A model of the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity

References

• Abraham, P. (2000). Duplicate and salami publications. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 46(2), 67–9. PMID: 11013467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ALLEA. (2023). The European Code of conduct for research integrity – revised edition 2023. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECOC
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264244
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, J. (2008). Plagiarism across cultures: Is there a difference? In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, imitation, and plagiarism: Teaching writing in the digital age (pp. 219–230). University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L. (2013). Research misconduct—definitions, manifestations and extent. Publications, 1(3), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications1030087
   Google Scholar
• Bouter, L. (2023). Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved. Accountability in Research, 1–10. Online first https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2189010
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Publication Ethics. (2011). Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for. Journal Editors. http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, J. M., Emily, E., Anderson, E. E., Chibnall, J., Carroll, K., Gibb, T., Ogbuka, C., & Rubbelke, T. (2013). Understanding research misconduct: A comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing. Accountability in Research, 20(5–6), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.822248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Science Foundation. (2011). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Science Foundation Policy Debriefing. (2000). Good scientific practice in research and scholarship. http://archives.esf.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&g=0&t=1687755906&hash=31597d33645ab53f396351cf0c4a7f0c196fa7a1&file=/fileadmin/be_user/activities/research_conferences/Docs_NEW/2007/2007-242_Good_Scientific_Practice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D., & Tregenza, T. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A Systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), 1–11. e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, H., Becket, G. H., & Huang, D. (2013). From ‘import’ to ‘import—export’ oriented internationalization: The impact of national policy on scholarly publication in China. Language Policy, 12(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9285-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Research Council. (2022). Statement of principles and practices for research ethics, integrity, and culture in the context of rapid-results research. https://globalresearchcouncil.org/fileadmin/documents/GRC_Publications/SoP_Research_Ethics_May_2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hiney, M. (2015). Research integrity: What it means, why it is important and how we might protect it. Science Europe Report. https://scienceeurope.org/media/dnwbwaux/briefing_paper_research_integrity_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L., Alba, S., Gopalakrishna, G., Kleinert, S., Kombe, F., Lavery, J. V., & Visagie, R. G. (2023). The Cape Town statement on fairness, equity, and diversity in research. Nature, 615(7954), 790–793. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00855-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, L. M., & Resnik, D. B. (2023). Using AI to write scholarly publications. Accountability in Research, Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., & Holmes, K. (2023). The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(4), 449–465. Online first https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449
   Google Scholar
• Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2015). Chinese university students’ perceptions of plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 25(3), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.923313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insuring Integrity in Irish Research. (2010). A Discussion Document. Royal Irish Academy. https://www.interacademies.org/sites/default/files/publication/ensuring-integrity-in-irish-research.pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kang, E. (2020). The Consequences of Data Fabrication and Falsification among Researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kuroki, T. (2018). New classification of research misconduct from the viewpoint of truth, trust, and risk. Accountability in Research, 25(7–8), 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1548283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2013). Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Language Policy, 12(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9267-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martyn, C. (2003). Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 96(4), 243–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcg036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthanna, A. (2016). Plagiarism: A shared responsibility of all, current situation, and future actions in Yemen. Accountability in Research, 23(5), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1154463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurunnabi, M., & Hossain, M. A. (2019). Data falsification and question on academic integrity. Accountability in Research, 26(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1564664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, E. H., & Gotz, M., (2022). Questionable research practices. In Jussim, L. J., Krosnick, J. A., and Stevens, S. T. Research integrity: Best practices for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 260–294). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0010
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Global Science Forum. (n.d.). Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved June 25, 2023, from http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/40188303.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students-literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677
   Google Scholar
• Patrzek, J., Sattler, S., van Veen, F., Grunschel, C., & Fries, S. (2014). Investigating the effect of academic procrastination on the frequency and variety of academic misconduct: A panel study. Studies in Higher Education, 40(6), 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.854765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, B. (2010). Exploring academic misconduct: Some insights into student behaviour. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410365657
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Berzofsky, M. E. (2020). Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA. Accountability in Research, 27(7), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1772060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., Rasmussen, L. M., & Kissling, G. E. (2015). An international study of research misconduct policies. Accountability in Research, 22(5), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.958218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roig, M. (2010). Plagiarism and self-plagiarism: What every author should know. Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, O. P. (2015). Ethics in science. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 55(3), 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-015-0532-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolčić, V. S. (2013). Salami publication: Definitions and examples. Biochemia Medica, 23(3), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.030
   Google Scholar
• Smolčić, V. S., & Bilić-Zulle, L. (2013). Patchwork plagiarism – a jigsaw of stolen puzzle pieces. Biochemia Medica, 23(1), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H. (2007). Office of research integrity (ORI): Introduction to responsible conduct of research. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Superior Council of Scientific Investigations (SCSI). (2021). SCSI code of good scientific practices (Revised ed.). Higher Council for Scientific Research.
   Google Scholar
• Timothy, P., Johnson, V. P., & Clements, C. (2001). Detection and prevention of data falsification in survey research. Survey Research Laboratory, 23(3), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Zavrsnik, J., Kokol, P., Del Torso, S., & Vosner, H. B. (2016). Citation context and impact of ‘sleeping beauties’ in paediatric research. Journal of International Medical Research, 44(6), 1212–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060516672129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietman, A. L. (2013). Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 87(2), 225–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar