The Transformative Potential of Social Innovation for, in and by Education

References

• Altrichter, H. 2017. “Change and Innovation in Education in a Governance Perspective.” In Making Change Happen, 169–177. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., and J. Cunha. 2015. “Universities’ Contributions to Social Innovation: Reflections in Theory & Practice.” European Journal of Innovation Management 18 (4): 508–527. doi:10.1108/EJIM-10-2013-0099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. 2020. “EU-Arbeitsprogramm und strategischer Rahmen - Strukturierte europäische Bildungszusammenarbeit.” BMBF. https://www.bmbf.de/de/auf-dem-weg-zum-europaeischen-bildungsraum-304.html
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, I. 2013. “Bildung Für Nachhaltige Entwicklung Als Praxis Sozialer Innovation.” In Soziale Innovation Und Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven Sozialen Wandels, edited by J. Rückert-John, 269–288. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and J. Edler, editors. 2014. The Governance of Change in Socio-Technical and Innovation Systems: three Pillars for a Conceptual Framework. The Governance of Socio-Technical Systems: Explaining Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of European Policy Advisors. 2010. “Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union.” BEPA. https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/librarydoc/empowering-people-driving-change-social-innovation-in-the-european-union
   Google Scholar
• Busch, B. 2011. “Trends and Innovative Practices in Multilingual Education in Europe: An Overview.” International Review of Education 57 (5–6): 541–549. doi:10.1007/s11159-011-9257-1.
   Google Scholar
• CEDEFOP. 2018. Insights into Skill Shortages and Skill Mismatch. Learning from Cedefop’s European Skills and Jobs Survey. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• CEDEFOP. 2019. European skills index. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappero, E., and N. von Jacobi. 2015. “How Can Sen’s ‘Capabilities Approach’ Contribute to Understanding the Role of Social Innovations for the Marginalised?” CRESSI. Accessed September 23, 2019. http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/7083/1/Chapter%203.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions. 2016a. “A New Skills Agenda for Europe.” European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions. Accessed August 11, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-381-EN-F1-1.PDF.Last
   Google Scholar
• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions. 2016b. “Improving and Modernising Education.” European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions. Accessed August 11, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/COM-2016-941-F1-EN-MAIN.PDF.Last
   Google Scholar
• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions. 2017c. “School Development and Excellent Teaching for a Great Start in Life.” European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions. Accessed August 11, 2019. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0248&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, D. H. 2015. “Education and Social Innovation: The Youth Uncensored Project–A Case Study of Youth Participatory Research and Cultural Democracy in Action.” Canadian Journal of Education 38 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., P. A. David, and D. Foray. 2000. “The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness.” Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (2): 211–253. doi:10.1093/icc/9.2.211.
   Google Scholar
• Day, N. 2018. Spotlight on Sustainability. Calabasas, CA: MUSE school.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung. 2020. Dossier: Recht in der Weiterbildung. Bonn. https://wb-web.de/dossiers/recht-weiterbildung/folge-1-gesetzliche-rahmenbedingungen-auf-eu-bundes-und-landesebene/europaische-bildungspolitik.html
   Google Scholar
• Dominici, P. 2018. “For an Inclusive Innovation. Healing the Fracture between the Human and the Technological in the Hypercomplex Society.” European Journal of Futures Research 6 (1): 3. doi:10.1007/s40309-017-0126-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. 1957. Landmarks of Tomorrow: A Report on the New “Post-Modern” World. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Schachter, M., and M. L. Wallace. 2017. “Shaken, but Not Stirred’: Sixty Years of Defining Social Innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119 (C): 64–79. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017a. “Reflection Paper on the Social Dimension of Europe. European Commission.” European Commission. Accessed August 2, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/reflection-paper-social-dimension-europe_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017b. Rome Declaration of the Leaders of 27 Member States and of the European Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017c. “Strengthening European Identity through Education and Culture. The European Commission’s contribution to the Leaders’ Meeting in Gothenburg.” European Commission. Accessed April 11, 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2017%3A673%3AFIN
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A., Y. Punie, and C. Redecker. 2012. “Understanding Digital Competence in the 21st Century: An Analysis of Current Frameworks.” In 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. EC-TEL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by A. Ravenscroft, S. Lindstaedt, C. D. Kloos, and D. Hernández-Leo, Vol 7563. Berlin, Germany. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gallouj, F., and M. Savona. 2009. “Innovation in Services: A Review of the Debate and a Research Agenda.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19 (2): 149–172. doi:10.1007/s00191-008-0126-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., P. Tuertscher, and A. H. van de Ven. 2013. “Perspectives on Innovation Processes.” Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 775–819. doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.791066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesecke, S., D. Schartinger, K.-H. Leitner, R. Kalcik, L. Lassnigg, M. Steiner, and S. Vogtenhuber. 2020. Prospective Report on the Future of Social Innovation in Education. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Giesecke, S., G. Mildenberger, G. Schimpf, and A. Havas. 2019. “Social Housing as Social Innovation.” In Creating Space for Socio-Economic Innovation, edited by A. Nicholls and R. Ziegler. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., and M. Schwarz. 2010. Soziale Innovation im Fokus. Skizze Eines Gesellschaftstheoretisch Inspirierten Forschungskonzepts. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Kalemaki, I., I. Garefi, S. Kantsiou, A. Protopsaltis, J. Wall, R. Ridley-Duff, and F. Gonzales. 2018. “The NEMESIS Social Innovation Learning Framework.” NEMESIS. https://nemesis-edu.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/D1.1_NEMESIS-Social-Innovation-Competence-Framework-and-Pedagogical-Model_compressed.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, S. J., and N. Rosenberg. 1986. “An Overview of Innovation” In The Positive Sum Strategy. Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, edited by R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, 275–305. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• KreaMont – Kreatives Lernen nach Montessori. 2016. “Soziokratische Kreisorganisation.” KreaMont. https://www.kreamont.at/verein/arbeitskreise-und-delegiertenversammlung/
   Google Scholar
• Lebert, Y., and I. Gahren. 2019. “Fit für die digitale Transformation: Soziale Innovation in der beruflichen Weiterbildung.” betterplace.org. Accessed June 18th, 2019. https://www.ashoka.org/en-AT/node/32160
   Google Scholar
• Maestripieri, L. 2019. “The Socially Innovative Practices of Solidarity Purchasing Groups.” In Creating Space for Socio-Economic Innovation, edited by A. Nicholls and R. Ziegler. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. “Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union. A Problem-Solving Approach to Fuel Innovation-Led Growth.” Publications Office of the European Union. Accessed September 14, 2019. https://www.atlanticresource.org/aora/sites/default/files/GalleryFiles/Publications/MazzucatoreportMissionsLR.PD
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. 2006. “The Process of Social Innovation.” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1 (2): 145–162. doi:10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, A. 2020. “Umweltschutz an Schulen in Deutschland: Eine Honigsemmel vom Imker.” taz die Tageszeitung. https://taz.de/Umweltschutz-an-Schulen-in-Deutschland/!5704361/
   Google Scholar
• Noya, A. 2011. Fostering Innovation to Address Social Challenges. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Phills, J. A. J., K. Deiglmeier, and D. T. Miller. 2008. “Rediscovering Social Innovation. Social Innovation Review.” SSIR. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, W. 2010. “Die Innovationen Der Gesellschaft.” In Soziale Innovation. Auf Dem Weg zu Einem Postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma, edited by J. Howaldt and H. Jacobsen, 21–53. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rüede, D., and K. Lurtz. 2012. Mapping the Various Meanings of Social Innovation: Towards a Differentiated Understanding of an Emerging Concept. ESB Business School Research Paper Series. Oestrich-Winkel, Germany: EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht, EBS Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. L., and A. Schneiderheinze. 2005. “Understanding Innovation in Education Using Activity Theory.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 8 (1): 38–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1995. “Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking.” Sloan Management Review 36 (2): 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, A., and D. Krüger. 2019. “Social Innovation as a Driver for New Educational Practices: Modernising, Repairing and Transforming the Education System.” Sustainability 11 (4): 1070. doi:10.3390/su11041070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, M. 2016. “KreaMont Schule – Lernen als Gemeinschaftsaufgabe.” Soziokratiezentrum Österreich. https://soziokratiezentrum.org/privatschule-kreamont/
   Google Scholar
• Stéphan, V. L., U. Joaquin, K. Soumyajit, and J. Gwénaël. 2019. Educational Research and Innovation Measuring Innovation in Education 2019 What Has Changed in the Classroom? Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission solemnly proclaim the following text as the European Pillar of Social Rights. 2017. “The European Pillar of Social Rights.” The European Parliament. Accessed November 21, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/social-summit-european-pillar-social-rights-booklet_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toner, P. 2011. “Workforce Skills and Innovation: An Overview of Major Themes in the Literature.” OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry (STI) Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), Paris. STI Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, B., and F. Koester, editors. 2016. Educational Research and Innovation Governing Education in a Complex World. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2014. “UNESCO Roadmap for Implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development.” UNESCO. https://www.unesco.at/fileadmin/Redaktion/Publikationen/Publikations-Dokumente/2015_Roadmap_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Windrum, P., D. Schartinger, L. Rubalcaba, F. Gallouj, and M. Toivonen. 2016. “The Co-Creation of Multi-Agent Social Innovations. A Bridge Between Service and Social Innovation Research.” European Journal of Innovation Management 19 (2): 150–166. doi:10.1108/EJIM-05-2015-0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynarczyk, P., P. Piperopoulos, and M. McAdam. 2013. “Open Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: An Overview.” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 31 (3): 240–255. doi:10.1177/0266242612472214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar