Implementation of the Family Violence Option 20 Years Later: A Review of State Welfare Rules for Domestic Violence Survivors

References

• Baila, S. J. (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29(3), 221—45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395–415. doi:10.2307/1963526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz-Scharf, M. C., Lazer, D. M., & Mergel, I. (2012). Searching for answers: Networks of practice among public administrators. American Review of Public Administration, 42(2), 202–225. doi:10.1177/0275074011398956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, N. B., & Wolfer, T. A. (2002). Battered women speak out: Welfare reform and their decisions to disclose. Violence Against Women, 85(5), 566–584. doi:10.1177/107780102400388434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. C. (2005). Assessing dangerousness in domestic violence cases: History, challenges, and opportunities. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(4), 653. doi:10.1111/cpp.2005.4.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Casey, T., Davies, J., Gifford, A., & Menard, A. (2010). Not enough: What TANF offers family violence victims. Legal Momentum: The Women’s Legal Defend and Education Fund & The National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, L. (2001). Federalism and social policy: The case of domestic violence. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 60(1), 59–69. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2001.60.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, P. R. (2001). Impoverished women in violent partnerships: Designing service to fit their reality. Violence Against Women, 7(2), 222–223. doi:10.1177/10778010122182415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (1997). The new welfare law: State implementation and use of the family violence option. National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. Harrisburg, PA. Retrieved from http://www.vawnet.org/Assoc_Files_VAWnet/WELpol2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glick, H. R., & Hays, S. P. (1991). Innovation and reinvention in state policymaking: Theory and the evolution of living will laws. The Journal of Politics, 53(3), 835–850. doi:10.2307/2131581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetling, A., & Born, C. (2005). Examining the impact of the family violence option on women’s effort to leave welfare. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(3), 143–153. doi:10.1177/1049731504272908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetling, A., Saunders, C., & Born, C. (2006). “Missing” domestic violence victims in welfare caseloads: The discrepancy between administrative and survey disclosure rates. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 22(2), 79–95. doi:10.1300/J045v22n02_05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laasko, J. H., & Drevdahl, D. J. (2006). Women, abuse, and the welfare bureaucracy. Affilia, 21(1), 84–96. doi:10.1177/0886109905283135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, K. K., McPherson, M. D., Samuel, P. S., Sears, K. P., & Head, D. (2013). The impact of different types of intimate partner violence on the mental and physical health of women in different ethnic groups. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(2), 359–385. doi:10.1177/0886260512454743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legal Momentum. (2004). Family violence option state-by-state summary. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Lein, L., Jacquet, S. E., Lewis, C. M., Cole, P. R., & Williams, B. B. (2001). With the best of intentions: Family violence option and abused women’s needs. Violence Against Women, 7, 193–210. doi:10.1177/10778010122182398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhorst, T., Meyers, M., & Casey, E. (2008). Screening for domestic violence in public welfare offices: An analysis of a case manager and client interactions. Violence Against Women, 14(1), 5–28. doi:10.1177/1077801207311948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makse, T., & Volden., C. (2011). The role of policy attributes in the diffusion of innovations. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 108–124. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M.-S. (1995). Legislative Morality in the American States: The case of pre-roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 599–627. doi:10.2307/2111646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann. (1932). 285 U.S. 262.
   Google Scholar
• Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. P. L. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105.
   Google Scholar
• Postmus, J. L. (2004). Battered and on welfare: The experiences of women and the family violence option. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 31(2), 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Satel, S. L. (1998). The abuse excuse. The Women’s Quarterly, Winter, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D., Holter, M., Pahl, L., & Tolman, R. (2006). Welfare workers’ responses to domestic violence cases: The effects of training and worker characteristics. Families in Society, 87(3), 329–338. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, D., Holter, M., Pahl, L., Tolman, R., & Kenna, C. (2005). TANF workers responses to battered women and the impact of brief worker training. Violence Against Women, 11(2), 227–254. doi:10.1177/1077801204271837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriver, K. (2001). Domestic violence victims after welfare reform: Looking beyond the family violence option. Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal, 16(2), 241–257.
   Google Scholar
• Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857. doi:10.1111/ajps.2008.52.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72, 788–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of California—Health and Human Services Agency, Department of Social Services. (2006). California work opportunity and responsibility to kids (CalWorks) domestic abuse protocols and waivers (ACIN I-02-06). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Social Services.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, R. M., & Raphael, J. (2000). A review of research on welfare and domestic violence. Journal of Social Work, 56(4), 655–682.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(03), 880–899. doi:10.2307/1954434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar