199
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Assessing FAIRness of citizen science data in the context of the Green Deal Data Space

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2344587 | Received 22 Sep 2023, Accepted 14 Apr 2024, Published online: 09 May 2024

References

  • Aceves-Bueno, Eréndira, Adeyemi S. Adeleye, Marina Feraud, Yuxiong Huang, Mengya Tao, Yi Yang, and Sarah E. Anderson. 2017. “The Accuracy of Citizen Science Data: A Quantitative Review.” The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 98 (4): 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1336.
  • Althaus, F., N. Hill, R. Ferrari, L. Edwards, R. Przeslawski, C. H. L. Schönberg, R. Stuart-Smith, et al. 2015. “A Standardised Vocabulary for Identifying Benthic Biota and Substrata from Underwater Imagery: The CATAMI Classification Scheme.” PLoS One 10 (10): e0141039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141039.
  • Alvarez, Reynaldo, César González-Mora, José Zubcoff, Irene Garrigós, Jose-Norberto Mazón, and Hector Raúl González Diez. 2022. “FAIRification of Citizen Science Data Through Metadata-Driven Web API Development.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Engineering 13362: 162–176.
  • Bäckstrand, Karin. 2003. “Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance.” Global Environmental Politics 3 (4): 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003322757916.
  • Balázs, Bálint, Peter Mooney, Eva Nováková, Lucy Bastin, and Jamal Jokar Arsanjani. 2021. “Data Quality in Citizen Science.” The Science of Citizen Science 139.
  • Bista, Damber, Greg S. Baxter, Nicholas J. Hudson, Sonam Tashi Lama, and Peter John Murray. 2021. “Effect of Disturbances and Habitat Fragmentation on an Arboreal Habitat Specialist Mammal Using GPS Telemetry: A Case of the Red Panda.” Landscape Ecology 37: 1–15.
  • Bonney, Rick, Caren B. Cooper, Janis Dickinson, Steve Kelling, Tina Phillips, Kenneth V. Rosenberg, and Jennifer Shirk. 2009. “Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy.” BioScience 59 (11): 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
  • Bowser, Anne, Caren Cooper, Alex De Sherbinin, Andrea Wiggins, Peter Brenton, Tyng-Ruey Chuang, Elaine Faustman, Mordechai Haklay, and Metis Meloche. 2020. “Still in Need of Norms: The State of the Data in Citizen Science.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5 (1).
  • Bradshaw, Ben. 2003. “Questioning the Credibility and Capacity of Community-Based Resource Management.” Canadian Geographies / Géographies Canadiennes 47 (2): 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0064.t01-1-00001.
  • Bratic, G., and M. A. Brovelli. 2022. “Crowdsourcing for Deforestation Detection in the Amazon.” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLIII-B4-2022: 231–238. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2022-231-2022.
  • Busch, Julia A., Raul Bardaji, Luigi Ceccaroni, Anna Friedrichs, Jaume Piera, Carine Simon, Peter Thijsse, Marcel Wernand, Hendrik J. Van der Woerd, and Oliver Zielinski. 2016. “Citizen Bio-Optical Observations from Coast- and Ocean and Their Compatibility with Ocean Colour Satellite Measurements.” Remote Sensing 8 (11): 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8110879.
  • Campus, Sergio Francesco, Roberto Scotti, Irene Piredda, Ilenia Murgia, Antonio Ganga, and Filippo Giadrossich. 2020. “The Open Data Kit Suite, a Mobile Data Collection Technology as an Opportunity for Forest Mensuration Practices.” Ann. Silvic. Res 44: 86–94.
  • Ceccaroni, Luigi, Anne Bowser, and Peter Brenton. 2017. “Civic Education and Citizen Science: Definitions, Categories, Knowledge Representation.” In Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research, 1–23. IGI Global.
  • Chmielewski, Szymon, Marta Samulowska, Michał Lupa, Danbi Lee, and Bogdan Zagajewski. 2018. “Citizen Science and WebGIS for Outdoor Advertisement Visual Pollution Assessment.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 67: 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.09.001.
  • Coché, Lorraine, Elie Arnaud, Laurent Bouveret, Romain David, Eric Foulquier, Nadège Gandilhon, Etienne Jeannesson, et al. 2021. “Kakila Database: Towards a FAIR Community Approved Database of Cetacean Presence in the Waters of the Guadeloupe Archipelago, Based on Citizen Science.” Biodiversity Data Journal 9.
  • Conrad, Catherine T., and Tyson Daoust. 2008. “Community-Based Monitoring Frameworks: Increasing the Effectiveness of Environmental Stewardship.” Environmental Management 41: 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9042-x.
  • Conrad, Cathy C., and Krista G. Hilchey. 2011. “A Review of Citizen Science and Community-Based Environmental Monitoring: Issues and Opportunities.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176: 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5.
  • Council of the EU. 2021. “Conclusions on the future governance of the European Research Area (ERA).” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14126-2021-INIT/en/pdf.
  • DEIMS. 2023. “Welcome to DEIMS-SDR.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://deims.org/.
  • de Sherbinin, Alex, Anne Bowser, Tyng-Ruey Chuang, Caren Cooper, Finn Danielsen, Rorie Edmunds, Peter Elias, et al. 2021. “The Critical Importance of Citizen Science Data.” Frontiers in Climate 3: 20.
  • Dimitrov, Stelian, Anton Popov, and Martin Iliev. 2021. “An Application of the LCZ Approach in Surface Urban Heat Island Mapping in Sofia, Bulgaria.” Atmosphere 12 (11): 1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12111370.
  • EC. 2019. “Open Science.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-12/ec_rtd_factsheet-open-science_2019.pdf.
  • EC. 2020. “European Green Deal Call: €1 billion investment to boost the green and digital transition.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1669.
  • EC. 2022. “Staff working document on data spaces.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/staff-working-document-data-spaces.
  • EC. 2023. “A European Green Deal Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
  • ECSA. 2015. “Ten Principles of Citizen Science”. Berlin. Accessed August 30, 2023. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XPR2N
  • ECSA. 2023. “ECS | European Citizen Science”. Accessed August 30, 2023. https://www.ecsa.ngo/cases/eu-citizen-science/.
  • Eitzel, Melissa, Jessica Cappadonna, Chris Santos-Lang, Ruth Duerr, Sarah Elizabeth West, Arika Virapongse, Christopher Kyba, et al. 2017. “Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring key Terms.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1–20.
  • Elsevier. 2020. “Making your data FAIR with Mendeley Data”. Accessed August 30, 2023. https://assets.ctfassets.net/zlnfaxb2lcqx/1i7e6L9fWtPoEMynm0brai/a299816711e4f07ee72d816d1a287e6d/ACAD_RES_MDD_INFO_Fair-data-with-Mendeley-Data_WEB.pdf.
  • Elwood, Sarah, Michael F. Goodchild, and Daniel Z. Sui. 2012. “Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3): 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.595657.
  • EU-Citizen.Science. 2021. “FAIR data in citizen science projects”. Accessed August 30, 2023. https://eu-citizen.science/resource/159.
  • Farrell, Eimear, Marco Minghini, Alexander Kotsev, Josep Soler Garrido, Brooke Tapsall, Marina Micheli, Monica Posada Sanchez, et al. 2023. “European Data Spaces-Scientific Insights Into Data Sharing and Utilisation at Scale.” Joint Research Centre (Seville Site), https://doi.org/10.2760/301609.
  • Ferri, Michele, Uta Wehn, Linda See, Martina Monego, and Steffen Fritz. 2020. “The Value of Citizen Science for Flood Risk Reduction: Cost–Benefit Analysis of a Citizen Observatory in the Brenta-Bacchiglione Catchment.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 24 (12): 5781–5798. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5781-2020.
  • Fonte, Cidalia C., Patrícia Lopes, Linda See, and Benjamin Bechtel. 2019. “Using OpenStreetMap (OSM) to Enhance the Classification of Local Climate Zones in the Framework of WUDAPT.” Urban Climate 28: 100456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100456.
  • Fraisl, Dilek, Gerid Hager, Baptiste Bedessem, Margaret Gold, Pen-Yuan Hsing, Finn Danielsen, Colleen B. Hitchcock, et al. 2022. “Citizen Science in Environmental and Ecological Sciences.” Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2 (1): 64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00144-4.
  • Fritz, Steffen, Cidália Costa Fonte, and Linda See. 2017. “The Role of Citizen Science in Earth Observation.” Remote Sensing 9 (4): 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040357.
  • GBIF. 2023c. “Diversifying the GBIF Data Model.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://www.gbif-uat.org/composition/HjlTr705BctcnaZkcjRJq/gbif-new-data-model.
  • GO FAIR. 2016. “FAIR Principles.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/.
  • Goodchild, Michael F. 2007. “Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography.” GeoJournal 69: 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
  • Gura, Trisha. 2013. “Citizen Science: Amateur Experts.” Nature 496 (7444): 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7444-259a.
  • Haklay, Mordechai Muki, Daniel Dörler, Florian Heigl, Marina Manzoni, Susanne Hecker, and Katrin Vohland. 2021. “What is Citizen Science? The Challenges of Definition.” The Science of Citizen Science 13.
  • Haklay, Mordechai, Suvodeep Mazumdar, and Jessica Wardlaw. 2018. “Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation.” Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65633-5_4.
  • Hartung, Carl, Adam Lerer, Yaw Anokwa, Clint Tseng, Waylon Brunette, and Gaetano Borriello. 2010. “Open Data Kit: Tools to Build Information Services for Developing Regions.” In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 1–12.
  • Hawthorne, T. L., V. Elmore, A. Strong, P. Bennett-Martin, J. Finnie, J. Parkman, T. Harris, J. Singh, L. Edwards, and J. Reed. 2015. “Mapping Non-Native Invasive Species and Accessibility in an Urban Forest: A Case Study of Participatory Mapping and Citizen Science in Atlanta, Georgia.” Applied Geography 56: 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.10.005.
  • INSPIRE. 2022. “The development of a European Common Green Deal data space.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://wikis.ec.europa.eu/download/attachments/68190468/DOC3_16MIG_GreenDealDataSpace.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1669068487597&api=v2.
  • ITU. 2012. “Overview of the Internet of Things.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.2060-201206-I.
  • Jeffery, Keith G. 2021. “FAIR, Open, and Free Does Not Mean No Restrictions.” Patterns 2 (9).
  • Jonquet, Clement, John Graybeal, Syphax Bouazzouni, Michael Dorf, Nicola Fiore, Xeni Kechagioglou, Timothy Redmond, et al. 2023. “Ontology Repositories and Semantic Artefact Catalogues with the OntoPortal Technology.” In International Semantic Web Conference, 38–58. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  • Kloog, Itai, Lara Ifat Kaufman, and Kees De Hoogh. 2018. “Using Open Street Map Data in Environmental Exposure Assessment Studies: Eastern Massachusetts, Bern Region, and South Israel as a Case Study.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15 (11): 2443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112443.
  • Kocaman, Sultan, Sameer Saran, Murat Durmaz, and Senthil Kumar. 2021. “Editorial on the Citizen Science and Geospatial Capacity Building.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10 (11): 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10110741.
  • König, Ariane, Karl Pickar, Jacek Stankiewicz, and Kristina Hondrila. 2021. “Can Citizen Science Complement Official Data Sources That Serve as Evidence-Base for Policies and Practice to Improve Water Quality?.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 37 (1): 189–204. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-200737.
  • Leadbetter, Adam M. 2015. “Linked Ocean Data.” In The Semantic Web in Earth and Space Science. Current Status and Future Directions, 11–31. IOS Press.
  • Liu, Hai-Ying, Daniel Dörler, Florian Heigl, and Sonja Grossberndt. 2021. “Citizen Science Platforms.” The Science of Citizen Science 22: 439–459.
  • Magagna, Barbara, Ilaria Rosati, Maria Stoica, Sirko Schindler, Gwenaelle Moncoiffe, Anusuriya Devaraju, Johannes Peterseil, and Robert Huber. 2021. “The I-ADOPT Interoperability Framework for FAIRer Data Descriptions of Biodiversity.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06547.
  • Mankins, John C. 1995. “Technology readiness levels.” White Paper, April 6, no. 1995.
  • Marchezini, Victor, Rachel Trajber, Débora Olivato, Viviana Aguilar Munoz, Fernando de Oliveira Pereira, and Andréa Eliza Oliveira Luz. 2017. “Participatory Early Warning Systems: Youth, Citizen Science, and Intergenerational Dialogues on Disaster Risk Reduction in Brazil.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 8 (4): 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-017-0150-9.
  • Mons, Barend, Cameron Neylon, Jan Velterop, Michel Dumontier, Luiz Olavo Bonino da, Silva Santos, and Mark D. Wilkinson. 2017. “Cloudy, Increasingly FAIR; Revisiting the FAIR Data Guiding Principles for the European Open Science Cloud.” Information Services & use 37 (1): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170824.
  • Mooney, Peter, and Marco Minghini. 2017. “A Review of OpenStreetMap Data.” In Mapping and the Citizen Sensor, edited by Giles Foody, Linda See, Steffen Fritz, Peter Mooney, Ana-Maria Olteanu-Raimond, Cidália Costa Fonte, and Vyron Antoniou, 37–59. London, UK: Ubiquity Press.
  • Neis, Pascal, and Dennis Zielstra. 2014. “Recent Developments and Future Trends in Volunteered Geographic Information Research: The Case of OpenStreetMap.” Future Internet 6 (1): 76–106. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6010076.
  • OGC. 2021. “OGC SensorThings API Part 1: Sensing Version 1.1.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://docs.ogc.org/is/18-088/18-088.html#fig-sensing-entities.
  • OGC. 2022. “Best Practice for using SensorThings API with Citizen Science.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://docs.ogc.org/bp/21-068.pdf.
  • OSM. 2022. “WikiProject CircularEconomy.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_CircularEconomy.
  • Peng, G. 2023. “Finding Harmony in FAIRness.” Eos. Accessed August 30, 2023. https://eos.org/opinions/finding-harmony-in-fairness.
  • PlanIT, G. E. O. 2023. “A Better Way to Map and Manage Your Urban Forest.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://marketing.planitgeo.com/treeplotter-software-uk.
  • Poveda-Villalón, María, Paola Espinoza-Arias, Daniel Garijo, and Oscar Corcho. 2020. “Coming to Terms with FAIR Ontologies.” In International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, 255–270. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Ramachandran, Rahul, Kaylin Bugbee, and Kevin Murphy. 2021. “From Open Data to Open Science.” Earth and Space Science 8 (5): e2020E–A001562.
  • Ramírez-Andreotta, Mónica D., Ramona Walls, Ken Youens-Clark, Kai Blumberg, Katherine E. Isaacs, Dorsey Kaufmann, and Raina M. Maier. 2021. “Alleviating Environmental Health Disparities Through Community Science and Data Integration.” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5: 620470. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.620470.
  • Roger, Erin, Dax Kellie, Cameron Slatyer, Peter Brenton, Olivia Torresan, Elycia Wallis, and Andre Zerger. 2023. Open Access Research Infrastructures are Critical for Improving the Accessibility and Utility of Citizen Science: A Case Study of Australia’s National Biodiversity Infrastructure, the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA).
  • Schade, Sven, Marina Manzoni-Brusati, Chrysi Tsinaraki, Alexander Kotsev, K. Fullerton, Roberto Sgnaolin, Fabiano Spinelli, and Irena Mitton. 2017. Using New Data Sources for Policymaking. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Schade, Sven, and Chrysi Tsinaraki. 2016. Survey Report: Data Management in Citizen Science Projects. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
  • Schentz, Herbert, Johannes Peterseil, and Nic Bertrand. 2013. “EnvThes–Interlinked Thesaurus for Long Term Ecological Research, Monitoring, and Experiments.” In Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Environmental Informatics-Informatics for Environmental Protection, Sustainable Development and Risk Management. City: Shaker Verlag.
  • See, Linda. 2019. “A Review of Citizen Science and Crowdsourcing in Applications of Pluvial Flooding.” Frontiers in Earth Science 7: 44. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00044.
  • See, Linda, Peter Mooney, Giles Foody, Lucy Bastin, Alexis Comber, Jacinto Estima, Steffen Fritz, et al. 2016. “Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 5 (5): 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5050055.
  • Shirk, Jennifer L., Heidi L. Ballard, Candie C. Wilderman, Tina Phillips, Andrea Wiggins, Rebecca Jordan, Ellen McCallie, et al. 2012. “Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Deliberate Design.” Ecology and Society 17 (2).
  • Snell, Katherine RS, Rie BE Jensen, Troels E. Ortvad, Mikkel Willemoes, and Kasper Thorup. 2020. “Multiple Fragmented Habitat-Patch Use in an Urban Breeding Passerine, the Short-Toed Treecreeper.” PLoS One 15 (1): e0227731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227731.
  • Spasiano, Andrea, Salvatore Grimaldi, Alessio Maria Braccini, and Fernando Nardi. 2021. “Towards a Transdisciplinary Theoretical Framework of Citizen Science: Results from a Meta-Review Analysis.” Sustainability 13 (14): 7904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147904.
  • Spear, Dakota M., Gregory B. Pauly, and Kristine Kaiser. 2017. “Citizen Science as a Tool for Augmenting Museum Collection Data from Urban Areas.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 86.
  • Stevenson, Robert, Carl Merrill, and Peter Burn. 2021. “Useful Biodiversity Data Were Obtained by Novice Observers Using INaturalist During College Orientation Retreats.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 6 (1).
  • Sullivan, Brian L., Jocelyn L. Aycrigg, Jessie H. Barry, Rick E. Bonney, Nicholas Bruns, Caren B. Cooper, Theo Damoulas, et al. 2014. The EBird Enterprise: An Integrated Approach to Development and Application of Citizen Science.” Biological Conservation 169: 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003.
  • Sy, Bocar, Corine Frischknecht, Hy Dao, David Consuegra, and Gregory Giuliani. 2020. “Reconstituting Past Flood Events: The Contribution of Citizen Science.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 24 (1): 61–74. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-61-2020.
  • Thomas, Usländer, Yves Coene, and Pier Giorgio Marchetti. 2012. “Heterogenous Missions Accessibility.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258644058_Heterogenous_Missions_Accessibility.
  • Tom-Aba, Daniel, Adeniyi Olaleye, Adebola Tolulope Olayinka, Patrick Nguku, Ndadilnasiya Waziri, Peter Adewuyi, Olawunmi Adeoye, et al. 2015. “Innovative Technological Approach to Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak Response in Nigeria Using the Open Data kit and Form Hub Technology.” PLoS One 10 (6): e0131000.
  • Turicchia, Eva, Massimo Ponti, Gianfranco Rossi, and Carlo Cerrano. 2021a. “The Reef Check Med Dataset on Key Mediterranean Marine Species 2001–2020.” Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 675574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.675574.
  • Turicchia, Eva, Massimo Ponti, Gianfranco Rossi, Martina Milanese, Cristina Gioia Di Camillo, and Carlo Cerrano. 2021b. “The Reef Check Mediterranean Underwater Coastal Environment Monitoring Protocol.” Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 620368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.620368.
  • Usländer, Thomas, Yves Coene, and Pier G. Marchetti. 2012. “Heterogeneous missions accessibility.” ESA Training Manual.
  • Van den Berg, Wouter. 2023. “IDSA Tech Talk | Semantic interoperability.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://www.semantic-treehouse.nl/blog/idsa-tech-talk-semantic-interoperability/.
  • Wandersman, Abraham. 2003. “Community Science: Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice with Community-Centered Models.” American Journal of Community Psychology 31 (3-4): 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023954503247.
  • Wieczorek, J., D. Bloom, R. Guralnick, S. Blum, M. Döring, R. Giovanni, T. Robertson, and D. Vieglais. 2012. “Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard.” PLoS One 7 (1): e29715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029715.
  • Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al. 2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship.” Scientific Data 3 (1): 1–9.
  • Wolff, Erich. 2021. “The Promise of a “People-Centred” Approach to Floods: Types of Participation in the Global Literature of Citizen Science and Community-Based Flood Risk Reduction in the Context of the Sendai Framework.” Progress in Disaster Science 10: 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100171.
  • Wolff, Erich, and Felipe Muñoz. 2021. “The Techno-Politics of Crowdsourced Disaster Data in the Smart City.” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 3: 695329. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.695329.