1,985
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

The two principles that shape scientific research

Article: 2203625 | Received 14 Mar 2023, Accepted 13 Apr 2023, Published online: 17 Apr 2023

References

  • Spencer-Brown G. Laws of form. xxvi. New York: Dutton; 1977.
  • Milner S. Newton didn’t frame hypothesis. Why should we? Phys Today. 2018 April 24. Commentary. https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/pt.6.3.20180424a/full/
  • Einstein A. Relativity the special and general theory. London: The Folio Society of London; 2004. p. 6.
  • Cardinal S, Akin AP. Contextualising context for synthetic biology – identifying causes and failures of synthetic biology. Biotechnol J. 2012 July;7(7):856–14.
  • Morales MS. Who is telling the truth, nature or man. News Biomed Sci. 2016;13: 86–90.
  • https://www.academia.edu/s/34780cf563#comment_1319349
  • Seamon D. The legacy of henri bortoft (2022). Holistic Science Conference on the Legacy of Bortoft, Colquhoun and Goodwin; Feb 12–14. Gloucestershire, UK.
  • Lohrey A, Boreham B. The nonlocal universe. Commun Integr Biol. 2020;13(1):147–159. Lohrey A, Boreham B. ‘Lifting the veil on Bohm’s holomovement’. Commun Integr Biol. 2021;14(1):221–229; Lohrey A, Boreham B. ‘Omni-local consciousness’. Commun Integr Biol. 2022; 15 (1): 193–208. 10.1080/19420889.2020.1822583.
  • Bohm D. Wholeness and the implicate order, London: Ark Paperbacks; 1983.
  • Bohm D. A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter. Phil Psychol. 1983;3(2–3):273. 178 1990 2. 10.1080/09515089008573004.
  • de Grosson MA, Hiley BJ. Hamiltonian flows and the holomovement. Mind and Matter. 2013;11:2.
  • Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.
  • https://www.themarginalian.org/2016/09/02/it-from-bit-wheeler/
  • Stewart PJ. Eddies in the flow: towards an inclusive ecology. In: edit M. Updated chapter 18, where next? Reflections on the human future. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens; 2000. p. 291–327.
  • Bohm D. Unfolding meaning: a weekend of dialogue with David Bohm. London: Ark; 1984.
  • Nichol L. The essential David Bohm. London: Routledge; 2007.
  • Lawson H. Reflexivity: the post-modern predicament. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court; 1985.
  • Young A. The reflexive universe. Cambria: Anodos Publications; 1999.
  • Sheldrake R. The rebirth of nature: the greening of science and god. London: Rider; 1993.
  • Schrӧdinger E. What is life? Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 127.
  • Lohrey A. The evolution of consciousness: a new science, princeton. New Jersey: ICRL Press; 2018. p. 101–147.
  • Bohm D. On dialogue. Lee Nichol, London: Routledge; 2006.
  • Lohrey A. Language maps. Academic Letters; 2022 May. https://independent.academia.edu/AndrewLohrey
  • Lohrey A. Critical literacy: a professional development resource. Melbourne: National Language and Literacy Institute of Australia; 1998.
  • Foucault M. This is not a pipe. In: Harkness J, translator; Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982.
  • McCue K. Private conversation. 2021.