One way or another? Discussion disagreement and attitudinal homogeneity on social networking sites as pathways to polarization in Czechia

References

• Ali, M., & Altawil, A. (2022). Affective polarization and political engagement in the United States: What factors matter? Atlantic Journal of Communication, 1–16. doi:10.1080/15456870.2022.2076856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2018). Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 156–168. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edw022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguedas, A. R., Robertson, C. T., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarization: A literature review. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., Peacock, C., Kim, B., Kim, Y., & Xenos, M. A. (2022). Networks and selective avoidance: How social media networks influence unfriending and other avoidance behaviors. Social Science Computer Review, 089443932110696. doi:10.1177/08944393211069628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beam, M. A., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018). Facebook news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 940–958. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L. (2016). Pruning the news feed: Unfriending and unfollowing political content on social media. Research & Politics, 3(3), 1–8. doi:10.1177/2053168016661873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchtík, M., Eichler, P., Kopečný, O., Smejkalová, K., & Uhrová, J. (2021). Jedna Společnost, Různé Světy. One Society, Different Worlds. Praha: STEM, Masarykova demokratická akademie.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T., Ai, M., & Guo, J. (2022). The effect of cross-cutting exposure on attitude change: Examining the mediating role of response behaviors and the moderating role of openness to diversity and social network homogeneity. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(2), 93–110. doi:10.1080/01292986.2021.2022173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Ahmed, S., Kerum, H., Choi, Y. J., & Lee, J. H. (2018). Influencing myself: Self-reinforcement through online political expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 83–111. doi:10.1177/0093650216644020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vaus, D. (2002). Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Gubitz, S. R., Levendusky, M. S., & Lloyd, A. M. (2019). How incivility on partisan media (de)polarizes the electorate. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 291–295. doi:10.1086/699912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. (2021). How affective polarization shapes Americans’ political beliefs: A study of response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 8(3), 223–234. doi:10.1017/XPS.2020.28
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2016). The political environment on social media. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/.
   Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). How polarized are online and offline news audiences? A comparative analysis of twelve countries. The International Journal of Press/politics, 25(2), 169–195. doi:10.1177/1940161219892768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro- and counter attitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 309–332. doi:10.1111/hcre.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goyanes, M., Borah, P., & Gil De Zúñiga, H. (2021). Social media filtering and democracy: Effects of social media news use and uncivil political discussions on social media unfriending. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 120. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., van der Meer, T., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022). Civilized truths, hateful lies? Incivility and hate speech in false information – evidence from fact-checked statements in the US. Information, Communication & Society, 25(11), 1596–1613. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: Civility and incivility in American politics. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., & Hawkins, I. (2022). The language of extremism on social media: An examination of posts, comments, and themes on reddit. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 4. doi:10.3389/fpos.2022.805008
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Kim, Y., & Huh, C. U. (2014). Seeing is believing: Effects of uncivil online debate on political polarization and expectations of deliberation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 621–633. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.966365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Misleading Heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 100–109. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.100.18835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. doi:10.1111/ajps.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. K., Neo, R. L., Heinen, M. E. M., Smits, L., & van Veen, C. (2020). Issues, involvement, and influence: Effects of selective exposure and sharing on polarization and participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmoe, N., & Mason, L. (2019). Lethal mass partisanship: Prevalence, correlates, & electoral consequences [ Paper presentation]. In American Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting, Boston, MA. https://www.dropbox.com/s/bs618kn939gq0de/Kalmoe%20&%20Mason%20APSAVol.202018.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W., Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). The distorting prism of social media: How self-selection and exposure to incivility fuel online comment toxicity. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 922–946. doi:10.1093/joc/jqab034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B., Wang, Y., Lee, J., & Kim, Y. (2022). Unfriending effects: Testing contrasting indirect-effects relationships between exposure to hate speech on political talk via social media unfriending. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107414. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., Johnson, B. K., Westerwick, A., & Donsbach, W. (2015). Political online information searching in Germany and the United States: Confirmation Bias, source credibility, and attitude impacts. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 489–511. doi:10.1111/jcom.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social Media. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. doi:10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. doi:10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. doi:10.1111/jcom.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Rojas, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2022). Social Media, Messaging Apps, and affective polarization in the United States and Japan. Mass Communication and Society, 25(5), 673–697. doi:10.1080/15205436.2021.1953534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5–20. doi:10.1111/ajps.12237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Heatherly, K. A., & Lee, J. K. (2016). Cross-cutting exposure on social networking sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 74–81. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macková, A., Novotná, M., Procházková, K., Macek, J., & Hrbková, L. (2021). Češi na sítích, důvěra a polarizace v době pandemie. [Czechs on social networking sites, trust and polarization in pandemic]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352708609_Cesi_na_sitich_duvera_a_polarizace_v_dobe_pandemie_vyzkumna_zprava_2021
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, J., & Somer, M. (2019). Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: Comparative evidence and possible remedies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234–271. doi:10.1177/0002716218818782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2011). On the political. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, S. R. (2021). Politically motivated avoidance in social networks: A study of Facebook and the 2020 Presidential election. Social Media + Society, 7(4), 205630512110554. doi:10.1177/20563051211055438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Nordbrandt, M. (2021). Affective polarization in the digital age: Testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group parties. New Media & Society, 0(0), 146144482110443. doi:10.1177/14614448211044393
   Google Scholar
• Orhan, Y. E. (2022). The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding: Comparative evidence. Democratization, 29(4), 714–735. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2008912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, L. P., Lecheler, S., & Schuck, A. R. (2020). Is context the key? The (non-)differential effects of mediated incivility in three European Countries. Political Communication, 37(1), 88–107. doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1663324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Politics on Social Networking Sites . Pew Research Centre. Retrieved from 14 April 2023 https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2012/09/04/politics-on-social-networking-sites/
   Google Scholar
• Reiljan, A. (2020). ‘Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe: Affective polarisation in European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 376–396. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiljan, A., & Ryan, A. (2021). Ideological tripolarization, partisan tribalism and institutional trust: The foundations of affective polarization in the Swedish multiparty system. Scandinavian Political Studies, 44(2), 195–219. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekker, R., & Harteveld, E. (2022, Oct). Understanding factual belief polarization: The role of trust, political sophistication, and affective polarization. Acta Politica, 20, 1–28. doi:10.1057/s41269-022-00265-4
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, T. J., & Hetherington, M. J. (2021). Affective polarization in political and nonpolitical settings. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(3), 591–606. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovits, G., McCoy, J., & Littvay, L. (2022). Democratic hypocrisy and out-group threat: Explaining citizen support for democratic erosion. The Journal of Politics, 84(3). doi:10.1086/719009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Koc-Michalska, K., Boulianne, S., & Bimber, B. (2021). Selective avoidance on social media: A comparative study of Western Democracies. Social Science Computer Review, 40(5), 1–18. doi:10.1177/08944393211005468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., & Lin, J. H. T. (2018). What predicts selective avoidance on social media? A study of political unfriending in Hong Kong and Taiwan. The American Behavioral Scientist, 62(8), 1097–1115. doi:10.1177/0002764218764251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, M., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2016). Opportunity structures for selective exposure. Investigating selective exposure and learning in Swedish Election Campaigns using panel survey data. The International Journal of Press/politics, 21(4), 527–546. doi:10.1177/1940161216658157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slačálek, O. (2021). Czech republic: Populism without culture wars? In P. Barša, Z. Hesová, & O. Slačálek (Eds.), Central Europe culture wars: Beyond post-communism and populism (pp. 158–202). Prague: Humanitas.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. doi:10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steppat, D., Castro Herrero, L., & Esser, F. (2021). Selective exposure in different political information environments–How media fragmentation and polarization shape congruent news use. European Journal of Communication, 37(1), 82–102. doi:10.1177/02673231211012141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štětka, V. (2021). Czech Republic. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021/czech-republic
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhay, E., Bello-Pardo, E., & Maurer, B. (2018). The polarizing effects of online partisan criticism: Evidence from two experiments. The International Journal of Press/politics, 23(1), 95–115. doi:10.1177/1940161217740697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnberg, P. (2022). How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(42), e2207159119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2207159119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnberg, P., Andersson, C., Lindgren, K., Banisch, S., & Mahmoud, A. B. (2021). Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society. PLoS One, 16(10), e0258259. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth, F., Mihelj, S., Štětka, V., & Kondor, K. (2022). A media repertoires approach to selective exposure: News consumption and political polarization in Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Press/politics, 1–25. doi:10.1177/19401612211072552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, D., van Klingeren, M., & Tsfati, Y. (2017). Selective exposure, political polarization, and possible mediators: Evidence from the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 189–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2021). Outside the bubble: Social media and political participation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. A. (2019). From competition to polarization in Central Europe: How populists change party systems and the European Union. Polity, 51(4), 689–706. doi:10.1086/705704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vochocová, L. (2020). ‘Frustrated women invite the immigrants to Europe’: Intersection of (xeno-) racism and sexism in online discussions on gender aspects of immigration. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 333–349. doi:10.1177/1367549420973207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2021). Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 69, 102199. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., Viehmann, C., Ziegele, M., & Schemer, C. (2020). Online hate does not stay online – how implicit and explicit attitudes mediate the effect of civil negativity and hate in user comments on prosocial behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106192. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S. & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing: Integrating Online Exposure Patterns and Expression on Social Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerwick, A., Johnson, B. K., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2017). Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias vs. content bias. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 343–364. doi:10.1080/03637751.2016.1272761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived Partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 145–158. doi:10.1177/1745691615569849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, S. J., Peterson, E., & Lelkes, Y. (2019). Are there still limits on partisan prejudice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3), 584–597. doi:10.1093/poq/nfz034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Who’s right: The author or the audience? Effects of user comments and ratings on the perception of online science articles. Communications, 41(3). doi:10.1515/commun-2016-0008
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., de Leeuw, S., Menchen-Trevino, E., Lee, S., Huang-Isherwood, K. M., & Weeks, B. (2021). No polarization from partisan news: Over-time evidence from trace data. The International Journal of Press/politics, 1–26. doi:10.1177/19401612211047194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2017). The politics of “unfriending”: User filtration in response to political disagreement on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social Media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., & Skoric, M. M. (2022). Political implications of disconnection on social media: A study of politically motivated unfriending. New Media & Society, 24(12) , 2659–2679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar