Planners as middle actors in facilitating for city cycling

References

• Aldred, R. 2012. “Governing Transport from Welfare State to Hollow State: The Case of Cycling in the UK.” Transport Policy 23: 95–102. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R., and K. Jungnickel. 2014. “Why Culture Matters for Transport Policy: The Case of Cycling in the UK.” Journal of Transport Geography 34: 78–87. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J., and T. Koglin. 2022. “(In) Capacity to Implement Measures for Increased Cycling? Experiences and Perspectives from Cycling Planners in Sweden.” Journal of Urban Mobility 2: 100029. doi:10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100029.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. 2008. “The Sustainable Mobility Paradigm.” Transport Policy 15 (2): 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. 2019. “The Climate Crisis and Transport.” Transport Reviews 39 (5): 565–568. doi:10.1080/01441647.2019.1637113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkmar, D. 2018. “Violent Mobilities: men, Masculinities and Road Conflicts in Sweden.” Mobilities 13 (5): 1–16. doi:10.1080/17450101.2018.1500096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkmar, D. 2020. “Cycling Politics: imagining Sustainable Cycling Futures in Sweden.” Applied Mobilities 5 (3): 324–340. doi:10.1080/23800127.2020.1723385.
   Google Scholar
• Bardal, K. G., A. Gjertsen, and M. B. Reinar. 2019. Barrierer mot mer bærekraftig mobilitet. Erfaringer fra tre norske byer. Nordlandsforskning. NF rapport nr.: 1/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Barnfield, A., and A. Plyushteva. 2016. “Cycling in the Post-Socialist City: On Travelling by Bicycle in Sofia, Bulgaria.” Urban Studies 53 (9): 1822–1835. doi:10.1177/0042098015586536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicalho, T., C. Silva, I. Cunha, J. Teixeira, and A. Proença. 2019. “Planners’ Attitudes towards the Cycling Potential of Their Cities–Creating Awareness for Attitude Change.” Travel Behaviour and Society 17: 96–103. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2019.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezina, T., U. Leth, and H. Lemmerer. 2020. “Mental Barriers in Planning for Cycling.” In The Politics of Cycling Infrastructure: Spaces and (In)Equality, edited by P. Cox and T. Koglin, 73–95. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, M. 2022. “Cycling and Transitions Theories: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Relationship between Cycling Innovations and Sustainability Goals.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 15: 100642. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100642.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, M., and A. Nikolaeva. 2020. “Towards a Maintenance-Based Approach to Mode Shift: Comparing Two Cases of Dutch Cycling Policy Using Social Practice Theory.” Journal of Transport Geography 86: 102772. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, R. E., C. S. Bale, M. Powell, A. Gouldson, P. G. Taylor, and W. F. Gale. 2017. “The Role of Intermediaries in Low Carbon Transitions–Empowering Innovations to Unlock District Heating in the UK.” Journal of Cleaner Production 148: 137–147. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canitez, F. 2019. “A Socio-Technical Transition Framework for Introducing Cycling in Developing Megacities: The Case of Istanbul.” Cities 94: 172–185. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, I. R., and K. Ward. 2011. “Trans-Urban Networks of Learning, Mega Events and Policy Tourism. The Case of Manchester’s Commonwealth and Olympic Games Projects.” Urban Studies 48 (12): 2519–2535. doi:10.1177/0042098011411941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, P. 2010. Moving People: Sustainable Transport Development. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. 2015. Cycling Cultures. Chester: University of Chester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. 2019. Cycling: A Sociology of Vélomobility. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P., and T. Koglin, eds. 2020. The Politics of Cycling Infrastructure: Spaces and (In)Equality. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1068/d11407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creutzig, F., R. Mühlhoff, and J. Römer. 2012. “Decarbonizing Urban Transport in European Cities: four Cases Show Possibly High Co-benefits.” Environmental Research Letters 7 (4): 044042. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2007. Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. Copenhagen Business School Press. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuel, M. 2019. “Making a Bicycle City: Infrastructure and Cycling in Copenhagen since 1880.” Urban History 46 (3): 493–517. doi:10.1017/S0963926818000573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. “Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – Putting European Transport on Track for the Future.” COM/2020/789 final.
   Google Scholar
• Feddes, F., M. de Lange, and M. Te Brömmelstroet. 2020. “Hard Work in Paradise. The Contested Making of Amsterdam as a Cycling City.” In The Politics of Cycling Infrastructure: Spaces and (In)Equality, edited by P. Cox and T. Koglin, 133–156. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2015a. “Cyclists as Part of the City’s Organism: Structural Stories on Cycling in Copenhagen.” City & Society 27 (1): 30–50. doi:10.1111/ciso.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2015b. “Whose Commons Are Mobilities Spaces?–The Case of Copenhagen’s Cyclists.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (2): 598–621.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2020. “Sustainable Urban Futures from Transportation and Planning to Networked Urban Mobilities.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 82: 102310. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridstrøm, L., and K. H. Alfsen, eds. 2014. Vegen Mot Klimavennlig Transport. Transportøkonomisk Institutt.
   Google Scholar
• Green Partnership Agreement. 2014. Sykkelstrategi for Trondheim 2014–2025 [Cycling Strategy for Trondheim 2014–2025]. Accessed June 5, 2019. https://miljopakken.no/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Sykkelstrategi_trondheim.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grubler, Arnulf, Charlie Wilson, Nuno Bento, Benigna Boza-Kiss, Volker Krey, David L. McCollum, Narasimha D. Rao, et al. 2018. “A Low Energy Demand Scenario for Meeting the 1.5 °C Target and Sustainable Development Goals without Negative Emission Technologies.” Nature Energy 3 (6): 515–527. doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling, G. 2013. “Urban Transport Transitions: Copenhagen, City of Cyclists.” Journal of Transport Geography 33: 196–206. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hård, M., and T. J. Misa. 2008. Urban Machinery. Inside Modern European Cities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., and N. M. Gulsrud. 2019. Street Fights in Copenhagen: Bicycle and Car Politics in a Green Mobility City. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. 2015. “Framing Niche-Regime Linkage as Adaptation: An Analysis of Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture across Europe.” Journal of Rural Studies 40: 59–75. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda, K. B., and Y. Parag. 2013. “A Middle-Out Approach for Improving Energy Performance in Buildings.” Building Research & Information 41 (1): 39–50. doi:10.1080/09613218.2013.743396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungnickel, K., and R. Aldred. 2014. “Cycling’s Sensory Strategies: How Cyclists Mediate Their Exposure to the Urban Environment.” Mobilities 9 (2): 238–255. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.796772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., and F. Kern. 2016. “Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Support? Innovation Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 45 (1): 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., W. Boon, S. Hyysalo, and L. Klerkx. 2019. “Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions. A Systematic Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 48 (4): 1062–1075. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. 2017. “Urban Mobilities and Materialities–A Critical Reflection of “Sustainable” Urban Development.” Applied Mobilities 2 (1): 32–49. doi:10.1080/23800127.2017.1285169.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., and F. Pettersson. 2017. “Changes, Problems, and Challenges in Swedish Spatial Planning—An Analysis of Power Dynamics.” Sustainability 9 (10): 1836. doi:10.3390/su9101836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., and T. Rye. 2014. “The Marginalization of Bicycling in Modernist Urban Transport Planning.” Journal of Transport & Health 1 (4): 214–222. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. 2015. “Vélomobility and the Politics of Transport Planning.” GeoJournal 80 (4): 569–586. doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9565-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. 2020. “Spatial Dimension of the Marginalization of Cycling – Marginalization through Rationalization?” In The Politics of Cycling Infrastructure: Spaces and (In)Equality, edited by P. Cox and T. Koglin, 55–73. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbenstvedt, M. T., and A. S. Ruud. 2017. Byutredninger og byvekstavtaler. Tiltakskatalog for transport og miljø.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. 2016. “The Making of a Pro-Cycling City: Social Practices and Bicycle Mobilities.” Environment and Planning A 49 (4): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, A., and P. Wood. 2015. “Inhabiting Infrastructure: Exploring the Interactional Spaces of Urban Cycling.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47 (2): 300–319. doi:10.1068/a140049p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, J. 2015. Bike Battles. A History of Sharing the American Road. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. 2011. “Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Towards a Research Agenda.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (1): 107–130. doi:10.1080/00045608.2010.520219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMeekin, A., and D. Southerton. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions and Final Consumption: Practices and Socio-Technical Systems.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (4): 345–361. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.663960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Travelling Survey. 2018/2019. The Norwegian Public Roads Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Parag, Y., and K. B. Janda. 2010. “Midstream and Sideways: Considering a Middle-Out Approach to Changing Energy Demand.” Proceedings of Energy Transitions in an Interdependent World.
   Google Scholar
• Parag, Y., and K. B. Janda. 2014. “More than Filler: Middle Actors and Socio-Technical Change in the Energy System from the “Middle-out”.” Energy Research & Social Science 3: 102–112. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.011.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, J., ed. 2012. Cycling and Sustainability. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limit.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2015. Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P. 2010. “Bicycling as a Way of Life: A Comparative Case Study of Bicycle Culture in Portland, OR and Amsterdam.” In 7th Cycling and Society Symposium, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Petzer, B. J., A. J. Wieczorek, and G. P. Verbong. 2021. “The Legal Street: A Scarcity Approach to Urban Open Space in Mobility Transitions.” Urban Transformations 3 (1): 24. doi:10.1186/s42854-021-00018-0.
   Google Scholar
• Plyushteva, A., and A. Barnfield. 2020. “Navigating Cycling Infrastructure in Sofia, Bulgaria.” In The Politics of Cycling Infrastructure, edited by P. Cox and T. Koglin, 195–210. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., and R. Buehler. 2012. City Cycling. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., and R. Buehler. 2017. “Cycling towards a More Sustainable Transport Future.” Transport Reviews 37 (6): 689–694. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1340234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psarikidou, K., D. Zuev, and C. Popan. 2020. “Sustainable Cycling Futures: Can Cycling Be the Future?” Applied Mobilities 5 (3): 225–231. doi:10.1080/23800127.2020.1845073.
   Google Scholar
• Rérat, P. 2021. “The Rise of the e-Bike: Towards an Extension of the Practice of Cycling?” Mobilities 16 (3): 423–439. doi:10.1080/17450101.2021.1897236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., D. Shindell, K. Jiang, S. Fifita, P. Forster, V. Ginzburg, C. Handa, et al. 2018. Chapter 2: Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development. In: Global Warming of 1.5 °C, an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F. 2017. “Cycling the City, Re-Imagining the City: Envisioning Urban Sustainability Transitions in Thailand.” Urban Studies 54 (12): 2763–2779. doi:10.1177/0042098016652565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldrick, A., J. Evans, and G. Schliwa. 2017. “Policy Learning and Sustainable Urban Transitions: Mobilising Berlin’s Cycling Renaissance.” Urban Studies 54 (12): 2739–2762. doi:10.1177/0042098016653889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2021a. “Population Trondheim.” Accessed from Kommunefakta Trondheim-SSB.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2021b. “Population Bergen.” Accessed from Kommunefakta Bergen-SSB.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, A., V. Nenseth, and P. Christiansen. 2015. Norsk sykkelpolitikk – på vei. TØI rapport 1453/2015.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffers, M. 2012. “Cycling as Heritage: Representing the History of Cycling in The Netherlands.” The Journal of Transport History 33 (1): 92–114. doi:10.7227/TJTH.33.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Suboticki, I., and K. H. Sørensen. 2021. “Designing and Domesticating an Interstructure: Exploring the Practices and the Politics of an Elevator for Cyclists.” Urban Studies 58 (6): 1229–1244. doi:10.1177/0042098020910334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennøy, A., A. Tønnesen, and F. Gundersen. 2019. “Effects of Urban Road Capacity Expansion–Experiences from Two Norwegian Cases.” Transportation Research Part D: transport and Environment 69: 90–106. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennøy, A. 2010. “Why We Fail to Reduce Urban Road Traffic Volumes: Does It Matter How Planners Frame the Problem?” Transport Policy 17 (4): 216–223. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondheim Municipality. 1981. “[Trondheim kommune, Teknisk avdeling]. Plan for the cycling network [Plan for sykkelveinettet].”
   Google Scholar
• Tschoerner-Budde, C. 2020. “Cycling Policy Futures: Diversifying Governance, Expertise and the Culture of Everyday Mobilities.” Applied Mobilities 5 (3): 306–323. doi:10.1080/23800127.2020.1766217.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. 2020. “Planning for Cycling in a Growing Megacity: Exploring Planners’ Perceptions and Shared Values.” Cities 106: 102857. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White Paper 33. 2016–2017. National Transport Plan 2018–2029. Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, K., A. Woodward, A. Field, and A. Macmillan. 2018. “Beyond ‘Bikelash’: Engaging with Community Opposition to Cycle Lanes.” Mobilities 13 (4): 505–519. doi:10.1080/17450101.2017.1408950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. 2016. “Tracing Policy Movements: Methods for Studying Learning and Policy Circulation.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (2): 391–406. doi:10.1177/0308518X15605329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., T. A. Carstensen, T. A. S. Nielsen, and A. S. Olafsson. 2018. “Bicycle-Friendly Infrastructure Planning in Beijing and Copenhagen-between Adapting Design Solutions and Learning Local Planning Cultures.” Journal of Transport Geography 68: 149–159. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar