Techno-Economic Assessment of Peruvian Stipa Ichu Microfibres by Steam Explosion

References

• Baral, N. R., and A. Shah. 2017. Comparative techno-economic analysis of steam explosion, dilute sulfuric acid, ammonia fiber explosion and biological pretreatments of corn stover. Bioresource Technology. 232:331–14. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benini, K. C. C., H. J. Voorwald, M. O. Cioffi, M. C. Rezende, and V. Arantes. 2018. Preparation of nanocellulose from Imperata brasiliensis grass using Taguchi method. Carbohydrate Polymers 192 (March):337–46. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.055.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bitra, V. S. P., A. R. Womac, C. Igathinathane, and S. Sokhansanj. 2010. Knife mill comminution energy analysis of switchgrass, wheat straw, and corn stover and characterization of particle size distributions. Transactions of the ASABE 53 (5):1639–51. doi:10.13031/2013.34886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondancia, T. J., J. De Aguiar, G. Batista, A. J. G. Cruz, J. M. Marconcini, L. C. Mattoso, and C. S. Farinas. 2020. Production of nanocellulose using citric acid in a biorefinery concept: effect of the hydrolysis reaction time and techno-economic analysis. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 59 (25):11505–16. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfiglio, F., S. I. Mussatto, and P. Menéndez. 2019. Utilización de Biomasa Lignocelulósica Pretratada Con Explosión Por Vapor Para Producción de Etanol y Coproductos de Alto Valor Agregado. https://catalogo.latu.org.uy/opac_css/doc_num.php?explnum_id=2833.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, D. M., J. H. Queiroz, and J. L. Colodette. 2017. Hydrothermal and acid pretreatments improve ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomasses. BioResources 12 (2). https://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_12_2_3088_Carvalho_Hydrothermal_Acid_Pretreatments_Ethanol
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaker, A., S. Alila, P. Mutjé, M. R. Vilar, and S. Boufi. 2013. Key role of the hemicellulose content and the cell morphology on the nanofibrillation effectiveness of cellulose pulps. Cellulose 20 (6):2863–75. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-0036-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, B., X. Zhang, Q. Lin, F. Xin, R. Sun, X. Wang, and J. Ren. 2018. A new approach to recycle oxalic acid during lignocellulose pretreatment for xylose production. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 11 (1):1–9. BioMed Central. doi:10.1186/s13068-018-1325-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherian, B. M., A. L. Leão, S. Ferreira de Souza, S. Thomas, L. A. Pothan, and M. Kottaisamy. 2010. Isolation oF nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibres by steam explosion. Carbohydrate Polymers. 81 (3):720–25. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa Lopes, A. M. 2021. Biomass delignification with green solvents towards lignin valorisation: ionic liquids vs deep eutectic solvents. research and innovation centre pro-akademia. Acta Innovations (40):64–78. doi:10.32933/ActaInnovations.40.5.
   Google Scholar
• De Assis, C. A., C. Houtman, R. Phillips, E. M. (Ted) Bilek, O. J. Rojas, L. Pal, M. S. Peresin, H. Jameel, and R. Gonzalez. 2017. Conversion economics of forest biomaterials: risk and financial analysis of CNC manufacturing. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 11 (4):682–700. doi:10.1002/bbb.1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Assis, C. A., M. C. Iglesias, M. Bilodeau, D. Johnson, R. Phillips, M. S. Peresin, E. M. Bilek, O. J. Rojas, R. Venditti, and R. Gonzalez. 2018. Cellulose Micro- and Nanofibrils (CMNF) Manufacturing - Financial and risk assessment. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 12 (2):251–64. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. doi:10.1002/bbb.1835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho, D. M., O. Sevastyanova, L. S. Penna, B. P. da Silva, M. E. Lindström, and J. L. Colodette. 2015. Assessment of chemical transformations in eucalyptus, sugarcane bagasse and straw during hydrothermal, dilute acid, and alkaline pretreatments. Industrial Crops and Products 73:118–26. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corato, U., N. Sharma, and F. Zimbardi. 2011. Use of waste vegetable biomasses treated by steam explosion for the horticultural crop protection. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology 1 (June 2018):540–49.
   Google Scholar
• Deepa, B., E. Abraham, B. M. Cherian, A. Bismarck, J. J. Blaker, L. A. Pothan, A. L. Leao, S. F. de Souza, and M. Kottaisamy. 2011. Structure, morphology and thermal characteristics of banana nano fibers obtained by steam explosion. Bioresource Technology 102 (2):1988–97. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrote, G., and J. C. Parajó. 2002. Non-isothermal autohydrolysis of eucalyptus wood. Wood Science and Technology 36 (2):111–23. doi:10.1007/s00226-001-0132-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemmer, R. E., C. Borsoi, B. Hansen, M. A. Júnior, E. L. Francisquetti, L. V. Beltrami, A. J. Zattera, and A. L. Catto. 2021. Extraction oF nanocellulose from yerba mate residues using steam explosion, TEMPO-mediated oxidation and ultra-fine friction grinding. Journal of Natural Fibers 1–11. November, Taylor & Francis. 10.1080/15440478.2021.1994095
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Q. Tang, G. Lin, Y. Liu, J. Yu, B. Ding, and Z. Li. 2022. Anthraquinone-assisted deep eutectic solvent degumming of ramie fibers: evaluation of fiber properties and degumming performance. Industrial Crops and Products 185:115115. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., R. Sykes, M. F. Davis, E. C. Brummer, and A. J. Ragauskas. 2010. Chemical profiles of switchgrass. Bioresource Technology. 101 (9):3253–57. England. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IISD. 2016. Environmental impact assessment training manual, 1–178. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development. www.iisd.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Y. Zhu, and F. Jiang. 2021. Sustainable isolation of nanocellulose from cellulose and lignocellulosic feedstocks: recent progress and perspectives. Carbohydrate Polymers. 267 (September):118188. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2021.118188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaushik, A., and M. Singh. 2011. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw using steam explosion coupled with high shear homogenization. Carbohydrate Research 346 (1):76–85. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2010.10.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laboratory Supply Network, Inc. 2021. Q2000 sonicator - industrial-scale ultrasonic homogenizer | Homogenizers.Net. Accessed November 7. https://homogenizers.net/collections/sonic-homogenizers-sonicators/products/q2000-sonicator.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, P. S. W., S. Sokhansanj, J. Lim, X. Bi, and S. Melin. 2009. Kinetic modeling of pseudolignin formation in steam exploded woody biomass. Conference Proceeding of 8th World Congress of Chemical Engineering, 1001, place Jean-Paul-Riopelle Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., G. Henriksson, and G. Gellerstedt. 2007. Lignin depolymerization/repolymerization and its critical role for delignification of aspen wood by steam explosion. Bioresource Technology 98 (16):3061–68. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., C. Meng, and C. Yu. 2015. Analysis of oxidized cellulose introduced into ramie fiber by oxidation degumming. Textile Research Journal 85 (20):2125–35. doi:10.1177/0040517515581589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, J. K., J. L. Brown, C. A. Peterson, A. Ghosh, S. A. Rollag, P. D. Kouris, M. D. Boot, E. J. M. Hensen, P. Gable, R. G. Smith, et al. 2021. A novel semi-batch autoclave reactor to overcome thermal dwell time in solvent liquefaction experiments. Chemical Engineering Journal 417 (December 2020):128074. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.128074.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Q., N. Ji, M. Li, L. Dai, X. Xu, L. Xiong, and Q. Sun. 2020. Fabrication of debranched starch nanoparticles via reverse emulsification for improvement of functional properties of corn starch films. Food Hydrocolloids 104 (July):105760. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2020.105760.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, G., Q. Tang, H. Huang, J. Yu, Z. Li, and B. Ding. 2022. Process optimization and comprehensive utilization of recyclable deep eutectic solvent for the production of ramie cellulose fibers. Cellulose 29 (7):3689–701. doi:10.1007/s10570-022-04501-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Y. Lu, M. Aguedo, N. Jacquet, C. Ouyang, W. He, C. Yan, W. Bai, R. Guo, D. Goffin, et al. 2017. Isolation of high-purity cellulose nanofibers from wheat straw through the combined environmentally friendly methods of steam explosion, microwave-assisted hydrolysis, and microfluidization. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5 (7):6183–91. American Chemical Society. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, T. F., and R. M. Lukasik. 2020. Economic, social and environmental impacts attained by the use of the effluents generated within a small-scale biorefinery concept. Acta Innovations (36) September: 57–63. Research and Innovation Centre Pro-Akademia. 10.32933/ActaInnovations.36.5
   Google Scholar
• Louis, A. C. F., S. Venkatachalam, and S. Gupta. 2022. Innovative strategy for rice straw valorization into nanocellulose and nanohemicellulose and its application. Industrial Crops and Products 179 (May):114695. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/J.INDCROP.2022.114695.
   Google Scholar
• Manhas, N., K. Balasubramanian, P. Prajith, P. Rule, and S. Nimje. 2015. PCL/PVA nanoencapsulated reinforcing fillers of steam exploded/autoclaved cellulose nanofibrils for tissue engineering applications. RSC Advances. 5 (31):23999–4008. Royal Society of Chemistry. doi:10.1039/c4ra17191h.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, W. L., and J. C. Smith. 2016. Operaciones Básicas de Ingeniería Química, vol. 2. Barcelona, España: Editorial Reverté, S. A.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. 2018. Nanocellulose: producers, products, and applications a guide for end users. TAPPI. https://imisrise.tappi.org/TAPPI/Products/01/R/0101R350.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, C. A. M., I. J. Fernandes, D. Calheiro, A. G. Kieling, F. A. Brehm, M. R. Rigon, J. A. Filho, I. A. Schneider, and E. Osorio. 2014. Review of the rice production cycle: by-products and the main applications focusing on rice husk combustion and ash recycling. Waste Management & Research: The Journal of the International Solid Wastes & Public Cleansing Association, ISWA 32 (11):1034–48. Waste Manag Res. doi:10.1177/0734242X14557379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, S., C. Tenazoa, S. Candiotti, E. Flores, and S. Charca. 2020. Assessment of ichu fibers extraction and their use as reinforcement in composite materials. Journal of Natural Fibers. 17 (5):700–15. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1527271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanografi Nano Technology. 2022. Nanofibrillated cellulose (cellulose nanofibril). https://nanografi.com/popular-products/cellulose-nanofiber-cellulose-nanofibril-nanofibrillated-cellulose-cnfs/.
   Google Scholar
• Naveda Rengifo, R. A., P. A. Montalvo, L. F. Del Pino, and L. V. Figueroa. 2019. Análisis Multivariado de La Influencia de La Explosión de Vapor Sobre La Cascarilla de Arroz. Anales Científicos 80 (2):569. doi:10.21704/ac.v80i2.1492.
   Google Scholar
• Oyeoka, H. C., C. M. Ewulonu, I. C. Nwuzor, C. M. Obele, and J. T. Nwabanne. 2021. Packaging and degradability properties of polyvinyl alcohol/gelatin nanocomposite films filled water hyacinth cellulose nanocrystals. Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts 6 (2):168–85. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.jobab.2021.02.009.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. S., K. D. Timmerhaus, and R. E. West. 2003. Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. McGraw-Hill Chemical Engineering Series. McGraw-Hill Education. https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=3uVFkBBHyP8C.
   Google Scholar
• Relvas, F. M., A. R. C. Morais, and R. Bogel-Lukasik. 2015. Kinetic modeling of hemicellulose-derived biomass hydrolysis under high pressure CO2-H2O mixture technology. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 99:95–102. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2015.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seider, W. D., J. D. Seader, D. R. Lewin, and S. Widagdo. 2017. Annual costs, earnings, and profitability analysis. In Product and process design principles, 4th ed., vol. 604. New York: John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Serra, A., I. González, H. Oliver-Ortega, Q. Tarrès, M. Delgado-Aguilar, and P. Mutjé. 2017. Reducing the amount of catalyst in TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers: effect on properties and cost. Polymers 9 (11):557. doi:10.3390/polym9110557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, R. A. 2007. The E factor: fifteen years on. Green Chemistry 9 (12):1273–83. doi:10.1039/b713736m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, P., P. Shen, Q. Tang, X. Chen, and Z. Li. 2022. Nanocrystalline cellulose extracted from bast fibers: preparation, characterization, and application. Carbohydrate Polymers 290:119462–2022 v.290. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira, M. H. L., A. R. C. Morais, A. M. C. Lopes, D. N. Olekszyszen, R. Bogel-Łukasik, J. Andreaus, and L. P. Ramos. 2015. Current pretreatment technologies for the development of cellulosic ethanol and biorefineries. ChemSuschem 8 (20):3366–90. doi:10.1002/cssc.201500282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott, R., and G. Towler. 2019. Chemical engineering. Design: SI Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Stelte, W. 2013. Steam explosion for biomass pre-treatment. Gregersensvej 2C DK-2630 Taastrup: Danish Technological Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tabil, L., P. Adapa, and M. Kashaninej. 2011. Biomass feedstock pre-processing – Part 1: pre-treatment. Biofuel’s Engineering Process Technology. InTech. doi:10.5772/17086.
   Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., A. Boonmahitthisud, and S. Witayakran. 2019. Use of steam explosion as a green alternative method to prepare pulp from pineapple leaves. Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals 29 (2):110–14. Chulalognkorn University. doi:10.14456/jmmm.2019.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenazoa, C., H. Savastano, S. Charca, M. Quintana, and E. Flores. 2021. The effect of alkali treatment on chemical and physical properties of Ichu and cabuya fibers. Journal of Natural Fibers 18 (7):923–36. doi:10.1080/15440478.2019.1675211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tramper, A. C. Y. J. 2004. Production Yield Analysis in Food Processing Applications. https://edepot.wur.nl/121537.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhatalo, K. M., K. E. Parviainen, and O. P. Dahl. 2014. Techno-economic analysis of simplified microcrystalline cellulose process. BioResources 9(3). (2014), June. https://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_09_3_4741_Vanhatalo_Techno_Economic_Analysis/2884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., X. Zhu, X. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Yang, Q. Li, and J. Jiang. 2022. Isolation and characteristics of nanocellulose from hardwood pulp via phytic acid pretreatment. Industrial Crops and Products 182(August) Elsevier B.V.:114921. doi: 10.1016/J.INDCROP.2022.114921.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W., Y. Feng, H. He, and Z. Yang. 2018. Environmentally-friendly extraction of cellulose nanofibers from steam-explosion pretreated sugar beet pulp. Materials 11 (7):1107–60. doi:10.3390/ma11071160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardi, F., E. Ricci, and G. Braccio. 2002. Technoeconomic study on steam explosion application in biomass processing. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology - Part A Enzyme Engineering and Biotechnology 98–100 (1–9):89–100. doi:10.1385/ABAB:98-100:1-9:89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar