Use of Span Lengths Extracted from the HVI Fibrogram to Predict Yarn Quality

References

• Addisu, F., and P. M. A. Hameed. 2007. Investigation into the periodicity of mass variation of yarn and its effect on fabric appearance. AUTEX Research Journal 7 (2):89–14.
   Google Scholar
• Barella, A. M. M. A., and A. M. Manich. 1997. Yarn hairiness update. Textile Progress 26 (4):1–29. doi:10.1080/00405169708688867.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., X. Cui, J. Rodgers, D. Thibodeaux, V. Martin, M. Watson, and S. S. Pang. 2013. A comparative study of the effects of cotton fiber length parameters on modeling yarn properties. Textile Research Journal 83 (9):961–70. doi:10.1177/0040517512468821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhom, C. D., B. Kelly, and V. Martin. 2018. Physical properties of cotton fiber and their measurement. In Cotton fiber: Physics, chemistry and biology, ed. D. D. Fang, 41–73. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_3.
   Google Scholar
• Delhom, C. D., V. B. Martin, and M. K. Schreiner. 2017. COTTON GINNERS HANDBOOK: Textile industry needs. Journal of Cotton Science 21 (3):210–19. doi:10.56454/ZELZ3209.
   Google Scholar
• El Mogahzy, Y. E., R. Broughton Jr, and W. K. Lynch. 1990. A statistical approach for determining the technological value of cotton using HVI fiber properties. Textile Research Journal 60 (9):495–500. doi:10.1177/004051759006000901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmogahzy, Y., and R. Farag. 2018. Tensile properties of cotton fibers. In Handbook of properties of textile and technical fibres 223–73. Woodhead Publishing. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-101272-7.00007-9.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. B., E. F. Hequet, J. Wanjura, and R. Boman. 2012. Relationships of cotton fiber properties to ring-spun yarn quality on selected High Plains cottons. Textile Research Journal 82 (4):400–14. doi:10.1177/0040517511426613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleem, N., and X. Wang. 2015. Recent research and developments on yarn hairiness. Textile Research Journal 85 (2):211–24. doi:10.1177/0040517514538692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hequet, E. F., B. Wyatt, N. Abidi, and D. P. Thibodeaux. 2006. Creation of a set of reference material for cotton fiber maturity measurements. Textile Research Journal 76 (7):576–86. doi:10.1177/0040517506064710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, K. L. 1940. A method of fibre-length analysis using the fibrograph. Textile Research 10 (12):510–20. doi:10.1177/004051754001001203.
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, K. L., and C. J. Craven. 1960. Span length as a fiber length criterion. Textile Industries 124 (7):103–07.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., N. Abidi, D. Ethridge, and E. F. Hequet. 2015. Fiber to fabric. In Cotton, ed., D. D. Fang and R. G. Percy, 2nd, Vol. 57, 665–744. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc. doi:10.2134/agronmonogr57.2013.0031.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B. R., and E. F. Hequet. 2018. Variation in the advanced fiber information system cotton fiber length-by-number distribution captured by High Volume Instrument fiber length parameters. Textile Research Journal 88 (7):754–65. doi:10.1177/0040517516688628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. M., J. Osorio-Marin, N. Kothari, S. Hague, and J. K. Dever. 2019. Genetic improvement in cotton fiber elongation can impact yarn quality. Industrial Crops and Products 129:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W. 2014. Technology of short-staple spinning. In The rieter manual of spinning, Vol. 1, 11–22. Winterthur: Rieter Machine Works Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W., and H. Stalder. 2014. Ring spinning. In The rieter manual of spinning, Vol. 4, 1–11. Winterthur: Rieter Machine Works Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, N., J. Dever, S. Hague, and E. Hequet. 2015. Evaluating intraplant cotton fiber variability. Crop Science 55 (2):564–70. doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.01.0077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifa, M., and M. D. Ethridge. 2006. Compact spinning effect on cotton yarn quality: Interactions with fiber characteristics. Textile Research Journal 76 (5):388–99. doi:10.1177/0040517506062648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupincová, G., and M. Meloun. 2013. Yarn hairiness versus quality of yarn. The Journal of the Textile Institute 104 (12):1312–19. doi:10.1080/00405000.2013.800377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappage, J. 2005. End breaks in the spinning and weaving of weavable singles yarns: Part 2: End breaks in weaving. Textile Research Journal 75 (6):512–17. doi:10.1177/0040517505054189.
   Google Scholar
• Mathangadeera, R. W., E. F. Hequet, B. Kelly, J. K. Dever, and C. M. Kelly. 2020. Importance of cotton fiber elongation in fiber processing. Industrial Crops and Products 147:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, O. L., and R. A. Taylor. 1998. Breeding cottons with higher yarn tenacity. Textile Research Journal 68 (4):302–07. doi:10.1177/004051759806800409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, K. M., J. P. S. Morais, E. Hequet, and B. Kelly. 2019. Development of the correction procedure for High Volume Instrument elongation measurement. Textile Research Journal 89 (19–20):4095–103. doi:10.1177/0040517519829002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, W. E., and J. W. S. Hearle. 2008. Physical properties of textile fibres. 4th ed. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing Limited. doi:10.1533/9781845694425.
   Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan, A. R., and A. Balasubramanian. 1990. An exploratory study of imperfections in cotton yarns. Textile Research Journal 60 (1):17–22. doi:10.1177/004051759006000103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. B., T. A. Calamari, and W. R. Meredith Jr. 2002. A comparison of yarn evenness and imperfection data. Textile Research Journal 72 (9):810–16. doi:10.1177/004051750207200910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy, R. S. 2010b. Fundamental principles of ring spinning of yarns. In Advances in yarn spinning technology, ed. C. A. Lawrence, 42–78. Woodhead Publishing. doi:10.1533/9780857090218.1.42.
   Google Scholar
• Rengasamy, R. S. 2010a. Developments in ring spinning. In Advances in yarn spinning technology, C. A. Lawrence. ed., 193–216. Woodhead Publishing. doi:10.1533/9780857090218.2.193.
   Google Scholar
• Sasser, P. E., F. M. Shofner, Y. T. Chu, C. K. Shofner, and M. G. Townes. 1991. Interpretations of single fiber, bundle, and yarn tenacity data. Textile Research Journal 61 (11):681–90. doi:10.1177/004051759106101108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhney, P. S., and M. Zeidman. 2002. Influence of fiber length distribution on strength efficiency of fibers in yarn. Textile Research Journal 72 (3):216–20. doi:10.1177/004051750207200306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayeed, M. A., M. Schumann, J. Wanjura, B. R. Kelly, W. Smith, and E. F. Hequet. 2021. Characterizing the total within-sample variation in cotton fiber length using the High Volume INstrument fibrogram. Textile Research Journal 91 (1–2):175–87. doi:10.1177/0040517520935212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, M. W., and P. E. Sasser. 1996. The technological and economic impact of high volume instrument (HVI) systems on the cotton and cotton textile industries. The Journal of the Textile Institute 87 (3):43–59. doi:10.1080/00405009608659117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesema, A. F., M. A. Sayeed, C. Turner, B. R. Kelly, and E. F. Hequet. 2022. An approach for obtaining stable, reproducible, and accurate fibrogram measurements from High Volume Instruments. Agronomy 12 (5):1120. doi:10.3390/agronomy12051120.
   Google Scholar
• Thibodeaux, D., H. E. R. M. A. N. Senter, J. L. Knowlton, D. A. V. I. D. McAlister, and X. Cui. 2008. The impact of short fiber content on the quality of cotton ring spun yarn. Journal of Cotton Science 12 (4):368–77. http://journal.cotton.org.
   Google Scholar
• van der Sluijs, M. H. J., C. D. Delhom, and V. B. Martin. 2021. Assessment of cotton fibre length measurement methods. The Journal of the Textile Institute 112 (9):1377–89. doi:10.1080/00405000.2020.1816684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Sluijs, M. H. J., and L. Hunter. 1999. Neps in cotton lint. Textile Progress 28 (4):1–47. doi:10.1080/00405169908688875.
   Google Scholar
• van der Sluijs, M. H. J., and L. Hunter. 2016. A review on the formation, causes, measurement, implications and reduction of neps during cotton processing. Textile Progress 48 (4):221–323. doi:10.1080/00405167.2016.1233656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeham, H. 1955. Cotton fiber length distribution—an important quality factor. Textile Research Journal 25 (5):422–29. doi:10.1177/004051755502500509.
   Google Scholar