Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive ApproachFootnote^†

†. In Academy of Management Annals, 10 (1), 2016, edited by Sim B. Sitkin and Laurie R. Weingart.

References

• Abdallah, C., Denis, J. L., & Langley, A. (2011). Having your cake and eating it too: Discourses of transcendence and their role in organizational change dynamics. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 333–348. doi:10.1108/09534811111132730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, T., & Mollona, M. (2007). Organisational control as cultural practice: A shop floor ethnography of a Sheffield steel mill. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4/5), 305–331. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65(3), 367–390. doi:10.1177/0018726711430555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, W. K. Z., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2009). “Outcast among outcasts": Identity, gender, and leadership in a Mac users group. Women and Language, 30(1), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C. (2003). Six paradoxes in managing creativity: An embracing act. Long Range Planning, 36(4), 375–388. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(03)00071-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ann, C., & Carr, A. N. (2010). Critical reflections on the good, the bad and the ugly of organisation leadership: The case of Wal Mart. Culture and Organization, 16(2), 109–125. doi:10.1080/14759551003769268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apker, J. (2004). Sensemaking of change in the managed care era: A case of hospital-based nurses. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 211–227. doi:10.1108/09534810410530629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apker, J., Propp, K. M., & Zabava Ford, W. S. (2005). Negotiating status and identity tensions in healthcare team interactions: An exploration of nurse role dialectics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(2), 93–115. doi:10.1080/00909880500044620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aredal, A. (1986). A modern management pattern found in a classical myth. Journal of Management, 12(3), 403–414. doi:10.1177/014920638601200308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1982). The executive mind and double-loop learning. Organizational Dynamics, 11(2), 5–22. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(82)90002-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjoon, S. (2006). Striking a balance between rules and principles-based approaches for effective governance: A risks-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 53–82. doi:10.1007/S10551-006-9040-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L. (2005). Resistance through consent?: Occupational identity, organizational form, and the maintenance of masculinity among commercial airline pilots. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 67–90. doi:10.1177/0893318905276560
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L. (2006). Feminist-bureaucratic control and other adversarial allies: Extending organized dissonance to the practice of “new” forms. Communication Monographs, 73(1), 55–86. doi:10.1080/03637750600557081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., & Trethewey, A. (2004). Developing tension: An agenda for applied research on the organization of irrationality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 171–181. doi:10.1080/0090988042000178103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badham, R., Garrety, K., Morrigan, V., Zanko, M., & Dawson, P. (2003). Designer deviance: Enterprise and deviance in culture change programmes. Organization, 10(4), 707–730. doi:10.1177/13505084030104001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (pp. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays ( V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K. (2006). Dialogue, conflict, and community. In J. G. Oetzel & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice (pp. 517–544). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., Lee, M., Maddux, K., Nabring, R., & Townsend, B. (2008). Managing dualities in planned change initiatives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(4), 364–390. doi:10.1080/00909880802129996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., & Little, M. (2002). Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organizational life. Communication Theory, 12(4), 375–397. doi:10.1093/Ct/12.4.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 355–372. doi:10.2307/2393029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M. (1988). The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 137–162). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M. (2006). The Christmas gift: A story of dialectics. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1875–1894. doi:10.1177/0170840606071943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic-practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181–1201. doi:10.1177/0149206314529160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of the mind. New York, NY: Ballentine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2012). Liquid modernity. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues & dialectics. New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, N., Burns, H., de Caestecker, L., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2004). Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57(10), 1313–1332. doi:10.1177/0018726704048357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, N., MacPhail, S. A., & Coupland, C. (2009). Anti-dialogic positioning in change stories: Bank robbers, saviours and peons. Organization, 16(3), 335–352. doi:10.1177/1350508409102299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, M. (2001). How to develop an organization capable of sustained high performance: Embrace the drive for results-capability development paradox. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 233–247. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00030-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benn, S., & Baker, E. (2009). Advancing sustainability through change and innovation: A co-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Change Management, 9(4), 383–397. doi:10.1080/14697010903360574
   Google Scholar
• Benson, J. K. (1973). The analysis of bureaucratic-professional conflict: Functional versus dialectical approaches. Sociological Quarterly, 14(3), 376–394. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1973.tb00867.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 1–21. doi:10.2307/2391741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, J. K. (1983). A dialectical method for the study of organizations. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research (pp. 331–346). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bergadaà, M., & Thiétart, R. A. (1997). Stradin: A strategic dynamic and interactive decision-making process. Group Decision and Negotiation, 6(1), 61–75. doi:10.1023/A:1008688508836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, J., & Werr, A. (2000). The invincible character of management consulting rhetoric: How one blends incommensurates while keeping them apart. Organization, 7(4), 633–655. doi:10.1177/135050840074008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisel, R. S. (2009). On a growing dualism in organizational discourse research. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(4), 614–638. doi:10.1177/0893318908331100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerknes, G. (1992). Dialectical reflection in information systems development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Blackler, F. (1993). Knowledge and the theory of organizations: Organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 863–884. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloodgood, J. M., & Chae, B. (2010). Organizational paradoxes: Dynamic shifting and integrative management. Management Decision, 48(1), 85–104. doi:10.1108/00251741011014472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochantin, J. E. (2014). “Long live the mensi-mob”: Communicating support online with regards to experiencing menopause in the workplace. Communication Studies, 65(3), 260–280. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.811433
   Google Scholar
• Bouchikhi, H. (1998). Living with and building on complexity: A constructivist perspective on organizations. Organization, 5(2), 217–232. doi:10.1177/135050849852004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision process in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835. doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.7.816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, K., & Baxter, L. A. (1992). Blended relationships: Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communication, 56(3), 200–225. doi:10.1080/10570319209374414
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. (2008). Dominant, emergent, and residual culture: The dynamics of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(6), 743–757. doi:10.1108/09534810810915754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R., & Marshak, R. J. (2009). Revisioning organization development: Diagnostic and dialogic premises and patterns of practice. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(3), 348–368. doi:10.1177/0021886309335070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R., & Marshak, R. J. (Eds.). (2015). Dialogic organization development: The theory and practice of transformational change. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. A., & Modaff, D. P. (2008). When work is home: Agency, structure, and contradictions. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 232–257. doi:10.1177/0893318908323151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M., & Liu, M. (2005). Struggling with maternity leave policies and practices: A poststructuralist feminist analysis of gendered organizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(1), 1–25. doi:10.1080/0090988042000318495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M., & Liu, M. (2007). It's ‘give and take': Maternity leave as a conflict management process. Human Relations, 60(3), 463–495. doi:10.1177/0018726707076688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, G., & Thompson, P. (2002). ‘We recruit attitude’: The selection and shaping of routine call centre labour. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 233–254. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calori, R. (2002). Organizational development and the ontology of creative dialectical evolution. Organization, 9(1), 127–150. doi:10.1177/1350508402009001352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calton, J. M., & Payne, S. L. (2003). Coping with paradox: Multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems. Business & Society, 42(1), 7–42. doi:10.1177/0007650302250505
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, H. E. (2010a). Constructing policy knowledge: Contradictions, communication, and knowledge frames. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 181–206. doi:10.1080/03637751003758185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, H. E. (2010b). Structurating activity theory: An integrative approach to policy knowledge. Communication Theory, 20(1), 21–49. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2885.2009.01354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, G. R., Palich, L. E., & Wagner, J. A. (1995). Trialectics: A questionable logic for organizational change research. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 503–509. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.15355591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo, J. L., Lyytinen, K., & Boland, R. J. (2012). Dialectics of collective minding: Contradictory appropriations of information technology in a high-risk project. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1081–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, D., & Larson, G. S. (2006). Locating possibilities for control and resistance in a self-help program. Western Journal of Communication, 70(4), 270–291. doi:10.1080/10570310600992087
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. (2000a). Critical theory and the management of change in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(3), 208–220. doi:10.1108/09534810010330869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A. (2000b). Critical theory and the psychodynamics of change: A note about organizations as therapeutic settings. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(3), 289–299. doi:10.1108/09534810010330931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, B., & Nicholson, H. (2014). Resistance and struggle in leadership development. Human Relations, 67(11), 1413–1436. doi:10.1177/0018726714521644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. A., & Arneson, P. (2003). Communication in a shared governance hospital: Managing emergent paradoxes. Communication Studies, 54(1), 35–55. doi:10.1080/10510970309363263
   Google Scholar
• Castello, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29. doi:10.1007/S10551-011-0770-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–576. doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanin, M. N., & Shapiro, H. J. (1985). Dialectical inquiry in strategic planning: Extending the boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 663–675. doi:10.2307/258037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (2008). Encountering the ethics of engaged scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 281–288. doi:10.1080/00909880802172293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney, G., & Cloud, D. L. (2006). Doing democracy, engaging the material. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 501–540. doi:10.1177/0893318905285485
   Google Scholar
• Child, J., & McGrath, R. G. (2001). Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1135–1148. doi:10.2307/3069393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., & Robey, R. (2007). Dialectics of resilience: A multi-level analysis of a telehealth innovation. Journal of Information Technology, 22(1), 24–35. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1213–1218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chreim, S. (2005). The continuity-change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 567–593. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2015). Discursive closure and discursive openings in sustainability. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 135–144. doi:10.1177/0893318914563574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clair, R. P. (1997). Organizing silence: Silence as voice and voice as silence in the narrative exploration of the Treaty of New Echota. Western Journal of Communication, 61(3), 315–337. doi:10.1080/10570319709374580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (1998). Can specialists be general managers?: Developing paradoxical thinking in middle managers. Journal of Management Development, 17(3), 191–206. doi:10.1108/02621719810210730
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., Cunha, J. V., & Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations, 55(5), 483–503. doi:10.1177/0018726702555001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization, 12(2), 147–167. doi:10.1177/1350508405051186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, D. L. (2005). Fighting words: Labor and the limits of communication at Staley, 1993 to 1996. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 509–542. doi:10.1177/0893318904273688
   Google Scholar
• Coad, A. F., & Glyptis, L. G. (2014). Structuration: A position-practice perspective and an illustrative study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(2), 142–161. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, M. J. (2009). Negotiating intercommunity and community group identity positions: Summary discourses from two Northern Ireland intercommunity groups. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2(3), 285–306. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2009.00041.x
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. (2005). Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations, 58(11), 1419–1442. doi:10.1177/0018726705060902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership, 10(1), 36–55. doi:10.1177/1742715013510807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, J., & Miller, K. (2010). The dialectics of care: Communicative choices at the end of life. Health Communication, 25(2), 165–174. doi:10.1080/10410230903544951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. J., Hinings, B., Greenwood, R., & Brown, J. L. (1996). Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: The case of Canadian law firms. Organization Studies, 17(4), 623–647. doi:10.1177/017084069601700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (1986). Organization/disorganization. Social Science Information, 25(2), 299–335. doi:10.1177/053901886025002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (1989). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida. Organization Studies, 10(4), 479–502. doi:10.1177/017084068901000402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosier, R. A. (1983). Research notes and communications: Approaches for the experimental examination of the dialectic. Strategic Management Journal, 4(1), 79–84. doi:10.1002/smj.4250040108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosier, R. A., & Aplin, J. C. (1980). A critical view of dialectical inquiry as a tool in strategic planning. Strategic Management Journal, 1(4), 343–356. doi:10.1002/smj.4250010405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosier, R. A., Ruble, T. L., & Aplin, J. C. (1978). An evaluation of the effectiveness of dialectical inquiry systems. Management Science, 24(14), 1483–1490. doi:10.1287/mnsc.24.14.1483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo, L. A., & Di Domenico, M. L. (2015). A multi-level dialectical-paradox lens for top management team strategic decision-making in a corporate venture. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 484–506. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupland, C. (2001). Accounting for change: A discourse analysis of graduate trainees’ talk of adjustment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1103–1119. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cule, P. E., & Robey, D. (2004). A dual-motor, constructive process model of organizational transition. Organization Studies, 25(2), 229–260. doi:10.1177/0170840604040037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, M. P. (2004). Organizational time: A dialectical view. Organization, 11(2), 271–296. doi:10.1177/1350508404041616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, M. P., Kamoche, K., & Cunha, R. C. (2003). Organizational improvisation and leadership: A field study in two computer-mediated settings. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33(1), 34–57. doi:10.2307/40397556
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, M. P., Rego, A., & Vaccaro, A. (2014). Organizations as human communities and internal markets: Searching for duality. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(4), 441–455. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1998-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426. doi:10.1177/1052562904264440
   Google Scholar
• Cyphert, D., & Saiia, D. H. (2004). In search of the corporate citizen: The emerging discourse of corporate ecology. Southern Communication Journal, 69(3), 241–256. doi:10.1080/10417940409373295
   Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Kumar, R. (2010). Interpartner sensemaking in strategic alliances: Managing cultural differences and internal tensions. Management Decision, 48(1), 17–36. doi:10.1108/00251741011014436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11(1), 77–101. doi:10.1287/Orsc.11.1.77.12570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. S., Maranville, S. J., & Obloj, K. (1997). The paradoxical process of organizational transformation: Propositions and a case study. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 10, pp. 275–314). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M., & Oetzel, J. G. (2014). Physicians’ perspectives of managing tensions around dimensions of effective communication in the emergency department. Health Communication, 29(3), 257–266. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.743869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cock, C., & Rickards, T. (1996). Thinking about organizational change: Towards two kinds of process intervention. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 4(3), 233–251. doi:10.1108/eb028850
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2), 191–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbridge, R., & Edwards, T. (2013). Inhabiting institutions: Critical realist refinements to understanding institutional complexity and change. Organization Studies, 34(7), 927–947. doi:10.1177/0170840613483805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B. (1981). Toward a critical theory of public organization. Public Administration Review, 41(6), 628–635. doi:10.2307/975738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J. L., Dompierre, G., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2011). Escalating indecision: Between reification and strategic ambiguity. Organization Science, 22(1), 225–244. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue, W. A., Pugh, F., & Sabrie, S. (2014). Somali piracy negotiations: Resolving the paradoxes of extortionate transactions. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 7(3), 173–187. doi:10.1111/Ncmr.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., Claydon, T., & Buchanan, D. (2000). Mixed results, lousy process: The management experience of organizational change. British Journal of Management, 11(SI), S59–S80. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.11.s1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskill, G. W., Meyer, J., & Mirivel, J. C. (2012). Managing dialectics to make a difference: Tension management in a community-building organization. Communication Studies, 63(2), 243–261. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.634476
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, H. (2008). The Icarus paradox: An analysis of a totally destructive system. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 176–184. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2000). From individual action to collective action and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practices and information system design (pp. 150–166). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. doi:10.1108/09534811111132758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbert, L. A., Mearns, G. M., & Dena, S. (2005). Perceptions of turning points and dialectical interpretations in organizational team development. Small Group Research, 36(1), 21–58. doi:10.1177/1046496404266774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhardt, N., & Gibbs, J. L. (2014). The dialectical nature of impression management in knowledge work: Unpacking tensions in media use between managers and subordinates. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 155–186. doi:10.1177/0893318913520508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. A., Kunda, G., & Barley, S. R. (2004). Beach time, bridge and billable time hours: The temporal structure of technical contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 1–38. doi:10.2307/4131454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P., & Doz, Y. (1992). Dualities: A paradigm for human resource and organizational development in complex multinationals. In V. Pucik, N. M. Tichy, & C. K. Barnett (Eds.), Globalizing management: Creating and leading in the competitive organization (pp. 83–104). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2005). Peripheral vision: Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915–939. doi:10.1177/0170840605054610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T., Cooren, F., & Cahill, D. J. (2002). Discursiveness, contradiction and unintended consequences in successive downsizings. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 501–540. doi:10.1177/0893318902154001
   Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2014). Organizational discourse analysis. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 271–296). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, T. (2005). From” onion” to” ocean": Paradox and change in national cultures. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35(4), 71–90. doi:10.1080/00208825.2005.11043743
   Google Scholar
• Fang, T. (2012). Yin yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 25–50. doi:10.1111/J.1740-8784.2011.00221.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farjoun, M. (2002). The dialectics of institutional development in emerging and turbulent fields: The history of pricing conventions in the on-line database industry. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 848–874. doi:10.2307/3069318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225. doi:10.5465/AMR.2010.48463331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farjoun, M. (in press). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes. In H. Tsoukas & A. Langley (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M. (2002). Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science, 13(6), 653–666. doi:10.1287/Orsc.13.6.653.502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, P. (2007). Sexuality, power and resistance in the workplace. Organization Studies, 28(2), 239–256. doi:10.1177/0170840606068307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2008). Beyond power and resistance: New approaches to organizational politics. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 301–309. doi:10.1177/0893318907309928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 647–661. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2003). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foldy, E. G. (2006). Dueling schemata: Dialectical sensemaking about gender. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(3), 350–372. doi:10.1177/0021886306290309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C. J. (1986). Structural dynamics within and between organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 403–421. doi:10.2307/2392830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, K. A. (2001). Cultural-historical activity theory as practice theory: Illuminating the development of conflict-monitoring network. Communication Theory, 11(1), 56–83. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. (2006). Discourses of leadership: Gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership, 2(1), 77–99. doi:10.1177/1742715006060654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., & Backoff, R. H. (1988). Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 81–122). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 756–785. doi:10.5465/AMR.1994.9412190218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1995). Getting caught in our point of view: A response to Carini and colleagues. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 785–787. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.28081370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J., & Harding, N. (2008). Fear and loathing in harrogate, or a study of a conference. Organization, 15(2), 233–250. doi:10.1177/1350508407086582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison ( A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., & Engel, J. S. (2007). Models of innovation: Startups and mature corporations. California Management Review, 50(1), 94–120. doi:10.2307/41166418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyke, J. P., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2013). The ethics of conscious capitalism: Wicked problems in leading change and changing leaders. Human Relations, 66(12), 1619–1643. doi:10.1177/0018726713485306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanes, G. J. (2009). Dialectical tensions of small group leadership. Communication Studies, 60(5), 409–425. doi:10.1080/10510970903260228
   Google Scholar
• Garrety, K., Badham, R., Morrigan, V., Rifkin, W., & Zanko, M. (2003). The use of personality typing in organizational change: Discourse, emotions and the reflexive subject. Human Relations, 56(2), 211–235. doi:10.1177/0018726703056002892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Emergent by design: Performance and transformation at Infosys Technologies. Organization Science, 17(2), 277–286. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21(3), 593–608. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghemawat, P., & Costa, J. E. R. I. (1993). The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 59–73. doi:10.1002/smj.4250141007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. (2009). Dialectics in a global software team: Negotiating tensions across time, space, and culture. Human Relations, 62(6), 905–935. doi:10.1177/0018726709104547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. doi:10.2307/20159573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, A. G., Kirby, E. L., & Jorgenson, J. (2006). Work life research from both sides now: An integrative perspective for organizational and family communication. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 30, pp. 143–195). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. (2008). Consultant and critics on the couch. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(3), 243–249. doi:10.1177/1056492608318160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondo, M. B., & Amis, J. M. (2013). Variations in practice adoption: The roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 229–247. doi:10.5465/Amr.2010.0312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, D., & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. The Journal of Psychology, 147(5), 435–453. doi:10.1080/00223980.2012.710663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodier, B. C., & Eisenberg, E. M. (2006). Seeking the spirit: Communication and the (re)development of a “spiritual” organization. Communication Studies, 57(1), 47–65. doi:10.1080/10510970500483413
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. E. (2010). The dialectics of the exit interview: A fresh look at conversations about organizational disengagement. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 59–86. doi:10.1177/0893318910376914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (2007). The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(3), 265–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00222.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (2009). Duality theory and organizing forms in change management. Journal of Change Management, 9(1), 9–25. doi:10.1080/14697010902727146
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., Bougon, M. G., & Donnellon, A. (1985). Organizations as constructions and destructions of meaning. Journal of Management, 11(2), 83–98. doi:10.1177/014920638501100212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, A. J., & Cornwall, J. R. (1987). The disintegration of an organization: A dialectical analysis. Journal of Management, 13(1), 69–86. doi:10.1177/014920638701300106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groleau, C., Demers, C., & Engeström, Y. (2011). Guest editorial. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 330–332. doi:10.1108/09534811111132721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groleau, C., Demers, C., Lalancette, M., & Barros, M. (2012). From hand drawings to computer visuals: Confronting situated and institutionalized practices in an architecture firm. Organization Science, 23(3), 651–671. doi:10.1287/Orsc.1110.0667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groscurth, C. R. (2011). Paradoxes of privilege and participation: The case of the American Red Cross. Communication Quarterly, 59(3), 296–314. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.583498
   Google Scholar
• Haddadj, S. (2006). Paradoxical process in the organizational change of the CEO succession: A case study from France. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 447–456. doi:10.1108/09534810610676653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487. doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P., & Tyler, M. (2001). Managing subjectivity and the dialectic of self-consciousness: Hegel and organization theory. Organization, 8(4), 565–585. doi:10.1177/135050840184002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, C. (1994). The age of paradox. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864–888. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.22527458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. C., & Ogbonna, E. (2002). The unintended consequences of culture interventions: A study of unexpected outcomes. British Journal of Management, 13(1), 31–49. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, L. M. (2004). Masculinity(s), the agrarian frontier myth, and cooperative ways of organizing: Contradictions and tensions in the experience and enactment of democracy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 89–118. doi:10.1080/0090988042000210016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, L. M., Scott, J. A., Novak, D. R., Leeman, M., & Morris, J. F. (2006). Freedom through flight: Performing a counter-narrative of disability. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(1), 3–29. doi:10.1080/00909880500420192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343. doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslett, B. B. (2012). Communicating and organizing in context: The theory of structurational interaction. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. J. (1997). Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of a management team. Organization Science, 8(3), 275–288. doi:10.1287/orsc.8.3.275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. J., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1993). Spontaneous humour as an indicator of paradox and ambiguity in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(4), 505–526. doi:10.1177/017084069301400403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedberg, B., & Jönsson, S. (1978). Designing semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(1), 47–64. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(78)90006-5
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). The philosophy of history ( J. Sibree, Trans.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hemetsberger, A., & Reinhardt, C. (2009). Collective development in open-source communities: An activity theoretical perspective on successful online collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(9), 987–1008. doi:10.1177/0170840609339241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, A. (2003). Slaves to the market?: Competing discourses and paradoxical practices in a small business in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Communication, 30(1), 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, C. (1996). Understanding and creating whole organizational change through learning theory. Human Relations, 49(5), 621–641. doi:10.1177/001872679604900505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennestad, B. W. (1990). The symbolic impact of double bind leadership: Double bind and the dynamics of organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 27(3), 265–280. doi:10.1111/J.1467-6486.1990.Tb00247.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2014). A process theory of organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heydebrand, W. (1977). Organizational contradictions in public bureaucracies: Toward a Marxian theory of organizations. Sociological Quarterly, 18(1), 83–107. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1977.tb02163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. E. (2004). Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization, 11(1), 81–100. doi:10.1177/1350508404039659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmer-Nadesan, M. (1996). Organizational identity and space of action. Organization Studies, 17(1), 49–81. doi:10.1177/017084069601700103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. (Ed.). (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopson, M. C., & Orbe, M. P. (2007). Playing the game: Recalling dialectical tensions for black men in oppressive organizational structures. Howard Journal of Communications, 18(1), 69–86. doi:10.1080/10646170601147481
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L. A., & Geist, P. (1995). Ideological positioning in organizational change: The dialectic of control in a merging organization. Communication Monographs, 62(2), 110–131. doi:10.1080/03637759509376352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Beech, N. (2003). Contrary prescriptions: Recognizing good practice tensions in management. Organization Studies, 24(1), 69–93. doi:10.1177/0170840603024001678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylmö, A., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2002). Telecommuting as viewed through cultural lenses: An empirical investigation of the discourses of utopia, identity, and mystery. Communication Monographs, 69(4), 329–356. doi:10.1080/03637750216547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iedema, R., Degeling, P., Braithwaite, J., & White, L. (2004). ‘It’s an interesting conversation I’m hearing’: The doctor as manager. Organization Studies, 25(1), 15–33. doi:10.1177/0170840604038174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, G., & Rai, A. (2014). IT-enabled coordination for ambidextrous interorganizational relationships. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 72–92. doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, J. (1979). The language of dialectics and the dialectics of language. Copenhagen, DK: Munksgaard Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, W. A. (1999). Dualism, duality and the complexity of economic institutions. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(4), 545–558. doi:10.1108/03068299910215997
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, J. K. (2004). Negotiating autonomy and connection through politeness: A dialectical approach to organizational conflict management. Western Journal of Communication, 68(3), 257–277. doi:10.1080/10570310409374801
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. (1999). The world in two and a third way out? The concept of duality in organization theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 15(2), 121–139. doi:10.1016/S0956-5221(98)00010-4
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., & Lê, J. (in press). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. K., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280. doi:10.1177/1476127013481016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. doi:10.5465/Amj.2010.0772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. J., & Dillon, P. J. (2012). “This is what we're all about”: The (re)construction of an oppressive organizational structure. Southern Communication Journal, 77(4), 287–306. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2012.672538
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S., & Conley, H. (2007). Living with the contradictions of modernization? Emotional management in the teaching profession. Public Administration, 85(4), 979–1001. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00675.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermier, J. M. (1985). “When the sleeper wakes": A short story extending themes in radical organization theory. Journal of Management, 11(2), 67–80. doi:10.1177/014920638501100210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, G. (2007a). “Omega is a four-letter word": Toward a tension-centered model of resistance to information and communication technologies. Communication Monographs, 74(4), 517–540. doi:10.1080/03637750701716602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, G. (2007b). Unpacking unintended consequences in planned organizational change: A process model. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(1), 5–28. doi:10.1177/0893318907301986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, C., & Stohl, C. (2012). Cultural competence and institutional contradictions: The hydropower referendum. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(4), 329–349. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.720379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., & Duberley, J. (2003). Reflexivity in management research. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1279–1303. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., & Long, L. M. (2002). Being a part and being apart: Dialectics and group communication. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New Directions In Group Communication (pp. 25–41). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (2004). Jacques Derrida. In S. Linstead (Ed.), Organization theory and postmodern thought (pp. 34–63). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. S. (1994). A dialectical reframing of the mediation process. In J. P. Folger & T. S. Jones (Eds.), New directions in mediation: Communication research and perspectives (pp. 26–47). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. S., & Bodtker, A. (1998). A dialectical analysis of a social justice process: International collaboration in South Africa. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(4), 357–373. doi:10.1080/00909889809365514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juanillo, N. K., & Scherer, C. W. (1995). Attaining a state of informed judgments: Toward a dialectical discourse on risk. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 18, pp. 278–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kan, M. M., & Parry, K. W. (2004). Identifying paradox: A grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 467–491. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, S., & Merilainen, S. (2002). Metamorphosis: From ‘nice girls’ to ‘nice bitches’: Resisting patriarchal articulations of professional identity. Gender, Work and Organization, 9(3), 336–354. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00163
   Google Scholar
• Kellett, P. M. (1999). Dialogue and dialectics in managing organizational change: The case of a mission-based transformation. Southern Communication Journal, 64(3), 211–231. doi:10.1080/10417949909373135
   Google Scholar
• Keough, C., & Lake, R. (1993). Values as structuring properties in contract negotiations. In C. Conrad (Ed.), The ethical nexus (pp. 171–189). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Kerosuo, H. (2011). Caught between a rock and a hard place: From individually experienced double binds to collaborative change in surgery. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 388–399. doi:10.1108/09534811111132767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1978). The midcareer conundrum. Organizational Dynamics, 7(2), 45–62. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(78)90037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1980). Organizational paradoxes: Clinical approaches to management. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Khazanchi, S., Lewis, M. W., & Boyer, K. K. (2007). Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 871–884. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, E. L., & Krone, K. J. (2002). “The policy exists but you can't really use it": Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(1), 50–77. doi:10.1080/00909880216577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarner, P., & Raisch, S. (2013). Move to the beat--rhythms of change and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 160–184. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleist, C. (2013). Using Sartre's critique of dialectical reason for managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 341–352. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1266-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights, D. (1997). Organization theory in the age of deconstruction: Dualism, gender and postmodernism revisited. Organization Studies, 18(1), 1–19. doi:10.1177/017084069701800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, H., O’Doherty, D. P., Vurdubakis, T., & Westrup, C. (2015). Something happened: Spectres of organization/disorganization at the airport. Human Relations, 68(6), 1001–1020. doi:10.1177/0018726714550257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koene, B. A. S. (2006). Situated human agency, institutional entrepreneurship and institutional change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(3), 365–382. doi:10.1108/09534810610668364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. M. (1987). Corporate ombudsman and organization conflict resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(4), 673–691. doi:10.1177/0022002787031004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komporozos-Athanasiou, A., & Fotaki, M. (2015). A theory of imagination for organization studies using the work of Cornelius Castoriadis. Organization Studies, 36(3), 321–342. doi:10.1177/0170840614559258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M., & Laster, N. M. (2011). Communicative tensions of community organizing: The case of a local neighborhood association. Western Journal of Communication, 75(1), 28–51. doi:10.1080/10570314.2010.536965
   Google Scholar
• Kozica, A. M. F., Gebhardt, C., Muller-Seitz, G., & Kaiser, S. (2015). Organizational identity and paradox: An analysis of the “stable state of instability” of Wikipedia's identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(2), 186–203. doi:10.1177/1056492614553275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. W. (2004). Toward a communication theory of group dialectics: An ethnographic study of a community theater group. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 311–332. doi:10.1080/0363452042000288292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E., Sheep, M. L., Smith, B. R., & Kataria, N. (2015). Elasticity and the dialectic tensions of organizational identity: How can we hold together while we are pulling apart? Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 981–1011. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (2012). Negotiating the micro-macro divide: Thought leadership from organizational communication for theorizing organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(4), 543–584. doi:10.1177/0893318912462004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurian, P. A., Munshi, D., & Bartlett, R. V. (2014). Sustainable citizenship for a technological world: Negotiating deliberative dialectics. Citizenship Studies, 18(3–4), 435–451. doi:10.1080/13621025.2014.905284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladge, J. J., Clair, J. A., & Greenberg, D. (2012). Cross-domain identity transition during liminal periods: Constructing multiple selves as professional and mother during pregnancy. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1449–1471. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., & Sloan, P. (2011). Organizational change and dialectic processes. In D. M. Boje, B. Brurnes, & J. Hassard (Eds.), The Routledge companion to organizational change (pp. 261–275). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203810279.ch18
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2010). Introducing perspectives on process organization studies. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing: Perspectives on process organization studies (pp. 1–26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, G. S., & Tompkins, P. K. (2005). Ambivalence and resistance: A study of management in a concertive control system. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/0363775052000342508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautsch, B. A., Kossek, E. E., & Eaton, S. C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62(6), 795–827. doi:10.1177/0018726709104543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2013). Contradiction as a medium and outcome of organizational change: A Foucauldian reading. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(3), 556–572. doi:10.1108/09534811311328579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., Jackson, M. H., & Diwan, A. (2009). The enactment-externalization dialectic: Rationalization and the persistence of counterproductive technology design practices in student engineering. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 400–420. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.37315471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. (2010). The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(1), 85–105. doi:10.1080/00909880903483599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy-Storms, L., Claver, M., Gutierrez, V. F., & Curry, L. (2011). Individualized care in practice: Communication strategies of nursing aides and residents in nursing homes. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(3), 271–289. doi:10.1080/00909882.2011.585400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K., Isbell, M. G., & Koschmann, M. (2010). Collaborative tensions: Practitioners’ experiences of interorganizational relationships. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 460–479. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.523605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.3707712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 58–77. doi:10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., & Kelemen, M. L. (2002). Multiparadigm inquiry: Exploring organizational pluralism and paradox. Human Relations, 55(2), 251–275. doi:10.1177/0018726702055002185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149. doi:10.1177/0021886314522322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littler, C. R., & Innes, P. (2004). The paradox of managerial downsizing. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1159–1184. doi:10.1177/0170840604046314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2004). Negotiating maternity leave expectations: Perceived tensions between ethics of justice and care. Journal of Business Communication, 41(4), 323–349. doi:10.1177/0021943604268174
   Google Scholar
• Long, B. C., Hall, W. A., Bermbach, N., Jordan, S., & Patterson, K. (2008). Gauging visibility: How female clerical workers manage work-related distress. Qualitative Health Research, 18(10), 1413–1428. doi:10.1177/1049732308322604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Molo, C., & Udani, Z. (2013). Bringing back the essence of the ‘S’ and ‘R’ to CSR: Understanding the limitations of the merchant trade and the white man's burden. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 123–136. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1513-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenco, S. V., & Glidewell, J. C. (1975). A dialectical analysis of organizational conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4), 489–508. doi:10.2307/2392018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.31767217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüscher, L. S., Lewis, M. W., & Ingram, A. E. (2006). The social construction of organizational change paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 491–502. doi:10.1108/09534810610676680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, O. H. (2009). Kitchen antics: The importance of humor and maintaining professionalism at work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(4), 444–464. doi:10.1080/00909880903233143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, R. (2008). From networks to hierarchies: The construction of a subcontracting regime in the Irish telecommunications industry. Organization Studies, 29(6), 867–886. doi:10.1177/0170840608088706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, C. C., Anand, V., Joshi, M., & Manz, K. P. (2008). Emerging paradoxes in executive leadership: A theoretical interpretation of the tensions between corruption and virtuous values. Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 385–392. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, A., & Geffen, D. (1998). The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1145–1168. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12 <1145::AID-SMJ6 > 3.3.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, A. (1996). Designing discourse: A critical analysis of strategic ambiguity and workplace control. Management Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 389–421. doi:10.1177/0893318996009004002
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S., & Macalpine, M. (1999). The search for reconciling insights: A “really useful” tool for managing paradox. Journal of Management Development, 18(8), 642–651. doi:10.1108/02621719910293756
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. M. (2004). Humor in middle management: Women negotiating the paradoxes of organizational life. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 147–170. doi:10.1080/0090988042000210034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. R., O'Brien, J. L., Heyworth, J. A., & Meyer, N. R. (2008). Point counterpoint: The function of contradictions on an interdisciplinary health care team. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3), 369–379. doi:10.1177/1049732307311119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 51(2), 164–179. doi:10.2307/27838689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1906). Capital: A critique of political economy ( S. Moore & E. Aveling, Trans. Vol. 1). New York, NY: Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. O. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Science, 15(8), 403–414. doi:10.1287/mnsc.15.8.B403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. O. (1996). Commentary on varieties of dialectic change processes. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(3), 293–299. doi:10.1177/105649269653015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1979). Assumptions of majestic metals: Strategy through dialectics. California Management Review, 22(2), 80–88. doi:10.2307/41165323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuch, M. (1985). Vicious circles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 14–33. doi:10.2307/2392809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiassen, L. (1998). Reflective systems development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 10(1), 67–118.
   Google Scholar
• McClellan, J. G. (2011). Reconsidering communication and the discursive politics of organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 11(4), 465–480. doi:10.1080/14697017.2011.630508
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. (2011). Maoism versus Confucianism: Ideological influences on Chinese business leaders. Journal of Management Development, 30(7/8), 632–646. doi:10.1108/02621711111150164
   Google Scholar
• McGovern, P. (2014). Contradictions at work: A critical review. Sociology, 48(1), 20–37. doi:10.1177/0038038512467711
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, J. B. (1992). A qualitative analysis of dialectical processes in educational organizations. Human Relations, 45(4), 387–410. doi:10.1177/001872679204500405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, T. (2006). “Paradoxing the dialectic": The impact of patients’ sexual harassment in the discursive construction of nurses’ caregiving roles. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 416–450. doi:10.1177/0893318905280879
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay, A. (2010). Performativity and the politics of identity: Putting Butler to work. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(3), 232–242. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2008.01.011
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, W., & Scherer, A. G. (2000). Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 735–752. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.3707703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamee, L. G., & Peterson, B. L. (2014). Reconciling “third space/place": Toward a complementary dialectical understanding of volunteer management. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 214–243. doi:10.1177/0893318914525472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhee, R. D., Poole, M. S., & Iverson, J. (2014). Structuration theory. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 75–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Medved, C. E., Morrison, K., Dearing, J. W., Larson, R. S., Cline, G., & Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2001). Tensions in community health improvement initiatives: Communication and collaboration in a managed care environment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(2), 137–152. doi:10.1080/00909880128107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. B. (2006). Destructive dynamics of middle management intervention in postmerger processes. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(4), 397–419. doi:10.1177/0021886306289420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, R. A., & Garrett, D. E. (1993). Contradictions, values, and organizational argument. In C. Conrad (Ed.), The ethical nexus (pp. 149–170). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, V. D., Jablin, F. M., Casey, M. K., Lamphear-Van Horn, M., & Ethington, C. (1996). The maternity leave as a role negotiation process. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8(3), 286–309.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A. J. (2002). Studying the gendering of organizational culture over time: Concerns, issues and strategies. Gender, Work and Organization, 9(3), 286–307. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00161
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (2007). Ideational elements: A window on sensemaking about change communication. Australian Journal of Communication, 34(2), 13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mitroff, I. I., & Emshoff, J. R. (1979). On strategic assumption-making: A dialectical approach to policy and planning. Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 1–12. doi:10.5465/AMR.1979.4289165
   Google Scholar
• Mitroff, I. I., Emshoff, J. R., & Kilmann, R. H. (1979). Assumptional analysis: A methodology for strategic problem solving. Management Science, 25(6), 583–593. doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.6.583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinsky, A. L. (1999). Sanding down the edges: Paradoxical impediments to organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 8–24. doi:10.1177/0021886399351002
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, K. (2011). Evidence-based dialectics. Organization, 19(4), 461–479. doi:10.1177/1350508411414229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (2004). Discourse, power and ideology: Unpacking the critical approach. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 237–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (2005). Theorizing resistance in organization studies: A dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 19–44. doi:10.1177/0893318905276558
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (2013). Organizational communication: A critical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (2014). Critical theory and postmodernism. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 101–126). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., & Putnam, L. L. (1992). The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 465–486. doi:10.2307/258719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., & Stohl, C. (1991). Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse & Society, 2(3), 313–332. doi:10.1177/0957926591002003004
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. G. (1998). Hidden transcripts of flight attendant resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(4), 499–535. doi:10.1177/0893318998114001
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. G. (2003). The dialectical gaze exploring: The subject-object tension in the performances of women who strip. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(3), 305–335. doi:10.1177/0891241603032003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musson, G., & Duberley, J. (2007). Change, change or be exchanged: The discourse of participation and the manufacture of identity. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 143–164. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00640.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasim, S., & Sushil. (2011). Revisiting organizational change: Exploring the paradox of managing continuity and change. Journal of Change Management, 11(2), 185–206. doi:10.1080/14697017.2010.538854
   Google Scholar
• Neimark, M., & Tinker, T. (1986). The social construction of management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(4), 369–395. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(86)90008-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neimark, M., & Tinker, T. (1987). Identity and non-identity thinking: Dialectical critique of the transaction cost theory of the modern corporation. Journal of Management, 13(4), 661–673. doi:10.1177/014920638701300407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2001). From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: Contradictory outcomes of intranet development. British Journal of Management, 12(2), 97–111. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhouse, D. R., & Chapman, I. D. (1996). Organizational transformation: A case study of two aboriginal organizations. Human Relations, 49(7), 995–1011. doi:10.1177/001872679604900706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, T. (1998). Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of Foucauldian studies? Organization Studies, 19(3), 415–447. doi:10.1177/017084069801900303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. doi:10.1177/0170840609349875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. M., & Clinkscales, M. J. (2010). Nurses at the nexus: A case study in structurational divergence. Health Communication, 25(1), 32–49. doi:10.1080/10410230903473516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. M., Mahon, M. M., & Zhao, X. Q. (2010). Conceptualization and measurement of structurational divergence in the healthcare setting. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 362–385. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.514001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. F. (2008). Models of change and the adoption of web technologies: Encapsulating participation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(2), 263–286. doi:10.1177/0021886308314900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. P. (1996). Varieties of dialectic change processes. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(3), 276–292. doi:10.1177/105649269653014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1996a). Calendars and keys: The classification of ‘'home'‘ and ‘'work'‘. Sociological Forum, 11(3), 563–582. doi:10.1007/Bf02408393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1996b). Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norander, S., & Harter, L. M. (2011). Reflexivity in practice: Challenges and potentials of transnational organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 74–105. doi:10.1177/0893318911415607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, T. (2009). Situating organizations in politics: A diachronic view of control-resistance dialectics. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(4), 525–554. doi:10.1177/0893318908331099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, T., & Sadler, C. (2006). Dialectical hegemony and the enactment of contradictory definitions in a rural community planning process. Southern Communication Journal, 71(4), 363–382. doi:10.1080/10417940601000451
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, E. S. (1995). Paradoxes of participation: Textual analysis and organizational change. Organization Studies, 16(5), 769–803. doi:10.1177/001872679805100402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, B. (2005). The construction of a social account: A case study in an overseas aid agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 279–296. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbor, J. O. (2000). Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 605–635. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbor, J. O. (2001). Critical theory and the hegemony of corporate culture. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14(6), 590–608. doi:10.1108/09534810110408015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olufowote, J. O. (2008). A structurational analysis of informed consent to treatment: Societal evolution, contradiction, and reproductions in medical practice. Health Communication, 23(3), 292–303. doi:10.1080/10410230802056404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olufowote, J. O. (2011). A dialectical perspective on informed consent to treatment: An examination of radiologists’ dilemmas and negotiations. Qualitative Health Research, 21(6), 839–852. doi:10.1177/1049732311402097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Robey, D. (1991). Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 143–169. doi:10.1287/isre.2.2.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223. doi:10.2307/258154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortu, C. (2008). The denial of class struggle by British governments in their anti-union discourse (1978–2007). Critical Discourse Studies, 5(4), 289–301. doi:10.1080/17405900802405155
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, C. S. (1998). Systems for sustainable organizations: Emergent strategies, interactive controls and semi-formal information. Journal of Management Studies, 35(4), 481–509. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswick, C., Putnam, L. L., & Keenoy, T. (2004). Tropes, discourse and organizing. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 105–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, M., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2013). Breaking the myth of Indian call centers: A postcolonial analysis of resistance. Communication Monographs, 80(2), 199–219. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.776172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (2002). Managing discursive tension: The co-existence of individualist and collaborative discourses in Flight Centre. Journal of Management Studies, 39(8), 1045–1069. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, A., Cropp, F., & Cameron, G. T. (2006). Corporate crisis planning: Tensions, issues, and contradictions. Journal of Communication Management, 10(4), 371–389. doi:10.1108/13632540610714818
   Google Scholar
• Papa, M. J., Auwal, M. A., & Singhal, A. (1995). Dialectic of control and emancipation in organizing for social change: A multitheoretic study of the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. Communication Theory, 5(3), 189–223. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, K. P., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741–754. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.54.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599–620. doi:10.5465/amr.1993.9402210152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313–338. doi:10.1177/0149206311410060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, M., Fowler, C., Kaplan, M., Nussbaum, J., & Becker, J. (2009). Dialectical tensions underpinning family farm succession planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(1), 59–79. doi:10.1080/00909880802592631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578. doi:10.2307/258559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2004). Theories of organizational change and innovation processes. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 374–398). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, S. (2003). The intersections of medicine and business: Case studies of contradictions and negotiations in medical-business writing. Business Communication Quarterly, 66(2), 76–78. doi:10.1177/108056990306600208
   Google Scholar
• Porsander, L. (2000). Translating a dream of immortality in a (con)temporary order. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(1), 14–29. doi:10.1108/09534810010310212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42. doi:10.2307/259261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prenkert, F. (2006). A theory of organizing informed by activity theory: The locus of paradox, sources of change, and challenge to management. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 471–490. doi:10.1108/09534810610676671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. (1986). Contradiction and paradoxes in organizations. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Organizational communication: Emerging perspectives (Vol. I, pp. 151–167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. (2004). Dialectical tensions and rhetorical tropes in negotiations. Organization Studies, 25(1), 35–53. doi:10.1177/0170840604038179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. (2013). Primary and secondary contradictions: A literature review and future directions. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(4), 623–630. doi:10.1177/0893318913504139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2001). Discourse analysis in organizations: Issues and concerns. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 78–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2014). Organizational discourse analysis. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 271–295). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Jahn, J., & Baker, J. S. (2011). Intersecting difference: A dialectical perspective. In D. K. Mumby (Ed.), Reframing difference in organizational communication studies: Research, pedagogy, and practice (pp. 31–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67(4), 413–440. doi:10.1177/0018726713495704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, A. (1993). “Organizing as explaining” and the doing of managing: An integrative appreciation of processes of organizing. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(2), 157–168. doi:10.1177/105649269322006
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. (Eds.). (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S., & Keen, P. (2005). Activating knowledge through electronic, collaboration: Vanquishing the knowledge paradox. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 40–54. doi:10.1109/Tpc.2005.843296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. doi:10.1177/0149206308316058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramarajan, L., & Reid, E. (2013). Shattering the myth of separate worlds: Negotiating nonwork identities at work. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 621–644. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189–198. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real, K., & Putnam, L. L. (2005). Ironies in the discursive struggle of pilots defending the profession. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 91–119. doi:10.1177/0893318905276561
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. (2005). Reflections on the ‘realist turn’ in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 42(8), 1621–1644. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00559.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning, N. P. (2002). A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organization Science, 13(2), 109–127. doi:10.1287/Orsc.13.2.109.535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D. (2001). Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: Creating and sustaining process improvement. California Management Review, 43(4), 64–88. doi:10.2307/41166101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., & Cooper, S. D. (2010). Organizations and unusual routines: A systems analysis of dysfunctional feedback processes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robey, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (1999). Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 167–185. doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, D., & Holmstrom, J. (2001). Transforming municipal governance in global context: A case study of the dialectics of social change. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 4(4), 19–31. doi:10.1080/1097198X.2001.10856312
   Google Scholar
• Robey, D., Ross, J. W., & Boudreau, M. C. (2002). Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 17–46. doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rond, M., & Bouchikhi, H. (2004). On the dialectics of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 15(1), 56–69. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (Ed.). (1967). The linguistic turn: Recent essays in philosophical method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, A. (1979). Einstein's creative thinking and the general theory of relativity: A documented report. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 136(1), 38–43. doi:10.1176/ajp.136.1.38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rus, V. (1980). Positive and negative power: Thoughts on the dialectics of power. Organization Studies, 1(1), 3–19. doi:10.1177/017084068000100102
   Google Scholar
• Rusaw, A. C. (2000). Uncovering training resistance: A critical theory perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(3), 249–263. doi:10.1108/09534810010330896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud, G. (2000). The symphony: Organizational discourse and the symbolic tensions between artistic and business ideologies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(2), 117–143. doi:10.1080/00909880009365559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud, G., & Sprague, J. (2000). Can't see the (old growth) forest for the logs: Dialectical tensions in the interpretive practices of environmentalists and loggers. Communication Reports, 13(2), 55–65. doi:10.1080/08934210009367725
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. L., & McClellan, J. G. (2014). Being business-like while pursuing a social mission: Acknowledging the inherent tensions in US nonprofit organizing. Organization, 21(1), 68–89. doi:10.1177/1350508412464894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, L. (1971). Dialectic in sociology. American Sociological Review, 36(4), 667–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreyögg, G., & Kliesch-Eberl, M. (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 913–933. doi:10.1002/smj.613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Crossroads—organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21(6), 1251–1262. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, M., & Hatch, M. J. (1996). Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 529–557. doi:10.2307/258671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, D. M., & Sandberg, W. R. (1989). The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 31–43. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1), 51–71. doi:10.2307/255859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 745–772. doi:10.2307/256567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk, C. R. (1984). Effects of planning aids and presentation media on performance and affective responses in strategic decision-making. Management Science, 30(3), 263–272. doi:10.1287/Mnsc.30.3.263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk, C. R. (1989). Research notes and communications a meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry. Strategic Management Journal, 10(3), 303–306. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. W., & Trethewey, A. (2008). Organizational discourse and the appraisal of occupational hazards: Interpretive repertoires, heedful interrelating, and identity at work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 298–317. doi:10.1080/00909880802172137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal, W., & Ball, A. (2011). Interpreting the dynamics of public sector budgeting: A dialectic of control approach. Financial Accountability & Management, 27(4), 409–436. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00531.x
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247. doi:10.2307/4134353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, M. G., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 73–107). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, G., & Good, D. (2013). The work of middle managers: Sensemaking and sensegiving for creating positive social change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(1), 95–122. doi:10.1177/0021886312471375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheep, M. L., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2015). Accounting for disequilibrium in knotted systems of paradoxical tensions. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Group for Organizational Studies, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Sheep, M. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Khazanchi, S. (in press). Knots in the discourse of innovation: Investigating multiple tensions in a reacquired spin-off. Organization Studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherblom, J. C., Keranen, L., & Withers, L. A. (2002). Tradition, tension, and transformation: A structuration analysis of a game warden service in transition. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(2), 143–162. doi:10.1080/00909880216579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014). In search of phronesis: Leadership and the art of judgment. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(2), 224–243. doi:10.5465/amle.2013.0201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sias, P. M., Heath, R. G., Perry, T., Silva, D., & Fix, B. (2004). Narratives of workplace friendship deterioration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 321–340. doi:10.1177/0265407504042835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sison, M. D. (2010). Recasting public relations roles: Agents of compliance, control or conscience. Journal of Communication Management, 14(4), 319–336. doi:10.1108/13632541011090437
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. C. T., & Graetz, F. (2006a). Complexity theory and organizing form dualities. Management Decision, 44(7), 851–870. doi:10.1108/00251740610680569
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. C. T., & Graetz, F. (2006b). Organizing dualities and strategizing for change. Strategic Change, 15(5), 231–239. doi:10.1002/jsc.760
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112. doi:10.2307/2666980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotirin, P., & Gottfried, H. (1999). The ambivalent dynamics of secretarial ‘bitching': Control, resistance, and the construction of identity. Organization, 6(1), 57–80. doi:10.1177/135050849961003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, A., & Sewell, G. (2010). From national service to global player: Transforming the organizational logic of a public broadcaster. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 913–943. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 477–495. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steimel, S. J. (2010). Dialectical tensions experienced by resettled Sudanese refugees in mediating organizations. International Journal of Communication, 4(1), 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, W. B., Bartunek, J. M., & Borgatti, S. P. (2003). Front and backstage processes of an organizational restructuring effort. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 243–258. doi:10.1177/0021886303258073
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 349–407. doi:10.1177/0893318901143001
   Google Scholar
• Stoltzfus, K., Stohl, C., & Seibold, D. R. (2011). Managing organizational change: Paradoxical problems, solutions, and consequences. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 349–367. doi:10.1108/09534811111132749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoppelenburg, A., & Vermaak, H. (2008). Defixation as an intervention perspective: Understanding wicked problems at the Dutch ministry of foreign affairs. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(1), 40–54. doi:10.1177/1056492608329261
   Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A. (1997). The dialectics of consultancy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8(5), 511–535. doi:10.1006/cpac.1996.0119
   Google Scholar
• Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, D. C. McClelland, & J. Veroff (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393–400). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Surman, E. (2002). Dialectics of dualism: The symbolic importance of the home/work divide. Ephemera: Theory & politics in organization, 2(3), 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (2011). Duality theory and the management of the change-stability paradox. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(4), 534–547. doi:10.1017/S1833367200001437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., Lerch, F., Huxham, C., & Hibbert, P. (2011). A silent cry for leadership: Organizing for leading (in) clusters. Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 328–343. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2003). Knowledge, trust, and control: Managing tensions and contradictions in a regional network of service firms. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33(2), 69–99. doi:10.1080/00208825.2003.11043679
   Google Scholar
• Symon, G., Buehring, A., Johnson, P., & Cassell, C. (2008). Positioning qualitative research as resistance to the institutionalization of the academic labour process. Organization Studies, 29(10), 1315–1336. doi:10.1177/0170840607086552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskin, L., & Devos, V. (2005). Paradoxes from the individualization of human resource management: The case of telework. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(1), 13–24. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-8710-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. C. (2005). Postmodern theory. In S. May & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 113–140). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M. S. (2011). Negotiating the tension between the discourses of Christianity and spiritual pluralism in alcoholics anonymous. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(4), 389–405. doi:10.1080/00909882.2011.608694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2008). Organising and disorganising. London, UK: Tiarchy.
   Google Scholar
• Townley, B., Cooper, D. J., & Oakes, L. (2003). Performance measures and the rationalization of organizations. Organization Studies, 24(7), 1045–1071. doi:10.1177/01708406030247003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsley, N. C., & Geist, P. (2000). The discursive enactment of hegemony: Sexual harassment and academic organizing. Western Journal of Communication, 64(2), 190–217. doi:10.1080/10570310009374671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2004). Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 119–146. doi:10.1080/0090988042000210025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trethewey, A. (2001). Reproducing and resisting the master narrative of decline: Midlife professional women's experiences of aging. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(2), 183–226. doi:10.1177/0893318901152002
   Google Scholar
• Trethewey, A., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2004). Special issue introduction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 81–88. doi:10.1080/0090988042000210007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullar, W. L., & Kaiser, P. R. (2000). The effect of process training and outcomes in virtual groups. Journal of Business Communication, 37(4), 408–426. doi:10.1177/002194360003700404
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 169–188. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Sun, K. (2011). Breakdowns in implementing models of organization change. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 58–74. doi:10.5465/amp.2011.63886530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., & Stobbe, L. (2009). Doing gender in academic education: The paradox of visibility. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(4), 451–470. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanheule, S., Lievrouw, A., & Verhaeghe, P. (2003). Burnout and intersubjectivity: A psychoanalytical study from a Lacanian perspective. Human Relations, 56(3), 321–338. doi:10.1177/0018726703056003614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varman, R., & Chakrabarti, M. (2004). Contradictions of democracy in a workers’ cooperative. Organization Studies, 25(2), 183–208. doi:10.1177/0170840604036913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C., Schoeneborn, D., & Sergi, V. (2015). Summoning the spirits: Organizational texts and the (dis)ordering properties of communication. Human Relations, 69(3), 629–659. doi:10.1177/0018726715589422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., & Stamp, G. H. (2003). The empowerment dilemma: The dialectic of emancipation and control in staff/client interaction at shelters for battered women. Communication Studies, 54(2), 154–168. doi:10.1080/10510970309363277
   Google Scholar
• Vince, R., & Broussine, M. (1996). Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17(1), 1–21. doi:10.1177/017084069601700101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaar, P. W. L., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Towards a dialectic perspective on formalization in interorganizational relationships: How alliance managers capitalize on the duality inherent in contracts, rules and procedures. Organization Studies, 28(4), 437–466. doi:10.1177/0170840607078003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. A. (1978). The organizational double bind: Toward an understanding of rationality and its complement. Academy of Management Review, 3(4), 786–795. doi:10.5465/AMR.1978.4289283
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P., & Fahey, L. (1986). The role of negotiated belief structures in strategy making. Journal of Management, 12(3), 325–338. doi:10.1177/014920638601200302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. L., & Li, J. T. (2008). Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Management, 34(5), 925–951. doi:10.1177/0149206308321547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasson, C. (2004). The paradoxical language of enterprise. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 175–199. doi:10.1080/1740590042000302067
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social pyschology of organizing (2nd ed.). Redding, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, R. F. (1998). The sound of one hand clapping: Counterintuitive lessons extracted from paradoxes and double binds in participative organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(3), 323–371. doi:10.1177/0893318998113001
   Google Scholar
• Westenholz, A. (1993). Paradoxical thinking and change in the frames of reference. Organization Studies, 14(1), 37–58. doi:10.1177/017084069301400104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, R. (1992). Putting Giddens into action: Social systems and managerial agency. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 693–712. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00685.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, A. (2005). Preaching and practising ‘flexibility': Implications for theories of subjectivity at work. Human Relations, 58(10), 1301–1322. doi:10.1177/0018726705059859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, A. (2006). The paradoxical repertoires of management consultancy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 424–436. doi:10.1108/09534810610676635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., Mueller, F., & Mangan, A. (2008). In search of subtlety: Discursive devices and rhetorical competence. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 99–122. doi:10.1177/0893318908318515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieland, S. M. B. (2010). Ideal selves as resources for the situated practice of identity. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 503–528. doi:10.1177/0893318910374938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieland, S. M. B. (2011). Struggling to manage work as a part of everyday life: Complicating control, rethinking resistance, and contextualizing work/life studies. Communication Monographs, 78(2), 162–184. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.564642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2012). Expressions of identifications: The nature of talk and identity tensions among organizational members in a struggling organization. Communication Studies, 63(4), 457–481. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.630439
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. (1990). Subjectivity and dialectics of praxis: Opening up the core of labor process analysis. In D. Knights & H. Willmott (Eds.), Labour process theory (pp. 336–378). London, UK: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., O'Leary, M. B., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979–1002. doi:10.1177/0170840607083105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T., & Conrad, C. (1983). Paradox in the experiences of professional women. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47(4), 305–322. doi:10.1080/10570318309374128
   Google Scholar
• Wooton, L. M. (1977). The mixed blessings of contingency management. Academy of Management Review, 2(3), 431–441. doi:10.5465/AMR.1977.4281828
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. R., & Manning, M. R. (2004). Resourceful sensemaking in an administrative group. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4), 623–643. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, L. (2004). The paradox of control in participative decision-making: Facilitative discourse in banks. Text, 24(1), 113–146. doi:10.1515/Text.2004.001
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitz, G. (1980). Interorganizational dialectics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 72–88. doi:10.2307/2392227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. A. (2007). The story behind an organizational list: A genealogy of wildland firefighters’ 10 standard fire orders. Communication Monographs, 74(4), 415–442. doi:10.1080/03637750701716594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234–254. doi:10.2307/3069294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziller, R. C. (1977). Group dialectics: Dynamics of groups over time. Human Development, 20(5), 293–308. doi:10.1159/000271563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoller, H. M. (2014). Power and resistance in organizational communication. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 595–618). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zorn, T. E., Roper, J., & Richardson, M. (2014). Positive employment practices or reputational capital?: Tensions inherent in third-party legitimation processes. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 347–374. doi:10.1177/0893318914530921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar