Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning

References

• Frege G (1892). Über sinn und bedeutung zeitschrift für philosophische kritik, 100, 25–30. In M. Black & P. Geach (Eds.), (1952). Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–9). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Frege G. Posthumous writings. P. Long & R. White, Translated by. Oxford: Blackwell; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Montague R. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In: Hintikka KJJ, Moravcsik JME Suppes P, editors. Approaches to natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel; 1973. pp. 221–242.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff R. Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker R. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics: concept structuring systems. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro L. Embodied cognition. London: Routledge; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor JA, Pylyshyn ZW. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition. 1988;28:3–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fresco N. Physical computation and cognitive science. Berlin: Springer Nature; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal P. The puzzling chasm between cognitive representations and formal structures of linguistic meanings. Cogn Sci. 2022;46(9). DOI:10.1111/cogs.13200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenefelt M, White H. If A, then B. New York: Columbia University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Partee BH (2004). Compositionality in formal semantics: selected papers by Barbara H. Partee. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton JA, Winter Y, Eds. Compositionality and concepts in linguistics and psychology. Berlin: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pagin P. Compositionality, understanding, and proofs. Mind. 2009;118(471):713–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney PD, Pantel P. From frequency to meaning: vector space models of semantics. J artif intell res. 2010;37:141–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotaru AS, Vigliocco G, Frank SL. Modeling the structure and dynamics of semantic processing. Cogn Sci. 2018;42(8):2890–2917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor JA. The language of thought. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia G, McConnell-Ginet S. Meaning in grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor JA. A theory of content and other essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Language and thought. Wakefield: Moyer; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Quilty-Dunn J, Porot N, Mandelbaum E. The best game in town: the re-emergence of the language of thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2022;1–55. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X22002849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer D, Gonzalez Castillo J, Talavage T, et al. Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from fMRI. Brain Lang. 2008;107:16–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer D. Concepts in the brain: the view from cross-linguistic diversity. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs RW. Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain Lang. 2003;84:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain S. The emergence of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Baggio G. Meaning in the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Baggio G. Compositionality in a parallel architecture for language processing. Cogn Sci. 2021;45(5). DOI:10.1111/cogs.12949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbib MA. Compositionality and beyond: embodied meaning in language and protolanguage. In: Werning M, Hinzen W Machery E, editors. The Oxford handbook of compositionality. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Krifka M. Some remarks on event structure, conceptual spaces and logical form. Theor Linguist. 2012;38:223–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors P. Events and causal mappings modeled in conceptual spaces. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1078–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwarts J, Verkuyl H. An algebra of conceptual structure. Linguist Philos. 1994;17:1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher P. Explanatory unification. Philos Sci. 1981;48:507–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harner H, Khemlani S. Reasoning with Want. Cogn Sci. 2022;46(9). DOI:10.1111/cogs.13170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dale R, Duran ND. The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification. Cogn Sci. 2011;35(5):983–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atmanspacher H. Contextual emergence of mental states. Cogn Process. 2015;16(4):359–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graben PB, Barrett A, Atmanspacher H. Stability criteria for the contextual emergence of macrostates in neural networks. Network Comput Neural Syst. 2009;20(3):178–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maimon A, Hemmo M. Does neuroplasticity support the hypothesis of multiple realizability? Philos Sci. 2022;89(1):107–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambridge B, Pine JM, Rowland CF, et al. A semantics-based approach to the “no negative evidence” problem. Cogn Sci. 2009;33(7):1301–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg A. Explain me this: creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dobosz K, Duch W. Understanding neurodynamical systems via fuzzy symbolic dynamics. Neural Networks. 2010;23(4):487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier FJ. Compositionality and concepts—A perspective from formal Semantics and philosophy of language. In: Hampton J Winter Y, editors. Compositionality and concepts in linguistics and psychology. Berlin: Springer; 2017. pp. 31–94.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker R. Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lyu B, Choi HS, Marslen-Wilson WD, et al. Neural dynamics of semantic composition. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2019;116(42):21318–21327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnova A, Lliev R (2014). Evidentiality in language and cognition: the view from construal level theory. In Proceedings of the 36thAnnual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Quebec City, 36, 2943–2948.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnova A. Evidentiality in abductive reasoning: experimental support for a modal analysis of evidentials. J Semant. 2021;38(4):531–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker R. Striving for control. In: Juana I-M-A, Carretero M, Hita JA, and van der Auwera J, editors. English modality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 2013. pp. 3–56.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar