Process Improvement and the Efficient Frontier: Forecasting the Limits to Strategic Change across Crime Laboratory Areas of Investigation

References

• Bedford, K. 2011. Forensic science service provider models – Is there a ‘best’ option? Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 43 (2–3):147–56. doi:10.1080/00450618.2010.541498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Peinado, L., and L. M. de Castro. 2016. Present and foreseeable future of metabolomics in forensic analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 925:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.04.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrik, C., M. Paldam, and A. Wurtz. 2007. Public versus private production and economies of scale. Public Choice 130 (3–4):311–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houck, M. M. 2017. Strategic leadership through performance management: FORESIGHT as PerformanceStat. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 1–11 . doi:10/1080/00450618.2017.1374457.
   Google Scholar
• Houck, M. M., W. P. McAndrew, M. Porter, and B. Davies. 2015. A Review of Forensic Science Management Literature. Forensic Science Review 27 (1):53–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houck, M. M., R. A. Riley, P. J. Speaker, and T. S. Witt. 2009. FORESIGHT: A Business Approach to Improving Forensic Science Services. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1 (2):85–95. doi:10.1080/19409040902810723.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, C. N., M. M. Houck, P. J. Speaker, and R. Williams. 2012a. A feasible and sustainable model for forensic service delivery in Canada. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Public Safety Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, C., M. Houck, R. Williams, and P. Speaker. 2012b. Efficiency and the cost effective delivery of forensic science services: In-sourcing, out-sourcing, and privatization. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 3 (2):62–69. doi:10.1080/19409044.2012.734546.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, W. P., and M. G. Roth. 2016. Up from “Arts and Crafts”: Division of labor in forensic science laboratories. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 7(3–4):58–65.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies of Science (NAS). 2009. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., D. Dawley, and P. J. Speaker. 2011. Strategic management of forensic laboratory resources: From proect FORESIGHT metrics to the development of action plans. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 2 (4):164–74. doi:10.1080/19409044.2012.693571.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Justice Programs. 2016, September 9. Looking ahead: The national sexual assault policy symposium. Retrieved from National Institute of Justice: https://nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/investigations/sexual-assault/Pages/national-sexual-assault-symposium.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J. 2009a. Key performance indicators and managerial analysis for forensic laboratories. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1 (1):32–42. doi:10.1080/19409040802624075.
   Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J. 2009b. The decomposition of return on investment for forensic laboratories. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1 (2):96–102. doi:10.1080/19409040902800260.
   Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J. 2013. Forensic science service provider models: Data-driven support for better delivery options. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 45 (4):398–406. doi:10.1080/00450618.2013.773076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J., and A. S. Fleming. 2010. Benchmarking and budgeting techniques for improved forensic laboratory management. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1 (4):199–208. doi:10.1080/19409044.2010.491894.
   Google Scholar
• Tjin-A-Tsoi, T. 2013. Trends, challenges and strategy in the forensic science sector. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
   Google Scholar
• van Asten, A. C. 2014. On the added value of forensic science and grand innovation challenges for the forensic community. Science and Justice 54:170–79. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2013.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar