Trust in science moderates the effects of high/low threat communication on psychological reactance to COVID-19-related public health messages

References

• Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85–17. doi:10.2196/jmir.1933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran MB, Lucas M, Everhart K, Morgan A, Prickett E. What makes anti-vaccine websites persuasive? a content analysis of techniques used by anti-vaccine websites to engender anti-vaccine sentiment. J Commun Healthc. 2016;9(3):151–63. doi:10.1080/17538068.2016.1235531.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus T. Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: a review of the literature. Front Commun. 2019;4; doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavo R. Training the next generation of global health communication professionals: OPPORTUNITIES and challenges. J Commun Healthc. 2016;9(4):233–7. doi:10.1080/17538068.2016.1264103.
   Google Scholar
• Nan X, Iles IA, Yang B, Ma Z. Public health messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: lessons from communication science. Health Commun. 2023;37(1):1–19. doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1994910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verpaalen IAM, Ritter SM, van Hooff MLM, van Stekelenburg A, Fransen ML, Holland RW. Psychological reactance and vaccine uptake: a longitudinal study. Psychol Health. 2023, doi:10.1080/08870446.2023.2190761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihelič A, Jelovčan L, Prislan K. Internal and external drivers for compliance with the COVID-19 preventive measures in Slovenia: The view from general deterrence and protection motivation. Plos One. 2021;16(11):e0259675, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk E, Čelik T, Smrdu M, Šet J, Kuder A, Gregorič M, et al. Adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: The role of sociodemographic and personality factors. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(9):7771–87. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02051-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinas SR, Maner JK, Plant EA. What factors underlie attitudes regarding protective mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic? Pers Individ Dif. 2021;181:111038), doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SM, Faedda S. Refinement of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 1996;56(1):173–82. doi:10.1177/0013164496056001014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L, Dillard JP. Psychometric properties of the Hong psychological reactance scale. J Pers Assess. 2005;85(1):74–81. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algan Y, Cohen D, Davoine E, Foucault M, Stantcheva S. Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: panel evidence from 12 countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(40):1–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.2108576118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arif A, Turaga RMR. COVID-19 cure perceptions and media use in India. J Commun Healthc. 2023, doi:10.1080/17538068.2023.2228041.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pagliaro S, Sacchi S, Pacilli MG, Brambilla M, Lionetti F, Bettache K, et al. Trust predicts COVID-19 prescribed and discretionary behavioral intentions in 23 countries. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248334), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plohl N, Musil B. Understanding, trusting, and applying scientific insights to improve your health: a latent profile analysis approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):9967), doi:10.3390/ijerph19169967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell A, Trentadue JT. Advocating for mask-wearing across the aisle: applying moral reframing in health communication. Health Commun. 2023, doi:10.1080/10410236.2022.2163535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm JW. A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg BD, Siegel JT. A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: do not read this article. Motiv Sci. 2018;4(4):281–300. doi:10.1037/mot0000091.
   Google Scholar
• Quick BL, Shen L, Dillard JP. Reactance theory and persuasion. In: JP Dillard, L Shen, editor. The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice. SAGE publications; 2013. p. 167–83.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard JP, Shen L. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monogr. 2005;72(2):144–68. doi:10.1080/03637750500111815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains SA. The nature of psychological reactance revisited: a meta-analytic review. Hum Commun Res. 2013;39(1):47–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensley LS, Wu R. The role of psychological reactance in drinking following alcohol prevention messages. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1991;21(13):1111–24. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00461.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick BL, Stephenson MT. Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on perceived threat, state reactance, and reactance restoration. Hum Commun Res. 2008;34(3):448–76. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00328.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Miller C. “I felt completely turned off by the message”: The effects of controlling language, fear, and disgust appeals on responses to COVID-19 vaccination messages. J Health Commun. 2022;27(6):427–38. doi:10.1080/10810730.2022.2119311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller CH, Lane LT, Deatrick LM, Young AM, Potts KA. Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: the effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Hum Commun Res. 2007;33(2):219–40. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards AS, Bessarabova E, Banas JA, Bernard DR. Reducing psychological reactance to health promotion messages: comparing preemptive and postscript mitigation strategies. Health Commun. 2020;37(3):366–74. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1839203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessarabova E, Fink EL, Turner M. Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: comparative statics. Hum Commun Res. 2013;39(3):339–64. doi:10.1111/hcre.12007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X. Effects of freedom restoration, language variety, and issue type on psychological reactance. Health Commun. 2019;35(11):1316–27. doi:10.1080/10410236.2019.1631565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick BL, Kam JA, Morgan SE, Montero Liberona CA, Smith RA. Prospect theory, discrete emotions, and freedom threats: an extension of psychological reactance theory. J Commun. 2015;65(1):40–61. doi:10.1111/jcom.12134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L. Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Commun. 2015;30(10):975–85. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.910882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Liu W. Promoting COVID-19 vaccination: The interplay of message framing, psychological uncertainty, and public agency as a message source. Sci Commun. 2022;44(1):3–29. doi:10.1177/10755470211048192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm SS, Brehm JW. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd TE, Wallbrown F, Sanders D, Yesenosky JM. Psychological reactance and its relationship to normal personality variables. Cognit Ther Res. 1994;18(6):601–12. doi:10.1007/BF02355671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibel CA, Dowd ET. Personality characteristics associated with psychological reactance. J Clin Psychol. 2001;57(7):963–9. doi:10.1002/jclp.1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVoie NR, Quick BL, Riles JM, Lambert NJ. Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? a test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Communic Res. 2017;44(3):416–36. doi:10.1177/0093650215609669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiium N, Aarø LE, Hetland J. Psychological reactance and adolescents' attitudes toward tobacco-control measures. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;39(7):1718–38. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00501.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan C. The Persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades’ evidence. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34(2):243–81. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C, Rousseau DM, Burt RS. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23(3):393–404. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist M, Gutscher H, Earle TC. Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence. J Risk Res. 2005;8(2):145–56. doi:10.1080/1366987032000105315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, McComas KA, Schuler KL. Source effects on psychological reactance to regulatory policies: the role of trust and similarity. Sci Commun. 2018;40(5):591–620. doi:10.1177/1075547018791293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct in research. National Academies Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wilholt T. Epistemic trust in science. Br J Philos Sci. 2013;64(2):233–53. doi:10.1093/bjps/axs007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright AM, Dentzman K, Charters M, Dietz T. The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8(4):0044029), doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plohl N, Musil B. Assessing the incremental value of intellectual humility and cognitive reflection in predicting trust in science. Pers Individ Dif. 2023;214:112340), doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen MZ, Haupt MR, McMann T, Cuomo RE, Mackey TK. The influence of news consumption habits and dispositional traits on trust in medical scientists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(10):5842), doi:10.3390/ijerph20105842.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plohl N, Musil B. Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science. Psychol Health Med. 2021;26(1):1–12. doi:10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson L, Jorcyk C, Yang D, Jarratt Smith M, Matson S, Cornell K, et al. I just don’t trust them: the development and validation of an assessment instrument to measure trust in science and scientists. Sch Sci Math. 2014;114(2):76–86. doi:10.1111/ssm.12051.
   Google Scholar
• Agley J, Xiao Y, Thompson EE, Chen X, Golzarri-Arroyo L. Intervening on trust in science to reduce belief in COVID-19 misinformation and increase COVID-19 preventive behavioral intentions: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23; doi:10.2196/32425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oude Groeniger J, Noordzij K, van der Waal J, de Koster W. Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: a difference-in-differences analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2021;275:113819, doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard JP, Peck E. Affect and persuasion: emotional responses to public service announcements. Communic Res. 2000;27(4):461–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards AS, Larsen M. Anger expression moderates the effects of psychological reactance to sexual health messages. Health Commun. 2017;32(12):1491–500. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1230811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. (2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0574/b20bd58130dd5a961f1a2db10fd1fcbae95d.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maniaci MR, Rogge RD. Caring about carelessness: participant inattention and its effects on research. J Res Pers. 2014;48(1):61–83. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008.
   Google Scholar
• Shahi GK, Dirkson A, Majchrzak TA. An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. Online Social Networks Media. 2021;22:100104, doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The COVID-19 infodemic. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(8):875), doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30565-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou WYS, Budenz A. Considering emotion in COVID-19 vaccine communication: addressing vaccine hesitancy and fostering vaccine confidence. Health Commun. 2020;35(14):1718–22. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1838096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar