Parametric and Non-Parametric Measures to Identify Stable and Adaptable Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Genotypes

References

• Abdulahi, A., S. Pourdadand, and R. Mohammadi. 2008. “Study on Relationship Among Nonparametric Stability Statistics in Safflower.” Proceedings 7th International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga.
   Google Scholar
• Abro, S., M. Rizwan, Z. A. Deho, S. A. Abro, and M. A. Sial. 2022. “Identification of Heat Tolerant Cotton Lines Showing Genetic Variation in Cell Membrane Thermostability, Stomata, and Trichome Size and Its Effect on Yield and Fiber Quality Traits.” Frontiers in Plant Science 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.804315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abro, S., M. Rizwan, M. T. Rajput, M. A. Sial, and Z. A. Deho. 2022. “Evaluation of Upland Cotton Genotypes for Stability Over Different Locations Using Ammi and GGE Biplot Analysis.” Pakistan Journal of Botany 54 (5): 1733–1739. https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2022-5(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, J., B. Vaezi, A. Shaabani, K. Khademi, S. Fabriki Ourang, and A. Pour-Aboughadareh. 2018. “Non-Parametric Measures for Yield Stability in Gras S Pea (Lathyrus Sativus L.) Advanced Lines in Semi Warm Regions.” Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 17 (7): 1825–1838.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Y., Z. Aslam, and F. Hussain. 2005. “Genotype and Environment Interaction Effect on Yield of Cotton Under Naturally Salt Stress Condition.” International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology 2 (2): 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325872.
   Google Scholar
• Allard, R. W., and A. D. Bradshaw. 1964. “Implications of Genotype-Environmental Interactions in Applied Plant Breeding 1.” Crop Science 4 (5): 503–508. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050021x.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Obaidi, O. N. J., and J. M. A. Al-Jubouri. 2023. “Stability Study of Cotton Genotypes Cultivated in Different Environments.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, United Kingdom, 1–10/062030. United Kingdom: IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1158/6/062030.
   Google Scholar
• Annicchiarico, P. 2002. Genotype X Environment Interactions: Challenges and Opportunities for Plant Breeding and Cultivar Recommendations. Rome, Italy: Food & Agriculture Org. https://books.google.com.et/books?hl=en&lr=&id=so4UJSzWNbIC&oi=fnd&pg=PR8&dq=Annicchiarico+P.,+(2002).+Genotype+x+environment+interactions:+challenges+and+opportunities+for+plant+breeding+and+cultivar+recommendations,+Food+%26+Agriculture+Org.&ots=dDZonBscX4&sig=8PITRYbaL574ivef-JGr8jZDDK4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Annicchiarico%20P.%2C%20(2002).%20Genotype%20x%20environment%20interactions%3A%20challenges%20and%20opportunities%20for%20plant%20breeding%20and%20cultivar%20recommendations%2C%20Food%20%26%20Agriculture%20Org.&f=false.
   Google Scholar
• Ayana, G., A. Abdo, Y. Merine, T. Jobie, A. Bekele, D. Mekonnen, F. Mekibib, G. Tabor, M. Amare, and M. Eshete. 2016. Plant Variety Release. Protection and Seed Quality Control Directorate. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Baraki, F., Y. Tsehaye, and F. Abay. 2014. “AMMI Analysis of Genotype× Environment Interaction and Stability of Sesame Genotypes in Northern Ethiopia.” Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 13 (4–8): 178–183. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2014.178.183.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H., and J. Leon. 1988. “Stability Analysis in Plant Breeding.” Plant Breeding 101 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, J. S. 1982. “Plant productivity and environment.” Science 218 (4571): 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., and M. Jones. 2005. “Assessment of genotype× Environment Interactions for Yield and Fiber Quality in Cotton Performance Trials.” Euphytica 144 (1–2): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-4336-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, S. 2015. “Efficiency of Plant Breeding.” Crop Science 55 (1): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.02.0158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenci, S., and S. Saavedra. 2019. “Non-Parametric Estimation of the Structural Stability of Non-Equilibrium Community Dynamics.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 3 (6): 912–918. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0879-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Assis Machado, J. R., J. C. V. Penna, J. Fallieri, P. G. Santos, and M. A. Lanza. 2002. “Stability and Adaptability of Seedcotton Yields of Upland Cotton Genotypes in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil.” Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 2 (3): 401–410. https://doi.org/10.12702/1984-7033.v02n03a10.
   Google Scholar
• Delic, N., G. Stankovic, and K. Konstantinov. 2009. “Use of Non Parametric Statistics in Estimation of Genotypes Stability.” Maydica 54 (2): 155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, F., X. Zhang, W. Wang, R. Yuan, and F. Shen. 2018. “Identification of Gossypium Hirsutum Long Non-Coding RNAs (lncRnas) Under Salt Stress.” BMC Plant Biology 18 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1238-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eberhart, S. A., and W. Russell. 1966. “Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties 1.” Crop Science 6:36–40. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2021. “Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Data, Production Quantities of Cotton Seed by Country.” https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize.
   Google Scholar
• Farias, F., L. De Carvalho, J. Da Silva Filho, and P. Teodoro. 2016. “Biplot Analysis of Phenotypic Stability in Upland Cotton Genotypes in Mato Grosso.” Genetics & Molecular Research 15 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15028009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farshadfar, E., S. H. Sabaghpour, and H. Zali. 2012. “Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Stability Statistics for Selecting Stable Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Genotypes Under Diverse Environments.” Australian Journal of Crop Science 6 (3): 514–524.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, F., M. Moreno, and J. Cubero. 1998. “A Comparison of Univariate and Multivariate Methods to Analyze G× E Interaction.” Field Crops Research 56 (3): 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00095-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, T., and L. Kannenberg. 1978. “Yield Stability Studies in Short-Season Maize. I. A Descriptive Method for Grouping Genotypes.” Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58 (4): 1029–1034. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps78-157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauch, H. G. 2013. “A Simple Protocol for AMMI Analysis of Yield Trials.” Crop Science 53 (5): 1860–1869. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebregergis, Z., F. Baraki, G. Teame, and M. Tejada Moral. 2020. “Planting Geometry of Cotton Under Rain Fed Condition in the Dry Land Areas of Western Tigray.” Cogent Food & Agriculture 6 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1771113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotmare, V., P. Singh, and B. Tule. 2000. Wild and Cultivated Species of Cotton. Nagpur, India: Technical Bulletin; Central Institute for Cotton Research. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Heravani, J. L., N. Nemati, R. Bozorgipour, and Z. Hosseini-Negad. 2005. “Yield Stability of Some Promising Cultivars and Hybrids of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in Northern Khorasan and Moghan Plain.” JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology 8 (4): 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hühn, M., and R. Nassar. 1989. “On Tests of Significance for Nonparametric Measures of Phenotypic Stability.” Biometrics Bulletin 45 (3): 997–1000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531698.
   Google Scholar
• Kadhem, F. A., I. S. Al-Nedawi, S. D. Al-Atabe, and F. Y. Baktash. 2010. “Association Between Parametric and Nonparametric Measures of Phenotypic Stability in Rice Genotypes (Oryza Sativa L.).” Diyala Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2 (2): 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, T. 1960. “The Absorption Spectrum of Calcium Vapour in the Vacuum Ultra-violet.” Proceedings of the Physical Society 75 (1): 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/75/1/425.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali, S., O. Alishah, and N. Jelodar. 2009. “The Assessment of genotype× Environment Interaction Effect on and Yield Stability of Cotton Cultivars Using Uniparametric and Non-Parametric Methods.” Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 13 (48 (B)): 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali, S., N. Jeloudar, and O. Alishah. 2011. “The Assessment of Adaptability and Stability of Yield on Cotton Cultivars by Using Uniparametric, Non-Parametric Methods and AMMI Model.” Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 42 (2): 397–407.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, M. 1988. “A Rank-Sum Method for Selecting High-Yielding, Stable Corn Genotypes.” Cereal Research Communication 16 (1/2): 113–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M. S., and R. Magari. 1995. “STABLE: A BASIC Program for Calculating Stability and Yield‐Stability Statistics.” Agronomy Journal 87 (2): 276–277. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700020023x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassambara, A., and F. Mundt. 2020. “Factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses.” R package version, 1.0.7.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, Y., and S. Taner. 2003. “Estimating Genotypic Ranks by Nonparametric Stability Analysis in Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.).” Journal of Central European Agriculture 4:47–54. https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/jcea/article/view/158.
   Google Scholar
• Khalili, M., and A. A. Pour. 2016. “Parametric and Non-Parametric Measures for Evaluating Yield Stability and Adaptability in Barley Doubled Haploid Lines.” Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 18:789–803. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Khalili+M.%2C+Pour+A.A.%2C+(2016).+Parametric+and+non-parametric+measures+for+evaluating+yield+stability+and+adaptability+in+barley+doubled+haploid+lines.+J.+Agr.+Sci.+Tech.%2C+18%2C+789-803.&btnG=.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A. I., F. S. Awan, B. Sadia, R. M. Rana, and I. A. Khan. 2010. “Genetic Diversity Studies Among Coloured Cotton Genotypes by Using RAPD Markers.” Pakistan Journal of Botany 42 (1): 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılıç, H. 2012. “Assessment of Parametric and Nonparametric Methods for Selecting Stable and Adapted Spring Bread Wheat Genotypes in Multi–Environments.” Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 22 (2): 390–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilic, H., M. Akçura, and H. Aktaş. 2010. “Assessment of Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods for Selecting Stable and Adapted Durum Wheat Genotypes in Multi-Environments.” Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 38 (3): 271–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killi, F., and E. Harem. 2006. “Genotype X Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Cotton Yield in Aegean Region of Turkey.” Journal of Environmental Biology 37 (2): 427–430.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-S., and M. R. Binns. 1988. “A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar× location data.” Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68 (1): 193–198. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps88-018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., D. Yuan, X. Zhang, and Z. Lin. 2013. “Isolation, Characterization and Mapping of Genes Differentially Expressed During Fibre Development Between Gossypium Hirsutum and Gossypium Barbadense by cDNA-SRAP.” Journal of Genetics 92 (2): 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-013-0238-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleia, M. P., P. S. Vidigal Filho, M. V. Kvitschal, and M. Vidigal. 2010. “Stability and adaptability of commercial cotton cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum L. race latifolium H.) in Mozambique.” African Journal of Agricultural Research 5 (7): 539–550. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR09.244.
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, M., and S. Pourdad. 2009. “Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods for Analysing genotype× Environment Interactions in Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.).” The Journal of Agricultural Science 147 (5): 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990050.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, R., and A. Amri. 2008. “Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods for Selecting Stable and Adapted Durum Wheat Genotypes in Variable Environments.” Euphytica 159 (3): 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9600-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nix, A., C. Paull, and M. Colgrave. 2017. “Flavonoid Profile of the Cotton Plant, Gossypium hirsutum: A Review.” Plants 6 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6040043.
   Google Scholar
• Olivoto, T., A. D. C. Lúcio, and S. Jarman. 2020. “Metan: An R Package for Multi‐Environment Trial Analysis.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11 (6): 783–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peixoto, M. A., J. S. P. C. Evangelista, R. S. Alves, F. J. C. Farias, L. P. Carvalho, L. P. R. Teodoro, P. E. Teodoro, and L. L. Bhering. 2021. “Models for Optimizing Selection Based on Adaptability and Stability of Cotton Genotypes.” Ciência Rural 51 (5): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20200530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepho, H.-P., and S. Lotito. 1992. “Rank Correlation Among Parametric and Nonparametric Measures of Phenotypic Stability.” Euphytica 64 (3): 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinthus, M. J. 1973. “Estimate of genotypic value: A proposed method.” Euphytica 22 (1): 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pour-Aboughadareh, A., A. Barati, A. Gholipoor, H. Zali, A. Marzooghian, S. A. Koohkan, K. Shahbazi-Homonloo, and A. Houseinpour. 2023. “Deciphering Genotype-By-Environment Interaction in Barley Genotypes Using Different Adaptability and Stability Methods.” Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 26 (5): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-023-00199-z.
   Google Scholar
• Pour-Aboughadareh, A., S. Sanjani, H. Nikkhah-Chamanabad, M. R. Mehrvar, A. Asadi, and A. Amini. 2021. “Identification of Salt-Tolerant Barley Genotypes Using Multiple-Traits Index and Yield Performance at the Early Growth and Maturity Stages.” Bulletin of the National Research Centre 45 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00576-0.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.” Vienna, Austria. https://www.rproject.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz, M., J. Farooq, S. Ahmed, M. Amin, W. S. Chattha, M. Ayoub, and R. A. Kainth. 2019. “Stability Analysis of Different Cotton Genotypes Under Normal and Water-Deficit Conditions.” Journal of Integrative Agriculture 18 (6): 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62041-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, N.2002. “Comparison of Stability Statistics for Yield and Quality Traits in Bread Wheat.” Euphytica 128: 333–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadabadi, M. F., G. Ranjbar, M. Zangi, S. Tabar, and H. N. Zarini. 2018. “Analysis of Stability and Adaptation of Cotton Genotypes Using GGE Biplot Method.” Trakia Journal of Sciences 16 (1): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2018.01.009.
   Google Scholar
• Saleem, M. F., S. A. Anjum, A. Shakeel, M. Y. Ashraf, and H. Z. Khan. 2009. “Effect of Row Spacing on Earliness and Yield in Cotton.” Pakistan Journal of Botany 41 (5): 2179–2188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satish, Y., P. Jain, and B. Chhabra. 2009. “Stability Analysis for Yield and Its Component Traits in American Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.).” Journal of Cotton Research and Development 23 (2): 175–182.
   Google Scholar
• Scapim, C. A., V. R. Oliveira, C. D. Cruz, C. A. D. B. Andrade, M. C. G. Vidigal, and M. C. G. Vidigal. 2000. “Yield Stability in Maize (Zea Mays L.) and Correlations Among the Parameters of the Eberhart and Russell, Lin and Binns and Huehn Models.” Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 (2): 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572000000200025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, E. 2019. “Genotype Selection and Stability Analysis for Seed Yield of Nigella Sativa Using Parametric and Non-Parametric Statistics.” Scientia Horticulturae 253:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad, K., T. Qi, L. Guo, H. Tang, X. Zhang, H. Wang, X. Qiao, et al. 2019. “Adaptability and Stability Comparisons of Inbred and Hybrid Cotton in Yield and Fiber Quality Traits.” Agronomy 9 (9): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090516.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, G. 1972. “Some Statistical Aspects of Partitioning Genotype Environmental Components of Variability.” Heredity 29 (2): 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1972.87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmonds, N. 1991. “Selection for Local Adaptation in a Plant Breeding Programme.” Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82 (3): 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temesgen, T., G. Keneni, T. Sefera, and M. Jarso. 2015. “Yield Stability and Relationships Among Stability Parameters in Faba Bean (Vicia Faba L.) Genotypes.” The Crop Journal 3 (3): 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Teodoro, P. E., F. J. C. Farias, L. P. De Carvalho, L. P. Ribeiro, M. Nascimento, C. F. Azevedo, C. D. Cruz, and L. L. Bhering. 2019. “Adaptability and Stability of Cotton Genotypes Regarding Fiber Yield and Quality Traits.” Crop Science 59 (2): 518–524. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.04.0250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thennarasu, K. 1995. “On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype-environment interactions and yield stability.” Ph. D. thesis. New Delhi, India: PJ School, IARI.
   Google Scholar
• Unay, A., H. Basal, A. Erkul, and Z. Yuksekkaya. 2004. “Stability Analysis of Upland Cotton Genotypes to the Aegean Region in Turkey.” Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 3 (1): 36–38. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2004.36.38.
   Google Scholar
• Vaezi, B., A. Pour-Aboughadareh, A. Mehraban, T. Hossein-Pour, R. Mohammadi, M. Armion, and M. Dorri. 2018. “The Use of Parametric and Non-Parametric Measures for Selecting Stable and Adapted Barley Lines.” Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 64 (5): 597–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1369529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezi, B., A. Pour-Aboughadareh, R. Mohammadi, A. Mehraban, T. Hossein-Pour, E. Koohkan, S. Ghasemi, H. Moradkhani, and K. H. Siddique. 2019. “Integrating Different Stability Models to Investigate genotype× Environment Interactions and Identify Stable and High-Yielding Barley Genotypes.” Euphytica 215 (4): 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2386-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, A., V. Kumar, A. Kharab, R. Chatrath, and G. Singh. 2018. “Parametric Vis-A-Vis Non Parametric Measures Describing G X E Interactions for Salt Salinity Tolerant Barley Genotypes in Multi-Environment Trials.” Journal of Applied and Natural Science 10 (2): 557–563. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v10i2.1736.
   Google Scholar
• Vineeth, T., I. Prasad, A. R. Chinchmalatpure, B. Lokeshkumar, S. Kumar, K. Ravikiran, and P. C. Sharma. 2022. “Weighted Average Absolute Scores of BLUPs (WAASB) Based Selection of Stable Asiatic Cotton Genotypes for the Salt Affected Vertisols of India.” Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 82 (1): 104–108. https://doi.org/10.31742/IJGPB.82.1.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wricke, G. 1962. “Uber eine Methode zur Erfassung der okologischen Streubreite in Feldverzuchen. Z.” pflanzenzuchtg 47:92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, L., J. Meredith, B. T. Campbell, J. K. Dever, J. Zhang, K. M. Glass, A. S. Jones, G. O. Myers, and F. M. Bourland. 2014. “Genotype-By-Environment Interaction Effects on Lint Yield of Cotton Cultivars Across Major Regions in the US Cotton Belt.” Journal of Cotton Science 18 (1): 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Zobel, R. 1990. “A Powerful Statistical Model for Understanding Genotype by Environment Interaction.” Genotype by Environment Interaction and Plant breeding’ (Ed MS Kang) 126–140. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Zobel/publication/285717060_Ammi_analysis_of_yield_trials_In_Genotype-by-environment_interaction_kang_ms_and_hg_gauch_eds/links/56b4c2b408aebbde1a77922e/Ammi-analysis-of-yield-trials-In-Genotype-by-environment-interaction-kang-ms-and-hg-gauch-eds.pdf.
   Google Scholar