Advanced search
Publication Cover
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Volume 17, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
375
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Advancements in meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs

Oliver Wendta Cognitive and Emotional Disabilities, College of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany;b Human Development and Family Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USACorrespondence[email protected] [email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7363-3779View further author information
ORCID Icon &
David Rindskopfc CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3344-0320View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 1-5 | Published online: 23 Nov 2023

REFERENCES

  • Alresheed, F., & Machalicek, W. (2023). A systematic comparison of non-overlap metrics and visual analysis in single-case experimental design. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2023.2200813
  • Beretvas, S. N., & Chung, H. (2008). A review of meta-analyses of single-subject experimental designs: Methodological issues and practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489530802446302
  • Fingerhut, J., Xu, X., & Moeyaert, M. (2021a). Impact of within-case variability on Tau-U indices and the hierarchical linear modeling approach for multiple-baseline design data: A monte carlo simulation study. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 15(3), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2021.1933727
  • Fingerhut, J., Xu, X., & Moeyaert, M. (2021b). Selecting the proper Tau-U measure for single-case experimental designs: Development and application of a decision flowchart. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 15(3), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2021.1937851
  • Jamshidi, L., Heyvaert, M., Declercq, L., Fernández-Castilla, B., Ferron, J. M., Moeyaert, M. S., Beretvas, N., Onghena, P., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2023). A systematic review of single-case experimental design meta-analyses: Characteristics of study designs, data, and analyses. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2022.2089334
  • Manolov, M., Onghena, P., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2023). Meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs: How can alternating treatments and changing criterion designs be included? Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2022.2040164
  • Moeyaert, M., & Dehghan-Chaleshtori, M. (2023). Evaluating the design and evidence of single-case experimental designs using the What Works Clearinghouse standards. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2022.2139148
  • Nourbakhsh, M. R., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (1994). The statistical analysis of single-subject data: A comparative examination. Physical Therapy, 74(8), 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/74.8.768
  • Pennington, L. (2005). Book review [Review of the book “The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice”]. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40(1), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820400006028
  • Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The role of systematic reviews in evidence-based practice, research, and development (Focus: Technical Brief No. 15). http://www.ncddr.org/kt/products/focus/focus15/
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Raghavendra, P. (2004). Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610310001621083
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2008). Meta-analysis of single-subject experimental designs: Why now? Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489530802520429
  • Shadish, W. R., Rindskopf, D. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2008). The state of the science in the meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489530802581603
  • Turner, H. M., Nye, C., Ortiz, M., Liu, E., & Eisenstein, E. L. (2007). Producing systematic reviews of interventions in speech-language pathology: A framework for sustainability. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1(4), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489530701856577
  • Vannest, K. J., & Sallese, M. R. (2021). Benchmarking effect sizes in single-case experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 15(3), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2021.1886412
  • van Walraven, C. (2010). Individual patient meta-analysis—rewards and challenges. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(3), 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.04.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.