Integrating faith-based perspectives across the curriculum in Queensland Catholic schools: the potential of Catholic social teaching

References

• Annett, A. 2022. The Fallen Idol. A Catholic alternative to neoliberalism. Commonweal, January 3rd.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J. 2013. “The de-Catholicising of the Curriculum in English Catholic Schools.” International Studies in Catholic Education 5 (1): 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2011. “Teaching Under the new Taylorism: High-Stakes Testing and the Standardization of the 21st Century Curriculum.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 43: 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). 2012. The Shape of the Australian Curriculum. Version 4.0. Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2014. Review of the Australian Curriculum: Final Report. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, B., A. Stretton, and A. Cunningham. 2017. “How Will a Fourth Cross Curriculum Priority of Catholicity and an Eighth General Capability of Wisdom Contribute to Catholic Curriculum in Tasmanian Catholic Schools?” eJournal of Catholic Education in Australasia 3 (1): 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2016. “Neoliberal Education? Confronting the Slouching Beast.” Policy Futures in Education 14 (8): 1046–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmonte, A., and N. Cranston. 2009. “The Religious Dimension of Lay Leadership in Catholic Schools: Preserving Catholic Culture in an Era of Change.” Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice 12 (3): 294–319.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, P., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1977. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Volume VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2009. “Good Education in an age of Measurement: On the Need to Reconnect with the Question of Purpose in Education.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishops of New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. 2007. Catholic Schools at a Crossroads (Pastoral Letter). Sydney, Australia: Catholic Education Office and Bishops of NSW and the ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S. 1996. Lessons from Catholic High Schools. In The Contemporary Catholic School: Context, Identity and Diversity 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Burridge, N. 2020. “Teaching for a Just World: Social Justice and Human Rights Perspectives Across the Curriculum.” In Faith-Based Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Schools, edited by J. Gleeson, and P. Goldburg, 98–112. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carmelite Order. undated. Curriculum on Laudato ‘Si for Secondary Education, An international project of the Carmelite NGO.
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Education Commission of New South Wales. 2014. Submission to the Review of the Australian Curriculum. Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Education Commission of Victoria. (CECV). 2005a. Development framework and standards of practice. Retrieved from http://web.cecv.catholic.edu.au/publications/leadership/wholebook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Education Commission of Victoria (CECV). 2005b. School improvement framework. Retrieved from http://www.ceomelb.catholic.edu.au/our-schools/SIF/.
   Google Scholar
• Centre of Concern. 2018. Retrieved from https://educationforjustice.org/topics/.
   Google Scholar
• Congregatio de Institutione Catholica (De Studiorum Institutis). undated. Vademecum, Global Compact on Education http://www.educationglobalcompact.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Congregation for Catholic Education (CCE). 1997. The Catholic School on the Threshold of the Third Millennium. Vatican City: Congregation for Catholic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Congregation for Catholic Education (CCE). 2014. Educating Today and Tomorrow: A Renewing Passion, Instrumentum Laboris. Vatican City: Congregation for Catholic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Convey, J. J. 2012. “Perceptions of Catholic Identity: Views of Catholic School Administrators and Teachers.” Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice 16 (1): 187–214.
   Google Scholar
• Croke, B. 2007. “Australian Catholic Schools in a Changing Political and Religious Landscape.” In International Handbook of Catholic Education – Challenges for School Systems in the 21st Century, edited by G. Grace and J. O'Keefe, 811–834. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• D’Orsa, T. 2013. “Catholic Curriculum: Re-Framing the Conversation.” International Studies in Catholic Education 5 (1): 68–82. doi:10.1080/19422539.2012.754589.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, A., A. Beavis, C. Underwood, R. Sadeghi, and K. O’Malley. 2009. Who’s Coming to School Today? Final Report. Brisbane: ACER, Brisbane Catholic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, S. 2012. Creating Standards-Based Integrated Curriculum. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2016. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 5th Ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J. 2015. “Critical Challenges and Dilemmas for Catholic Education Leadership Internationally.” International Studies in Catholic Education 7 (2): 145–161. doi:10.1080/19422539.2015.1072955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J. 2020a. “The Integration of Catholic Social Teaching Across the Curriculum: A School-Based Action Research Approach.” In Faith-Based Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Schools, edited by J. Gleeson, and P. Goldburg, 244–273. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J. 2020b. Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Education: Main Lessons and Issues Arising. In Faith-Based Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Schools, edited by J. Gleeson and P. Goldburg, 274–295. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J. 2021. “Evolution of Irish Curriculum Culture: Understandings, Policy, Reform and Change.” Irish Educational Studies, doi:10.1080/03323315.2021.1899028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J., and P. Goldburg. 2020. Faith-Based Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J., J. O’Gorman, and M. O’Neill. 2020. “The Identity of Catholic Schools as Seen by Teachers in Catholic Schools in Queensland.” In Faith-Based Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Schools, edited by J. Gleeson, and P. Goldburg, 133–161. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J., and M. O’Neill. 2020. “Longitudinal Study of the Attitudes of pre-Service Teachers at an Australian Catholic University to key Aspects of Faith-Based Education: Some Conundrums to Ponder.” In Faith-Based Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Schools, edited by J. Gleeson, and P. Goldburg, 188–217. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldburg, P. 2020. “Catholic Social Teaching.” In Faith-Based Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Schools, edited by J. Gleeson and P. Goldburg, 31–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, G. 2003. “Educational Studies and Faith-Based Schooling: Moving from Prejudice to Evidence-Based Argument.” British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (2): 149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, G. 2010. “Renewing Spiritual Capital: An Urgent Priority for the Future of Catholic Education Internationally.” International Studies in Catholic Education 2 (2): 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, G. 2013. “Catholic Social Teaching Should Permeate the Catholic Secondary School Curriculum: An Agenda for Reform.” International Studies in Catholic Education 5 (1): 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. 2003. Working Laterally: How Innovation Networks Make an Education Epidemic. Nottingham: DEMOS and NCSL DfES publications.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, T. 1979. Teaching About Controversial Issues in Catholic Schools (No. 7). Norwich: University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, T. 2017. Educator’s Guide to Catholic Curriculum. Learning for ‘Fullness of Life’. Mulgrave, VA: Vaughan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsby-Smith, M. P. 2006. An Introduction to Catholic Social Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Catholic Education. 1996. Curriculum Matters: A Resource for Catholic Educators. Toronto: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. A. 1991. Catholic Education and the School. Some Theological Reflections. Dublin: Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. 2010. “Policy Borrowing, Policy Learning: Testing Times in Australian Schooling.” Critical Studies in Education 51 (2): 129–147. doi:10.1080/17508481003731026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. 2018. “The Australian Curriculum: A Critical Interrogation of why, What and Where to?” Curriculum Perspectives 38: 55–65. doi:10.1007/s41297-017-0033-7.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. 2006. “Teaching After the Market.” In Ideology, Curriculum, and the New Sociology of Education, edited by L. Weis, C. McCarthy, and G. Dimitriadis, 115–144. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marcel, G. 1950. The Metaphysical Journal, trans. Bernard Wall. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro, T. 2012. Living Justice: Catholic Social Teaching in Action. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., and G. McGregor. 2016. “Learning not Borrowing from the Queensland Education System: Lessons on Curricular, Pedagogical and Assessment Reform.” The Curriculum Journal 27 (1): 113–133. doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1147969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, Y., and S. Lau. 2010. “Differential Relations of Constructivist and Didactic Instruction to Students’ Cognition, Motivation, and Achievement.” Learning and Instruction 20: 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. Embedding Values and Attitudes in Curriculum: Shaping a Better Future. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/aee2adcd-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, S. 2007. “Challenges for Catholic Education in Australia.” In International Handbook of Catholic Education, 787–810. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, L. B., and L. Southwell. 2014. “Access to Academic Curriculum in Australian Secondary Schools: A Case Study of a Highly Marketised Education System.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (4): 467–485. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.846414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieper, J. 1952. Leisure, the Basis of Culture. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Polesel, J., S. Rice, and N. Dulfer. 2014. “The Impact of High-Stakes Testing on Curriculum and Pedagogy: A Teacher Perspective from Australia.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (5): 640–657. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.865082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollefeyt, D., and J. Bouwens. 2014. Identity in Dialogue. Assessing and Enhancing Catholic School Identity. Research Methodology and Research Results in Catholic Schools in Victoria, Australia (Vol. l). LIT Verlag: Zurich and Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Pope Francis. 2015. Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’ on Care for our Common Home. Strathfield: St. Pauls.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., and C. Sinnema. 2014. “Downgraded Curriculum? An Analysis of Knowledge in new Curricula in Scotland and New Zealand.” The Curriculum Journal 25 (1): 50–75.
   Google Scholar
• QCEC. 2012. Queensland Catholic Schools. Brisbane: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, G. 2013. “Perspective on the use of Construct “Catholic Identity” for Australian Catholic Schooling: Sociological Background and Literature – Part 1.” Journal of Religious Education 61 (2): 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J., and N. Mockler. 2012. “Performance Cultures of Teaching: Threat or Opportunity?” In Routledge International Handbook on Teacher and School Development, edited by C. Day, 33–43. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, R. 2008. “The age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1968. “The Humanities Curriculum Project.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 1: 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, K., and M. Pautler. 2020. The Distinctive Nature of Catholic Education in Ontario: Catholic perspective integrated across the formal curriculum. In Faith-Based Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Schools. London: Routledge 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Treston, K. 1995. Five Paths of Teaching. Brisbane: Creation Enterprises.
   Google Scholar