The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: a systematic review

References

• Allen, B. P. (2000). Personality theories: Development, growth, and diversity. Adolescence, 35(138), 415.
   Google Scholar
• Banicki, K. (2014). Positive psychology on character strengths and virtues. A disquieting suggestion. New Ideas in Psychology, 33, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohlmeijer, E., & Westerhof, G. (2021). The model for sustainable mental health: Future directions for integrating positive psychology into mental health care. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(Article), 747999. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747999
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bright, D. S., Winn, B. A., & Kanov, J. (2014). Reconsidering virtue: Differences of perspective in virtue ethics and the positive social sciences. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1832-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. J. L., Sokal, A. D., & Friedman, H. L. (2013). The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio. American Psychologist, 68(9), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. J., Sokal, A. D., & Friedman, H. L. (2014). Positive psychology and romantic scientism. American Psychologist, 69(6), 636–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, V., & Dick, P. (2021). A social constructionist critique of positive psychology. In B. D. Slife, S. C. Yanchar, & F. C. Richardson Eds. Routledge international handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology (pp. 151–169). Routledge Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036517-11
   Google Scholar
• Buscemi, N., Hartling, L., Vandermeer, B., Tjosvold, L., & Klassen, T. P. (2006). Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(7), 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabanas, E. (2018). Positive psychology and the legitimation of individualism. Theory & Psychology, 28(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317747988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., & Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, J. C. (2014). Putting “positive” and “psychology” in perspective: The role of Indian psychology. Psychological Studies, 59(2), 110–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-014-0256-8
   Google Scholar
• Ciarrochi, J., Hayes, S. C., Oades, L. G., & Hofmann, S. G. (2022). Toward a unified framework for positive psychology interventions: Evidence-based processes of change in coaching, prevention, and training. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(Article), 809362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809362
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cipresso, P., & Immekus, J. C. (2017). Back to the future of quantitative psychology and measurement: Psychometrics in the twenty-first century. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(Article), 2099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02099
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cloninger, S. (2009). Conceptual issues in personality psychology. In P. J. İçinde & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 3–26). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, M., & Van Zyl, L. E. (2013). Advancing research in industrial and organisational psychology-A brief overview of 2013. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(1), a1174. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v39i1.1174
   Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, J. C., & Tennen, H. (2010). Positive psychology in cancer care: Bad science, exaggerated claims, and unproven medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9154-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, J. C., Tennen, H., & Ranchor, A. V. (2010). Positive psychology in cancer care: A story line resistant to evidence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9157-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curd, M., & Psillos, S. (2014). The Routledge companion to philosophy of science. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeRobertis, E. M., & Bland, A. M. (2021). Humanistic and positive psychologies: The continuing narrative after two decades. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678211008353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (2012). Positive psychology: Past, present, and future. S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder, Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. 6–12. Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Disabato, D., Goodman, F., & Kashdan, T. (2019). Is grit relevant to wellbeing and strengths? Evidence across the globe for separating perseverance of effort and consistency of interests. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobele, A. R. (2015). Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1011086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S. I., Van Zyl, L. E., & Donaldson, S. I. (2022). PERMA+4: A framework for work-related wellbeing, performance and positive organizational psychology 2.0. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(Article), 817244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.817244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efendic, E., & Van Zyl, L. E. (2019). On reproducibility and replicability: Arguing for open science practices and methodological improvements at the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45, a1607. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmons, R. A., & Paloutzian, R. F. (2003). The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engber, D. (2017). Is science broken? Or is it self-correcting? https://slate.com/technology/2017/08/science-is-not-self-correcting-science-is-broken.html
   Google Scholar
• Englar-Carlson, M., & Smart, R. (2014). Positive psychology and gender. In J. T. Pedrotti & L. M. Edwards (Eds.), Perspectives on the intersection of multiculturalism and positive psychology (pp. 125–141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8654-6_9
   Google Scholar
• European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations. (2013). EFPA review model for the description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests, version 4.2.6. http://www.efpa.eu/download/650d0d4ecd407a51139ca44ee704fda4
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2017). Positive psychology apps: A systematic review of current positive psychological apps aiming to increase happiness (Master’s thesis, University of Twente).
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ríos, L., & Novo, M. (2012). Positive psychology: Zeigeist (or spirit of the times) or ignorance (or disinformation) of history? International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12(2), 333–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ríos, L., & Vilariño, M. (2016). Myths of positive psychology: Deceptive manoeuvres and pseudoscience. Papeles Del Psicólogo/Psychologist Papers, 37(2), 134–142. https://doaj.org/article/d60c8fd3e5424fba8873f1a59e53e3b5
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Updated thinking on positivity ratios. American Psychologist, 68(9), 814–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. L., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Implications of debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for humanistic psychology: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 58, 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818762227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. L., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Implications of debunking the “critical positivity ratio” for humanistic psychology: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 58(3), 239–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Kauffman, S. B. (2018). Measuring wellbeing: A comparison of subjective wellbeing and PERMA. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindji, R., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(2), 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Held, B. S. (2018). Positive psychology’s a priori problem. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 58(3), 313–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167817739409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, T., Warren, M. A., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., Graafsma, T., Bohlmeijer, E., & de Jong, J. (2019). How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, H. H. (1989). Theory of socialism and capitalism. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2011). Assessment service delivery — Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings (ISO/DIS Standard No. 10667-1:2011). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:10667:-1:ed-1:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2017). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd) ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jabłoński, A., & Jabłoński, M. (2020). Digital business models: Perspectives on monetisation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarden, A., Rashid, T., Roache, A., & Lomas, T. (2021). Ethical guidelines for positive psychology practice (version 2.0: English). International Journal of Wellbeing, 11(3), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v11i3.1819
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, S. (2021). How humanistic is positive psychology? Lessons in positive psychology from Carl Rogers’ person-centered approach—it’s the social environment that must change. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(Article), 709789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709789
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., … Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, K. (2010). Positive psychology, happiness, and virtue: The troublesome conceptual issues. Review of General Psychology, 14(4), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, K. (2012). Positive psychology and positive education: Old wine in new bottles? Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.610678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Virtues and vices in positive psychology: A philosophical critique. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, K. (2021). Recent attacks on character education in a UK context: A case of mistaken identities?. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 42(3), 363–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd Eds ed.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, T., & Ivtzan, I. (2016). Second wave positive psychology: Exploring the positive–negative dialectics of wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1753–1768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9668-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, T., Waters, L., Williams, P., Oades, L. G., & Kern, M. L. (2021). Third wave positive psychology: Broadening towards complexity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(5), 660–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1805501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marecek, J., & Cristopher, J. C. C. (2018). Is positive psychology an indigenous psychology. In N. J. L. Brown, T. Lomas, & F. J. Eiroa-Orosa (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Positive Psychology (1st ed., pp. 84–98). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70(6), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., Marchand, G., & Schutz, P. (2019). Mixed methods in educational psychology inquiry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., Thi Nguyen, L., Bubna-Litic, D., Nguyen, T.-N., & Taylor, G. (2021). Positive psychology applied to the workplace: A Foucauldian discourse analysis. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678211029400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica: Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://hrcak.srce.hr/89395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C. (2006). Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: Prevalence and effects of reviewer hostility, bias, and dissensus. Academy Management Journal, 49(3), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’Pherson, P. K. (1974). A perspective on systems science and systems philosophy. Futures, 6(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(74)90046-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. M., & Slife, B. D. (2017). A new positive psychology: A critique of the movement based on early Christian thought. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(5), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1228006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., & Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Van Assen, M. A. L. M., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372 (1),article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
   Google Scholar
• Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2005). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: Guilford Publications..
   Google Scholar
• Pawelski, J. O. (2016). Defining the ‘positive’ in positive psychology: Part 2. A normative analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2012). Positive psychology: Sympathetic magic. Papeles Del Psicólogo/Psychologist Papers, 33(3), 183–201.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2013). Positive psychology and its friends revealed. Papeles Del Psicólogo/Psychologist Papers, 34(3), 208–226.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2016). The science of happiness: As felicitous as it is fallacious. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000030
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association; Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2019). The snake oil charms of positive psychology. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(11), 1116–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1678428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A., & Evangelidou, S. (2018). Toward a culturally competent positive psychology. In N. J. Brown, T. Lomas, & F. J. Eiroa-Orosa (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical positive psychology (1st) ed., pp. 263–280). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R., & Livingston, R. A. (2021). Mastering modern psychological testing. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, S., Van Zyl, L. E., Roll, L. C., & Stander, M. W. (2021). Positive psychological coaching tools and techniques: A systematic review and classification. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12(Article), 667200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.667200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins, B. D., & Friedman, H. L. (2017). The unavoidable role of values in positive psychology: Reflections in light of psychology’s replicability crisis. In N. J. Brown, T. Lomas, & F. J. Eiroa-Orosa (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Positive Psychology (1st ed., pp. 15–25). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th) ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., & Ditrich, L. (2019). Research in social psychology changed between 2011 and 2016: Larger sample sizes, more self-report measures, and more online studies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838781
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz, S. E., de Klerk, W., & de Beer, L. T. (2020). The use of research methods in psychological research: A systematized review. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5(Article), 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.00001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholtz, S. E., De Klerk, W., & de Beer, L. T. (2021). The use of research methods in the South African Journal of Psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246320969872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M. (2011). What’s positive about positive psychology: Reducing value-bias and enhancing integration within the field. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 421–429). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staude, J. R. (1976). From depth psychology to depth sociology: Freud, Jung, and Lévi-Strauss. Theory and Society, 3(3), 303–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, S. (Ed.). (2005). Handbook of personology and psychopathology. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. (2018). Positive psychology, mental health, and the false promise of the medical model. In N. J. Brown, T. Lomas, & F. J. Eiroa-Orosa (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical positive psychology (1st) ed., (pp. 71–83). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Schoot, R., De Bruin, J., Schram, R., Zahedi, P., De Boer, J., Weijdema, F., Kramer, B., Huijts, M., Hoogerwerf, M., Ferdinands, G., Harkema, A., Willemsen, J., Ma, Y., Fang, Q., Hindriks, S., Tummers, L., & Oberski, D. L. (2021). An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00287-7
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, L. E. (2019). Enhancing scientific credibility: An open science strategy for the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45(1), a1768. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1768
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, L. E., Heijenk, B., Klibert, J., Shankland, R., Verger, N. B., Rothmann, S., Cho, V., Feng, K., See-To, E. W. K., Roll, L. C., & Van Der Meij, L. (2022). Grit across nations: An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Grit-O Scale. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(7), 3179–3213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00543-0
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, L. E., & Junker, N. M. (2019). Debating the scientific credibility of industrial and organisational psychology: A rebuttal. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45(1), a1766. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1766
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, L. E., & Rothmann, S. (2022). Grand challenges for positive psychology: Future perspectives and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(Article), 833057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833057
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Zyl, L. E., & Salanova, M. (2022). Editorial: Facilitating the third wave of positive psychology: Perspectives on the future of the discipline. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(Article), 963167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Zyl, L. E., & Ten Klooster, P. M. (2022). Exploratory structural equation modelling: Practical guidelines and tutorial with a convenient online tool for Mplus. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12(Article), 795672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waterman, A. S. (2013). The humanistic psychology–positive psychology divide: Contrasts in philosophical foundations. American Psychologist, 68(3), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelmy, A., & Köhler, T. (2022). Qualitative research in work and organizational psychology journals: Practices and future opportunities. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.2009457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissing, M. P. (2021). Beyond the “third wave of positive psychology”: Challenges and opportunities for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(795067), 795067. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong, P. T. (2011). Positive psychology 2.0: Towards a balanced interactive model of the good life. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 52(2), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P. T. P., & Roy, S. (2018). Critique of positive psychology and positive interventions. In N. J. Brown, T. Lomas, & F. J. Eiroa-Orosa (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical positive psychology (1st ed., pp. 142–160). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakushko, O., & Blodgett, E. (2021). Negative reflections about positive psychology: On constraining the field to a focus on happiness and personal achievement. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(1), 104–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818794551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, J. (2010). Authorizing happiness: Rhetorical demarcation of science and society in historical narratives of positive psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 30(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019103
   Google Scholar