Prediction of temporal atmospheric boundary layer height using long short-term memory network

References

• Adnan, R. M., Liang, Z., Parmar, K. S., Soni, K. and Kisi, O. 2021 . Modeling monthly streamflow in mountainous basin by MARS, GMDH-NN and DENFIS using hydroclimatic data. Neural Comput. Appl. 33(7), 2853–2871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyrich, F. 1997. Mixing height estimation from SODAR data—a critical discussion. Atmos. Environ. 31, 3941–3953. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00231-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, S. 2007. Atmospheric Acoustic Remote Sensing: Principles and Applications. Taylor & Francis Group, USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caughey, S. J. 1984. Observed characteristics of the atmospheric boundary layer. In: Atmospheric Turbulence and Air Pollution Modelling. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 107–158.
   Google Scholar
• Chelani, A. B. 2005. Predicting chaotic time series of PM10 concentration using artificial neural network. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 62, 181–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020723042000285906
   Google Scholar
• Emeis, S., Schäfer, K. and Münkel, C. 2008. Surface-based remote sensing of the mixing-layer height–a review. Metz. 17, 621–630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettouney, R. S., Farouq, S. M., John, G. Z., Mahmoud, A. E. and Hisham, M. E. 2009. Forecasting of ozone pollution using artificial neural networks. Manag. Environ. Qual. 20, 668–683. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830910990843
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, B. S., Taylor, G., Gharabaghi, B. and Thé, J. 2018. Forecasting air quality time series using deep learning. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 68, 866–886. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2018.1459956
   Google Scholar
• Frigge, M., Hoaglin, D. C. and Iglewicz, B. 1989. Some implementations of the boxplot. Am. Statist. 43, 50–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garratt, J. R. 1994. The atmospheric boundary layers. Earth. Sci. Rev. 37, 89–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(94)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gera, B. S., Raghavendra, T., Singh, G., Ojha, V. K., Malik, J. and co-authors. 2011. Instrumentation and computer capabilities for improving SODAR data acquisition. Int. J. Remote Sens. 32, 4807–4817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.489072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, G. W., Coxhead, W. B. and Willis, F. H. 1946. Reflection of sound signals in the troposphere. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 18, 274–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1916364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakami, K. 2008. Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks. Ph.D. dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
   Google Scholar
• Koffi, E. N., Bergamaschi, P., Karstens, U., Krol, M., Segers, A. and co-authors. 2016. Evaluation of the boundary layer dynamics of the TM5 model over Europe. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3137–3160. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3137-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N. and Jha, G. K. 2013. A time series ANN approach for weather forecasting. Int. J. Control Theory Comput. Model 3, 19–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.5121/ijctcm.2013.3102
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Parmar, K. S., Soni, K., Garg, N. and Agarwal, R. 2015. Prediction of ventilation coefficient, using a conjunction model of wavelet-neuro-fuzzy model: A case study Delhi, India. Acad. J. Sci. Res. 3, 184–191.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Soni, K. and Agarwal, R. 2021. A comprehensive study of different feature selection methods and machine-learning techniques for SODAR structure classification. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 7, 209–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00872-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Soni, K., Agarwal, R. and Singh, M. 2017a. SODAR as a diagnostics tool for urban air-quality and health care system. J. Acoust. Soc. India 44, 213–222.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Soni, K., Agarwal, R. and Singh, M. 2019. Preliminary analysis of operating conditions of acoustic sounder (SODAR) before the installation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 2997–2998. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137378
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Soni, K., Garg, N., Agarwal, R., Saha, D. and co-authors. 2017b. SODAR pattern classification and its dependence on meteorological parameters over a semiarid region of India. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38, 3466–3482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1294774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. R. and Pal, S. 2017. On the potential of 25 years (1991–2015) of rawinsonde measurements for elucidating climatological and spatiotemporal patterns of afternoon boundary layer depths over the contiguous US. Adv. Meteorol. 2017, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, Y., Dayan, U., Levy, I. and Broday, D. M. 2020. On the association between characteristics of the atmospheric boundary layer and air pollution concentrations. Atmos. Res. 231, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Huang, J., Wang, Y., Tao, X., Hu, C. and co-authors. 2020. Vertical distribution of PM2.5 and interactions with the atmospheric boundary layer during the development stage of a heavy haze pollution event. Sci. Total Environ. 704, 135329–135348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niska, H., Hiltunen, T., Karppinen, A., Ruuskanen, J. and Kolehmainen, M. 2004. Evolving the neural network model for forecasting air pollution time series. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17, 159–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2004.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paoli, C., Cyril, V., Marc, M. and Marie-Laure, N. 2010. Forecasting of preprocessed daily solar radiation time series using neural networks. Sol. Energy 84, 2146–2160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, S., Kedia, S. and Srivastava, R. 2012. Aerosol optical depth trends over different regions of India. Atmos. Environ. 49, 338–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, S. and Mohandes, M. 2008. Artificial neural network estimation of global solar radiation using air temperature and relative humidity. Energy Policy 36, 571–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S. S., Singh, R. B. and Kumar, M. 2011. An analysis of local spatial temperature patterns in the Delhi Metropolitan Area. Phys. Geogr. 32, 114–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.32.2.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvin, S., Vinayakumar, R., Gopalakrishnan, E. A., Menon, V. K. and Soman, K. P. 2017. Stock price prediction using LSTM, RNN and CNN-sliding window model. In 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). IEEE, pp. 1643–1647.
   Google Scholar
• Singal, S. P., Gera, B. S. and Pahwa, D. R. 1994. Application of SODAR to air pollution meteorology. Remote Sens. 15, 427–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169408954084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni, K. and Parmar, K. S. 2020. Soft computing applications in air pollution meteorology. In: Intelligent Data Analytics for Decision-Support Systems in Hazard Mitigation, Springer, Singapore, pp. 441–469.
   Google Scholar
• Soni, K., Singh, S., Bano, T., Tanwar, R. S. and Nath, S. 2011. Wavelength dependence of the aerosol angstrom exponent and its implications over Delhi, India. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 45, 1488–1498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.601774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stull, R. B. 2012. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Vol. 13. Springer Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Terradellas, E., Soler, M. R., Ferreres, E. and Bravo, M. 2005. Analysis of oscillations in the stable atmospheric boundary layer using wavelet methods. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 114, 489–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-1293-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal, Y., Kindap, T. and Karaca, M. 2003. Redefining the climate zones of Turkey using cluster analysis. Int. J. Climatol. 23, 1045–1055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivas, D. R., Sánchez, E. and Reina, J. H. 2020. Deep learning the atmospheric boundary layer height. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04353. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.04353.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, D. F., Parker, R. A. and Kendrick, J. S. 1989. The box plot: a simple visual method to interpret data. Ann. Intern. Med. 110, 916–921. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, S., Zela, A., Elsken, T., Holmes, C., Hutter, F. and co-authors. 2020. Neural ensemble search for performant and calibrated predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.08573.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Wu, J., Guo, X., Han, J., Yang, K. and co-authors. 2019. Prediction of radar sea clutter based on LSTM. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar