Avengers’ anti-Oedipal endgame

References

• Bennett, J. 2004. The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory 32, no. 3: 347–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergthaller, H. 2018. Malthusian biopolitics, ecological immunity, and the anthropocene/biopolítica malthusiana, inmunidad ecológica y el antropoceno. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment 9, no. 1: 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bongco, M. 2014. Reading comics: language, culture, and the concept of the superhero in comic books. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., and M. Hlavajova. 2018. Posthuman glossary. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, R. 1980. Irony, literature, and schizophrenia. New Literary History 12, no. 1: 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clode, D. 2019. “Avengers: Endgame” is a climate change movie in disguise. https://qz.com/quartzy/1624617/marvels-avengers-endgame-is-a-climate-change-movie-in-disguise/.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2014. Death of the PostHuman: essays on extinction, Vol. 1. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2019. The future in the anthropocene: extinction and the imagination. In Climate and literature, ed. A Johns. Putra, 263–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S.G. 2003. Sail on! sail on!: Anthropology, science fiction, and the enticing future. Science Fiction Studies 30, no. 2: 180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1986. Cinema 1: The movement-lmage. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1989. Cinema 2: The time-image. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What is philosophy? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, I.E. 2015. Are batman and superman the barometer of our times?-A review of ‘superheroes in crisis’. The Comics Grid: Journal of Comics Scholarship 5, no. 1: 1–3. https://www.comicsgrid.com/article/id/3518/.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. 2017. Securing ourselves from ourselves? The paradox of ‘entanglement’ in the anthropocene. Crime Law and Social Change 68: 579–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellekson, K. 2001. The alternate history: refiguring historical time. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggett, P. 2011. Climate change and the apocalyptic imagination. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 16, no. 3: 261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Holdier, A.G. 2018. On superhero stories: The marvel cinematic universe as Tolkienesque fantasy. Mythlore 36, no. 2: 82.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, I.W. 2012. The frailty of everything – Cormac McCarthy’s The road and modern disaster discourse. In The cultural life of catastrophes and crises, eds. C. Meiner and K Veel, 233–248. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, E. 2014. The last Man: The birth of modern apocalypse in Jean Paul, John Martin, and Lord Byron. In Catastrophes: A history and theory of an operative concept, eds. N. Lebovic and A Killen, 55–74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, E. 2018. The future as catastrophe: imagining disaster in the modern Age. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hupkes, T., and A. Hedman. 2022. Shifting towards non-anthropocentrism: In dialogue with speculative design futures. Futures 140: 102950.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.K. 2013. Superheroes in crisis: adjusting to social change in the 1960s and 1970s. Rochester: RIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilborne, B. 2003. Oedipus and the Oedipal. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 63, no. 4: 289–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latour, B. 2014. Agency at the time of the anthropocene. New Literary History 45, no. 1: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. 2005. Tragic will and the subject of politics. Phoenix 59, no. 1/2: 140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovasz, A. 2019. Icebound modernity: The shipwreck as metaphor in Dan Simmons’ The terror. American, British and Canadian Studies 33, no. 1: 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. 2012. Local histories/global designs: coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 43
   Google Scholar
• Monastersky, R. 2015. Anthropocene: The human age. Nature News 519, no. 7542: 144–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. 2007. Unstable universalities: poststructuralism and radical politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Northcott, M., et al. 2015. Eschatology in the anthropocene: from the chronos of deep time to the kairos of the age of humans. In The anthropocene and the global environmental crisis, ed. C Hamilton, 100–111. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, P. 2011. From risk to resilience: Technologies of the self in the Age of catastrophes. Carceral Notebooks no. 7: 41–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ojeda, D., et al. 2019. Malthus’s spectre and the anthropocene. Gender, Place & Culture 27, no. 3: 316–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusa, I. 2016. Heroes beyond good and evil: Theorizing transgressivity in Japanese and western fiction. Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies 16, no. 1: 1–30. https://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/ejcjs/vol16/iss1/prusa.html.
   Google Scholar
• Randazzo, E., and Richter, H. 2021. The Politics of the Anthropocene: Temporality, Ecology, and Indigeneity. International Political Sociology 15, no. 3: 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothe, D. 2020. Governing the end times? Planet politics and the secular eschatology of the anthropocene. Millennium no. 48, no. 2: 143–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, J.D. 1989. The use and misuse of Giambattista Vico: rhetoric, orality and theories of discourse. In The New historicism, ed. H Veeser, 89–101. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeink, L. 2017. Biopunk dystopias: genetic engineering, society and science fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• See, Mark. 1983. Introduction. In Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia, eds. G. Deleuze and F. Guattari (pp. xv–xxiv). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singles, K. 2013. Alternate history: playing with contingency and necessity. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, S. 2008. Things made strange: On the concept of ‘estrangement’ in science fiction theory. Science Fiction Studies no. 35, no. 3: 369–385.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. 1999. Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suvin, D. 1972. On the poetics of the science fiction genre. College English 34, no. 3: 372–382.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., and H. Ernstson. 2018. Interrupting the anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and depoliticizing ontologies in the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society 35, no. 6: 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2018. How Marvel’s superhero films exploit the genre’s limitations. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/books-and-arts/2018/04/26/how-marvels-superhero-films-exploit-the-genres-limitations.
   Google Scholar
• Thiele, K. 2012. The world with(out) others, or How to unlearn the desire for the other. In Postcolonial literatures and Deleuze, eds. L Burns and LM Kaiser, 55–75. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tyszczuk, R.A. 2014. Architecture of the anthropocene: The crisis of agency. Scroope The Cambridge Architecture Journal 23, no. 23: 44–51.
   Google Scholar