The structural characteristics of online sports betting: a scoping review of current product features and utility patents as indicators of potential future developments

References

• Andrade M, Sharman S, Xiao LY, Newall P. 2023. Safer gambling and consumer protection failings among 40 frequently visited cryptocurrency-based online gambling operators. Psychol Addict Behav. 37(3):545–557. doi:10.1037/adb0000885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res. Methodol. 8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Banks J, Waters J. 2022. The Gambling Act 2005 and the (de) regulation of commercial gambling in Britain: a state-corporate harm. Sociol Res. 136078042110722. Online.13607804211072263. doi:10.1177/13607804211072263.
   Google Scholar
• Biggar B, Zendle D, Wardle H. 2023. Targeting the next generation of gamblers? Gambling sponsorship of esports teams. J Public Health. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdac167.
   Google Scholar
• Browne BR. 1989. Going on tilt: frequent poker players and control. J Gambling Stud. 5(1):3–21. doi:10.1007/BF01022134.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn C, Mtema O, Songo J, Udedi M. 2020. The growth of sports betting in Malawi: corporate strategies, public space and public health. Public Health. 184:95–101. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy R, Loussouarn C, Pisac A. 2014. Fair game: producing gambling research. Int Gambl Stud. 14(3):345–353. doi:10.1080/14459795.2014.971420.
   Google Scholar
• Cantinotti M, Ladouceur R, Jacques C. 2004. Sports betting: can gamblers beat randomness? Psychol Addict Behav. 18(2):143–147. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.2.143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin J, inventor. 2022. Method of notifying a user about placing an uncommon bet. Patent WO2022104100A1.
   Google Scholar
• Das M. 2021. Fantasy sports and gambling regulation in the Asia-Pacific. Int Sports Law J. 21(3):166–179. doi:10.1007/s40318-021-00198-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deans EG, Thomas SL, Daube M, Derevensky J. 2016. “I can sit on the beach and punt through my mobile phone”: the influence of physical and online environments on the gambling risk behaviours of young men. Soc Sci Med. 166:110–119. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfabbro P, King D, Gainsbury SM. 2020. Understanding gambling and gaming skill and its implications for the convergence of gaming with electronic gaming machines. Int Gambl Stud. 20(1):171–183. doi:10.1080/14459795.2019.1662824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer B, Drayer J, Shapiro SL. 2019. To play or not to play? An analysis of dispositions, gambling, and daily fantasy sport. J. Sport Manag. 33(3):174–188. doi:10.1123/jsm.2018-0115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etuk R, Xu T, Abarbanel B, Potenza MN, Kraus SW. 2022. Sports betting around the world: a systematic review. J Behav Addict. 11(3):689–715. doi:10.1556/2006.2022.00064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flayelle M, Brevers D, King DL, Maurage P, Perales JC, Billieux J. 2023. A taxonomy of technology design features that promote potentially addictive online behaviours. Nat Rev Psychol. 2(3):136–150. doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00153-4.
   Google Scholar
• Froy D, inventor. 2020. Augmented reality sports betting and augmented reality features. Patent US10706661B2.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsbury SM, Abarbanel B, Blaszczynski A. 2017. Game on: comparison of demographic profiles, consumption behaviors, and gambling site selection criteria of esports and sports bettors. Gaming Law Rev. 21(8):575–587. doi:10.1089/glr2.2017.21813.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsbury SM, Abarbanel B, Blaszczynski A. 2020. The relationship between in-play betting and gambling problems in an Australian context of prohibited online in-play betting. Front Psychiatry. 11:574884. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.574884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginley MK, Whelan JP, Pfund RA, Peter SC, Meyers AW. 2017. Warning messages for electronic gambling machines: evidence for regulatory policies. Addict Res Theory. 25(6):495–504. doi:10.1080/16066359.2017.1321740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleich A, inventor. 2019. METHOD FOR SIMULATING RANKING LISTS IN SPORTS BETTING. Patent DE102017213009A1.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon R, Gurrieri L, Chapman M. 2015. Broadening an understanding of problem gambling: the lifestyle consumption community of sports betting. J Bus Res. 68(10):2164–2172. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer N, Rockloff M, Browne M, Hing N, King DL. 2019. Esports betting and skin gambling: a brief history. J Gambl Issues. 43:128–146.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths M. 1993. Fruit machine gambling: the importance of structural characteristics. J Gambl Stud. 9(2):101–120. doi:10.1007/BF01014863.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths MD. 2019. Online gambling and geolocation technology: implications for regulation and potential threats to player protection. Gaming Law Rev. 23(5):344–347. doi:10.1089/glr2.2019.2352.
   Google Scholar
• Harris A, Griffiths MD. 2018. The impact of speed of play in gambling on psychological and behavioural factors: a critical review. J Gambl Stud. 34(2):393–412. doi:10.1007/s10899-017-9701-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazarika A, Ray K. 2023. Current updates on the regulation of online sports betting in India. Gaming Law Rev. 27(3):117–122.
   Google Scholar
• Hing N, Li E, Vitartas P, Russell AM. 2018. On the spur of the moment: intrinsic predictors of impulse sports betting. J Gambl Stud. 34(2):413–428. doi:10.1007/s10899-017-9719-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Lole L, Russell AM, Rockloff M, King DL, Browne M, Newall P, Greer N. 2022. Adolescent betting on esports using cash and skins: links with gaming, monetary gambling, and problematic gambling. PLoS One. 17(5):e0266571. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Rockloff M, Browne M. 2023. Adoption, adaptation or exposure? Novel digital gambling activities and links with gambling problems. Curr Addict Rep. 10(2):254–261. doi:10.1007/s40429-023-00473-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hing N, Smith M, Rockloff M, Thorne H, Russell AM, Dowling NA, Breen H. 2022. How structural changes in online gambling are shaping the contemporary experiences and behaviours of online gamblers: an interview study. BMC Public Health. 22(1):1620. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14019-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Thorne H, Russell AM, Newall P, Lole L, Rockloff M, Browne M, Greer N, Tulloch C. 2022. ‘Immediate access… everywhere you go’: a grounded theory study of how smartphone betting can facilitate harmful sports betting behaviours amongst young adults. Int J Ment Health Addict. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton SPB, Moss M. 2022. Assessing the bets advertised on Twitter by gambling operators and gambling affiliates–an observational study incorporating simulation data to measure bet success. Int Gambl Stud. 1–14. doi:10.1080/14459795.2022.2114527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugues O, Fuchs P, Nannipieri O. 2011. New augmented reality taxonomy: technologies and features of augmented environment. In: Handbook of augmented reality. New York (NY): Springer international Publishing. p. 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Huke CA, Cronin J, Beyers JW, D’andrea M, inventors. 2022. Method of displaying sports news related to a placed wager. Patent WO2022087082A1.
   Google Scholar
• Huke CA, D’andrea M, inventors. 2022. Ar vr in-play wagering system. Patent WO2022066518A1.
   Google Scholar
• Ibisworld. 2023. Global sports betting & lotteries - market size 2005–2028. Ibisworld. Online
   Google Scholar
• Killick EA, Griffiths MD. 2019. In-play sports betting: a scoping study. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 17(6):1456–1495. doi:10.1007/s11469-018-9896-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killick EA, Griffiths MD. 2021. Why do individuals engage in in-play sports betting? A qualitative interview study. J Gambl Stud. 37(1):221–240. doi:10.1007/s10899-020-09968-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King DL, Delfabbro PH, Gainsbury SM, Dreier M, Greer N, Billieux J. 2019. Unfair play? Video games as exploitative monetized services: an examination of game patents from a consumer protection perspective. Comput Human Behav. 101:131–143. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets RV. 2023. Immersive netnography: a novel method for service experience research in virtual reality, augmented reality and metaverse contexts. JOSM. 34(1):100–125. doi:10.1108/JOSM-12-2021-0481.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger TB, Dixon MJ, Graydon C, Larche CJ, Stange M, Smith SD, Smilek D. 2022. Contrasting mind-wandering,(dark) flow, and affect during multiline and single-line slot machine play. J Gambl Stud. 38(1):185–203. doi:10.1007/s10899-021-10027-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. 2010. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 5:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone C. 2017. How electronic gambling machines work: EGM structural characteristics. Melbourne: Australian Gambling Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Estévez A, Griffiths MD. 2019. Internet-based structural characteristics of sports betting and problem gambling severity: is there a relationship? Int J Ment Health Addiction. 17(6):1360–1373. doi:10.1007/s11469-018-9876-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Griffiths MD. 2018. Understanding the convergence of markets in online sports betting. Int Rev Sport Sociol. 53(7):807–823. doi:10.1177/1012690216680602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Griffiths MD, Estévez A. 2020a. In-play betting, sport broadcasts, and gambling severity: a survey study of Spanish sports bettors on the risks of betting on sport while watching it. Commun Sport. 8(1):50–71. doi:10.1177/2167479518816338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Griffiths MD, Estévez A. 2020b. Why some sports bettors think gambling addiction prevented them from becoming winners? A qualitative approach to understanding the role of knowledge in sports betting products. J Gambl Stud. 36(3):903–920. doi:10.1007/s10899-020-09944-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Griffiths MD, Jimenez-Murcia S. 2021. The symbolic construction of sports betting products. Int Gambl Stud. 21(3):498–515. doi:10.1080/14459795.2021.1937274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Jimenez-Murcia S, Griffiths MD. 2019. Customization and personalization of sports betting products: implications for responsible gambling. Gaming Law Rev. 23(8):572–577. doi:10.1089/glr2.2019.2383.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy S, Thomas SL, Randle M, Bestman A, Pitt H, Cowlishaw S, Daube M. 2018. Women’s gambling behaviour, product preferences, and perceptions of product harm: differences by age and gambling risk status. Harm Reduct J. 15:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee D. 2020. On the normalisation of online sports gambling among young adult men in the UK: a public health perspective. Public Health. 184:89–94. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau A, Chauchard É, Sévigny S, Giroux I. 2020. Tilt in online poker: loss of control and gambling disorder. IJERPH. 17(14):5013. doi:10.3390/ijerph17145013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 18:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D, Filipour C, inventors. 2021. Gaming systems, devices, and methods for competitive real-time sports wagering. Patent US11087596B2.
   Google Scholar
• Newall P. 2018. A behavioral scientist’s guide to (not) betting on the 2018 world cup. Culture. http://behavioralscientist.org/a-behavioral-scientists-guide-to-not-betting-on-the-2018-world-cup/.
   Google Scholar
• Newall P. 2019. Dark nudges in gambling. Addict Res Theory. 27(2):65–67. doi:10.1080/16066359.2018.1474206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall P, Cassidy R, Walasek L, Ludvig EA, Meyer C. 2021. Who uses custom sports betting products? Addict Res Theory. 29(2):148–154. doi:10.1080/16066359.2020.1792887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall P, Moodie C, Reith G, Stead M, Critchlow N, Morgan A, Dobbie F. 2019. Gambling marketing from 2014 to 2018: a literature review. Curr Addict Rep. 6(2):49–56. doi:10.1007/s40429-019-00239-1.
   Google Scholar
• Newall P, Rockloff MJ. 2022. Promoting safer gambling via the removal of harmful sludge: a view on how behavioural science’s ‘nudge’concept relates to online gambling. Addiction. 117(3):838–839. doi:10.1111/add.15700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall P, Russell AM, Hing N. 2021. Structural characteristics of fixed-odds sports betting products. J Behav Addict. 10(3):371–380. doi:10.1556/2006.2021.00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall P, Walasek L, Kiesel RV, Ludvig EA, Meyer C. 2020. Request-a-bet sports betting products indicate patterns of bettor preference and bookmaker profits. J Behav Addict. 10(3):381–387. doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyemcsok C, Pitt H, Kremer P, Thomas SL. 2022. Young men’s perceptions about the risks associated with sports betting: a critical qualitative inquiry. BMC Public Health. 22(1):867. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13164-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomäki J, Laakasuo M, Salmela M. 2013. ‘This is just so unfair!’: a qualitative analysis of loss-induced emotions and tilting in on-line poker. Int Gambl Stud. 13(2):255–270. doi:10.1080/14459795.2013.780631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke A, Parke J. 2019. Transformation of sports betting into a rapid and continuous gambling activity: a grounded theoretical investigation of problem sports betting in online settings. Int J Ment Health Addict. 17(6):1340–1359. doi:10.1007/s11469-018-0049-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke J, Griffiths MD. 2007. The role of structural characteristics in gambling. In G. Smith, D. Hodgins, R. Williams, editors. Research and measurement issues in gambling studies. New York: Elsevier. p. 211–243.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering D, Philander KS, Gainsbury SM. 2020. Skill-based electronic gaming machines: a review of product structures, risks of harm, and policy issues. Curr Addict Rep. 7(2):229–236. doi:10.1007/s40429-020-00309-9.
   Google Scholar
• Pilnock EM, Kenneth E, Irwin Day MT, Pilnock M, Finnerty FW, inventors. 2021. Method of allowing a player to wager via an augmented reality device on a real world event displayed on a virtual video display that is being viewed by the augmented reality device. Patent US11037410B2.
   Google Scholar
• Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S. 2006. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: final report. Swindon: ESRC Methods Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Powell K. 2016. Does it take too long to publish research? Nature. 530(7589):148–151. doi:10.1038/530148a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradier P-C. 2019. Betting on sport: history, regulation, measurement. In: Historical perspectives on sports economics. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 150–166.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi R, Nairn A. 2022. New developments in gambling marketing: the rise of social media ads and its effect on youth. Curr Addict Rep. 9(4):385–391. doi:10.1007/s40429-022-00457-0.
   Google Scholar
• Russell AM, Hing N, Browne M, Li E, Vitartas P. 2019. Who bets on micro events (microbets) in sports? J Gambl Stud. 35(1):205–223. doi:10.1007/s10899-018-9810-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüll ND. 2012. Addiction by design. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharman S. 2022. Gambling in football: how much is too much? Manag Sport Leisure. 27(1–2):85–92. doi:10.1080/23750472.2020.1811135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang WY, Fox J. 2016. Men’s harassment behavior in online video games: personality traits and game factors. Aggress Behav. 42(6):513–521. doi:10.1002/ab.21646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodosopoulos T, inventor. 2019. Tournament style in-play sports betting with real time leaderboard tracking. Patent US10198910B2.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance J, John B, Greville J, O'Hanrahan M, Davies N, Roderique-Davies G. 2021. Emergent gambling advertising; a rapid review of marketing content, delivery and structural features. BMC Public Health. 21(1):718. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10805-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance J, Roderique-Davies G, Greville J, O'Hanrahan M, Davies N, Sabolova K, John B. 2022. Conceptualising emotional and cognitive dysregulation amongst sports bettors; an exploratory study of ‘tilting’in a new context. PLoS One. 17(2):e0264000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, et al. 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira JL, Coelho SG, Snaychuk LA, Parmar PK, Keough MT, Kim HS. 2023. Who makes in-play bets? Investigating the demographics, psychological characteristics, and gambling-related harms of in-play sports bettors. J Behav Addict. 12(2):547–556. doi:10.1556/2006.2023.00030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters M. 2023. Legislative tracker: sports betting. Legalsportsreport. https://www.legalsportsreport.com/sportsbetting-bill-tracker/
   Google Scholar
• Yücel M, Carter A, Harrigan K, van Holst RJ, Livingstone C. 2018. Hooked on gambling: a problem of human or machine design? Lancet Psychiatry. 5(1):20–21. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30467-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar