References
- Virmani AK, Fong KM, Kodagoda D, et al. Allelotyping demonstrates common and distinct patterns of chromosomal loss in human lung cancer types. Genes, Chromosomes Cancer [Internet]. 1998;21:308–319. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10. 1002/%28SICI%291098-2264%28199804%2921%3A4%3C308%3A%3AAID-GCC4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-2.
- Adelstein DJ, Tomashefski JF, Snow NJ, et al. Mixed small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. Chest [Internet]. 1986;89:699–704. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012369216616045.
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.
- Oser MG, Niederst MJ, Sequist L V, et al. Transformation from non-small-cell lung cancer to small-cell lung cancer: molecular drivers and cells of origin. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2015;16:e165–e172. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204514711805.
- Ochiai S, Yamakado K, Kodama H, et al. Comparison of therapeutic results from radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy in solitary lung tumors measuring 5 cm or smaller. Int J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2015;20:499–507. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/s10147-014-0741-z.
- Calbo J, van Montfort E, Proost N, et al. A functional role for tumor cell heterogeneity in a mouse model of small cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell [Internet]. 2011;19:244–256. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1535610810005301.
- Krishnaiah V, Narsimha G, Subhash N, et al. Diagnosis of lung cancer prediction system using data mining classification techniques. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol. 2013;4:39–45.
- González-Forteza C, Torres CS, Tapia AJ, et al. Confiabilidad y validez de la escala de depresión CES-D en un censo de estudiantes de nivel medio superior y superior, en la Ciudad de México. Salud Ment. 2011;34:53–59.
- Thummajitsakul S, Kaewsri W, Deetae P. Analysis of intraspecific genetic variation, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Zingiber zerumbet. Int Food Res J. 2016;23:1552–1557.
- Silvestri GA, Gould MK, Margolis ML, et al. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132:178S–201S.
- Adenocarcinoma L, Travis WD, Brambilla E, et al. American Thoracic Society International Association for the study of lung cancer / American Thoracic Society / European Respiratory Society : international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. Am Thorac Soc. 2011;8:381–385.
- Loo PS, Thomas SC, Nicolson MC, et al. Subtyping of undifferentiated non-small cell carcinomas in bronchial biopsy specimens. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:442–447.
- Nicholson AG, Gonzalez D, Shah P, et al. Refining the diagnosis and EGFR status of non-small cell lung carcinoma in biopsy and cytologic material, using a panel of Mucin staining, TTF-1, cytokeratin 5/6, and P63, and EGFR mutation analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:436–441.
- Blandin Knight S, Crosbie PA, Balata H, et al. Progress and prospects of early detection in lung cancer. Open Biol [Internet]. 2017;7:170070. Available from: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10. 1098/rsob.170070.
- Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc [Internet]. 2008;83:584–594. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0025619611607350.
- Osterlind K. Chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2001;18:1026–1043. Available from: http://erj.ersjournals.com/cgi/doi/10.1183/09031936.01.00266101.
- El-Regaily SA, Salem MA, Abdel Aziz MH, et al. Survey of computer aided detection systems for lung cancer in computed tomography. Curr Med Imaging Rev [Internet]. 2017;14:3–18. Available from: http://www.eurekaselect.com/152893/article.
- Shao H, Cao L, Liu Y. A detection approach for solitary pulmonary nodules based on CT images. Proc 2012 2nd Int Conf Comput Sci Netw Technol [Internet]. IEEE; 2012. p. 1253–1257. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6526151/.
- Cruz JA, Wishart DS. Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis. Cancer Inform [Internet]. 2006;2:117693510600200. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10. 1177/117693510600200030.
- Muthazhagan B, Ravi T. An early diagnosis of lung cancer disease using data mining and medical image processing methods : a survey. Middle-East J Sci Res. 2016;24:3263–3267.
- Lee Y, Hara T, Fujita H, et al. Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in helical CT images based on an improved template-matching technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20:595–604.
- Rathore S, Hussain M, Aksam Iftikhar M, et al. Ensemble classification of colon biopsy images based on information rich hybrid features. Comput Biol Med. 2014;47:76–92.
- Rathore S, Hussain M, Ali A, et al. A recent survey on colon cancer detection techniques. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2013;10:545–563.
- Rathore S, Iftikhar A, Ali A, et al. Capture largest included circles: An approach for counting red blood cells. Commun Comput Inf Sci. 2012;281 CCIS:373–384.
- Rathore S, Hussain M, Khan A. Automated colon cancer detection using hybrid of novel geometric features and some traditional features. Comput Biol Med [Internet]. 2015;65:279–296. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010482515000827.
- Hussain L, Saeed S, Awan IA, et al. Detecting brain tumor using machines learning techniques based on different features extracting strategies. Curr Med Imaging Former Curr Med Imaging Rev [Internet]. 2019;15:595–606. Available from: http://www.eurekaselect.com/163868/article.
- Hussain L, Aziz W, Saeed S, et al. Automated breast cancer detection using machine learning techniques by extracting different feature extracting strategies. 2018 17th IEEE Int Conf Trust Secur Priv Comput Commun 12th IEEE Int Conf Big Data Sci Eng [Internet]. IEEE; 2018. p. 327–331. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8455925/.
- Hussain L, Ahmed A, Saeed S, et al. Prostate cancer detection using machine learning techniques by employing combination of features extracting strategies. Cancer Biomarkers [Internet]. 2018;21:393–413. Available from: http://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&doi=10. 3233/CBM-170643.
- Fenton L. The lung cancer alliance. J Oncol Pract [Internet]. 2006;2:306–306. Available from: http://ascopubs.org/doi/10. 1200/jop.2006.2.6.306.
- Adegoke OB, Polytechnic OS OM, State O, et al. Review of feature selection methods in medical image processing international organization of scientific research. IOSR J Eng. 2014;04:1–5.
- Hussain L, Rathore S, Abbasi AA, et al. Automated lung cancer detection based on multimodal features extracting strategy using machine learning techniques. In: Bosmans H, Chen G-H, Gilat Schmidt T, editors. Med Imaging 2019 Physics of Medical Imaging [Internet]. San Diego, CA: SPIE; 2019. p. 134. Available from: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/10948/2512059/Automated-lung-cancer-detection-based-on-multimodal-features-extracting-strategy/10. 1117/12.2512059.full.
- Hussain L, Aziz W, Alshdadi AA, et al. Analyzing the dynamics of lung cancer imaging data using refined fuzzy entropy methods by extracting different features. IEEE Access [Internet]. 2019;7:64704–64721. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8716659/.
- Mavroforakis ME, Georgiou H V, Cavouras D, et al. Mammographic mass classification using textural features and descriptive diagnostic data. Int Conf Digit Signal Process DSP. 2002;1:461–464.
- Lowe DG. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis [Internet]. 2004;60:91–110. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94.
- Hussain L, Ali A, Rathore S, et al. Applying Bayesian network approach to determine the association between morphological features extracted from prostate cancer images. IEEE Access. 2018;7:1586–1601.
- Khalvati F, Zhang J, Chung AG, et al. MPCad: a multi-scale radiomics-driven framework for automated prostate cancer localization and detection. BMC Med Imaging [Internet]. 2018;18:16. Available from: https://bmcmedimaging.biomedcentral.com/articles/10. 1186/s12880-018-0258-4.
- Fetz V, Prochnow H, Brönstrup M, et al. Target identification by image analysis. Nat Prod Rep [Internet]. 2016;33:655–667. Available from: http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C5NP00113G.
- Mattiazzi Usaj M, Styles EB, Verster AJ, et al. High-content screening for quantitative cell biology. Trends Cell Biol [Internet]. 2016;26:598–611. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0962892416300010.
- Boutros M, Heigwer F, Laufer C. Microscopy-based high-content screening. Cell [Internet]. 2015;163:1314–1325. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867415014877.
- Kadir T, Gleeson F. Lung cancer prediction using machine learning and advanced imaging techniques. Transl Lung Cancer Res [Internet]. 2018;7:304. http://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/21998.
- Fatouros DG, Deen GR, Arleth L, et al. Structural development of Self Nano Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (SNEDDS) during In vitro lipid digestion monitored by small-angle X-ray scattering. Pharm Res [Internet]. 2007;24:1844–1853. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/s11095-007-9304-6.
- Naranjo V, Lloréns R, Alcañiz M, et al. Metal artifact reduction in dental CT images using polar mathematical morphology. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011;102:64–74.
- Welfer D, Scharcanski J, Marinho DR. Fovea center detection based on the retina anatomy and mathematical morphology. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011;104:397–409.
- Masseroli M, Bollea A, Forloni G. Quantitative morphology and shape classification of neurons by computerized image analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1993;41:89–99.
- Li YM, Zeng XP. A new strategy for urinary sediment segmentation based on wavelet, morphology and combination method. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006;84:162–173.
- Extraction F, Target A, Maximum O, et al. A target recognition method using orthogonal maximum margin criterion projection. 2017;79.
- Largeron C, Moulin C, Géry M. Entropy based feature selection for text categorization. Proc 2011 ACM Symp Appl Comput - SAC ‘11. 2011;924.
- Largeron C, Moulin C, Mathias G, et al. Entropy based feature selection for text categorization. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM symposium on applied computing; 2011. p. 924–928.
- Costa M, Goldberger AL, Peng C-K. Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Phys Rev Lett [Internet]. 2002;89:068102. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.89.068102.
- Costa M, Goldberger AL, Peng C-KK. Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals. Phys Rev E [Internet]. 2005;71:021906. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.71.021906.
- Aziz W, Arif M. Complexity analysis of stride interval time series by threshold dependent symbolic entropy. Eur J Appl Physiol [Internet]. 2006;98:30–40. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/s00421-006-0226-5.
- Peng C-KK, Costa M, Goldberger AL. Adaptive data analysis of complex fluctuations in physiologic time series. Adv Adapt Data Anal [Internet]. 2009;01:61–70. Available from: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10. 1142/S1793536909000035.
- Arking R, Dudas SP. Review of genetic investigations into the aging processes of drosophila. J Am Geriatr Soc [Internet]. 1989;37:757–773. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10. 1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb02240.x.
- Kornecki S, Zschorlich V. The nature of the stabilizing functions of skeletal muscles. J Biomech [Internet]. 1994;27:215–225. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0021929094902119.
- Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Myosin isoforms in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol [Internet]. 1994;77:493–501. Available from: http://www.physiology.org/doi/10. 1152/jappl.1994.77.2.493.
- West MD. The cellular and molecular biology of skin aging. Arch Dermatol [Internet]. 1994;130:87. Available from: http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10. 1001/archderm.1994.01690010091014.
- Finch CE, Gosden RG. Animal models for the human menopause. Aging, Reprod Climacteric [Internet]. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1986. p. 3–34. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/978-1-4684-5047-7_1.
- Wei J Y, Gersh BJ. Heart disease in the elderly. Curr Probl Cardiol [Internet]. 1987;12:7–65. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0146280687900156.
- Mosher-Ashley PM. Procedural and methodological parameters in behavioral-gerontological research: a review. Int J Aging Hum Dev [Internet]. 1987;24:189–229. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10. 2190/2B3T-7RFN-AYM7-C4GG.
- Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM. Changing complexity in human behavior and physiology through aging and disease. Neurobiol Aging [Internet]. 2002;23:1–11. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0197458001002470.
- Hussain L, Saeed S, Awan IA, et al. Multiscaled complexity analysis of EEG epileptic seizure using entropy-based techniques. Arch Neurosci [Internet]. 2018;5:1–11. Available from: http://archneurosci.com/en/articles/61161.html.
- Hussain L, Aziz W, Alowibdi JS, et al. Symbolic time series analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) epileptic seizure and brain dynamics with eye-open and eye-closed subjects during resting states. J Physiol Anthropol. 2017;36:1–12.
- Hussain L, Aziz W, Saeed S, et al. Quantifying the dynamics of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals to distinguish alcoholic and non-alcoholic subjects using an MSE based K-d tree algorithm. Biomed Eng / Biomed Tech. 2017;63:481–490.
- Haralick RM, Shanmugam K.. Textural features for image classification. EEE Trans. Syst Man Cybern Syst. 1973;6:610–621.
- Khuzi AM, Besar R, Zaki WMDW. Texture features selection for masses detection in digital mammogram. IFMBE Proc. 2008;21 IFMBE:629–632.
- Nguyen VD, Nguyen DT, Nguyen TD, et al. An automated method to segment and classify masses in mammograms. Eng Technol. 2009;3:942–947.
- Nithya R, Santhi B. Classification of normal and abnormal patterns in digital mammograms for diagnosis of breast cancer. Int J Comput Appl. 2011;28:975–8887.
- Soh L, Tsatsoulis C, Member S. Texture analysis of SAR Sea Ice imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1999;37:780–795.
- Nithya R. Comparative study on feature extraction. J Theor Appl Infrormation Technol. 2011;33:7.
- Guru DS, Sharath YH, Manjunath S. Texture features and KNN in classification of flower images. IJCA. 2010;Special Issue on RTIPPR(1):21–29.
- Berbar MA. Hybrid methods for feature extraction for breast masses classification. Egypt Informatics J. 2017;19:1–11.
- Beura S, Majhi B, Dash R. Neurocomputing Mammogram classi fi cation using two dimensional discrete wavelet transform and gray-level co-occurrence matrix for detection of breast cancer. Neurocomputing. 2015;154:1–14.
- Parvez A. Feature computation using CUDA platform. 2017;296–300.
- Amrit G, Singh P. Performance analysis of various machine learning-based approaches for detection and classification of lung cancer in humans. Neural Computing and Applications. 2018;31:3456789.
- Liang JK. Transactions briefs. IEEE Transitions on Circuits and Systems, Vol. CAS-32, No. 4, April. 1984;Vol. CAS-32:7.
- Mitrou N. Results on nonrecursive digital filters with nonequidistant taps. IEEE Trans Acoust [Internet]. 1985;33:1621–1624. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1164722/.
- Willmore B, Tolhurst DJ. Characterizing the sparseness of neural codes. Netw Comput Neural Syst [Internet]. 2001;12:255–270. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10. 1080/net.12.3.255.270.
- Cevher V, Sankaranarayanan A, Duarte MF, et al. Compressive sensing for background subtraction. 2008;155–156.
- Gu J, Nayar S, Grinspun E, et al. Compressive structured light for recovering inhomogeneous participating media. 2008;d:845–846.
- Wright J, Yang AY, Ganesh A, et al. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell [Internet]. 2009;31:210–227. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4483511/.
- Mei X, Ling H, Jacobs DW. Sparse representation of cast shadows via l1-regularized least squares. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision [Internet]. IEEE; 2009. p. 583–590. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5459185/.
- Hyvärinen A, Oja E. Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Networks [Internet]. 2000;13:411–430. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0893608000000265.
- Xiao Y, Zhu Z, Zhao Y, et al. Kernel reconstruction ICA for sparse representation. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst [Internet]. 2015;26:1222–1232. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6862892/.
- Wu Y, Wang S, Huang Q. Multi-modal semantic autoencoder for cross-modal retrieval. Neurocomputing. 2018;1:1–30.
- Cowan JD, Tesauro G, Alspector J. Advances in neural information processing systems 6: 7th Annual Conference Entitled "Neural Information Processing Systems-Natural and Synthetic". Morgan Kaufmann; 1994.
- Vincent P, Larochelle H. Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. Proc 25th Int Confer- ence Mach Learn. 2008. p. 1096–1103.
- Zhang Y-D, Zhang Y, Hou X-X, et al. Seven-layer deep neural network based on sparse autoencoder for voxelwise detection of cerebral microbleed. Multimed Tools Appl [Internet]. 2018;77:10521–10538. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/s11042-017-4554-8.
- Mehta J, Majumdar A. RODEO: robust DE-aliasing autoencOder for real-time medical image reconstruction. Pattern Recognit [Internet]. 2017;63:499–510. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031320316302850.
- Seghier ML, Kolanko MA, Leff AP, et al. Microbleed detection using automated segmentation (MIDAS): A new method applicable to standard clinical MR images. Zhan W, editor. Plos One [Internet]. 2011;6:e17547. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0017547.
- Zeng K, Yu J, Wang R, et al. Coupled deep autoencoder for single image super-resolution. IEEE Trans Cybern [Internet]. 2017;47:27–37. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7339460/.
- Jia W, Muhammad K, Wang S-H, et al. Five-category classification of pathological brain images based on deep stacked sparse autoencoder. Multimed Tools Appl [Internet]. 2019;78:4045–4064. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/s11042-017-5174-z.
- Way GP, Greene CS. Extracting a biologically relevant latent space from cancer transcriptomes with variational autoencoders. Biocomput 2018. WORLD SCIENTIFIC; 2018. p. 80–91.
- Tan J, Ung M, Cheng C, et al. Unsupervised feature construction and knowledge extraction from genome-wide assays of breast cancer with denoising autoencoders. Biocomput 2015 [Internet]. WORLD SCIENTIFIC; 2014. p. 132–143. Available from: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10. 1142/9789814644730_0014.
- Baldi P, Hornik K. Neural networks and principal component analysis: learning from examples without local minima. Neural Networks. 1989;2:53–58.
- Lee H, Pham P, Largman Y, et al. Unsupervised feature learning for audio classification using convolutional deep belief networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2009;22:1096–1104.
- Rifai S, Vincent P, Muller X. Contractive auto-encoders: Explicit invariance during feature extraction. Proc 28th Int Conf Mach Learn. 2011. p. 833–840.
- Aurelio M, Rob R. Learning Invariant features through topographic filter maps. Proc Twenty-Eighth Int Conf Mach Learn, Miami, FL. 2009:1605–1612.
- Getoor L, Scheffer T, Glorot X, et al. Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth International Conference on Machine Learning. 2011. p. 1216.
- Bengio Y. Learning deep architectures for AI. Found Trends® Mach Learn [Internet]. 2009;2:1–127. Available from: http://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/MAL-006.
- Kacser H. Greedy layer-wise training of deep Networks Yoshua. J Theor Biol. 1991;149:141–144.
- Dilokthanakul N, Mediano PAM, Garnelo M, et al. Deep unsupervised clustering with Gaussian mixture variational autoencoders. 2016;48. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02648.
- Masci J, Meier U, Cireşan D, et al. Stacked Convolutional Auto-Encoders for Hierarchical Feature Extraction. Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2011 ICANN 2011 Lecture Notes in Computer Science [Internet]. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2011. p. 52–59. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/978-3-642-21735-7_7.
- Gehring J, Miao Y, Metze F, et al. Extracting deep bottleneck features using stacked auto-encoders. 2013 IEEE International Conference Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing. IEEE; 2013. p. 3377–3381.
- Shin H-C, Orton MR, Collins DJ, et al. Stacked autoencoders for unsupervised feature learning and multiple organ detection in a pilot study using 4D patient data. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013;35:1930–1943.
- Alain GYB. What regularized auto-encoders learn from the data-generating distribution. J Mach Learn. 2014;1:3563–3593.
- Bengio Y, Lecun Y. Scaling Learning Algorithms towards AI To appear in “Large-Scale Kernel Machines”. New York. 2007;1–41.
- Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science. 2006;313:504–507.
- Vincent P. A connection between score matching and denoising autoencoders. Neural Comput. 2011;23:1661–1674.
- Wang Y, Yao H, Zhao S. Auto-encoder based dimensionality reduction. Neurocomputing. 2016;184:232–242.
- Bhatia V, Rani R. A distributed overlapping community detection model for large graphs using autoencoder. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2018: 16–26.
- Vapnik VN. An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Trans Neural Networks [Internet]. 1999;10:988–999. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/788640/.
- Toccaceli P, Gammerman A. Combination of conformal predictors for classification. Proc Sixth Work Conform Probabilistic Predict Appl [Internet]. 2017;60:39–61. Available from: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v60/toccaceli17a/toccaceli17a.pdf.
- Subasi A. Classification of EMG signals using PSO optimized SVM for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Comput Biol Med [Internet]. 2013;43:576–586. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010482513000401.
- Dobrowolski AP, Wierzbowski M, Tomczykiewicz K. Multiresolution MUAPs decomposition and SVM-based analysis in the classification of neuromuscular disorders. Comput Methods Programs Biomed [Internet]. 2012;107:393–403. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169260710002981.
- Muller KR, Mika S, Ratsch G, et al. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2001;12:181–201.
- Huang CL, Wang CJ. A GA-based feature selection and parameters optimization for support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl. 2006;31:231–240.
- Liu W, Chawla S, Cieslak DA, et al. A robust decision tree algorithm for imbalanced data sets. Proceedings of the 2010 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining [Internet]. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2010. p. 766–777. Available from: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10. 1137/1.9781611972801.67.
- Aitkenhead MJ. A co-evolving decision tree classification method. Expert Syst Appl [Internet]. 2008;34:18–25. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095741740600251X.
- Wang R, Kwong S, Wang X-Z, et al. Segment based decision tree induction With continuous valued attributes. IEEE Trans Cybern [Internet]. 2015;45:1262–1275. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6912950.
- Rissanen JJ. Fisher information and stochastic complexity. IEEE Trans Inf Theory [Internet]. 1996;42:40–47. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/481776/.
- Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1988.
- De Campos LM, Fernández-Luna JM, Gámez JA, et al. Ant colony optimization for learning Bayesian networks. Int J Approx Reason. 2002;31:291–311.
- Zaidi A, Ould Bouamama B, Tagina M. Bayesian reliability models of Weibull systems: state of the art. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci [Internet]. 2012;22:585–600. Available from: https://content.sciendo.com/doi/10. 2478/v10006-012-0045-2.
- Asim Y, Raza B, Kamran A, et al. A multi-modal, multi-atlas-based approach for Alzheimer detection via machine learning [Internet]. Int J Imaging Syst Technol Jun, 2018;28:113–123. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10. 1002/ima.22263.
- Kanakatte A, Mani N, Srinivasan B, et al. Pulmonary Tumor Volume Detection from Positron Emission Tomography Images. 2008 Int Conf Biomed Eng Informatics. 2008;D:213–217.
- Liu Y, Yang J, Zhao D, et al. A method of pulmonary nodule detection utilizing multiple support vector machines. ICCASM 2010 - 2010 Int Conf Comput Appl Syst Model Proc. 2010;10:0–3.
- Parveen SS, Kavitha C. Detection of lung cancer nodules using automatic region growing method. 2013 Fourth Int Conf Comput Commun Netw Technol. 2013;1–6.
- Shaffie A, Soliman A, Ghazal M, et al. A Novel Autoencoder-Based Diagnostic System for Early Assessment of Lung Cancer. 2018 25th IEEE Int Conf Image Process [Internet]. IEEE; 2018. p. 1393–1397. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8451595/.
- Kumar D, Wong A, Clausi DA. Lung Nodule Classification Using Deep Features in CT Images. 2015 12th Conf Comput Robot Vis [Internet]. IEEE; 2015. p. 133–138. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7158331/.
- Chen Y-J, Hua K-L, Hsu C-H, et al. Computer-aided classification of lung nodules on computed tomography images via deep learning technique. Onco Targets Ther [Internet]. 2015;2015:2015–2022. http://www.dovepress.com/computer-aided-classification-of-lung-nodules-on-computed-tomography-i-peer-reviewed-article-OTT.
- Krewer H, Geiger B, Hall LO, et al. Effect of Texture Features in Computer Aided Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules in Low-Dose Computed Tomography. 2013 IEEE Int Conf Syst Man, Cybern [Internet]. IEEE; 2013. p. 3887–3891. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6722416/.
- Jiang H, Ma H, Qian W, et al. A novel pixel value space statistics map of the pulmonary nodule for classification in computerized tomography images. 2017 39th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc [Internet]. IEEE; 2017. p. 556–559. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8036885/.
- Lakshmanaprabu SK, Mohanty SN, Shankar K, et al. Optimal deep learning model for classification of lung cancer on CT images. Futur Gener Comput Syst [Internet]. 2019;92:374–382. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167739X18317011.
- Singh GAP, Gupta PK. Performance analysis of various machine learning-based approaches for detection and classification of lung cancer in humans. Neural Comput Appl [Internet]. 2019;31:6863–6877. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/s00521-018-3518-x.
- Nasrullah N, Sang J, Alam MS, et al. Automated detection and classification for early stage lung cancer on CT images using deep learning. In: Alam MS, editor. Pattern recognit track XXX [Internet]. Baltimore, Maryland: SPIE; 2019. p. 27. Available from: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/10995/2520333/Automated-detection-and-classification-for-early-stage-lung-cancer-on/10. 1117/12.2520333.full.
- Kumari K, Sharma P. Lung cancer segmentation and prediction techniques review. Int J Adv Eng Glob Technol. 2015;03:1374–1379.