learning community linking in-and out-of-class activity. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(1), 13–16.
  • Belanich, J., Wisher, R. A., Orvis, K. L. (2005). Using a question generation approach to improve web-based collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning (Online). https://reurl.cc/3o6RpM
  • Berking, P., & Gallagher, S. (2016). Choosing a learning management system (Report). Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) Initiative.
  • Birch, M., Beal, C. R. (2008). Problem posing in AnimalWatch: An interactive system for student-authored content. In Proceedings of the 21st International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 397–402). AAAI Press.
  • Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Buckner, E., & Kim, P. (2014). Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based learning: The Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE). PROSPECTS, 44(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9269-7
  • Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2013). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3
  • Chang, K. E., Wu, L. J., Weng, S. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2012). Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning. Computers & Education, 58(2), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.002
  • Chang, S. B., Tung, K. J., Huang, H. M., & Chan, T. W. (2005a). AGQ: A model of student question generation supported by one-on-one educational computing [Paper presentation]. In Koschmann, T., Suthers, D. D., & Chan, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 28–32). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  • Chang, S. B., Tung, K. J., & Chan, T. W. (2005b). A learning strategy of student question generation to enhance comprehension of learning materials in digital classroom environment [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 38–40). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2005.12
  • Cheng, H. N., Weng, Y. L., & Chan, T. W. (2014). Computer-supported problem posing by annotated expressions: Content-first design and evaluation. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(4), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0019-5
  • Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications Limited.
  • Denny, P., Hamer, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Purchase, H. (2008). PeerWise: Students sharing their multiple choice questions [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp. 51–58). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1404520.1404526
  • Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., Tempero, E., & Hendrickx, J. (2011). CodeWrite: Supporting student-driven practice of java [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 471–476). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953299
  • Doyle, E., Buckley, P., & McCarthy, B. (2021). The impact of content co-creation on academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1782832
  • Draaijer, S., & Boter, J. (2005). Questionbank: Computer supported self-questioning. In Danson, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (pp.235–250). Loughborough University.
  • English, L. D. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(3), 183–217. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002963618035
  • Hayashi, T., Mizuno, T., Tominaga, H., Tarumi, H., Yamasaki, T. (2008). A Learner-centered e-learning environment by contributing and sharing problems created by learners. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Technologies (pp. 94–98). Information Processing Society of Japan.
  • Hayashi, T., Nakagawa, S., Kishimoto, T., Hirai, Y., Ura, K., Yaegashi, R., Murai, H., & Tarumi, H. (2015). Active S-quiz: An intelligent educational system for basic knowledge learning by question-posing [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of 2015 IEEE/ACIS 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, (pp.583–586). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD.2015.7176264
  • Hazeyama, A., & Hirai, Y. (2007). Concerto II: A learning community support system based on question-posing [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 338–339). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2007.101
  • Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504914
  • Hills, T. T. (2015). Crowdsourcing content creation in the classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9089-2
  • Hirai, Y., & Hazeyama, A. (2007). A learning support system based on question-posing and its evaluation [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing (pp. 178–184). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/C5.2007.2
  • Hirai, Y., Hazeyama, A., & Inoue, T. (2009). Assessment of learning in concerto III: A collaborative learning support system based on question-posing. In Uskov, V. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (pp. 36–43). ACTA Press.
  • Hirashima, T., Nakano, A., Takeuchi, A. (2000). A diagnosis function of arithmetical word problems for learning by problem posing. In R. Mizoguchi & J. Slaney (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 745–755). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_74
  • Hirashima, T., Yokoyama, T., Okamoto, M., Takeuchi, A. (2006). A computer-based environment for learning by problem-posing as sentence-integration. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Learning by Effective Utilization of Technologies: Facilitating Intercultural Understanding (pp. 127–130). IOS Press.
  • Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and hsumanities. Addison-Wesley.
  • Hsiao, J. Y., Hung, C. L., Lan, Y. F., & Jeng, Y. C. (2013). Integrating worked examples into problem posing in a web-based learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 166–176.
  • Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, S. Y. (2014). Effects of an integrated mind–mapping and problem–posing approach on students’ in–field mobile learning performance in a natural science course. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(3/4), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.067019
  • Hwang, G. J., Chang, S. C., Song, Y., & Hsieh, M. C. (2021). Powering up flipped learning: An online learning environment with a concept map‐guided problem‐posing strategy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12499
  • Hwang, G. J., Huang, H., Wang, R. X., & Zhu, L. L. (2021). Effects of a concept mapping‐based problem‐posing approach on students’ learning achievements and critical thinking tendency: An application in classical Chinese learning contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 374–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13007
  • Hwang, G. J., Hung, P. H., Chen, N. S., & Liu, G. Z. (2014). Mindtool-assisted in-field learning (MAIL): An advanced ubiquitous learning project in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 4–16.
  • Hwang, G. J., Zou, D., & Lin, J. (2020). Effects of a multi-level concept mapping-based question-posing approach on students’ ubiquitous learning performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 149, 103815–103817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103815
  • Karabenick, S. A., & Sharma, R. (1994). Perceived teacher support of student questioning in the college classroom: Its relation to student characteristics and role in the classroom questioning process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.90
  • King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029002303
  • Kiron, N., Vassileva, J. (2018). Tower of questions: Gamified testing to engage students in peer evaluation. In Guin, N., & Kumar, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 113–119). Hal.
  • Kojima, K., Miwa, K., & Matsui, T. (2013). Supporting mathematical problem posing with a system for learning generation processes through examples. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22(4), 161–190.
  • Kojima, K., & Miwa, K. (2008). A system that facilitates diverse thinking in problem posing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 209–236.
  • Kopparla, M., Bicer, A., Vela, K., Lee, Y., Bevan, D., Kwon, H., Caldwell, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). The effects of problem-posing intervention types on elementary students’ problem-solving. Educational Studies, 45(6), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509785
  • Kul, Ü., & Çelik, S. (2020). A meta-analysis of the impact of problem posing strategies on students’ learning of mathematics. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/325
  • Lai, C. H., Tho, P. D., & Liang, J. S. (2017). Design and evaluation of question-generated programming learning system [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of 2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (pp. 573–578). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2017.107
  • Lan, Y. F., & Lin, P. C. (2011). Evaluation and improvement of student’s question-posing ability in a web-based learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.939
  • Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679
  • Lin, B., Hirashima, T., Kunichika, H. (2010). Interactive question-posing environment for beginners’ English learning. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 17–24). APSCE.
  • Lin, G. Y. (2010). Evaluating satisfaction regarding interaction with a collaborative problem posing and solving learning system [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer (pp. 481–484). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETC.2010.5529638
  • Lin, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Hsu, Y. D. (2019). Effects of ASQ-based flipped learning on nurse practitioner learners’ nursing skills, learning achievement and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 139, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.014
  • Luxton-Reilly, A., Plimmer, B., & Sheehan, R. (2010). StudySieve: A tool that supports constructive evaluation for free-response questions [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the NZ Chapter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 65–68). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1832838.1832849
  • Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Monograph.
  • MacGregor, S. K. (1988). Use of self-questioning with a computer-mediated text system and measures of reading performance. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968809547631
  • McDonald, P. A., & Smith, J. M. (2020). Improving mathematical learning in Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence through problem posing: An integrative review. The Curriculum Journal, 31(3), 398–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.15
  • Miciano, R. Z. (2004). The content and form of reader-generated questions: Implications for teaching questioning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024952
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  • Mishra, S., & Iyer, S. (2015). An exploration of problem posing-based activities as an assessment tool and as an instructional strategy. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41039-015-0006-0
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
  • Nakano, A., Hirashima, T., & Takeuchi, A. (2002). A support environment for learning by describing problem map [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 119–123). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIE.2002.1185881
  • Nolte, R. Y., & Singer, H. (1985). Active comprehension: Teaching a process of reading comprehension and its effects on reading achievement. The Reading Teacher, 39(1), 24–31.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  • Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.102.0128
  • Rafaeli, S., Barak, M., Dan-Gur, Y., & Toch, E. (2004). QSIA–A Web-based environment for learning, assessing and knowledge sharing in communities. Computers & Education, 43(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.008
  • Riggs, C. D., Kang, S., & Rennie, O. (2020). Positive impact of multiple-choice question authoring and regular quiz participation on student learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), ar16–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-09-0189
  • Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2014). The effects of problem posing on student mathematical learning: A meta-analysis. International Education Studies, 7(13), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p227
  • Santos, J., Figueiredo, A. S., & Vieira, M. (2019). Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003
  • Shimada, S., Kunimune, H., Niimura, M. (2013). Proposal of a method of problem-posing and a system that assists to manage problems and assist peer evaluation. In G. A. Tsihrintzis, Virvou, M., Watanabe, T., Jain, L.C., Howlett, R.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services (pp. 128–137). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-262-2-128
  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
  • Snowball, J. D., & McKenna, S. (2017). Student-generated content: An approach to harnessing the power of diversity in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 604–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1273205
  • Song, D. (2016). Student-generated questioning and quality questions: A literature review. Research Journal of Educational Studies and Review, 2(5), 58–70.
  • Song, D., Oh, E. Y., & Glazewski, K. (2017). Student-generated questioning activity in second language courses using a customized personal response system: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1425–1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9520-7
  • Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
  • Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
  • Su, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Investigating the effects of flipped learning, student question generation, and instant response technologies on students’ learning motivation, attitudes, and engagement: A structural equation modeling. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2453–2466. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89938
  • Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, Y. C. (2016). Development of a mobile learning system based on a collaborative problem-posing strategy. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.867889
  • Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, S. F. (2019). Effects of embedding a problem-posing-based learning guiding strategy into interactive e-books on students’ learning performance and higher order thinking tendency. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474235
  • Syahidi, A. A., Tolle, H., Supianto, A. A., & Hirashima, T. (2019). TOLSYASUPI-EduMed: Development of educational media using the problem-posing learning model for basic programming subjects. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 4(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.201942106
  • Takagi, M., Kaneko, T., Mochizuki, M., Sasaki, J., & Teshigawara, Y. (2010). A survey on educational methods using “Collabtest”, a web-based learning system enabling students to create quizzes collaboratively. In H. Fujita & J. Sasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology (pp. 318–324). WSEAS.
  • Touissi, Y., Hjiej, G., Hajjioui, A., Ibrahimi, A., & Fourtassi, M. (2022). Does developing multiple-choice questions improve medical students’ learning? A systematic review. Medical Education Online, 27(1), 2005505–2005513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2005505
  • Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2019). Learning management systems: An overview. In A. Tatnall (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education and technologies (pp.1–7). Springer.
  • Utami, I. Q., & Hwang, W. Y. (2022). The impact of collaborative problem posing and solving with ubiquitous-decimal app in authentic contexts on math learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(3), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00209-5
  • Wang, X. M., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). A problem posing-based practicing strategy for facilitating students’ computer programming skills in the team-based learning mode. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1655–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9551-0
  • Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2007). An argument for clarity: What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become? Tech Trends, 51(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-007-0023-y
  • Wilson, E. V. (2004). ExamNet asynchronous learning network: Augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions. Computers & Education, 42(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00066-6
  • Wu, C. P., & Wu, S. L. (2017). Development of a web-based learning system to engage students in question generation activities. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, 6(3), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijfcc.2017.6.3.502
  • Yamamoto, S., Akao, Y., Murotsu, M., Kanbe, T., Yoshida, Y., Maeda, K., Hayashi, Y., & Hirashima, T. (. (2014). Interactive environment for learning by problem-posing of arithmetic word problems solved by one-step multiplication and division. In Liu, C.-C., Ogata, H., Kong, S. C., & Kashihara, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 89–94). APSCE.
  • Yamamoto, S., Kanbe, T., Yoshida, Y., Maeda, K., & Hirashima, T. (2013). Interactive environment for learning by problem-posing of arithmetic word problems solved by one multiplication. In L.-H. Wong, C.-C. Liu, T. Hirashima, P. Sumedi, & M. Lukman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 51–60). APSCE.
  • Yamamoto, S., Kanbe, T., Yoshida, Y., Maeda, K., & Hirashima, T. (. (2012). A case study of learning by problem-posing in introductory phase of arithmetic word problems. In Biswas, G., Wong, L.-H., Hirashim, T. & Chen, W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 25–32). APSCE.
  • Ye, X. D., Chang, Y. H., & Lai, C. L. (2019). An interactive problem-posing guiding approach to bridging and facilitating pre-and in-class learning for flipped classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495651
  • Yeckehzaare, I., Barghi, T., & Resnick, P. (2020). QMaps: Engaging students in voluntary question generation and linking [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376882
  • Yeh, H. C., & Lai, P. Y. (2012). Implementing online question generation to foster reading comprehension. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1152–1175. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.794
  • Yu, F. Y., & Wu, W. S. (2020). Effects of student-generated feedback corresponding to answers to online student-generated questions on learning: What, why, and how? Computers & Education, 145, 103723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103723
  • Yu, F. Y. (2009). Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.002
  • Yu, F. Y., & Li, M. H. (2011). Effects of different types of online student question-generation on learning. In T. Hirashima. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 768–770). APSCE.
  • Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2002). The efficacy of a web-based domain independent question-posing and peer assessment learning system [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 641–642). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIE.2002.1186028
  • Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A web‐based learning system for question‐posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500062557
  • Yu, F. Y., Tsai, H. C., & Wu, H. L. (2013). Effects of online procedural scaffolds and the timing of scaffolding provision on elementary Taiwanese students’ question-generation in a science class. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.197
  • Zuya, H. E. (2017). The benefits of problem posing in the learning of mathematics: A systematic review. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(3), 853–860. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3581

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.