Effects of fast and slow-wilting soybean genotypes on fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) growth and development

References

• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO-UN. Fao.org. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2024. https://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/crop-information/soybean/en/
   Google Scholar
• Fried HG, Narayanan S, Fallen B, et al. Evaluation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes for yield, water use efficiency, and root traits. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Soybean Association. Annual soy stats results. American Soybean Association; 2022. https://soygrowers.com/education-resources/publications/soy-stats/
   Google Scholar
• Bray EA. Responses to abiotic stresses. Biochem Molecul Biol Plants; 2000. p. 1158–13.
   Google Scholar
• Heatherly LG. Drought stress and irrigation effects on germination of harvested soybean seed. Crop sci. 1993;33(4):777–781. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300040029x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell LC, Specht JE. Physiological traits for ameliorating drought stress. Soybeans: Improvement, Prod Uses. 2004;16:569–620.
   Google Scholar
• Dornbos DL Jr, Mullen RE. Influence of stress during soybean seed fill on seed weight, germination, and seedling growth rate. Can J Plant Sci. 1991;71(2):373–383. doi: 10.4141/cjps91-052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku YS, Au-Yeung WK, Yung YL, et al. Drought stress and tolerance in soybean. A Comprehensive Survey Int Soybean Res—Genetic, Physiol, Agron Nitrog Relationships. 2013:209–237.
   Google Scholar
• Bellaloui N, Gillen AM, Mengistu A, et al. Responses of nitrogen metabolism and seed nutrition to drought stress in soybean genotypes differing in slow-wilting phenotype. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:498. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki A, Naderi A, Naseri R, et al. Physiological performance of soybean cultivars under drought stress. Bullet Environ, Pharmacol Life Sci. 2013;2(6):38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander S, Hrozencik A, Aillery M. Some irrigation organizations rely on formal drought plans. Amber Waves: The Economics Of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, And Rural America; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Chamarthi SK, Kaler AS, Abdel-Haleem H, et al. Identification and confirmation of loci associated with canopy wilting in soybean using genome-wide association mapping. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:698116. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.698116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield JL, Dold C. Water-use efficiency: advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:429990. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet MT, Jones ER, Flörke M, et al. Global water scarcity including surface water quality and expansions of clean water technologies. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16(2):024020. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair TR, Purcell LC, Sneller CH. Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(2):70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Chang SX, Anyia AO. The physiology and stability of leaf carbon isotope discrimination as a measure of water‐use efficiency in barley on the Canadian prairies. J Agron Crop Sci. 2011;197(1):1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher AL, Sinclair TR, Allen LH Jr. Transpiration responses to vapor pressure deficit in well watered ‘slow-wilting’and commercial soybean. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;61(2):145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King CA, Purcell LC, Brye KR. Differential wilting among soybean genotypes in response to water deficit. Crop sci. 2009;49(1):290–298. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2008.04.0219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunert K, Vorster BJ. In search for drought-tolerant soybean: is the slow-wilting phenotype more than just a curiosity? J Exp Bot. 2020;71(2):457–460. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi MJ, Sinclair TR. Fixation drought tolerance of the slow‐wilting soybean PI 471938. Crop sci. 2013;53(5):2072–2078. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.02.0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries LL, Purcell LC, Carter TE Jr, et al. Physiological traits contributing to differential canopy wilting in soybean under drought. Crop sci. 2012;52(1):272–281. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson DV, Bhatnagar S, King CA, et al. Polygenic inheritance of canopy wilting in soybean [glycine max (L.) merr.]. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;119(4):587–594. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1068-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair TR, Messina CD, Beatty A, et al. Assessment across the United States of the benefits of altered soybean drought traits. Agronomy J. 2010;102(2):475–482. doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye H, Song L, Schapaugh WT, et al. The importance of slow canopy wilting in drought tolerance in soybean. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(2):642–652. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann E, Blevins C, Franks SJ, et al. Climate change alters plant–herbivore interactions. New Phytol. 2021;229(4):1894–1910. doi: 10.1111/nph.17036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczyk J, Müller C, Fischer K. Plant-mediated indirect effects of climate change on an insect herbivore. Basic Appl Ecol. 2021;53:100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouault G, Candau JN, Lieutier F, et al. Effects of drought and heat on forest insect populations in relation to the 2003 drought in Western Europe. Annals Forest Sci. 2006;63(6):613–624. doi: 10.1051/forest:2006044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy BA, Güsewell S, Harte J. Response of plant pathogens and herbivores to a warming experiment. Ecol. 2004;85(9):2570–2581. doi: 10.1890/03-0182
   Google Scholar
• Staley JT, Mortimer SR, Masters GJ, et al. Drought stress differentially affects leaf‐mining species. Ecol Entomol. 2006;31(5):460–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00808.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gely C, Laurance SG, Stork NE. How do herbivorous insects respond to drought stress in trees? Biol Rev. 2020;95(2):434–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur J, Kariyat R. Role of trichomes in plant stress biology. Evolut Ecol Plant-Herbivore Interact; 2020. p. 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan D, Bateman N, Kariyat RR. Rice physical defenses and their role against insect herbivores. Planta. 2024;259(5):110. doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04381-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariyat RR, Hardison SB, De Moraes CM, et al. Plant spines deter herbivory by restricting caterpillar movement. Biol Lett. 2017;13(5):20170176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gélin U, Charles-Dominique T, Davies TJ, et al. The evolutionary history of spines – a Cenozoic arms race with mammals. bioRxiv. 2023:2023–02.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur I, Kariyat RR. Eating barbed wire: direct and indirect defensive roles of non‐glandular trichomes. Plant Cell Environ. 2020;43(9):2015–2018. doi: 10.1111/pce.13828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts S, Kariyat R. Picking sides: feeding on the abaxial leaf surface is costly for caterpillars. Planta. 2021;253(4):1–6. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03592-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts S, Kariyat R, Buckley T. Morphological characterization of trichomes shows enormous variation in shape, density and dimensions across the leaves of 14 Solanum species. AoB Plants. 2021;13(6):lab071. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plab071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinnan R, Carter TE, Johnson MT. Effects of drought, temperature, herbivory, and genotype on plant–insect interactions in soybean (glycine max). Arthropod Plant Interact. 2013;7(2):201–215. doi: 10.1007/s11829-012-9234-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruska AJ. Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) management by smallholders. CABI Rev. 2019;2019:1–11. doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR201914043
   Google Scholar
• Kenis M, Benelli G, Biondi A, et al. Invasiveness, biology, ecology, and management of the fall armyworm. Spodoptera frugiperda; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Yan XR, Wang ZY, Feng SQ, et al. Impact of temperature change on the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda under global climate change. Insects. 2022;13(11):981. doi: 10.3390/insects13110981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdue University. Fall armyworms. Purdue University - College of Agriculture; 2023. https://ag.purdue.edu/department/entm/extension/field-crops-ipm/corn/fall-armyworms.html
   Google Scholar
• Mota-Sanchez D, Wise JC. Arthropod pesticide resistance database (APRD). Michigan State University 2021. 2024. https://www.pesticideresistance.org
   Google Scholar
• Udayakumar A, Shivalingaswamy TM, Bakthavatsalam N. Legume-based intercropping for the management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda L in maize. J Plant Dis Protect. 2021;128(3):775–779. doi: 10.1007/s41348-020-00401-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu K, Jiang C, Zhou S, et al. Optimizing arrangement and density in maize and alfalfa intercropping and the reduced incidence of the invasive fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in southern China. Field Crops Res. 2022;287:108637. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Kariyat RR. Exposure to polyphenol-rich purple corn pericarp extract restricts fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) growth. Plant Signal Behav. 2020;15(9):1784545. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1784545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavana J, Singh S, Vazquez A, et al. Local adaptation to continuous mowing makes the noxious weed Solanum elaeagnifolium a superweed candidate by improving fitness and defense traits. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamarthi SK, Kaler AS, Abdel‐Haleem H, et al. Identification of genomic regions associated with the plasticity of carbon 13 ratio in soybean. Plant Genome. 2023;16(1):e20284. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva TRFB, Almeida ACDS, Moura TDL, et al. Effect of the flavonoid rutin on the biology of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Acta Scientiarum Agron. 2016;38:165–170. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v38i2.27956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza BH, Costa EN, Ribeiro ZA, et al. Soybean leaf age and plant stage influence expression of resistance to velvetbean caterpillar and fall armyworm. Chemoecol. 2021;31(6):377–390. doi: 10.1007/s00049-021-00360-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai VC, Tran NT, Nguyen DS. The involvement of peroxidases in soybean seedlings’ defense against infestation of cowpea aphid. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2016;10(4):283–292. doi: 10.1007/s11829-016-9424-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyla T, Moriles-Miller J, Gustafson K, et al. (PDF) Soybean Growth Stages. Research Gate; 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331683847_Soybean_Growth_Stages
   Google Scholar
• Amaliah N, Zubaidah S, Kuswantoro H. Trichomes and stomata diversity in soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) lines. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; Malang, Indonesia; (Vol. 276). IOP Publishing; 2019. p. 012025
   Google Scholar
• Romero B, Dillon FM, Zavala JA. Different soybean cultivars respond differentially to damage in a herbivore-specific manner and decreas herbivore performance. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2020;14(1):89–99. doi: 10.1007/s11829-019-09730-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abebe AT, Adewale S, Chigeza G, et al. Diallel analysis of soybean (glycine max L.) for biomass yield and root characteristics under low phosphorus soil conditions in Western Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0281075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson WJ, Haack RA. The role of drought in outbreaks of plant-eating insects. BioScience. 1987;37(2):110–118. doi: 10.2307/1310365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnicer J, Stefanescu C, Vives‐Ingla M, et al. Phenotypic biomarkers of climatic impacts on declining insect populations: a key role for decadal drought, thermal buffering and amplification effects and host plant dynamics. J Animal Ecol. 2019;88(3):376–391. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JJ, Sun Y, Kopp K, et al. Effects of water availability on leaf trichome density and plant growth and development of Shepherdia× utahensis. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:855858. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.855858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbivory Variability Network*†, Robinson ML, Hahn PG, et al. Plant size, latitude, and phylogeny explain within-population variability in herbivory. Sci. 2023;382(6671):679–683. doi: 10.1126/science.adh8830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naganna R, Jethva DM, Bhut JB, et al. Present status of new invasive pest fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda in India: a review. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2020;8(2):150–156.
   Google Scholar