530
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research paper

Maximin principle, emotional aversion, and integrative judgment in the NIMBY context, including social dilemma and moral dilemma: The roles of the amygdala, angular gyrus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 282-291 | Received 01 Apr 2023, Published online: 24 Nov 2023

References

  • Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2007). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: How low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. The Neuroscientist, 13(6), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858407304654
  • Easterling, D. (2001). Fear and loathing of las vegas: Will a nuclear waste repository contaminate the imaginary of nearby places? In J. Flynn, P. Slovic, & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), Risk, media, and stigma (pp. 133–156). Earthscan Publications Ltd (UK).
  • Everett, J. A., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(6), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000165
  • Foster, D., & Warren, J. (2022). The NIMBY problem. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 34(1), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/09516298211044852
  • Gleichgerrcht, E. & Young, L. (2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. PLoS ONE, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060418
  • Gold, N., Colman, A. M., & Pulford, B. D. (2014). Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems. Judgment & Decision Making, 9(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S193029750000499X
  • Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2011). Value, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex. Trends cogn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.004
  • Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
  • Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
  • Kameda, T., Inukai, K., Higuchi, S., Ogawa, A., Kim, H., Matsuda, T., & Sakagami, M. (2016). Rawlsian maximin rule operates as a common cognitive anchor in distributive justice and risky decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(42), 11817–11822. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602641113
  • Lombardo, M. V., Chakrabarti, B., Bullmore, E. T., Sadek, S. A., Pasco, G., Wheelwright, S. J., Suckling, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2010). Atypical neural self-representation in autism. Brain A Journal of Neurology, 133(2), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp306
  • Moran, J. M., Heatherton, T. F., & Kelley, W. M. (2009). Modulation of cortical midline structures by implicit and explicit self-relevance evaluation. Social Neuroscience, 4(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910802250519
  • Nonami, H., Ohtomo, S., Sakamoto, G., Tahiro, Y., & Aoki, T. (2021). Superior legitimization of a concerned party in NIMBY problem as a moral dilemma: Case of geological disposal facility of high-level radioactive waste. Journal of Environmental Science International, 2020, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.11492/ceispapersen.2020.2_47
  • Nonami, H., Sakamoto, G., Ohtomo, S., Tashiro, Y., & Aoki, T. (2022). Why are concerned parties legitimized superiorly in NIMBY problems: Effects of the maximin principle and moral foundations on the right to Decide on a high-level radioactive waste storage facility. JJESP, 61(2), 57–70. ( (in Japanese with English abstract)). https://doi.org/10.2130/jjesp.2103
  • O’Hare, M. (1977). Not on my back, you don’t: Facility siting and the strategic importance of compensation. Public Policy, 25(4), 407–458.
  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
  • Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x
  • Rangel, A., & Hare, T. (2010). Neural computations associated with goal-directed choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.03.001
  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (revised ed.). Harvard University Press.
  • Sakai, T. (2012). Fair waste pricing: An axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem. Economic Theory, 50(2), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0562-x
  • Shenhav, A., & Greene, J. D. (2014). Integrative moral judgment: Dissociating the roles of the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 34(13), 4741–4749. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3390-13.2014
  • Smith, V. K., & Desvousges, W. H. (1986). The value of avoiding a LULU: Hazardous waste disposal sites. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(2), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925509
  • Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15(1), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
  • Wexler, N. M. (1996). A sociological framing of the NIMBY (NOT-IN-MY-backyard) syndrome. International Review of Modern Sociology, 26(1), 91–110. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41421101
  • Wolsink, M. (2007). Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2692–2704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002
  • Yamada, J., Kito, M., & Yuki, M. (2017). Passion, relational mobility, and proof of commitment: A comparative socio–ecological analysis of an adaptive emotion in a sexual market. Evolutionary Psychology: An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior, 15(4), 1474704917746056. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917746056
  • Yamamoto, S., & Yuki, M. (2019). What causes cross-Cultural differences in reactions to the trolley problem? A cross-Cultural study on the roles of relational mobility and reputation expectation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 61–71. (in Japanese with English abstract). https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jssp/35/2/35_1733/_article/-char/ja/
  • Yuki, M., Sato, K., Takemura, K., & Oishi, S. (2013). Social ecology moderates the association between self-esteem and happiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.006