References
- Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided they blog. LinkKDD ‘05: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1134271.1134277
- Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
- Baysha, O. (2018). Miscommunicating social change: Lessons from Russia and Ukraine. Lexington Books.
- Baysha, O. (2020). Dividing social networks: Facebook unfriending, unfollowing, and blocking in turbulent political times. Russian Journal of Communication, 12(2), 104–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2020.1773911
- Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
- Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2010). The shifting Foundations of Political communication: Responding to a defense of the media Effects paradigm. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01471.x
- Bodrunova, S., Litvinenko, A., & Nigmatullina, K. (2020). Who is the censor? Self-censorship of Russian journalists in professional routines and social networking. Journalism, 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920941965
- Bodrunova, S. S., & Litvinenko, A. A. (2013). New media and political protest: The formation of a public counter-sphere in Russia, 2008–12. Russia’s Changing Economic and Political Regimes: The Putin Years and Afterwards, 29–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203730669
- Boulianne, S. (2018). Twenty years of digital media Effects on civic and political participation. Communication Research, 20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218808186
- Boulianne, S. (2019). Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353641
- Bruns, A. (2019). It’s not the technology, stupid: How the ‘echo chamber’ and ‘filter bubble’ metaphors have failed us. International Association for Media and Communication Research, 13. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/131675/
- Castells, M. (2008). The New public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
- Chaffee, S. H., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). The end of mass communication? Mass Communication and Society, 4(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_3
- Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data: Political homophily on Twitter. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12084
- Crossley, N., & Roberts, J. M. (2004). After habermas: New perspectives on the public sphere. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
- Davis, R. (2005). Politics online: Blogs, chatrooms, and discussion groups in American democracy. Routledge.
- DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. Government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
- Dokuka, S., Koltcov, S., Koltsova, O., & Koltsov, M. (2018). Echo chambers vs opinion crossroads in news consumption on social media. In W. M. P. van der Aalst, V. Batagelj, G. Glavaš, D. I. Ignatov, M. Khachay, S. O. Kuznetsov, O. Koltsova, I. A. Lomazova, N. Loukachevitch, A. Napoli, A. Panchenko, P. M. Pardalos, M. Pelillo, & A. V. Savchenko (Eds.), Analysis of images, social networks and texts (Vol. 11179) (pp. 13–19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11027-7_2
- Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
- Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016284431021
- Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
- Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Generalised scepticism: How people navigate news on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1751–1769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1450887
- FOM. (2018, April 4). Internet in Russia: The dynamics of penetration. Winter 2017–2018 [Internet v Rossii: Dinamika proniknoveniya. Zima 2017–2018] (In Russian). Fond Obshchestvennoye Mneniye. https://fom.ru/SMI-i-internet/13999
- Fraser, N. (1985). What’s critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. New German Critique, 35(35), 97–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/488202
- Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26(25/26), 56–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
- Freedom House. (2020). Russia. https://freedomhouse.org/country/russia/freedom-world/2020
- Gainous, J., Wagner, K. M., & Ziegler, C. E. (2018). Digital media and political opposition in authoritarian systems: Russia’s 2011 and 2016 duma elections. Democratization, 25(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1315566
- Gel′man, V. (2010, March 9). The trap of half-freedom [Lovushka polusvobody]. Republic. https://republic.ru/posts/l/310531
- Gel’man, V. (2014). The rise and decline of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Demokratizatsiya, 22(4), 503–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2012-67-4-65-88
- Gel′man, V. (2015). Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing post-Soviet regime changes. University of Pittsburgh Press.
- GFK. (2019, January 15). Gfk research: Internet penetration in Russia [issledovaniye GfK: Proniknoveniye Interneta v Rossii] (In Russian). Growth from Knowledge. https://www.gfk.com/press/issledovanie-gfk-proniknovenie-interneta-v-rossii
- Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press. http://choicereviews.org/review/https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.27-4175
- Hale, H. E. (2010). Eurasian polities as hybrid regimes: The case of Putin’s Russia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2009.11.001
- Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2005). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. Penguin Books.
- Hoffman, M., Bach, F. R., & Blei, D. M. (2010). Online learning for Latent Dirichlet allocation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23 (NIPS 2010), 9. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2010/hash/71f6278d140af599e06ad9bf1ba03cb0-Abstract.html
- Kim, Y., Kim, S., Jaimes, A., & Oh, A. (2014). A Computational Analysis of Agenda Setting, 323–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2577379
- Koltcov, S., Koltsova, O., & Nikolenko, S. (2014). Latent Dirichlet Allocation: stability and Applications to studies of user-generated content. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science, 161–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615680
- Koltsov, S., Pashakhin, S., & Dokuka, S. (2018). A full-cycle methodology for news topic modeling and user feedback research. In S. Staab, O. Koltsova, & D. I. Ignatov (Eds.), Social informatics (Vol. 11185) (pp. 308–321). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_19
- Koltsova, O., & Pashakhin, S. (2020). Agenda divergence in a developing conflict: Quantitative evidence from Ukrainian and Russian TV newsfeeds. Media, War & Conflict, 13(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219829876
- Konradova, N. (2020). The Rise of Runet and the main stages of its history. In S. Davydov (Ed.), Internet in Russia (pp. 39–61). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33016-3_3
- Korenčić, D., Ristov, S., & Šnajder, J. (2015). Getting the agenda right: Measuring media agenda using topic models. Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Topic Models: Post-Processing and Applications, 61–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2809936.2809942
- Levada. (2020a, April 28). Russian Media Landscape 2020 [ROSSIYSKIY MEDIALANDSHAFT-2020]. Levada-Tsentr. https://www.levada.ru/2020/04/28/rossijskij-medialandshaft-2020/
- Levada. (2020b, September 28). Sources of information [Istochniki informatsii] (In Russian) [Levada-Tsentr]. https://www.levada.ru/2020/09/28/ggh/
- Litvinenko, A., & Toepfl, F. (2019). The “gardening” of an authoritarian public at large: How Russia’s ruling elites transformed the country’s media landscape after the 2011/12 protests “for fair elections.”. Publizistik, 64(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-019-00486-2
- Lokot, T. (2018). Be safe or be seen? How Russian activists negotiate visibility and security in online resistance practices. Surveillance & Society, 16(3), 332–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i3.6967
- Lonkila, M., Shpakovskaya, L., & Torchinsky, P. (2019). The occupation of Runet? The tightening state regulation of the Russian-language section of the internet. In M. Wijermars, & K. Lehtisaari (Eds.), Freedom of Expression in Russia’s New mediasphere (pp. 17–18). Routledge.
- Luo, Y., Burley, H., Moe, A., & Sui, M. (2019). A meta-analysis of news media’s public agenda-setting effects, 1972–2015. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 150–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018804500
- Malinova, O. (2007). Ideological pluralism and the transformation of the public sphere in Post-Soviet Russia [ideologicheskiy plyuralizm i transformatsiya publichnoy sfery v postsovetskoy Rossii]. Polis, 1, 6–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2007.01.02
- Marcinkowski, F. (2008). Public sphere, fragmentation of. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. wbiecp138). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecp138
- McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
- McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Wiley.
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
- Minh Pham, T., Kondor, I., Hanel, R., & Thurner, S. (2020). The effect of social balance on social fragmentation. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 17(172), 20200752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0752
- Moeller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., Irion, K., & De Vreese, C. (2016). Shrinking core? Exploring the differential agenda setting power of traditional and personalized news media. Info, 18(6), 26–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2016-0020
- Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso.
- Oates, S. (2016). Russian media in the digital age: Propaganda rewired. Russian Politics, 1(4), 398–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/2451-8921-00104004
- Oates, S., & Lokot, T. (2013). Twilight of the Gods?: How the Internet challenged Russian television news frames in the winter protests of 2011–12. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2286727
- OpenNet Initiative. (2010). Russia. https://opennet.net/research/profiles/russia
- Pallin, C. V. (2017). Internet control through ownership: The case of Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 33(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1121712
- Papathanassopoulos, S., Coen, S., Curran, J., Aalberg, T., Rowe, D., Jones, P., Rojas, H., & Tiffen, R. (2013). Online threat, But television is still dominant: A comparative study of 11 nations’ news consumption. Journalism Practice, 7(6), 690–704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.761324
- Pariser, E. (2014). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin Books. http://rbdigital.oneclickdigital.com
- Rains, S. A., & Brunner, S. R. (2015). What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites. New Media & Society, 17(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814546481
- Rauchfleisch, A. (2017). The public sphere as an essentially contested concept: A co-citation analysis of the last 20 years of public sphere research. Communication and the Public, 2(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317691054
- Reporters without borders. (2020). Russia: Stifling atmosphere for independent journalists. Reporters without Borders [RSF]. https://rsf.org/en/russia
- Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988–1003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
- Roberts, M. E., Tingley, D., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2013). The structural topic model and applied social science. Workshop on Topic Models: Computation, Application, and Evaluation, ‘Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems’ in 2013, 1–4. http://scholar.princeton.edu/files/bstewart/files/stmnips2013.pdf
- Shearer, E. (2018). Social media outpaces print newspapers in the U.S. as a news source. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/12/10/social-media-outpaces-print-newspapers-in-the-u-s-as-a-news-source/
- Sherstoboeva, E. (2020). Regulation of online Freedom of Expression in Russia in the context of the council of Europe standards. In S. Davydov (Ed.), Internet in Russia (pp. 83–100). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33016-3_5
- Smoliarova, A. S., Bodrunova, S. S., Blekanov, I. S., & Maksimov, A. (2020). Discontinued public spheres? Reproducibility of user structure in Twitter discussions on inter-ethnic conflicts. In C. Stephanidis, M. Antona, & S. Ntoa (Eds.), HCI international 2020 – Late breaking posters (Vol. 1293) (pp. 262–269). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_34
- Stoycheff, E., Liu, J., Wibowo, K. A., & Nanni, D. P. (2017). What have we learned about social media by studying Facebook? A decade in review. New Media & Society, 19(6), 968–980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817695745
- Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0 (1. pbk. Print). Princeton Univ. Press.
- Toepfl, F. (2020). Comparing authoritarian publics: The benefits and risks of three types of publics for autocrats. Communication Theory, 30(2), 105–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz015
- Tong, J. (2015). The formation of an agonistic public sphere: Emotions, the Internet and news media in China. China Information, 29(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X15602863
- Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139
- Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
- van Osch, W., & Coursaris, C. K. (2014). Social media research: An assessment of the domain’s productivity and intellectual evolution. Communication Monographs, 81(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.921720
- VK. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved November 20, 2020, from https://vk.com/about
- Weimann, G., & Brosius, H.-B. (2016). A new agenda for agenda-setting research in the digital Era. In G. Vowe, & P. Henn (Eds.), Political Communication in the online world: Theoretical approaches and research designs (pp. 26–44). Routledge.
- Wesslen, R. (2018). Computer-assisted text analysis for social science: Topic models and beyond. ArXiv:1803.11045 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.11045
- Yurchak, A. (2005). Everything was forever, until it was No more: The last Soviet generation. Princeton University Press.