Sensory and emotional dimensions of domesticating new technology: an experiment with new e-bike users in Norway

References

• Adey, P. 2009. Mobility. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, P. 2017. Mobility. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315669298
   Google Scholar
• Aldred, R. 2015. “A Matter of Utility? Rationalising Cycling, Cycling Rationalities.” Mobilities 10 (5): 686–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.935149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Author 2021. “El-sykkel som utvidelsesteknologi: Nødvendigheten av å studere en mulig grønn omstillingsprosess i et brukerperspektiv.” Norsk Sosiologisk Tidsskrift 5 (4): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2021-04-01
   Google Scholar
• Behrendt, F. 2018. “Why Cycling Matters for Electric Mobility: Towards Diverse, Active and Sustainable E-Mobilities.”  Mobilities 13 (1) : 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1335463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, T., S. Halvachizadeh, J. Backup, Y. Kalbas, T. Rauer, R. Zettl, H. C. Pape, F. Hess, and J. E. Welter. 2022. “Increased Injury Severity and Hospitalization Rates following Crashes with e-Bikes versus Conventional Bicycles: An Observational Cohort Study from a Regional Level II Trauma Center in Switzerland.” Patient Safety in Surgery 16 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-022-00318-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandal, J., and R. J. Noonan. 2022. “Motivations, Perceptions and Experiences of Cycling for Transport: A Photovoice Study.” Journal of Transport & Health 25: 101341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borer, M. I. 2013. “Being in the City: The Sociology of Urban Experiences.” Sociology Compass 7 (11): 965–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12085
   Google Scholar
• Brand, C., J. Anable, I. Ketsopoulou, and J. Watson. 2020. “Road to Zero or Road to Nowhere? Disrupting Transport and Energy in a Zero Carbon World.” Energy Policy 139: 111334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, M., and D. Howes. 2016. “Editorial: The Expanding Field of Sensory Studies.” The Senses and Society 11 (1): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2016.1194612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, S., F. Behrendt, D. Raffo, C. Beaumont, and C. Kiefer. 2017. “Electrically-Assisted Bikes: Potential Impact on Travel Behavior.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 103: 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S., J. Green, and E. Speed. 2018. “Digital Technologies and the Biomedicalisation of Everyday Activities: The Case of Walking and Cycling.” Sociology Compass 12 (4): e12572. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T., and J. Halley, eds. 2007. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389606
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2006. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (1): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, J. E. 2001. The Invention of Comfort. Sensibilities & Design in Early Modern Britain & Early America, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency) 2021. “Building the Foundations for Fundamental Change.” Accessed August 3, 2022. https://www.eea.europa.eu/articles/building-the-foundations-for-fundamental-change
   Google Scholar
• Figenbaum, E. 2017. “Perspectives on Norway’s supercharged electric vehicle policy.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 25: 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, E., and C. Cherry. 2016. “E-Bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research.” Transport Reviews 36 (1): 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2017. “Time: The Particular and the Universal.” In Mobilities and Complexities, edited by O. B. Jensen, S. Kesselring, and M. Sheller, 143–147. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, O. J., and J. Larsen. 2021. “‘Converting Motorist’: E-Bikes Experiments and Commuting in Greater Copenhagen.” In Cycling Societies. Innovations, Inequalities and Governance, edited by D. Zuev, K. Psarikidou, and C. Popan, 92–101. London; New York, NY: Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fyhri, A., and H. B. Sundfør. 2020. “Do People Who Buy E-Bikes Cycle More?” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 86: 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyhri, A., and N. Fearnley. 2015. “Effects of E-Bikes on Bicycle Use and Mode Share.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 36: 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P. 2021. “We Are Now Facing Two Alternative Futures (Plus an Untenable One).” Accessed August 3, 2022. https://www.transportxtra.com/publications/transit/news/69570/we-are-now-facing-two-alternative-futures-plus-an-untenable-one-/
   Google Scholar
• Gromark, S., M. Ilmonen, K. Paadam, and E. Støa. 2016. Ways of Residing in Transformation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545738
   Google Scholar
• Hagman, O. 2003. “Mobilizing meanings of mobility: car users’ constructions of the goods and bads of car use.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 8 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00014-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, M. 2020. “The Domestication of Nordic Domestication?” Nordic Journal of Media Studies 2 (1): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2020-0005
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. 2020. “EVs Are Not the Answer: A Mobility Justice Critique of Electric Vehicle Transitions.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (6): 1993–2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1744422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, D., and H. Richardson. 2009. “What Use is Domestication Theory to Information Systems Research?” In Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems, edited by Y. Diwedi, B. Lai, M. Schneberger, and M. Wade, 482–494. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Ingulfsvann, L. S., F. M. Moe, and G. Engelsrud. 2022. “Unpacking the Joy of Movement – ‘It’s Almost Never the Same’.” Sport, Education and Society 27 (7): 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1927695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., M. Sheller, and S. Wind. 2015. “Together and Apart: Affective Ambiences and Families’ Everyday Life and Mobility.” Mobilities 10 (3): 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2013.868158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2012. “Sensory Indiscipline and Affect: A Study of Commuter Cycling.” Social & Cultural Geography 13 (6): 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.713505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T., L. Harms, and E. Heinen. 2016. “Motives, Perceptions and Experiences of Electric Bicycle Owners and Implications for Health, Wellbeing and Mobility.” Journal of Transport Geography 53: 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemzadeh, K., and E. Ronchi. 2022. “From Bike to Electric Bike Level-of-Service.” Transport Reviews 42 (1): 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1900450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontar, W., S. Ahn, and A. Hicks. 2022. “Electric Bicycles Sharing: Opportunities and Environmental Impacts.” Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability 2 (3): 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac7c8b
   Google Scholar
• Korsnes, M., B. Loewen, R. F. Dale, M. Steen, and T. M. Skjølsvold. 2023. “Paradoxes of Norway’s Energy Transition: Controversies and Justice.” Climate Policy 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2169238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamvik, G. M. 1996. “A Fairy Tale on Wheels: The Car as a Vehicle for Meaning within a Norwegian Subculture.” In Making Technology Our Own?: Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life, edited by M. Lie and K. H. Sørensen, 151–171. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies.” Body & Society 10 (2–3): 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943
   Google Scholar
• Lie, M., and K. H. Sørensen, eds. 1996. “Making Technology Our Own?” In Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martiskainen, M., and B. K. Sovacool. 2021. “Mixed Feelings: A Review and Research Agenda for Emotions in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 40: 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, et al., eds. 2021. “IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.001
   Google Scholar
• Mersky, A. C., F. Sprei, C. Samaras, and Z. S. Qian. 2016. “Effectiveness of Incentives on Electric Vehicle Adoption in Norway.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 46: 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljødirektoratet 2020. Klimakur 2030: Tiltak og virkemidler mot 2030. https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/m1625/m1625.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nordengen, S., L. B. Andersen, A. Riiser, and A. K. Solbraa. 2021. “National Trends in Cycling in Light of the Norwegian Bike Traffic Index.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (12): 6198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantzar, M. 1997. “Domestication of Everyday Life Technology: Dynamic Views on the Social Histories of Artifacts.” Design Issues 13 (3): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips, I., J. Anable, and T. Chatterton. 2022. “E-Bikes and Their Capability to Reduce Car CO2 Emissions.” Transport Policy 116: 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plazier, Paul A., Gerd Weitkamp, and Agnes E. Van Den Berg. 2018. “Exploring the Adoption of E-Bikes by Different User Groups.” Frontiers in Built Environment 4: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popovich, N., E. Gordon, Z. Shao, Y. Xing, Y. Wang, and S. Handy. 2014. “Experiences of Electric Bicycle Users in the Sacramento, California Area.” Travel Behaviour and Society 1 (2): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodaway, P. 1994. Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense, and Place. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2012. “E-Bikes and Urban Transportation: Emerging Issues and Unresolved Questions.” Transportation 39 (1): 81–96. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9328-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahakian, M. 2022. “More, Bigger, Better’ Household Appliances: Contesting Normativity in Practices Through Emotions.” Journal of Consumer Culture 22 (1): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540519889983
   Google Scholar
• Sahakian, M., and H. Wilhite. 2014. “Making Practice Theory Practicable: Towards More Sustainable Forms of Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (1): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513505607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samferdselsdepartementet 2021. Nasjonal Transportplan 2022–2033. Meld. St 20 (2020–2021). https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/transport-og-kommunikasjon/nasjonal-transportplan/id2475111/
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, T. 2020. “Vi må ta sykling på større alvor enn før.” Dagsavisen, October 16. https://www.dagsavisen.no/nyheter/innenriks/2020/10/16/vi-ma-ta-sykling-pa-mye-storre-alvor-enn-for/
   Google Scholar
• Sarıbaş, Ö., and C. Demir. 2020. “Sensory Studies as a Multidisciplinary Research Field and Its Use in Tourism Research: A Bibliometric Analysis on Tourism Literature.” Turizm Akademik Dergisi 7 (1): 269–283. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1152681
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2004. “Automotive Emotions: Feeling the Car.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (2): 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D., eds. 2020. “Introducing Qualitative Research.” In Qualitative Research. 5th ed., 3–16. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R., and E. Hirsch, eds. 1992. Consuming Technologies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solbu, G., and K. H. Sørensen. 2022. “Incorporation Work: The Socialisation of Bio- and Nanotechnology Through Newspapers.” Nordic Journal of Science and Technology studies 10 (1): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v10i1.4020
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. H. 1992. “Bilen og det moderne Norge. En sosioteknisk transformasjon.” Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning 33 (1): 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. H. 1994. Technology in Use: Two Essays on the Domestication of Artefacts. STS Working Papers 2/94. Trondheim: NTNU, Centre for Technology and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. H. 2006. “Domestication: The Enactment of Technology.” In Domestication of Media and Technology, edited by T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, and K. Ward, 40–61. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. H., M. Aune, and M. Hatling. 2000. “Against Linearity: On the Cultural Appropriation of Science and Technology.” In Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology, edited by M. Dierkes and C. von Grote, 237–257. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. 2011. “A Chance to Catch a Breath: Using Mobile Video Ethnography in Cycling Research.” Mobilities 6 (2): 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2011.552771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statens Vegvesen 2020. Nasjonalt regnskap for bærekraftig mobilitet 2019. Transport og samfunn. https://www.vegvesen.no/globalassets/fag/fokusomrader/miljovennlig-transport/nasjonalt-regnskap-for-baerekraftig-mobilitet-2019b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, J. R., A. I. Sinding, and L. Greenberg. 2019. “Hva forteller følelsene oss?” Psykologisk.no. https://psykologisk.no/2019/12/hva-forteller-folelsene-oss/
   Google Scholar
• Suominen, J., A. Silvast, and T. Harviainen. 2018. “Smelling Machine History: Olfactory Experiences of Information Technology.” Technology and Culture 59 (2): 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2018.0031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiseo, I. 2021. “Distribution of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Produced by the Transportation Sector Worldwide in 2020, by Subsector.” Statista.com. Accessed October 12, 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1185535/transport-carbon-dioxide-emissions-breakdown/
   Google Scholar
• Tjora, A. 2017. Kvalitative Forskningsmetoder i Praksis. 3rd ed. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE/WHO 2021. The Pan-European Master Plan for Cycle Promotion, 2021. https://thepep.unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/MASTERPLAN_2021-05-20-II_BF%203%20June_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weenink, D., and G. Spargaren. 2016. “Emotional Agency Navigates a World of Practice.” In Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, edited by G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink, and L. Lamers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wikstrøm, R. D., and L. Böcker. 2020. “Changing Suburban Daily Mobilities in Response to a Mobility Intervention: A Quality Investigation of an E-Bike Trial.” Sustainability 12 (6): 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, K., & A. Woodward, and C. Shaw. 2021. “Gender and the E-Bike: Exploring the Role of Electric Bikes in Increasing Women’s Access to Cycling and Physical Activity.” Active Travel Studies 1 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.991
   Google Scholar
• Wild, K., and A. Woodward. 2019. “Why Are Cyclists the Happiest Commuters? Health, Pleasure and the E-Bike.” Journal of Transport & Health 14: 100569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winther, H. 2014. “Grundfølelsernes liv og funktion i idræts- og bevægelsesundervisning – et allestedsnærværende læringspotentiale.” idrotssforum.org, 1–12. https://idrottsforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/winther141118.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A., and S. Seebauer. 2014. “Technology Adoption of Electric Bicycles: A Survey Among Early Adopters.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 69: 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ydersbond, I. M., and K. Veisten. 2019. Klimaeffekten av elsykkel. TØI rapport 1691/2019. https://www.toi.no/getfile.php?mmfileid=49973
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Y.,. F. Xin, and L. Wei. 2014. “Characteristics of the Electric Bicycle: A Comparative Analysis with Bicycles and Public Transit.” 14th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413623.330
   Google Scholar