443
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Social media, quality of democracy, and citizen satisfaction with democracy in central and eastern Europe

References

  • Anspach, N. M. (2017). The new personal influence: How our Facebook friends influence the news we read. Political Communication, 34(4), 590–606.
  • Bailard, C. S. (2014). Democracy’s double-edged sword. Johns Hopkins University Press. doi:10.1353/book.72112
  • Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H. … Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115
  • Bajomi-Lázár, P. (2012). The party colonisation of the media: The case of hungary. East European Politics and Societies, 27(1), 69–89. doi:10.1177/0888325412465085
  • Bajomi-Lázár, P. (2014). Party colonisation of the media in central and Eastern Europe. Central European University Press. doi:10.1515/9789633860427
  • Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620
  • Beam, M. A., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018). Facebook news and (De)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Information communication & society, 21(7), 940–958. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783
  • Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
  • Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication & Society, 19(1), 24–48. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
  • Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. doi:10.1111/jcom.12166
  • Boese, V. A. (2019). How (not) to measure democracy. International Area Studies Review, 22(2), 95–127. doi:10.1177/2233865918815571
  • Booth, J. A., & Seligson, M. A. (2009). The legitimacy puzzle in latin America: Political support and democracy in eight nations. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511818431
  • Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211. doi:10.1080/10584600902854363
  • Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. INformation Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
  • Boulianne, S. (2022). Standby ties that mobilize: social media platforms and civic engagement. Social Science Computer Review, 1–16. doi:10.1177/08944393211067687
  • Canache, D., Mondak, J. J., & Seligson, M. A. (2001). Meaning and measurement in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(4), 506–528. doi:10.1086/323576
  • Ceron, A. (2015). Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 487–503. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12129
  • Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S. M., & Porro, G. (2014). Every tweet counts? how sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society, 16(2), 340–358. doi:10.1177/1461444813480466
  • Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. doi:10.1111/jcom.12084
  • Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A. … Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(3), 554–559. doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113
  • Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118. doi:10.1177/0093650211426004
  • Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. The American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000500
  • Enyedi, Z. (2020). Right-wing authoritarian innovations in central and eastern Europe. East European Politics, 36(3), 363–377. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787162
  • Feller, A., Kuhnert, M., Sprenger, T., & Welpe, I. (2011). Divided they tweet: The network structure of political microbloggers and discussion topics. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, July 17-21, 2011, Barcelona Spain, 474–477.
  • Gainous, J., Abbott, J. P., & Wagner, K. M. (2021). Active vs. passive social media engagement with critical information: protest behavior in two asian countries. The International Journal of Press/politics, 26(2), 464–483. doi:10.1177/1940161220963606
  • Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
  • Gil de Zuniga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
  • Guzek, D., & Grzesiok-Horosz, A. (2022). Political will and media law: A Poland case analysis. East European Politics and Societies, 36(4), 1245–1262. doi:10.1177/08883254211049514
  • Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr025
  • Hansen, N., Postmes, T., van der Vinne, N., & van Thiel, W. (2012). Information and communication technology and cultural change: How ICT changes self-construal and values. Social Psychology, 43(4), 222–231. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000123
  • Hladík, R., & Štětka, V. (2017). The powers that tweet. Journalism Studies, 18(2), 154–174. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2015.1046995
  • Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236. doi:10.1093/pan/mpl013
  • Inglehart, R. (1988). The renaissance of political culture. The American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1203. doi:10.2307/1961756
  • Inglehart, R. (2003). Technological Change, Culture Change, and Society. In R. Breton & J. G. Rietz (Eds.), Globalization and Society: Processes of Differentiation Examined. Praeger.
  • Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Lee, N.-J., & Feezell, J. T. (2012). Youth online activity and exposure to diverse perspectives. New Media & Society, 14(3), 492–512. doi:10.1177/1461444811420271
  • Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. doi:10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
  • Lee, F. L. F. (2016). Impact of social media on opinion polarization in varying times. Communication and the Public, 1(1), 56–71. doi:10.1177/2057047315617763
  • Lee, J. K., & Kim, E. (2017). Incidental exposure to news: Predictors in the social media setting and effects on information gain online. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 1008–1015. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.018
  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511781353
  • Linde, J., & Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391–408. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00089
  • Mancini, P. (2012). Media fragmentation, party system, and democracy. The International Journal of Press/politics, 18(1), 43–60. doi:10.1177/1940161212458200
  • Matay, M., & Kaposi, I. (2008). Radicals online: The hungarian street protests of 2006 and the internet. In K. Jakubowicz & M. Sükösd (Eds.), Finding the right place on the map: Central and Eastern European media change in a global perspective (pp. 277–296). Bristol, U.K: Intellect Books.
  • Metcalfe, B. (2013). Metcalfe’s Law after 40 Years of Ethernet. Computer, 46(12), 26–31. doi:10.1109/MC.2013.374
  • Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (1997). Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. The Journal of Politics, 59(2), 418–451. doi:10.1017/S0022381600053512
  • Nanz, A., & Matthes, J. (2022). Seeing political information online incidentally. effects of first- and second-level incidental exposure on democratic outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107285. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107285
  • Newton, K. (2021). Widespread reach, not much influence: online news and mass political attitudes and behaviour in the UK. The Political Quarterly, 92(4), 716–726. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.13052
  • Ohme, J. (2021). Algorithmic social media use and its relationship to attitude reinforcement and issue-specific political participation – the case of the 2015 European immigration movements. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(1), 36–54. doi:10.1080/19331681.2020.1805085
  • Placek, M. (2018). Can the Internet aid democratic consolidation? online news and legitimacy in central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2810–2831.
  • Placek, M. (2020). Learning democracy digitally? the internet and knowledge of democracy in nondemocracies. Democratization, 27(8), 1413–1435. doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1795640
  • Placek, M. A. (2017). #democracy: Social media use and democratic legitimacy in central and Eastern Europe. Democratization, 24(4), 632–650. doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1202929
  • Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x
  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-Broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139878425
  • Ridge, H. M. (2021). Just like the others: Party differences, perception, and satisfaction with democracy. Party Politics, 28(3), 419–430. doi:10.1177/1354068820985193
  • Robson, K., & Pevalin, D. (2015). Multilevel Modeling in Plain Language. Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781473920712
  • Schedler, A. (1998). What is democratic consolidation? Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 91–107.
  • Sekhon, J. S. (2009). Opiates for the matches: Matching methods for causal inference. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 487–508. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135444
  • Simpson, P. A., & Druxes, H. (2015). Digital media strategies of the far right in Europe and the United States. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Southwell, B. G., & Thorson, E. A. (2015). The prevalence, consequence, and remedy of misinformation in mass media systems. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 589–595. doi:10.1111/jcom.12168
  • Stanley, B. (2019). Backsliding away? the quality of democracy in central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 15(4), 343–353. doi:10.30950/jcer.v15i4.1122
  • Steenbergen, M. R., & Jones, B. S. (2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 218. doi:10.2307/3088424
  • Stegmueller, D. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? a comparison of frequentist and bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 748–761. doi:10.1111/ajps.12001
  • Stetka, V. (2012). From multinationals to business tycoons media ownership and journalistic autonomy in central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Press/politics, 17(4), 433–456. doi:10.1177/1940161212452449
  • Stetka, V., Surowiec, P., & Mazák, J. (2019). Facebook as an Instrument of election campaigning and voters’ engagement: Comparing Czechia and poland. European Journal of Communication, 34(2), 121–141. doi:10.1177/0267323118810884
  • Stroud, N. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
  • Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2023). Platform affordances and political participation: How social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics, 46(4), 788–811. doi:10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410
  • Tomini, L. (2014). Reassessing democratic consolidation in central and Eastern Europe and the role of the EU. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(6), 859–891. doi:10.1080/09668136.2014.905387
  • Tworzecki, H., & Semetko, H. A. (2012). Media use and political engagement in three new democracies malaise versus mobilization in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. The International Journal of Press/politics, 17(4), 407–432. doi:10.1177/1940161212452450
  • Vaccaro, A. (2021). Comparing measures of democracy: statistical properties, convergence, and interchangeability. European Political Science, 20(4), 666–684. doi:10.1057/s41304-021-00328-8
  • Vachudova, M. A. (2020). Ethnopopulism and democratic backsliding in central Europe. East European Politics, 36(3), 318–340. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787163
  • Wagner, M. (2021). Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 69, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199
  • Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political Discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
  • Wojcieszak, M., & Warner, B. R. (2020). Can interparty contact reduce affective polarization? a systematic test of different forms of intergroup contact. Political Communication, 37(6), 789–811. doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1760406
  • Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511818691

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.