Single-cell analysis of the epitranscriptome: RNA modifications under the microscope

References

• Cappannini A, Ray A, Purta E, et al. Modomics: a database of RNA modifications and related information. 2023 Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;52(D1):D239–D244. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1083
   Google Scholar
• Fersht AR. Review lecture enzymic editing mechanisms and the genetic code. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981;212(1189):351–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benne R, Van Den Burg J, Brakenhoff JPJ, et al. Major transcript of the frameshifted coxll gene from trypanosome mitochondria contains four nucleotides that are not encoded in the DNA. Cell. 1986;46(6):819–26. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90063-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers R, Friderici K, Rottman F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1974;71(10):3971–3975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.3971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry RP, Kelley DE, LaTorre J. Synthesis and turnover of nuclear and cytoplasmic polyadenylic acid in mouse L cells. J Mol Biol. 1974;82(3):315–31. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90593-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei CM, Gershowitz A, Moss B. Methylated nucleotides block 5’ terminus of HeLa cell messenger RNA. Cell. 1975;4(4):379–386. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90158-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn WE. Pseudouridine, a Carbon-Carbon Linked Ribonucleoside in Ribonucleic Acids: Isolation, Structure, and Chemical Characteristics. J Biol Chem. 1960;235(5):1488–98. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69432-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amos H, Korn M. 5-methyl cytosine in the RNA of Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1958;29(2):444–5. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(58)90214-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esteve-Puig R, Bueno-Costa A, Esteller M. Writers, readers and erasers of RNA modifications in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020;474:127–37. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BioRender: 2023 BioRender; [cited 2023. Available from: https://www.biorender.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Limbach PA, Crain PF, McCloskey JA. Summary: the modified nucleosides of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(12):2183–96. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.12.2183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jora M, Lobue PA, Ross RL, et al. Detection of ribonucleoside modifications by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta, Gene Regul Mech. 2019;1862(3):280–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer M, Kapoor U, Jantsch MF. Understanding RNA modifications: the promises and technological bottlenecks of the ‘epitranscriptome’. Open Biol. 2017;7(5):170077. doi: 10.1098/rsob.170077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz S, Bernstein Douglas A, Mumbach Maxwell R, et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals widespread dynamic-regulated pseudouridylation of ncRNA and mRNA. Cell. 2014;159(1):148–162. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile TM, Rojas-Duran MF, Zinshteyn B, et al. Pseudouridine profiling reveals regulated mRNA pseudouridylation in yeast and human cells. Nature. 2014;515(7525):143–6. doi: 10.1038/nature13802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkedal U, Christensen-Dalsgaard M, Krogh N, et al. Profiling of ribose methylations in RNA by high-throughput sequencing. Angewandte Chemie. 2015;54(2):451–5. doi: 10.1002/anie.201408362
   Google Scholar
• Marchand V, Blanloeil-Oillo F, Helm M, et al. Illumina-based RiboMethSeq approach for mapping of 2’-O-Me residues in RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(16):e135. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires JE, Patel HR, Nousch M, et al. Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(11):5023–33. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelheit S, Schwartz S, Mumbach MR, et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping of 5-methylcytidine RNA modifications in bacteria, archaea, and yeast reveals m5C within archaeal mRnas. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(6):e1003602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes E, Anderson A, Cohen-Gadol A, et al. Adenosine Deaminase That Acts on RNA 3 (ADAR3) Binding to Glutamate Receptor Subunit B Pre-mRNA Inhibits RNA Editing in Glioblastoma. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(10):4326–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.779868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominissini D, Nachtergaele S, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, et al. The dynamic N1-methyladenosine methylome in eukaryotic messenger RNA. Nature. 2016;530(7591):441–6. doi: 10.1038/nature16998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Xiong X, Wang K, et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals reversible and dynamic N1-methyladenosine methylome. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12(5):311–316. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201–6. doi: 10.1038/nature11112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer Kate D, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, et al. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3‘UTRs and near stop codons. Cell. 2012;149(7):1635–1646. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke S, Alemu EA, Mertens C, et al. A majority of m6A residues are in the last exons, allowing the potential for 3’ UTR regulation. Genes Dev. 2015;29(19):2037–2053. doi: 10.1101/gad.269415.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amort T, Rieder D, Wille A, et al. Distinct 5-methylcytosine profiles in poly(A) RNA from mouse embryonic stem cells and brain. Genome Bio. 2017;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1139-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Barahona V, Soler M, Davalos V, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the 5-methylcytosine RNA methyltransferase NSUN7 is associated with clinical outcome and therapeutic vulnerability in liver cancer. Mol Cancer. 2023;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01785-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janin M, Ortiz-Barahona V, de Moura MC, et al. Epigenetic loss of RNA-methyltransferase NSUN5 in glioma targets ribosomes to drive a stress adaptive translational program. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138(6):1053–74. doi: 10.1007/s00401-019-02062-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David R, Burgess A, Parker B, et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping of RNA 5-methylcytosine in Arabidopsis mRnas and noncoding RNAs. Plant Cell. 2017;29(3):445–60. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazak L, Haviv A, Barak M, et al. A-to-I RNA editing occurs at over a hundred million genomic sites, located in a majority of human genes. Genome Res. 2014;24(3):365–76. doi: 10.1101/gr.164749.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J-W, Shrestha L, Green G, et al. The hitchhikers’ guide to RNA sequencing and functional analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2023;24(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke S, Pandya-Jones A, Saito Y, et al. m(6)A mRNA modifications are deposited in nascent pre-mRNA and are not required for splicing but do specify cytoplasmic turnover. Genes Dev. 2017;31(10):990–1006. doi: 10.1101/gad.301036.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou KI, Shi H, Lyu R, et al. Regulation of Co-transcriptional pre-mRNA splicing by m(6)A through the low-complexity protein hnRNPG. Mol Cell. 2019;76(1):70–81.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Sun H, Yi Y, et al. Absolute quantification of single-base m6A methylation in the mammalian transcriptome using GLORI. Nature Biotechnol. 2023;41(3):355–66. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01487-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkhout N, Tran J, Smith MA, et al. The RNA modification landscape in human disease. RNA. 2017;23(12):1754–69. doi: 10.1261/rna.063503.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbington MJT, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics to explore the immune system in health and disease. Science. 2017;358(6359):58–63. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lein E, Borm LE, Linnarsson S. The promise of spatial transcriptomics for neuroscience in the era of molecular cell typing. Science. 2017;358(6359):64–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawad C, Koh W, Quake SR. Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(3):175–88. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng GXY, Terry JM, Belgrader P, et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):14049. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsköld D, Luo S, Wang YC, et al. Full-length mRNA-seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(8):777–82. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraro MJ, Dharmadhikari G, Grün D, et al. A single-cell transcriptome atlas of the human pancreas. Cell Syst. 2016;3(4):385–94.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouno T, Moody J, Kwon AT, et al. C1 CAGE detects transcription start sites and enhancer activity at single-cell resolution. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):360. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08126-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dal Molin A, Di Camillo B. How to design a single-cell RNA-sequencing experiment: pitfalls, challenges and perspectives. Brief Bioinform. 2018;20(4):1384–1394. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson VM, Zhang KX, Kumar N, et al. Multiplexed quantification of proteins and transcripts in single cells. Nature Biotechnol. 2017;35(10):936–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeckius M, Hafemeister C, Stephenson W, et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nat Methods. 2017;14(9):865–868. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff DW, Dhingra DM, Thompson K, et al. High-throughput multimodal single-cell targeted DNA and surface protein analysis using the mission bio tapestri platform. In: Ooi A, editor. Single-cell protein analysis: methods and protocols. New York, NY: Springer US; 2022. pp. 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl PL, Salmén F, Vickovic S, et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science. 2016;353(6294):78–82. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin W, Tang Q, Wan M, et al. Genome-wide detection of DNase I hypersensitive sites in single cells and FFPE tissue samples. Nature. 2015;528(7580):142–6. doi: 10.1038/nature15740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Litzenburger UM, et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature. 2015;523(7561):486–90. doi: 10.1038/nature14590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusanovich DA, Daza R, Adey A, et al. Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science. 2015;348(6237):910–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aab1601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo F, Li L, Li J, et al. Single-cell multi-omics sequencing of mouse early embryos and embryonic stem cells. Cell Res. 2017;27(8):967–88. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pott S. Simultaneous measurement of chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, and nucleosome phasing in single cells. Elife. 2017;6:e23203. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SJ, Argelaguet R, Kapourani C-A, et al. scNMT-seq enables joint profiling of chromatin accessibility DNA methylation and transcription in single cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):781. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03149-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casado-Pelaez M, Bueno-Costa A, Esteller M. Single cell cancer epigenetics. Trends Cancer. 2022;8(10):820–38. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Zhu P, Wu X, et al. Single-cell methylome landscapes of mouse embryonic stem cells and early embryos analyzed using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Genome Res. 2013;23(12):2126–35. doi: 10.1101/gr.161679.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood SA, Lee HJ, Angermueller C, et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat Methods. 2014;11(8):817–820. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farlik M, Sheffield Nathan C, Nuzzo A, et al. Single-cell DNA methylome sequencing and bioinformatic inference of epigenomic cell-state dynamics. Cell Rep. 2015;10(8):1386–1397. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooijman D, Dey SS, Boisset J-C, et al. Single-cell 5hmC sequencing reveals chromosome-wide cell-to-cell variability and enables lineage reconstruction. Nature Biotechnol. 2016;34(8):852–6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Gao Y, Guo H, et al. Single-cell 5-formylcytosine landscapes of mammalian early embryos and ESCs at single-base resolution. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(5):720–31.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng C, Huang W, Li Y, et al. Roles of METTL3 in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic targeting. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00951-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Lu Z, Wang X, et al. High-resolution N6-methyladenosine (m6A) map using photo-crosslinking-assisted m6A sequencing. Angewandte Chemie. 2015;54(5):1587–90. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410647
   Google Scholar
• Linder B, Grozhik AV, Olarerin-George AO, et al. Single-nucleotide-resolution mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptome. Nat Methods. 2015;12(8):767–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinie B, Wang J, Lim KS, et al. m6A-LAIC-seq reveals the census and complexity of the m6A epitranscriptome. Nat Methods. 2016;13(8):692–698. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer KD. DART-seq: an antibody-free method for global m6A detection. Nat Methods. 2019;16(12):1275–1280. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0570-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Campos MA, Edelheit S, Toth U, et al. Deciphering the m6A code via antibody-independent quantitative profiling. Cell. 2019;178(3):731–47.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Chen L-Q, Zhao Y-L, et al. Single-base mapping of m6A by an antibody-independent method. Sci Adv. 2019;5(7):eaax0250. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Xiao Y, Dong S, et al. Antibody-free enzyme-assisted chemical approach for detection of N6-methyladenosine. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16(8):896–903. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0525-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren X, Deng R, Zhang K, et al. Single-cell imaging of m6A modified RNA using m6A-Specific in situ hybridization mediated proximity ligation assay (m6AISH-PLA). Angewandte Chemie. 2021;60(42):22646–51. doi: 10.1002/anie.202109118
   Google Scholar
• Kim KL, van Galen P, Hovestadt V, et al. Systematic detection of m(6)A-modified transcripts at single-molecule and single-cell resolution. Cell Rep Methods. 2021;1(5):100061. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100061
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tegowski M, Flamand MN, Meyer KD. scDART-seq reveals distinct m6A signatures and mRNA methylation heterogeneity in single cells. Molecular Cell. 2022;82(4):868–78.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao H, Gao C-C, Zhang D, et al. scm6A-seq reveals single-cell landscapes of the dynamic m6A during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):315. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35958-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang Y, Vera-Rodriguez M, et al. Single-cell m6A mapping in vivo using picoMeRIP–seq. Nature Biotechnol. 2023. doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01831-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikura K. A-to-I editing of coding and non-coding RNAs by ADARs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(2):83–96. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain M, Jantsch MF, Licht K. The Editor’s I on disease development. Trends Genet. 2019;35(12):903–913. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonzino A, Pesole G, Picardi E. Profiling RNA editing in single cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2584:347–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar