Exploring Structures of Urban Social Innovation Ecosystems: Cases of Manchester, Utrecht, Stockholm, Sofia and Budapest

References

• Akguc, Mehtap. 2019. “Understanding the Determinants of Social Innovation in Europe: An Econometric Approach.” European Planning Studies 28 (18): 1–14. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1578732.
   Google Scholar
• Alvedalen, Janna, and Ron Boschma. 2017. “A Critical Review of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Research: Towards a Future Research Agenda.” European Planning Studies 25 (6): 887–903. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, Paul, Jorge Cunha, and Ridvan Cinar. 2020. “Between Good Intentions and Enthusiastic Professors: The Missing Middle of University Social Innovation Structures in the Quadruple Helix.” In Regional Helix Ecosystems and Economic Growth, edited by Luís Farinha, João J. Ferreira, Marina Ranga, and Domingos Santos, 21–45. Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47697-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Biggeri, Mario, Enrico Testi, and Marco Bellucci. 2017. “Enabling Ecosystems for Social Enterprises and Social Innovation: A Capability Approach Perspective.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 18 (2): 299–306. doi:10.1080/19452829.2017.1306690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosma, Niels. 2019. Social Enterprises and Their Ecosystems in Europe. Updated Country Report: The Netherlands. doi:10.2767/929523.
   Google Scholar
• Deserti, Alessandro, and Francesca Rizzo. 2020. “Context Dependency of Social Innovation: In Search of New Sustainability Models” European Planning Studies. 28 (5): 864–817. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1634005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domanski, Dmitri, Jürgen Howaldt, and Christoph Kaletka. 2020. “A Comprehensive Concept of Social Innovation and Its Implications for the Local Context – On the Growing Importance of Social Innovation Ecosystems and Infrastructures.” European Planning Studies 28 (3): 454–474. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drewe, Paul, Juan-Luis Klein, and Edward Hulsbergen. 2008. The Challenge of Social Innovation in Urban Revitalization, edited by Paul Drewe, Juan-Luis Klein, and Edward Hulsbergen. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
   Google Scholar
• During, Roel, Pat van Jagt, and Natasha de Sena. 2014. “Social Enterprise, Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship in The Netherlands: A National Report,” 613179: 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, Chris, Hazenberg Richard, Field Martin, and Bajwa-Patel Meanu. 2014. “Social Enterprise, Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship in England: A National Report. EFESEIIS Project Report.”
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, Barbara Van., and Pieter van den Broeck. 2014. “Social Innovation: A Territorial Process.” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, edited by Frank Moulaert, Diana Maccallum, Abid Mehmood, and Abdelillah Hamdouch, 131–141. USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edmiston, Daniel. 2015a. “Social Innovation Policy in Hungary.” 21/2015. CRESSI Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Edmiston, Daniel. 2015b. “The UK Social Innovation Policy Agenda.” 19/2015. CRESSI Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Empowering People, Driving Change. Social Innovation in the European Union. Bepa. doi:10.2796/13155.
   Google Scholar
• Gawell, Malin. 2019. Social Enterprises and Their Ecosystems in Europe. Updated Country Report: Sweden. Luxembourg. doi:10.2767/929523.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos, Ana Lucia Figueiredo Facin, Mario Sergio Salerno, and Rodrigo Kazuo Ikenami. 2018. “Unpacking the Innovation Ecosystem Construct: Evolution, Gaps and Trends.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 136: 30–48. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Felicia, and Andreas Netz. 2018. Social Innovation i Sverige. Kartläggning Av Ekosystemet För Social Innovation. VINNOVA.
   Google Scholar
• Harrisson, Denis. 2008. “Social Innovation: An Institutionalized Process.” In The Challenge of Social Innovation in Urban Revitalization, edited by Paul Drewe, Juan-Luis Klein, and Edward Hulsbergen, 51–62. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, Jean. 2004. “Case Study Research.” In Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, edited by Catherine Cassel and Gillian Symon, 323–333. New York: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Havas, Attila, and György Molnár. 2016. “CRESSI Policy Roundtable Summary on Social Co-Operatives in Hungary.”
   Google Scholar
• Henry, Ella, Jamie Newth, and Chellie Spiller. 2017. “Emancipatory Indigenous Social Innovation: Shifting Power through Culture and Technology.” Journal of Management & Organization 23 (6): 786–802. doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howaldt, Jurgen, Christoph Kaletka, and Antonius Schröder. 2016. “Mapping the World of Social Innovation. Key Results of a Comparative Analysis of 1005.” https://www.si-drive.eu/?p=2283.%0AThis.
   Google Scholar
• Jeliazkova, Maria. 2019. Social Enterprises and Their Ecosystems in Europe. Updated Country Report: Bulgaria. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2767/929523.
   Google Scholar
• Kabakchieva, Petya, and Desislava Kurzydlowski. 2012. Civil Society in Bulgaria: NGOs versus Spontaneous Civic Activism? Bulgaria: Sofia.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, Julianna, and Melinda Mihály. 2019. Social Enterprises and Their Ecosystems in Europe. Updated Country Report: Hungary. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2767/929523.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Juan-Luis, Jean-Marc Fontan, and Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay. 2008. “Local Development as Social Innovation: The Case of Montreal.” In The Challenge of Social Innovation in Urban Revitalization, edited by Paul Drewe, Juan-Luis Klein, and Edward Hulsbergen, 103–116. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, Fergus, Bianca Stumbitz, and Ian Vickers. 2018. Social Enterprises and Their Ecosystems in Europe. Updated Country Report: United Kingdom. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2767/330252.
   Google Scholar
• Maccallum, Diana, Moulaert Frank, Hillier Jean, and Serena Vicari Haddock. 2009. Social Innovation and Territorial Development. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Diana MacCallum, and Jean Hillier. 2014. “Social Innovation: Intuition, Precept, Concept, Theory and Practice.” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, 13–24. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Maccallum Diana, Mehmood Abid, and Hamdouch Abdelillah. 2013. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw, and S. González. 2005. “Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1969–1990. doi:10.1080/00420980500279893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Flavia Martinelli, Sara González, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2007. “Introduction: Social Innovation and Governance in European Cities. Urban Development between Path Dependency and Radical Innovation.” European Urban and Regional Studies 14 (3): 195–209. doi:10.1177/0969776407077737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, and Abid Mehmood. 2011. “Spaces of Social Innovation.” In Handbook of Local and Regional Development, edited by Andy Pike, Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, and John Tomaney, 210–225. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, and Jacques Nussbaumer. 2005. “The Social Region. Beyond the Territorial Dynamics of the Learning Economy.” European Urban and Regional Studies 12 (1): 45–64. doi:10.1177/0969776405048500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, and Farid Sekia. 2003. “Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey.” Regional Studies 37 (3): 289–302. doi:10.1080/0034340032000065442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, Geoff. 2006. “The Process of Social Innovation.” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1 (2): 145–162. doi:10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145.
   Google Scholar
• Noack, Anika, and Tobias Federwisch. 2019. “Social Innovation in Rural Regions: Urban Impulses and Cross-Border Constellations of Actors.” Sociologia Ruralis 59 (1): 92–112. doi:10.1111/soru.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordberg, Kenneth, Åge Mariussen, and Seija Virkkala. 2020. “Community-Driven Social Innovation and Quadruple Helix Coordination in Rural Development. Case Study on LEADER Group Aktion Österbotten.” Journal of Rural Studies 79: 157–168. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeij, Peter R. A., Wouter Van Der Torre, Fietje Vaas, and Steven Dhondt. 2019. “Understanding Social Innovation as an Innovation Process: Applying the Innovation Journey Model.” Journal of Business Research 101: 243–254. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, Bonno, Julia Wittmayer, Jens Dorland, and Michael Søgaard Jørgensen. 2020. “Unpacking the Social Innovation Ecosystem: An Empirically Grounded Typology of Empowering Network Constellations.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 33 (3): 311–336. doi:10.1080/13511610.2019.1705147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, H.Thomas R., and Niklas Hafen. 2014. “Social Enterprise, Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship in Sweden: A National Report. EFESEIIS Project Report.”
   Google Scholar
• Phills Jr., James, Kriss Deiglmeier, and Dale Miller. 2008. “Rediscovering Social Innovation.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 6 (4): 34–43. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Snavely, Keith. 1996. “The Welfare State and the Emerging Non-Profit Sector in Bulgaria.” Europe - Asia Studies 48 (4): 647–662. doi:10.1080/09668139608412372.
   Google Scholar
• Spigel, Ben. 2017. “The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 41 (1): 49–72. doi:10.1111/etap.12167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spigel, Ben, and Richard Harrison. 2018. “Toward a Process Theory of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12 (1): 151–168. doi:10.1002/sej.1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, Erik. 2015. “Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique.” European Planning Studies 23 (9): 1759–1769. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanimoto, Kanji. 2012. “The Emergent Process of Social Innovation: Multi-Stakeholders Perspective.” International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 4 (3/4): 267. doi:10.1504/IJIRD.2012.047561.
   Google Scholar
• Terstriep, Judith, Dieter Rehfeld, and Maria Kleverbeck. 2020. “Favourable Social Innovation Ecosystem (s)? – An Explorative Approach Approach.” European Planning Studies 28 (5): 881–825. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1708868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Tracy A., Jill M. Purdy, and Marc J. Ventresca. 2018. “How Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Take Form: Evidence from Social Impact Initiatives in Seattle.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12 (1): 96–116. doi:10.1002/sej.1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkeli, S., and René Wintjes. 2014. “Towards the Societal System of Innovation: The Case of Metropolitan Areas in Europe.” MERIT Working Papers. http://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/unumer/2014040.html.
   Google Scholar
• Venugopal, Srinivas, and Madhubalan Viswanathan. 2019. “Implementation of Social Innovations in Subsistence Marketplaces: A Facilitated Institutional Change Process Model.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 36 (6): 800–823. doi:10.1111/jpim.12508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar