Machine learning for sustainable reutilization of waste materials as energy sources – a comprehensive review

References

• Abbas, D., D. Current, M. Phillips, R. Rossman, H. Hoganson, and K. N. Brooks. 2011. Guidelines for collecting forest biomass for energy: A synthesis of environmental considerations. Biomass and Bioenergy 35 (11):4538–46. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abioye, E. A., O. Hensel, T. J. Esau, O. Elijah, M. S. Z. Abidin, A. S. Ayobami, O. Yerima, and A. Nasirahmadi. 2022. Precision irrigation management using machine learning and digital farming solutions. AgriEngineering 4 (1):70–103. doi:10.3390/agriengineering4010006.
   Google Scholar
• Adawiyah, A. R., and I. N. Nik. 2013. A hybrid P-Graph and WEKA approach in decision-making: Waste conversion technologies selection., a hybrid P-Graph and WEKA approach in decision-making: Waste conversion technologies selection. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 26 (2): 261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, F., M. S. Younis, R. U. Zahid, and L. A. Shahid. 2020. Machine learning based grain moisture estimation for real-time monitoring of high-temperature paddy drying silo. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Multitopic Conference (INMIC), 1–6, doi:10.1109/INMIC50486.2020.9318071.
   Google Scholar
• Ajjolli Nagaraja, A., P. Charton, X. F. Cadet, N. Fontaine, M. Delsaut, B. Wiltschi, A. Voit, B. Offmann, C. Damour, B. Grondin-Perez, et al. 2020. A machine learning approach for efficient selection of enzyme concentrations and its application for flux optimization. Catalysts 10 (3):291. doi:10.3390/catal10030291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alley, E. C., G. Khimulya, S. Biswas, M. AlQuraishi, and G. M. Church. 2019. Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning. Nature Methods 16 (12):1315–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, J., A. Villa, and A. Bahamonde. 2015. Improved estimation of bovine weight trajectories using support vector machine classification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 110:36–41. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluko, O. O., C. Li, Q. Wang, and H. Liu. 2021. Sucrose utilization forImproved crop yields: A review article. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:4704. doi:10.3390/ijms22094704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amani, M. A., and F. Marinello. February, 2022. A deep learning-based model to reduce costs and increase productivity in the case of small datasets: A case study in cotton cultivation. Agriculture, MDPI 12(2):1–13. doi:10.3390/agriculture12020267.
   Google Scholar
• Anjum, M., and M. S. Umar. 2018. Garbage localization based on weakly supervised learning in deep convolutional neural network. Proceedings - IEEE 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking, ICACCCN 2018, Oct. 1108–13. doi:10.1109/ICACCCN.2018.8748568.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, M., T. Rivas, E. Giraldez, and J. Taboada. 2011. Use of machine learning techniques to analyse the risk associated with mine sludge deposits. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 54 (7–8):1823–28. ISSN 0895-7177. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.11.066.
   Google Scholar
• Asantewaa Owusu, P., S. Asumadu-Sarkodie, and S. Dubey. 2016. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering 3 (1):1. doi:10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990.
   Google Scholar
• Averesch, N. J. H., V. S. Martínez, L. K. Nielsen, and J. O. Krömer. 2018. Toward synthetic biology strategies for adipic acid production: An in silico tool for combined thermodynamics and stoichiometric analysis of metabolic networks. ACS Synthetic Biology 7 (2):490–509. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.7b00304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadnia, R., S. Fouladi, and A. Jahanbakhshi. 2023. Intelligent detection and waste control of hawthorn fruit based on ripening level using machine vision system and deep learning techniques. Results in Engineering 17:100891. ISSN 2590-1230. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100891.
   Google Scholar
• Badreldin, N., B. Prieto, and R. Fisher. 2021. Mapping grasslands in mixed grassland ecoregion of Saskatchewan using big remote sensing data and machine learning. Remote Sensing 13 (24):4972. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13244972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, J., S. Lian, Z. Liu, K. Wang, and D. Liu. 2019. Deep learning based robot for automatically picking up garbage on the grass. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 64 (3):382–89. doi:10.1109/TCE.2018.2859629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, M., and D. Braha. 1996. Control limits for multi-stage manufacturing processes with binomial yield (single and multiple production runs). The Journal of the Operational Research Society 47 (1):98–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1996.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basher, S. A., D. Raboy, S. Kaitibie, and I. Hossain. 2013. Understanding challenges to food security in dry Arab micro-states: Evidence from Qatari micro-data. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandari, S. October 2020. Automative Waste Sorting in Industrial Environment via Machine Learning Approaches. Master’s Thesis, Information Technology and Communication Sciences TAU.
   Google Scholar
• Bijos, J. C. B. F., V. M. Zanta, J. Morató, L. M. Queiroz, and K. P. S. R. Oliveira-Esquerre. 2022. Improving circularity in municipal solid waste management through machine learning in Latin America and the Caribbean. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy 28:100740. ISSN 2352-5541. doi:10.1016/j.scp.2022.100740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birgen, C., E. Magnanelli, P. Carlsson, Ø. Skreiberg, J. Mosby, and M. Becidan. 2021. Machine learning based modelling for lower heating value prediction of municipal solid waste. Fuel 283:118906. ISSN 0016-2361. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobulski, K. M. J. Waste classification system using image processing and convolutional neural networks. International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Springer, Cham. 350–61. Jun 12, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20518-8_30.
   Google Scholar
• Boniecki, P., J. Dach, K. Pilarski, and H. Piekarska-Boniecka. 2012. Artificial neural networks for modeling ammonia emissions released from sewage sludge composting. Atmospheric Environment 57:49–54. ISSN 1352-2310. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.04.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudru, M. 1989. Forêt et sylviculture. Le traitement Des forêts [forest and silviculture. The treatment of forests]. Tome 2, 344. Gembloux: Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux. in french.
   Google Scholar
• Buxbaum, N., J. H. Lieth, and M. Earles. Apr 13, 2022. Non-destructive plant biomass monitoring with high spatio-temporal resolution via proximal RGB-D imagery and end-to-end deep learning. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:758818. PMID: 35498682 PMCID: PMC9043900. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.758818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell, J. G., R. S. Michalski, and T. M. Mitchell. 1983. Machine learning: A historical and methodological analysis. AI Magazine 4 (3):69–79. doi:10.1609/aimag.v4i3.406.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., R. Avtar, D. Agus Umarhadi, A. Stephanus Louw, S. Shrivastava, A. P. Yunus, K. Mohamed Khedher, T. Takemi, and H. Shibata. 2022. Post-typhoon forest damage estimation using multiple vegetation indices and machine learning models. Weather and Climate Extremes 38:100494. ISSN 2212-0947. doi:10.1016/j.wace.2022.100494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Y. Huang, C. Nie, S. Zhang, G. Wang, S. Chen, and Z. Chen. 2022. A long-term reconstructed TROPOMI solar-induced fluorescence dataset using machine learning algorithms. Scientific Data 9 (1):427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01520-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhokar, R. S., R. Kumar Sharma, M. Kumar Gathala, and A. Kumar Pundir. 2014. Effects of crop establishment techniques on weeds and rice yield. Crop Protection 64:7–12. ISSN 0261-2194. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2014.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, C., C. Barnes, P. P. Angelov, and R. M. Jiang. 2020. Deep learning based Automated forest health diagnosis from aerial images. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access 8:144064–76. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012417.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, P. M. L., A. P. Mayol, J. L. G. S. Juan, R. H. Y. So, C. L. Sy, E. Mandia, A. T. Ubando, and A. B. Culaba. 2022. Early prediction of spirulina platensis biomass yield for biofuel production using machine learning. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 24 (7):2283–93. doi:10.1007/s10098-022-02321-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concu, R., M. Cordeiro, D. S. Natália, C. R. Munteanu, and H. González-Díaz. 2019. PTML model of enzyme subclasses for mining the proteome of biofuel producing microorganisms. Journal of Proteome Research 18 (7):2735–46. doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coopersmith, E. J., B. S. Minsker, C. E. Wenzel, and B. J. Gilmore. 2014. Machine learning assessments of soil drying for agricultural planning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 104:93–104. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coşgun, A., M. E. Günay, and R. Yıldırım. 2021. Exploring the critical factors of algal biomass and lipid production for renewable fuel production by machine learning. Renewable Energy 163:1299–317. ISSN 0960-1481. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubillos, M. 2020. Multi-site household waste generation forecasting using a deep learning approach. Waste Management 115:8–14. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnecki, S., M. Hadzima-Nyarko, A. Chajec, and Ł. Sadowski. 2022. Design of a machine learning model for the precise manufacturing of green cementitious composites modified with waste granite powder. Scientific Reports 12 (1):13242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17670-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalaka, A., B. Kompare, and M. Robnik-Šikonja. 2000. Sgardelis stefanos modelling the effects of environmental conditions on apparent photosynthesis of stipa bromoides by machine learning tools. Ecological Modelling 129 (2–3):245–57. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00237-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantas, D., M. D. Terra, L. P. Schorr, and N. Calegário. 2021. Machine learning for carbon stock prediction in a tropical forest in Southeastern Brazil. Valdivia: Bosque.
   Google Scholar
• Defresne, M., S. Barbe, and T. Schiex. Oct 29, 2021. Protein design with deep learning. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22 (21):11741. PMID: 34769173; PMCID: PMC8584038. doi:10.3390/ijms222111741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente, R., J. Cancino, and E. Acuña. 2021. Comparison of machine learning methods for dry biomass estimation based on green logging residues chips. International Journal of Forest Engineering 32 (2):174–84. doi:10.1080/14942119.2021.1892415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit, M., M. Junginger, and A. Faaij. 2013. Learning in dedicated wood production systems: Past trends, future outlook and implications for bioenergy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 19:417–32. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Gonzalez, F. A., J. Vuelvas, C. A. Correa, V. E. Vallejo, and D. Patino. 2022. Machine learning and remote sensing techniques applied to estimate soil indicators – review, ecological indicators. Ecological Indicators 135:108517. ISSN 1470-160X. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi, Z., S. Nadkarni, R. Agrawal, and N. Shah. 2018. AgroConsultant: Intelligent crop recommendation system using machine learning algorithms. Proceedings of the 2018 Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, India, 1–6. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, August 16–18, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Y., Q. Meng, S. Wang, and H. Kuang. 2019. Two-phase optimal solutions for ship speed and trim optimization over a voyage using voyage report data. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 122:88–114. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2019.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, R., C. Li, D. Smith, A. Das, and J. Aryal. 2015. Big data architecture for environmental analytics. International Symposium on Environmental Software Systems, Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 578–88.
   Google Scholar
• Duysak, H., and E. Yigit. 2020. Machine learning based quantity measurement method for grain silos. Measurement 152:107279. ISSN 0263-2241. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F., B. Ni, W. Li, G. Sheng, and H. Yu. 2011. A simulation-based integrated approach to optimize the biological nutrient removal process in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Chemical Engineering Journal 174 (2–3):635–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.09.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2016. Poplars and other fast-growing trees-renewable resources for future green economies. Synthesis of country progress reports. Activities related to poplar and willow cultivation and utilization – 2012 through 2016. FAO- Forest Policy and Resource Division, Forestry Department International Poplar Commission 25th Session, Berlin, Rome, Sept 13–16, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Farahani, R. Z., N. Asgari, H. Hojabri, and A. A. Jaafari. 2009. Optimizing wheat storage and transportation system using a mixed integer programming model and genetic algorithm: A case study. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2109–13. doi:10.1109/IEEM.2009.5373152.
   Google Scholar
• Fechner, R., S. Legler, and T. Engelmann. 2012. Germany - a source of raw materials. 2012 Electronics Goes Green 2012+ 12:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Feehan, R., M. W. Franklin, and J. S. G. Slusky. 2021. Machine learning differentiates enzymatic and non-enzymatic metals in proteins. Nature Communications 12 (1):3712. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24070-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, B., L. Zhuo, M. M. Mekonnen, L. T. Marston, X. Yang, Z. Xu, Y. Liu, W. Wang, Z. Li, M. Li, et al. 2022. Inputs for staple crop production in China drive burden shifting of water and carbon footprints transgressing part of provincial planetary boundaries. Water Research 221:118803. ISSN 0043-1354. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2022.118803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, C. B., M. J. Behrenfeld, J. T. Randerson, and P. Falkowski. 1998. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281 (5374):237–40. doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, P., V. Hernández, J. Fenoll, and P. Hellín. 2019. Pre-harvest application of ozonated water on broccoli crops: Effect on head quality. Journal of Food Composition & Analysis 83:103260. ISSN 0889-1575. doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, P., K. Meacham-Hensold, K. Guan, and C. J. Bernacchi. 2019. Hyperspectral leaf reflectance as proxy for photosynthetic capacities: An ensemble approach based on multiple machine learning algorithms. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:730. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuya, D. E. G., J. A. F. Aguiar, N. V. Estrabis, M. M. F. Pinheiro, M. T. G. Furuya, D. R. Pereira, W. N. Gonçalves, V. Liesenberg, J. Li, J. Marcato Junior, et al. 2020. A machine learning approach for mapping forest vegetation in riparian zones in an Atlantic Biome environment using Sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sensing 12 (24):4086. doi:10.3390/rs12244086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvão, V. C., and C. Fankhauser. 2015. Sensing the light environment in plants: Photoreceptors and early signaling steps. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 34:46–53. PMID 25638281. S2CID 12390801. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, C., D. Bryant, D. Carrieri, E. Bixby, J. Dang, J. Marshall, D. Doughty, L. Colwell, M. Berndl, J. Roberts, et al. 2021. Machine learning optimization of photosynthetic microbe cultivation and recombinant protein production. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/2021.08.06.453272.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao, Y., D. Chang, C. H. Chen, and T. Fang. 2018. Deep learning with long short-term memory recurrent neural network for daily container volumes of storage yard predictions in port. 2018 International Conference on Cyberworlds, Singapore, IEEE, 427–30.
   Google Scholar
• Garre, A., M. C. Ruiz, and E. Hontoria. 2020. Application of machine learning to support production planning of a food industry in the context of waste generation under uncertainty. Operations Research Perspectives 7:100147. ISSN 2214-7160. doi:10.1016/j.orp.2020.100147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, S., U. Mishra, C. D. Scown, and Y. Zhang. 2020. Sorghum biomass production in the continental United States and its potential impacts on soil organic carbon and nitrous oxide emissions. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 12 (10):878–90. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goettsch, D., K. K. Castillo-Villar, and M. Aranguren. 2020. Machine-learning methods to select potential depot locations for the supply chain of biomass co-firing. Energies 13 (24):6554. doi:10.3390/en13246554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. Jan 2002. Waste not, pollute not [animal waste recycling for power production. IEEE Spectrum 39 (1):72–77. doi:10.1109/6.975026.
   Google Scholar
• Grinblat, G. L., L. C. Uzal, M. G. Larese, and P. M. Granitto. 2016. Deep learning for plant identification using vein morphological patterns. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 127:418–24. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudavalli, C., E. Bose, B. S. Donohoe, and D. A. Sievers. 2020. Real-time biomass feedstock particle quality detection using image analysis and machine vision. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 12 (12):5739–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00904-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, J., C. Cederberg, U. Sonesson, R. Van Otterdijk, and A. Meybeck. 2011. Global food losses and food waste. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. O. 1979. Solar energy use through biology—past, present and future. Solar Energy 22 (4):307–28. doi:10.1016/0038-092X(79)90184-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, X., W. Ning, X. Ma, X. Wang, and K. Zhou. 2020. Improving protein solubility and activity by introducing small peptide tags designed with machine learning models. Metabolic Engineering Communications 11:e00138. ISSN 2214 0301. doi:10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han, Z., J. Sun, A. Lv, Y. Sung, H. Shi, X. Hu, and K. Xing. 2017. Isolation, identification and characterization of shewanella algae from reared tongue sole, cynoglossus semilaevis günther. Aquaculture 468:356–62. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.10.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, E., K. Sim, K. Kamimura, C. Meredieu, D. Guyon, and B. Gardiner. 2019. Use of machine learning techniques to model wind damage to forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 265:16–29. ISSN 0168-1923. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häse, F., L. M. Roch, P. Friederich, and A. Aspuru-Guzik. 2020. Designing and understanding light-collecting devices with machine learning. Nature Communications 11 (1):4587. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17995-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, T., J. Jo Marco, and R. Soares. 2019. Machine learning models with quantitative wood anatomy data can discriminate between swietenia macrophylla and swietenia mahagoni. Jornal of Forest 11 (1):36. doi:10.3390/f11010036.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekman, D. H. 1997. Radar monitoring system for sustainable forest management in Indonesia, IGARSS’97. 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. Remote Sensing - A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development 4:1731–33. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.1997.609048.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S. E. 2022. Transition away from fossil fuels toward renewables: Lessons from Russia-Ukraine Crisis. Future Energy 1 (1):2–5. https://fupubco.com/fuen/article/view/8.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Z. Q., Y. C. Chen, and C. Y. Wen. 2020. Real-time weather monitoring and prediction using city buses and machine learning. Sensors (Switzerland) 20 (18):1–21. doi:10.3390/s20185173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P., S. K. S. Chu, H. N. Frizzo, M. P. Connolly, R. W. Caster, and J. B. Siegel. 2020. Evaluating protein engineering thermostability prediction tools using an independently generated dataset. ACS Omega 5 (12):6487–93. doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b04105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G. L., J. He, Z. Xu, and G. Huang. 2020. A combination model based on transfer learning for waste classification. Concurrency & Computation: Practice & Experience 32 (19):1–12. doi:10.1002/cpe.5751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, F., K. Richards, J. Girel, T. Moss, E. Muller, C. Nilsson, and S. Rood. 2003. The flooded forest: Guidance for policy makers and river managers in Europe on the restoration of floodplain forests. FLOBAR2. Cambridge, UK: Department of Geography, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, H., X. Cui, U. Mishra, and D. Scown. February 05, 2020. Machine learning to predict biomass sorghum yields under future climate scenarios. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1002/bbb.2087.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, A., U. Draz, T. Ali, S. Tariq, M. Irfan, A. Glowacz, J. A. Antonino Daviu, S. Yasin, and S. Rahman. 2020. Waste management and prediction of air pollutants using IoT and machine learning approach. Energies 13 (15):3930–51. doi:10.3390/en13153930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, Z., and A. M. Sharif. 2016. Sustainable food security futures: Perspectives on food waste and information across the food supply chain. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 29 (2):171–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2015-0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarbiglu, H., and A. Pourreza. 2022. A comprehensive review of remote sensing platforms, sensors, and applications in nut crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 197:106844. ISSN 0168-1699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, B. V., M. Dakoske, and P. P. Vijayakumar. 2022. Bacteriophage-mediated control of pre- and post-collect produce quality and safety. LWT 169:113912. ISSN 0023-6438. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johann, A. L., A. G. de Araújo, H. C. Delalibera, and A. R. Hirakawa. 2016. Soil moisture modeling based on stochastic behavior of forces on a no-till chisel opener. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 121:420–28. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabugo, J. C., S.-L. Jämsä-Jounela, R. Schiemann, and C. Binder. 2020. Industry 4.0 based process data analytics platform: A waste-to-energy plant case study. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 115:15508. ISSN 0142-0615. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko, T., K. Nomura, D. Yasutake, T. Iwao, T. Okayasu, Y. Ozaki, M. Mori, T. Hirota, and M. Kitano. 2022. A canopy photosynthesis model based on a highly generalizable Artificial neural Network incorporated with a mechanistic understanding of single-leaf photosynthesis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology v 323:109036. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Z., J. Yang, G. Li, and Z. Zhang. 2020. An automatic garbage classification system based on deep learning. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access 8:140019–29. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010496.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., R. Schwarz, J. Lieman-Hurwitz, M. Ronen-Tarazi, and L. Reinhold. 1994. The molecular biology of the cyanobacteria. ed. Bryant, D, 469–85. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0227-8_15.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, Y., S. O. Prasher, R. M. Patel, and S. H. Kim. 2006. Application of support vector machine technology for weed and nitrogen stress detection in corn. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 51 (1–2):99–109. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, R., S. Kumar, A. K. Srivastava, N. Dhingra, M. Gupta, N. Bhati, and P. Kumari. Aug 26, 2021. Machine learning and IoT-Based waste management model. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2021:1–11. PMID: 34484322;PMCID:PMC8416408. doi:10.1155/2021/5942574.
   Google Scholar
• Khruschev, S. S., T. Y. Plyusnina, T. K. Antal, S. I. Pogosyan, G. Y. Riznichenko, and A. B. Rubin. 2022. Machine learning methods for assessing photosynthetic activity: Environmental monitoring applications. Biophysical Reviews 14 (4):821–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-022-00982-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kibleur, P., J. Aelterman, M. N. Boone, J. Van den Bulcke, and J. Van Acker. 2022. Deep learning segmentation of wood fiber bundles in fiberboards. Composites Science and Technology 221:109287. ISSN 0266-3538. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S. 2017. Vessel target prediction method and dead reckoning position based on SVR seaway model. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic & Intelligent Systems 17 (4):279–88. doi:10.5391/IJFIS.2017.17.4.279.
   Google Scholar
• Kindermann, G. E., I. McCallum, S. Fritz, and M. Obersteiner. 2008. A global forest growing stock, biomass and carbon map based on FAO statistics. Silva Fennica 42 (3):387–96. doi:10.14214/sf.244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher, S., and P. Schopfer. 2012. Photosynthetic sucrose acts as cotyledon-derived long-distance signal to control root growth during early seedling development in arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (28):11217–21. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203746109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhl, M., R. Lasco, M. Cifuentes, Ö. Jonsson, K. T. Korhonen, P. Mundhenk, J. de Jesus Navar, and G. Stinson. 2015. Changes in forest production, biomass and carbon: Results from the 2015UNFAO global forest resource assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 352:21–34. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk-Juśko, A., P. Pochwatka, M. Zaborowicz, W. Czekała, J. Mazurkiewicz, A. Mazur, D. Janczak, A. Marczuk, and J. Dach. 2020. Energy value estimation of silages for substrate in biogas plants using an artificial neural network. Energy 202:117729. ISSN 0360-5442. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, D., J. Chen, E. Ostendorf, X. Lei, J. Cruz, and J. Brodersen. 2022. Methods for estimating photosynthetic characteristics in plant canopies and systems and apparatus related thereto. Board of trustees of Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, A., M. K. M. Engqvist, D. Heckmann, M. J. Lercher, and J. W. Locasale. 2021. Deep learning allows genome-scale prediction of Michaelis constants from structural features. PLoS Biology 19 (10):e3001402. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujawa, S., J. Mazurkiewicz, and W. Czekała. 2020. Using convolutional neural networks to classify the maturity of compost based on sewage sludge and rapeseed straw. Journal of Cleaner Production 258:120814. ISSN 0959-6526. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., O. Rajendra, and S. Chakraborty, 2019 Intelligent crop recommendation system using ML http://203.201.63.46:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6116/1/PR3111.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., A. Sharma, R. Kumar, R. Bhardwaj, A. Kumar Thukral, and J. Rodrigo-Comino. 2018. Assessment of heavy-metal pollution in three different Indian water bodies by combination of multivariate analysis and water pollution indices. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 26 (1):1–16. doi:10.1080/10807039.2018.1497946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, N., G. Rani, and V. Singh Dhaka. 2022. Seeds classification and quality testing using deep learning and YOLO v5. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Science, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (DSMLAI ‘21’), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–60. doi:10.1145/3484824.3484913.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. Y., H. N. Y. J. Choi, Y. J. Jung, H. S. Uhm, and B. K. Kang. 2003. Sewage sludge treatment by arc discharge. Digest of Technical Papers. PPC-2003. 14th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37472) 2:1247–49. doi:10.1109/PPC.2003.1278039.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., J. Im, K. Kim, and L. J. Quackenbush. 2018. Machine learning approaches for estimating forest stand height using plot-based observations and airborne LiDAR data. Forests 9 (5):268. doi:10.3390/f9050268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. J., S. T. Yun, S. Yu, K. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, and S. H. Lee. 2019. The combined use of self-organizing map technique and fuzzy c-means clustering to evaluate urban groundwater quality in Seoul metropolitan city, South Korea. Journal of Hydrology 569:685–97. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. 2022. Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning based on big data analysis in sustainable agriculture. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science 71 (9):956–69. doi:10.1080/09064710.2021.1965650/.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, S., and Y. Gu. 2021. A deep convolutional neural network to simultaneously localize and recognize waste types in images. Waste Management 126:247–57. 03.017. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., H. Sträuber, J. Saraiva, H. Harms, S. G. Silva, J. C. Kasmanas, S. Kleinsteuber, and U. Nunes da Rocha. 2022. Machine learning-assisted identification of bioindicators predicts medium-chain carboxylate production performance of an anaerobic mixed culture. Microbiome 10 (1):48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01219-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., J. Wang, A. Sangaiah, Y. Xie, and X. Yin. 2019. Analysis and prediction of water quality using LSTM deep neural networks in IoT environment. Sustainability 11 (7):072058. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loaiza, M. F., R. P. Solano, R. Simancas, and V. H. Ojito. 2017. Modeling demand for air cargo in the Colombian context. International Conference on Advanced Materials Science and Civil Engineering, Thailand, 70, 132–37.
   Google Scholar
• Long, B., B. Fischer, Y. Zeng, Z. Amerigian, Q. Li, H. Bryant, M. Li, S. Y. Dai, and J. S. Yuan. 2022. Machine learning-informed and synthetic biology enabled semi-continuous algal cultivation to unleash renewable fuel productivity. Nature Communications 13 (1):541. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27665-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, É., and P. Carteri Coradi. 2022. Applications of new technologies for monitoring and predicting grains quality stored: Sensors. Internet of Things, and Artificial Intelligence Measurement 188:110609. ISSN 0263-2241. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110609.
   Google Scholar
• Ly, Q. V., X. C. Nguyen, N. C. Le, T. D. Truong, T. T. Hoang, T. J. Park, T. Maqbool, J. Pyo, K. H. Cho, K. S. Lee, et al. 2021. Application of machine learning for eutrophication analysis and algal bloom prediction in an urban river: A 10-year study of the han river, South Korea. Science of the Total Environment 797:149040. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maione, C., B. L. Batista, A. D. Campiglia, F. Barbosa, and R. M. Barbosa. 2016. Classification of geographic origin of rice by data mining and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 121:101–07. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek, S., F. Miglietta, T. Gobakken, E. Næsset, D. Gianelle, and M. Dalponte. 2019. Prediction of stem diameter and biomass at individual tree crown level with advanced machine learning techniques. IForest - Biogeosciences & Forestry 12 (3):323–29. doi:10.3832/ifor2980-012.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, W. L., W. C. Chen, C. T. Wang, and Y. H. Lin. 2020. Recycling waste classification using optimized convolutional neural network. Resources Conservation & Recycling 164 (August):105132. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105132.
   Google Scholar
• Maponya, M. G., A. van Niekerk, and Z. E. Mashimbye. 2020. Pre-harvest classification of crop types using a sentinel-2 time-series and machine learning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 169:105164. ISSN 0168-1699. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.105164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Luengo, M. A. 2011. Renewable raw materials for advanced applications. 2011 World Congress on Sustainable Technologies (WCST), 19–22, doi:10.1109/WCST19361.2011.6114229.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. G., J. J. Ross, B. A. Babst, B. N. Wienclaw, and C. A. Beveridge. 2014. Sugar demand, not auxin, is the initial regulator of apical dominance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (16):6092–97. doi:10.1073/pnas.1322045111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. D. 1989. Silvicultural systems, 284. Oxford: Claredon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, S. G., A. L. Miller, T. Plötz, and I. Kyriazakis. 2017. Automated tracking to measure behavioural changes in pigs for health and welfare monitoring. Scientific Reports 7 (1):17582. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17451-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattsson, J. E. 1990. Basic handling characteristics of wood fuel: Angle of repose, friction against surfaces and tendency to bridge building for different assortments. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 5 (1–4):583–97. doi:10.1080/02827589009382641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendry, K. 2002. Energy production from biomass (part 1): Overview of biomass. Bioresource Technology 83 (1):37–46. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milenković, M., N. Milosavljevic, N. Bojović, and S. Val. 2017. Container flow forecasting through neural networks based on metaheuristics. Operational Research 21: 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadimanesh, F., B. Salehi, M. Mahdianpari, E. Gill, and M. Molinier. 2019. A new fully convolutional neural network for semantic segmentation of polarimetric SAR imagery in complex land cover ecosystem. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 151:223–36. ISSN 0924-2716. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, K., S. Shamshirband, S. Motamedi, D. Petkovi´c, R. Hashim, and M. Gocic. 2015. Extreme learning machine based prediction of daily dew point temperature. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 117:214–25. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, M., R. Kolapalli, N. Golla, and S. S. Maturi. 2020. Prediction of rainfall using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 9 (1):3236–40. doi:10.36227/techrxiv.14398304.
   Google Scholar
• Mohri, S., and H. Haghshenas. 2017. Modeling the container selection for freight transportation: Case study of Iran. International Journal of Transportation Engineering 5 (1):31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Moore Bethany, M., P. Wang, P. Fan, B. Leong, C. A. Schenck, and P. Lloyd. 2019. Robust predictions of specialized metabolism genes through machine learning 2019. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (6):2344–53. doi:10.1073/pnas.1817074116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morellos, A., X.-E. Pantazi, D. Moshou, T. Alexandridis, R. Whetton, G. Tziotzios, J. Wiebensohn, R. Bill, and A. M. Mouazen. 2016. Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy. Biosystems Engineering 152:104–16. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshou, D., X.-E. Pantazi, D. Kateris, and I. Gravalos. 2014. Water stress detection based on optical multisensory fusion with a least squares support vector machine classifier. Biosystems Engineering 117:15–22. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munis, R. A., R. O. Almeida, D. A. Camargo, R. B. G. da Silva, J. Wojciechowski, and D. Simões. 2022. Machine learning methods to estimate productivity of collecters: Mechanized timber collecting in Brazil. Forests 13 (7):1068. doi:10.3390/f13071068.
   Google Scholar
• Musa, E., F. Doherty, and B. R. Goldsmith. 2022. Accelerating the structure search of catalysts with machine learning. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 35:100771. ISSN 2211-3398. doi:10.1016/j.coche.2021.100771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag, A., A. Gerritsen, C. Doeppke, and A. E. Harman-Ware. 2021. Machine Learning-Based Classification of Lignocellulosic Biomass from Pyrolysis-Molecular Beam Mass Spectrometry Data. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22 (8):4107. doi:10.3390/ijms22084107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahvi, B., J. Habibi, K. Mohammadi, S. Shamshirband, and O. S. Al Razgan. 2016. Using self-adaptive evolutionary algorithm to improve the performance of an extreme learning machine for estimating soil temperature. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 124:150–60. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2016.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namías, R., E. N. Morandi, G. L. Grinblat, J. S. Bianchi, L. C. Uzal, M. G. Larese, and P. M. Granitto. 2018. Seed-per-pod estimation for plant breeding using deep learning Computers and Eletronics in Agriculture. 150:196–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narmilan, A., F. Gonzalez, A. S. A. Salgadoe, U. W. L. M. Kumarasiri, H. A. S. Weerasinghe, and B. R. Kulasekara. 2022. Predicting canopy chlorophyll content in sugarcane crops using machine learning algorithms and spectral vegetation indices derived from UAV multispectral imagery. Remote Sensing 14 (5):1140. doi:10.3390/rs14051140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasirzadehdizaji, R., Z. Cakir, F. Balik Sanli, S. Abdikan, A. Pepe, and F. Calò. 2021. Sentinel-1 interferometric coherence and backscattering analysis for crop monitoring. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 185:106118. ISSN 016 1699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, M., Y. Hu, S. Sun, and Y. Liu. 2018. A novel hybrid decomposition-ensemble model based on VMD and HGWO for container throughput forecasting, Appl. Applied Mathematical Modelling 57:163–78. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2018.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyland, R. D. 2007. Silviculture: Concepts and applications. 2nd ed. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oehmcke, S., L. Li, J. Revenga, T. Nord-Larsen, and K. Trepekli. 2021. Deep learning based 3D point cloud regression for estimating forest biomass. Journal of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Cornell University Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa, T. 1993. Photosynthetic responses to the environment, eds. Yamamoto, H. and Smith, C., 113–25. Rockville: American Society of Plant Physiologist Series.
   Google Scholar
• Olatunji, O. O., S. Akinlabi, N. Madushele, and P. A. Adedeji. 2020. Property based biomass feedstock grading using k-Nearest Neighbour technique. Energy 190:116346. ISSN 0360-5442. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.116346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyebisi, S., and H. Owamah. 2023. Application of machine learning techniques in the prediction of excess lifetime cancer risks of agricultural byproducts used as building and construction materials. Cleaner Waste Systems 5:100088. ISSN 2772-9125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2023.100088.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, B. S., P. V. Lasyasri, D. Maneesha, P. Goutham, K. Suresh, and C. Pranavsankar. 2019. A novel approach for weather forecasting using machine learning techniques. Journal of Computing and Communication 11:25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pantazi, X.-E., D. Moshou, T. K. Alexandridis, R. L. Whetton, and A. M. Mouazen. 2016. Wheat yield prediction using machine learning and advanced sensing techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 121:57–65. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantazi, X.-E., D. Moshou, and C. Bravo. 2016. Active learning system for weed species recognition based on hyperspectral sensing. Biosystems Engineering 146:193–202. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwar, H. Sep 2020. AquaVision: Automating the detection of waste in water bodies using deep transfer learning. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering 2:100026. doi:10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100026.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, H., X. Zheng, X. Tian, Y. Geng, X. Zhang, S. Xiao, Z. Gao, Y. Yang, X. Liu, L. Li, et al. 2022. Toward sustainable crop production in China: A co-benefits evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production 361:132285. ISSN 0959-6526. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parashar, A. 2019. IoT based automated weather report generation and prediction using machine learning. 2019 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Communication and Computational Techniques ICCT 2019, 339–44. doi:10.1109/ICCT46177.2019.8968782.
   Google Scholar
• Parolas, I., L. Tavasszy, I. Kourounioti, R. van Duin, and K. Cities. 2017. Prediction of vessel’s estimated time of arrival (ETA) using machine learning—A port of Rotterdam case study. 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research, 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, A., and P. Deka. 2016. An extreme learning machine approach for modeling evapotranspiration using extrinsic inputs. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 121:385–92. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2016.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel, D., H. Boogaard, A. de Wit, S. Janssen, S. Osinga, C. Pylianidis, and I. N. Athanasiadis. 2021. Machine learning for large-scale crop yield forecasting. Agricultural Systems 187:103016. ISSN 0308-521X. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pence, I., K. Kumaş, M. C. Siseci, and A. Akyüz. June 28, 2022. Detailed analysis of animal manure-based CO2 emissions, coal, electricity, thermal energy, and CH4 emissions and using machine learning as a forecasting method: A study from Turkey. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1648218/v1.
   Google Scholar
• Périé, C., and S. de Blois. 2016. Dominant forest tree species are potentially vulnerable to climate change over large portions of their range even at high latitudes. PeerJ 4:e2218. doi:10.7717/peerj.2218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierdicca, R., M. Balestra, G. Micheletti, A. Felicetti, and G. Toscano. 2022. Semi-automatic detection and segmentation of wooden pellet size exploiting a deep learning approach. Renewable Energy 197:406–16. ISSN 0960-1481. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping, P., G. Xu, E. Kumala, and J. Gao. 2020. Smart street litter detection and classification based on faster R-CNN and edge computing. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 30 (4):537–53. doi:10.1142/S0218194020400045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitak, L., K. Laloon, S. Wongpichet, P. Sirisomboon, and J. Posom. 2021. Machine learning-based prediction of selected parameters of commercial biomass pellets using line scan near infrared-hyperspectral image. Processes 9 (2):316. doi:10.3390/pr9020316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plankenbuhler, T., S. Kolb, F. Grümer, D. Müller, and J. Karl. June 2020. Image-based model for assessment of wood chip quality and mixture ratios. Processes 8 (6):728. Accessed 13 Oct. 2022. Gale Academic OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A634050532/AONE?u=anon~364015e&sid=sitemap&xid=cded69b6. doi:10.3390/pr8060728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puttinaovarat, S., and P. Horkaew. 2022. A geospatial platform for crowdsourcing green space area management using GIS and deep learning classification. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 11 (3):208. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11030208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Y., A. Clausen, and B. N. Jørgensen. 2021. Net photosynthesis prediction by deep learning for commercial greenhouse production. 2021 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES), 000139–44. doi:10.1109/INES52918.2021.9512919.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, A. M., N. R. Street, and M. Rodríguez-Acosta. 2007. Populus trees. In Forest trees, ed. C. Kole, 1–28. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-34541-1_1.
   Google Scholar
• Rana, P., and D. Miller. 2019. Machine learning to analyze the social-ecological impacts of natural resource policy: Insights from community forest management in the Indian Himalaya. Environmental Research Letters 14 (2):024008. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aafa8f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razeghi, M., A. Hajinezhad, A. Naseri, Y. Noorollahi, and S. F. Moosavian. 2023. An overview of renewable energy technologies for the simultaneous production of high-performance power and heat. Future Energy 2 (2):1–11. doi:10.55670/fpll.fuen.2.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• Retschitzegger, S., T. Brunner, and I. Obernberger. 2015. Low temperature corrosion in biomass boilers fired with chemically untreated wood chips and bark. Energy Fuels 29 (6):3913–21. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. L., M. D. Smith, J. E. Richman, K. G. Aukema, and L. P. Wackett. 2020. Machine learning-based prediction of activity and substrate specificity for OleA enzymes in the thiolase superfamily. Synthetic Biology 5 (1):ysaa004. doi:10.1093/synbio/ysaa004.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Rángel, H., D. M. Arias, L. A. Morales-Rosales, V. Gonzalez-Huitron, M. Valenzuela Partida, and J. García. 2022. Machine learning methods modeling carbohydrate-enriched cyanobacteria biomass production in wastewater treatment systems. Energies 15 (7):2500. doi:10.3390/en15072500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy Choudhury, M., S. Das, J. Christopher, A. Apan, S. Chapman, N. W. Menzies, and Y. P. Dang. 2021. Improving biomass and grain yield prediction of wheat genotypes on sodic soil using integrated high-resolution multispectral, hyperspectral, 3D point cloud, and machine learning techniques. Remote Sensing 13 (17):3482. doi:10.3390/rs13173482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rump, T., A. K. Mahlein, U. Steiner, E. C. Oerke, H. W. Dehne, and L. Plümer. 2010. Early detection and classification of plant diseases with support vector machines based on hyperspectral reflectance. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 74 (1):91–99. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2010.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safder, U., J. Loy-Benitez, H.-T. Nguyen, and C. Yoo. 2022. A hybrid extreme learning machine and deep belief network framework for sludge bulking monitoring in a dynamic wastewater treatment process. Journal of Water Process Engineering 46:102580. ISSN 2214-7144. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, S., S. Bhattacharjee, P. Kumar Shit, N. Sengupta, and B. Bera. 2022. Deforestation probability assessment using integrated machine learning algorithms of Eastern Himalayan foothills (India). Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances 14:200077. ISSN 2667-3789. doi:10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200077.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, D.K, A. Rai, A. Devi, S. Pabbi, D. Chhabra, J.-S. Chang, and P. Shukla. 2021. A multi-objective hybrid machine learning approach-based optimization for enhanced biomass and bioactive phycobiliproteins production in Nostoc sp. CCC-403. Bioresource Technology 329:124908. ISSN 0960-8524. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman, A. G., B. Kanigoro, and Y. Heryadi. 2016. Weather forecasting using deep learning techniques. ICACSIS 2015 - 2015 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems 281–85. doi:10.1109/ICACSIS.2015.7415154.
   Google Scholar
• Sangeetha J., P. Govindarajan. 2023. Prediction of agricultural waste compost maturity using fast regions with convolutional neural network (R-CNN), Materials Today: Proceedings. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.112.
   Google Scholar
• Sanni, O., O. Adeleke, K. Ukoba, J. Ren, and T.-C. Jen. 2022. Application of machine learning models to investigate the performance of stainless steel type 904 with agricultural waste. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 20:4487–99. ISSN 2238-7854. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.076.
   Google Scholar
• Schucknecht, A., B. Seo, A. Krämer, S. Asam, C. Atzberger, and R. Kiese. 2022. Estimating dry biomass and plant nitrogen concentration in pre-Alpine grasslands with low-cost UAS-borne multispectral data – a comparison of sensors, algorithms, and predictor sets. Biogeosciences 19 (10):2699–727. doi:10.5194/bg-19-2699-2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, S. Y., and C. J. Malins. 2014. Will energy crop yields meet expectations? Biomass and Bioenergy 65:3–12. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Septiyadi, E., E. Firmansyah, and F. Danang Wijaya. 2017. Preliminary design of biomass fuel storage on a thermoelectric based biomass-electric energy conversion. 2017 7th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAes) 1–5. doi:10.1109/INAES.2017.8068572.
   Google Scholar
• Serva, L., L. Magrin, G. Marchesini, and I. Andrighetto. 2022. Short communication: Prognostic values of a multiparametric risk score in maize silage undergoing different ensiling conditions. Agronomy 12 (4):774. doi:10.3390/agronomy12040774.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, M., J. Skvaril, and E. Tomas Aparicio. 2019. Applications of hyperspectral imaging and machine learning methods for real-time classification of waste stream components. Presented at the 19th International Conference on Near Infrared Spectroscopy - NIR 2019, Gold Coast, Australia, 15-20 September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhawat, K., S. S. Rathore, B. K. Kandpal, O. P. Premi, D. Singh, and B. S. Chauhan. 2016. Crop establishment techniques affect productivity, sustainability, and soil health under mustard-based cropping systems of Indian semi-arid regions. Soil and Tillage Research 158:137–46. ISSN 0167-1987. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyur, H. J., J. T. Luxhoj, and T. P. Williams. 1996. Using neural networks to predict component inspection requirements for aging aircraft. Computers & Industrial Engineering 30 (2):257–67. doi:10.1016/0360-8352(95)00170-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, J. P. M., M. Luiza, M. da Silva, A. R. de Mendonça, G. F. da Silva, A. A. de Barros Junior, E. F. da Silva, M. Otone Aguiar, and J. Silva Santos. 2021. Nívea Maria Mafra Rodrigues, prognosis of forest production using machine learning techniques. Information Processing in Agriculture ISSN 2214-3173. doi:10.1016/j.inpa.2021.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., and Sannihit. 2022. Sustainable and smart agriculture: A holistic approach. 2022 2nd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), 543–47. doi:10.1109/ICACITE53722.2022.9823634.
   Google Scholar
• Siqueira, V. S., M. M. Borges, R. G. Furtado, C. N. Dourado, and R. da Costa. 2021. Artificial intelligence applied to support medical decisions for the automatic analysis of echocardiogram images: A systematic review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 120 (5):102165. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sivasothy, P., M. Andres, and G. Corbin. 2018. Machine learning based filling level estimation for bulk solid silos. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144 (3_Supplement):1685. doi:10.1121/1.5067492.
   Google Scholar
• Sonoki, T., K. Takahashi, H. Sugita, M. Hatamura, Y. Azuma, T. Sato, S. Suzuki, N. Kamimura, and E. Masai. 2018. Glucose-free cis,cis-muconic acid production via new metabolic designs corresponding to the heterogeneity of lignin. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 6 (1):1256–64. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srisruthi, S., N. Swarna, G. M. S. Ros, and E. Elizabeth. 2016. Sustainable agriculture using eco-friendly and energy efficient sensor technology. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), 1442–46. doi:10.1109/RTEICT.2016.7808070.
   Google Scholar
• Sterkens, W., D. Diaz-Romero, T. Goedemé, W. Dewulf, and J. R. Peeters. May 2021. Detection and recognition of batteries on X-Ray images of waste electrical and electronic equipment using deep learning. Resources Conservation & Recycling 168:105246. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucky, B. J., R. Guralnick, J. Deck, E. G. Denny, K. Bolmgren, and R. Walls. 2018. The plant phenology ontology: A new informatics resource for large-scale integration of plant phenology data. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:517. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, D., J. W. Lee, S. Choi, and Y. Lee. 2021. Recent applications of deep learning methods on evolution- and contact-based protein structure prediction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22 (11):6032. doi:10.3390/ijms22116032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresha, A. M. October 2020. Machine learning for mining weather patterns and weather forecasting. ResearchGate 95 (6):42–51. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.22296.42243.
   Google Scholar
• Takshak, S., and S. B. Agrawal. 2019. Defense potential of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants under UV-B stress. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 193:51–88. PMID 30818154. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, H., C. W. Anderson, C. V. Chandra, I. Ray, and J. L. Chavez 2019. Machine learning-based fusion studies of rainfall estimation from spaceborne and ground-based radars.
   Google Scholar
• Thimm, O., O. Bläsing, Y. Gibon, A. Nagel, S. Meyer, P. Krüger, J. Selbig, L. A. Müller, S. Y. Rhee, M. Stitt et al. 2004. MAPMAN: A user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology. 37 (6):914–39. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02016.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, H., J. Zhu, X. He, X. Chen, Z. Jian, C. Li, Q. Ou, Q. Li, G. Huang, C. Liu, et al. 2022. Using machine learning algorithms to estimate stand volume growth of Larix and quercus forests based on national-scale forest inventory data in China. Forest Ecosystems 9:100037. ISSN 2197-5620. doi:10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiitta, M., V. Tiitta, J. Heikkinen, R. Lappalainen, and L. Tomppo. Feb 17, 2020. Classification of wood chips using electrical impedance spectroscopy and machine learning. Sensors (Basel) 20 (4):1076. PMID: 32079155; PMCID: PMC7070823. doi:10.3390/s20041076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toklu, E. 2017. Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey. Renewable Energy 107:235–44. ISSN 0960-1481. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenberth, K. E., J. T. Fasullo, and J. Kiehl. 2009. Earth’s global energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 90:311–324. doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1. 3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamsi, T. S., S. K. Terlapu, M. V. Subbarao, and C. Grandhi. 2022. Crop protection and establishment of E-Farmers market. 2022 Second International Conference on Power, Control and Computing Technologies (ICPC2T), 1–4. doi:10.1109/ICPC2T53885.2022.9777040.
   Google Scholar
• Vo, A. H., L. Hoang Son, M. T. Vo, and T. Le. 2019. A novel framework for trash classification using deep transfer learning. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access 7:178631–39. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2959033.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerman, J. 2020. Nation-wide mapping of tree growth using repeated airborne laser scanning. IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4822–25. doi:10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9323955.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., X. Dai, D. Fu, P. Li, and B. Du. 2022. PGD: A machine learning-based photosynthetic-related gene detection approach. BMC Bioinformatics 23 (1):183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04722-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Q. Li, and J. You. 2008. On wheat storage period estimation using Markov_ chain analysis. 2008 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 882–87. doi:10.1109/INDIN.2008.4618225.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, L., S. Li, Y. Chen, Z. He, and Y. Shi. 2022. Application of deep learning in land use classification for soil erosion using remote sensing. Frontiers in Earth Science 10:849531. doi:10.3389/feart.2022.849531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Z., Q.-D. Wang, D. Liu, and J. Liang. 2019. Accelerating the optimization of enzyme-catalyzed synthesis conditions via machine learning and reactivity descriptors. Journal of Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 19 (28):6267. 2021. doi:10.1039/D1OB01066B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, M. J., J. Bramley-Alves, R. E. Miller, P. A. Keller, and S. A. Robinson. 2018. Photoprotection enhanced by red cell wall pigments in three East Antarctic mosses. Biological Research. 51 (1):49. PMC 6247747. PMID 30463628. doi:10.1186/s40659-018-0196-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wild, M., D. Folini, C. Schär, N. Loeb, E. G. Dutton, and G. König-Langlo. 2013. The global energy balance from a surface perspective. Climate Dynamics 40 (11–12):3107–34. doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1569-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windrim, L., M. Bryson, M. McLean, J. Randle, and C. Stone. 2019. Automated mapping of woody debris over collected forest plantations using UAVs, high-resolution imagery, and machine learning. Remote Sensing 11 (6):733. doi:10.3390/rs11060733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongchai, W., T. Onsree, N. Sukkam, A. Promwungkwa, and N. Tippayawong. 2022. Machine learning models for estimating above ground biomass of fast growing trees. Expert Systems with Applications 199:117186. ISSN 0957-4174. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., S. B. J. Kan, R. D. Lewis, B. J. Wittmann, and H. Frances. 2019. Arnold machine learning-assisted directed protein evolution with combinatorial libraries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (18):8852–58. doi:10.1073/pnas.1901979116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., X. Zhang, Y. Xiao, and J. Feng. 2020. Attention neural network for water image classification under IoT environment. Applied Sciences 10 (3):030909. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030909.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and N. Huynh. 2010. Kernel-based machine learning models for predicting daily truck volume at seaport terminals. Journal of Transportation Engineering 136 (12):1145 1152. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000186.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, B. 2012. Lidar and Machine Learning Estimation of Hardwood Forest Biomass in Mountainous and Bottomland Environments. Thesis, Northwest University, Bachelor of Science in Management of Resource and Environment and Urban-Rural Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, B. 2015. Lidar and Machine Learning Estimation of Hardwood Forest Biomass in Mountainous and Bottomland Environments. Theses and Dissertations. 1274. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1274.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., S. Gao, F. Xiao, G. Li, Y. Ding, Q. Guo, M. J. Paul, and Z. Liu. 2020. Leaf to panicle ratio (LPR): A new physiological trait indicative of source and sink relation in japonica rice based on deep learning. Journal of Plant Methods 16 (1):117. doi:10.1186/s13007-020-00660-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., J. Tian, Z. Wang, and K. Feng. 2022. Monitoring the photosynthetic performance of grape leaves using a hyperspectral-based machine learning model. The European Journal of Agronomy 140:126589. ISSN 1161-0301. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2022.126589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., M. A. White, A. R. Michaelis, K. Ichii, H. Hashimoto, P. Votava, A.-X. Zhu, and R. R. Nemani. Nov, 2006. Prediction of continental-scale evapotranspiration by combining MODIS and AmeriFlux data through support vector machine. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 44(11):3452–61. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2006.876297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, P., Q. Zhao, and X. Cai. 2020. Machine learning based estimation of land productivity in the contiguous US using biophysical predictors. Environmental Research Letters 15 (7):074013. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab865f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousafzai, A., W. Manzoor, G. Raza, T. Mahmood, F. Rehman, R. Hadi, S. Shah, M. Amin, A. Akhtar, S. Bashir, et al. Oct 29, 2021. Forest yield prediction under different climate change scenarios using data intelligent models in Pakistan. Brazilian Journal of Biology 84:e253106. PMID: 34730700. doi:10.1590/1519-6984.253106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zahraee, S. M., S. Rahimpour Golroudbary, N. Shiwakoti, and P. Stasinopoulos. 2022. Palm oil biomass global supply chain: Environmental emissions vs. technology development of maritime transportation. Procedia CIRP 105:817–22. ISSN 2212-8271. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.135.
   Google Scholar
• Zambrano, J., O. Samuelsson, and B. Carlsson. 2019. Machine learning techniques for monitoring the sludge profile in a secondary settler tank. Applied Water Science 9 (6):146. doi:10.1007/s13201-019-1018-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.-Y., Z. Huang, X. Su, A. Siu, Y. Song, D. Zhang, and Q. Fang. 2020. Machine learning models for net photosynthetic rate prediction using poplar leaf phenotype data. PLoS ONE 15 (2):e0228645. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., J. Ma, S. Liang, X. Li, and M. Li. 2020. An evaluation of eight machine learning Regression algorithms for forest aboveground biomass estimation from multiple satellite data products. Remote Sensing 12 (24):4015. doi:10.3390/rs12244015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., S. D. Petersen, T. Radivojevic, A. Ramirez, A. Pérez-Manríquez, E. Abeliuk, B. J. Sánchez, Z. Costello, Y. Chen, M. J. Fero et al. 2020. Combining mechanistic and machine learning models for predictive engineering and optimization of tryptophan metabolism. Nature Communications. 11 (1):1–13. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17910-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., M. Pope, N. Shakoor, R. Pless, T. C. Mockler, and A. Stylianou. 2022. Comparing deep learning approaches for understanding genotype × phenotype interactions in biomass sorghum. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 5:872858. doi:10.3389/frai.2022.872858.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, F., X. Tian, H. Zhang, and M. Jiang. 2022. Estimation of aboveground carbon density of forests using deep learning and Multisource remote sensing. Remote Sensing 14 (13):3022. doi:10.3390/rs14133022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., A. Yin, X. Yang, M. Fan, S. Shao, J. Wu, P. Wu, M. Zhang, and C. Gao. 2021. Use of machine-learning and receptor models for prediction and source apportionment of heavy metals in coastal reclaimed soils. Ecological Indicators 122:107233. ISSN 1470-160X. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, C., A. Abd-Elrahman, V. Whitaker, and C. Dalid. 2022. Prediction of strawberry dry biomass from UAV multispectral imagery using multiple machine learning methods. Remote Sensing 14 (18):4511. doi:10.3390/rs14184511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, K., Y. Bo, Y. Bao, X. Zhu, J. Wang, and Y. Wang. 2021. A machine learning model for photorespiration response to multi-factors. Horticulturae 7 (8):207. doi:10.3390/horticulturae7080207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X. T., Y. L. Chen, X. H. Zhang, M. L. Cai, Z. C. Yu, and C. L. Peng. 2019. ANS-deficient Arabidopsis is sensitive to high light due to impaired anthocyanin photoprotection. Functional Plant Biology 46 (8):756–65. PMID 31023420. doi:10.1071/FP19042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi, W., D. Feng, W. P. Tsai, G. Sterle, A. Harpold, C. Shen, and L. Li. 2021. From hydrometeorology to river water quality: Can a deep learning model predict dissolved oxygen at the continental scale? Environmental Science and Technology 55 (4):2357–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubler, A. V., and J. Y. Yoon. Nov 29, 2020. Proximal methods for plant stress detection using optical sensors and machine learning. Biosensors (Basel) 10 (12):193. PMID: 33260412; PMCID: PMC7760370. doi:10.3390/bios10120193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar