Sustainable mobility transitions in suburbia – exploring (dis)connections between transport planning and daily mobility

References

• Aarsæther, N., E. Falleth, T. Nyseth, and R. Kristiansen. 2018. Plan og samfunn: system, praksis og teori. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademis.
   Google Scholar
• Addie, J. P. 2019. “In What Sense Suburban Infrastructure.” In Critical Perspectives on Suburban Infrastructures. Contemporary International Cases, edited by P. Filion and N. M. Pulver, 45–66. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, P. 2017. Mobility. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2010. “Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces.” Environment and Planning Cancer Government & Policy 28 (5): 803–818. doi:10.1068/c09163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K. 2015. “What is the Issue? The Transformative Capacity of Documents.” Distinktion 16 (1): 74–90. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022194.
   Google Scholar
• Adey,P. 2017. Mobility. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. 2011. “Cities, Mobility and Climate Change.” Journal of Transport Geography 19 (6): 1538–1546. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsli, H., and K. A. Harvold. 2018. “Planning for Polycentricity. The Development of a Regional Plan for the Oslo Metropolitan Area.“ Scandinavian journal of public administration 22 (1): 99–117 .
   Google Scholar
• Bonehill, J., N. von Benzon, and J. Shaw. 2020. “‘The Shops Were Only Made for People Who Could Walk’: Impairment, Barriers and Autonomy in the Mobility of Adults with Cerebral Palsy in Urban England.” Mobilities 15 (3): 341–361. doi:10.1080/17450101.2020.1746057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces : Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo and Akershus City Council. 2015. Regional Plan for Areal Og Transport I Oslo Og Akershus. Oslo: Councils of Oslo and Akershus.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning Society & Space 28 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1068/d11407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2003. “EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European Spatial Planning: From an Analytical Tool to a Normative Agenda.” European Planning Studies 11 (8): 979–999. doi:10.1080/0965431032000146169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2006. “Evidence-Based Planning: Rhetoric and Reality.” Disp 42 (165): 14–24. doi:10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, K., and J. Urry. 2009. After the Car. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elldér, E., K. Haugen, and B. Vilhelmson. 2022. “When Local Access Matters: A Detailed Analysis of Place, Neighbourhood Amenities and Travel Choice.” Urban Studies 59: 120–139. doi:10.1177/0042098020951001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., and D. G. Martin. 2004. ““Placing” Interviews: Location and Scales of Power in Qualitative Research.” The Professional Geographer 52 (4): 649–657. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00253.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, J., and C. Farrington. 2005. “Rural Accessibility, Social Inclusion and Social Justice: Towards Conceptualisation.” Journal of Transport Geography 13 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2009. Mobility in Daily Life : Between Freedom and unfreedom, Transport and Society. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. 1967. The Levittowners : Ways of Life and Politics in a New Suburban Community. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2011. “The Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 24–40. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• González, S. 2006. “Scalar Narratives in Bilbao: A Cultural Politics of Scales Approach to the Study of Urban Policy.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (4): 836–857. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00693.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and P. Healey. 1999. “Relational Concepts of Space and Place: Issues for Planning Theory and Practice.” European Planning Studies 7 (5): 623–646. doi:10.1080/09654319908720542.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism : Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2014. Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2006. “Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/17450100500489189.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2002. “On Creating the ‘City’ as a Collective Resource. Urban Studies 39.10, 1777–1792.” Urban Studies 39 (10): 1777–1792. doi:10.1080/0042098022000002957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, J. 2003. Social exclusion and transport systems. Transport policy 10 (4): 263–263.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R. 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport : The Approach of Strategic Niche management, Transport, Development and Sustainability. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2009. “Flows of Meaning, Cultures of Movements – Urban Mobility as Meaningful Everyday Life Practice.” Mobilities 4 (1): 139–158. doi:10.1080/17450100802658002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2013. Staging mobilities, International Library of Sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., M. Sheller, and S. Wind. 2014. “Together and Apart: Affective Ambiences and Negotiation in Families’ Everyday Life and Mobility.” Mobilities 10 (3): 363–382. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.868158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 1996. “Towards Minor Theory.” Environment and Planning Society & Space 14: 487–499. doi:10.1068/d140487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 2017. “Revisiting Minor Theory.” Environment and Planning Society & Space 35 (4): 596–599. doi:10.1177/0263775817718012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, R. 2018. “After Suburbia: Research and Action in the Suburban Century.” Urban Geography 41 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/02723638.2018.1548828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, R., P. Hamel, J.-A. Boudreau, and S. Kipfer. 2017. Governing Cities Through Regions : Canadian and European Perspectives. Waterloo, Ont: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 2013. “Beyond Space (As We Knew It): Toward Temporally Integrated Geographies of Segregation, Health, and Accessibility: Space–time Integration in Geography and Giscience.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1078–1086. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.792177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of space, La Production de L’éspace. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. 2017. “What is Planning?” The Town Planning Review 88 (2): 147–151. doi:10.3828/tpr.2017.11.
   Google Scholar
• Lunke, B. E., and N. Ferarnley. 2019. Generalisert Arbeidstid – Hvordan Oppleves Arbeidsreiser I Norske Byer?. Oslo, Norway: Institute of Transport Economics. Accessed 10 March 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lupi, T., and S. Musterd. 2006. “The Suburban ‘Community Question’.” Urban Studies 43 (4): 801–817. doi:10.1080/00420980600597723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2010. “Relationality/territoriality: Toward a Conceptualization of Cities in the World.” Geoforum 41 (2): 175–184. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. 1961. The City in History : Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its prospects, A Harvest/hbj Book. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L. 2008. “Motherhood, Risk and Everyday Mobilities.” In Gendered Mobilities, edited by T. P. Uteng and T. Cresswell, 47–59. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A., P. Adey, T. Cresswell, J. Yeonjae Lee, A. Nóvoa, and C. Temenos. 2019. “Commoning Mobility: Towards a New Politics of Mobility Transitions.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (2): 346–360. doi:10.1111/tran.12287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. H. M., T. Schwanen, and D. Banister. 2017. “Distributive Justice and Equity in Transportation.” Transport Reviews 37 (2): 170–191. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2017. “Policy Capacity in Public Administration.” Policy & Society 34 (3–4): 219–228. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., and A. M. Wood. 2011. “The New Post-Suburban Politics?” Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland) 48 (12): 2591–2610. doi:10.1177/0042098011411944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., A. M. Wood, and D. C. Valler. 2010. “A Postsuburban World? An Outline of a Research Agenda.” Environment & Planning A 42 (2): 366–383. doi:10.1068/a427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renne, J. L., L. Bertolini, and C. Curtis. 2009. Transit Oriented Development : Making It happen, Transport and Mobility Series. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, S. 2012. Architect knows best: environmental determinism in architecture culture from 1956 to the present. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Røe, P. G. 2000. “Qualitative Research on Intra-Urban Travel: An Alternative Approach.” Journal of Transport Geography 8 (2): 99–106. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00039-3.
   Google Scholar
• Røe, P. G. 2014. “Analysing Place and Place‐making: Urbanization in Suburban Oslo.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 498–515. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruter. 2022. ”Situasjonsrapport: Passasjertall.” 29 (05). https://ruter.no/contentassets/d5dcd4f6f3f9496399fe48120037c78d/situasjonsrapport-uke-21.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 2003. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century. 2 ed. London: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P. 2013. “Planning for Polycentricity in European Metropolitan Areas-Challenges, Expectations and Practices.” Planning, Practice & Research 28 (4): 400–419. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.780570.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T. 2015. “The Bumpy Road Toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities.” Sustainability 7 (6): 7086–7111. doi:10.3390/su7067086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., D. Banister, and J. Anable. 2011. “Scientific Research About Climate Change Mitigation in Transport: A Critical Review.” Transportation Research Part A 45: 993–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2004. “Automotive Emotions: Feeling the Car.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 221–242. doi:10.1177/0263276404046068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2018. “Theorising Mobility Justice.” Tempo Social 30 (2): 17–34. doi:10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2018.142763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St.meld.nr.33. 2016-2017. National Transport Plan 2018–2029: A Targeted and Historic Commitment to the Norwegian Transport Sector. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications. Accessed 05 January 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Talén, E. 1999. “Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism.” Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland) 36 (8): 1361–1379. doi:10.1080/0042098993033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. 2012. “How Theories of Practice Can Inform Transition to a Decarbonised Transport System.” Journal of Transport Geography 24 (C): 488–496. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Wikstrøm, R. D., and L. Böcker. 2020. “Changing Suburban Daily Mobilities in Response to a Mobility Intervention: A Qualitative Investigation of an E-Bike Trial.” Sustainability 12 (6). doi:10.3390/su12062413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar