The Other – a troublesome dyad?

References

• Bader, Veit, and Sawitri Saharso. 2004. “Introduction: Contextualized Morality and Ethno-Religious Diversity.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (2): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETTA.0000032758.77152.0a.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, Lawrence A. 1994. Moral Perception and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Casebeer, William D. 2003. “Opinion: Moral Cognition and Its Neural Constituents.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (10): 840–846. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, George. 2003. “Pluralism, Relativism and Liberalism in Isaiah Berlin.” In Paper Presented at the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Tasmania, 29 Sep–1 Oct 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fiasse, Gaelle. 2012. “Ricoeur's Medical Ethics: The Encounter Between the Physician and the Patient.” In Reconceiving Medical Ethics, edited by Christopher Cowley, 30–42. London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, Daniel. 2013. “Ethics is an Optics: The Levinasian Perspective on Value as Primary.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Education, Religion and Values, edited by James Arthur, and Terence Lovat, 362–372. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, Daniel, and Terence Lovat. 2013. “‘Self-Other’ or ‘Other-Self-Other’? – A Conversation Between Bonhoeffer and Levinas on Vulnerability.” The Bonhoeffer Legacy: An International Journal 1 (1): 133–149.
   Google Scholar
• Gaita, Raimond. 1991, 2004. Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Haidt. 2002. “How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12): 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtler, Gary M. 2008. “Plotinus on the Soul's Omnipresence in Body.” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2: 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1163/187254708X335737.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action [Moralbewusstsein und Kommunikatives Handeln]. Translated by Christian Lenhardt & Shierry Weber. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Clive. 2008. The Freedom Paradox. Towards a Post-Secular Ethics. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, Sean. 1989. “Introduction.” In The Levinas Reader, edited by Sean Hand, 1–8. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Lasana T., and Susan T. Fiske. 2006. “Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses to Extreme Out-Groups.” Psychological Science 17 (10): 847–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsinger, George. 2006. “Torture, Common Morality, and the Golden Rule.” Theology Today 63: 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/004057360606300309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian Meditations. Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. 1964. The Idea of Phenomenology. Translated by William Alston & George Nakhnikian. The Hague: Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. 2012. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by R. Boyce Gibson. London: Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers, Karl. 2001. The Question of German Guilt. Translated by E.B. Ashton, Perspectives in Continental Philosophy. 2nd ed, edited by John D. Caputo. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1952. “The Critique of Pure Reason.” In The Critique of Pure Reason, The Critique of Practical Reason and Other Ethical Treatises, The Critique of Judgement. Vol. 42, edited by Mortimer J. Adler, 1–250. Chicago: William Benton, Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, Anthony. 2010. A New History of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Ocford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. “The Origin of Value and the Scope of Obligation.” In The Sources of Normativity, edited by Onora O'Neill, 131–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latecka, Ewa. 2020. “Metaphysical Guilt: Jaspers, Honneth, and the Problem of Dehumanisation.” Acta Academica 52 (2): 131–146. https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa52i2/7.
   Google Scholar
• Lateef, Soofia Noor. 2020. Hell is Otter People: Locating Animals in Satre's Ontology.” https://philosophy.wvu.edu/files/d/46f2e7a5-4572-4ee5-b409-03989ae9d2f4/lateef.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, Emmanuel. 1985. Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Translated by Richard A Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, Emmanuel. 1989. “Substitution.” In The Levinas Reader, edited by Sean Hand, 88–125. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, Emmanuel. 1999. “Alterity and Transcendence. Translated by Michael B Smith.” In European Perspectives, edited by Lawrence D. Kritzman, xxiv, 195. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Thomas. 1979. The Possibility of Altruism. Revised ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norenberg, Henning. 2017. “The Numinous, the Ethical and the Body: Rudolf Otto's “The Idea of the Holy” Revisited.” Open Theology 3 (1): 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0042.
   Google Scholar
• Nortvedt, Per. 2003. “Subjectivity and Vulnerability: Reflections on the Foundation of Ethical Sensibility.” Nursing Philosophy 4 (3): 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-769X.2003.00120.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otto, Rudolf. 1970. The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry Into the non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and its Relation to the Rational. Translated by John W. Harvey. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ousager, Asger. 2004. Plotinus on Selfhood, Freedom and Politics, Atlander Jutlandica LXXIX:1. Lanelandsgade: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, Bhikhu. 1996. “Minority Practices and Principles of Toleration.” International Migration Review 30 (1): 251–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839603000117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfit, Derek. 2011. “On What Matters.” In 3 Vols, The Berkeley Tanner Lectures. Vol. 1, edited by Samuel Scheffler, xxxiii, 540. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plotinus. 1952. Plotinus: The Six Enneads. Translated by Stephen MacKenna and BS Page. 1st ed, Vol. 17. Chicago: William Benton, Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Raus, Kasper, Eric Mortier, and Kristof Eeckloo. 2018. “In Defence of Moral Pluralism and Compromise in Health Care Networks.” Health Care Analysis 26 (4): 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-018-0355-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1965. On the Basis of Morality. Translated by E Payne. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1969. The World as Will and Representation. Vol. 2. Translated by EFJ Payne. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D. P. 1968. Cassell's New Latin Dictionary. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1985. “The Rani of Sirmur: An Essay in Reading the Archives.” History and Theory 24 (3): 247–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staszak, Jean-Francois. 2009. “Other/Otherness.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography: A 12-Volume Set. Vol. 10, edited by R. Kitchin, and N. Thrift, 25–32. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Verlinden, An. 2010. “Reconciling Global Duties with Special Responsibilities: Towards Dialogical Ethics.” In Questioning Cosmopolitanism, edited by Stan van Hooft, and Wim Vandekerckhove, 83–104. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Paul. 2021. “Triage in a Pandemic: Equity, Utility, or Both?” Ethics and Medicine 36 (3): 147–152. https://www.ethicsandmedicine.com/ethics-medicine-volume-363-fall-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Paul, and Terence Lovat. 2016. “Dialogic Consensus in Clinical Decision-Making.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4): 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9743-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Paul, and Terence Lovat. 2018. “In a World Characterised by Moral Pluralism, is Dialogic Consensus a Way to Establish Moral Truth?” Review of Contemporary Philosophy 17: 43–55. https://doi.org/10.22381/RCP1720184.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Paul, and Terence Lovat. 2019. “Dialogic Consensus in Medicine—A Justification Claim.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 44 (1): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy038.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Paul, and Terence Lovat. 2022. “The Moral Authority of Consensus.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 47 (3): 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhac007.
   Google Scholar
• Warnock, Mary. 1970. Existentialism. Revised ed, Opus Books. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Thomas R. 2015. “Will We Be Able To Justify The International Birthright Lottery To Our Grandchildren?” In The Philosopher's Beard.
   Google Scholar
• White, Stephen K. 1991. Political Theory and Postmodernism, Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Amanda. 2021. “Guilt Beyond Guilt: From Political Theory to Metaphysics with Herbert Morris.” The Modern Law Review 84 (1): 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zournazi, Mary, and Williams Rowan. 2020. Justice and Love: A Philosophical Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar