Beyond the family life cycle: Understanding family development in the twenty-first century through complexity theories

References

• Carter, B., & Mcgoldrick, M. (1989). The changing family life cycle: A framework for family therapy (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F. (2009). Sociology and complexity science: A new field of inquiry. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243–267. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 193–196. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, G. (2011). Towards a two-body neuroscience. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 4(3), 349–352. doi:10.4161/cib.4.3.15110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). Consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. F. R., & Bloch, C. S. (2011). Top-down causation, adaptive selection, and their consequences: Commentary on Witherington. Human Development, 54, 93–100. doi:10.1159/000327098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Érdi, P. (2008). Complexity explained. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, R. (2012). Bio-behavioral synchrony: A model for integrating biological and microsocial behavioral processes in the study of parenting. Parenting: Science and Practice, 12, 154–164. doi:10.1080/15295192.2012.683342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action and though. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 313–399). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, A. (2011). Theoretical and applied dynamic systems research in developmental science. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 267–272. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, A., & Jirsa, V. K. (Eds.). (2008). Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granic, I. (2005). Timing is everything: Developmental psychopathology from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Review, 25, 386–407. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granic, I., Dishion, T. J., & Hollenstein, T. (2003). The family ecology of adolescence: A dynamic systems perspective on normative development. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 60–91). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Granic, I., & Lamey, A. V. (2002). Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(3), 265–283. doi:10.1023/A:1015106913866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granic, I., & Patterson, G. R. (2006). Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113(1), 101–131. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haken, H. (1981). The science of structure: Synergetics. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar
• Haken, H. (2008). Self-organization. Scholarpedia, 3(8), 1401. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1401
   Google Scholar
• Hollenstein, T. (2011). Twenty years of dynamic systems approaches to development: Significant contributions, challenges and future directions. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 256–259. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00210.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (2012). Multistability and metastability: Understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 906–918. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrøm, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavee, Y., Mccubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1985). The double ABCX model of family stress and adaptation: An empirical test by analysis of structural equations with latent variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47(4), 811–825. doi:10.2307/352326. http://www.jstor.org/stable/352326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. D. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71(1), 36–43. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (Revised). Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mccubbin, H. I., & Figley, C. R. (Eds.). (1983). Stress and the family. Vol. 1. Coping with normative transitions. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meiss, J. (2007). Dynamical systems. Scholarpedia, 2(2), 1629. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1629
   Google Scholar
• Milnor, J. W. (2006). Attractor. Scholarpedia, 1(11), 1815. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1815
   Google Scholar
• Minuchin, S. (1974). Families & family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity. A guided tour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolis, G., & Rouvas-Nicolis, C. (2007). Complex systems. Scholarpedia, 2(11), 1473. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1473
   Google Scholar
• Oullier, O., De Guzman, G. C., Jantzen, K. J., Lagarde, J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 178–192. doi:10.1080/17470910701563392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, J. (2002). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 349–360. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, P. (1982). Circular questioning. Family Process, 21(3), 267–280. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1982.00267.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigogine, I., & Stengers, S. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Toronto, ON: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(3), 284–295. doi:10.1037/a0023419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). The developing person: The experiential perspective. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 465–515). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Relvas, A. P. (1996). O ciclo vital da família. Perspectiva sistémica [The family life cycle. Systemic perspective]. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
   Google Scholar
• Sporn, O. (2007). Complexity. Scholarpedia, 2(10), 1623. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1623
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15(2), 255–283. doi:10.1080/10481881509348831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., Ulrich, B. D., & Wolff, P. H. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(1), i+iii+v+vi+1–103. doi:10.2307/1166099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E., & Varela, F. J. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), 418–425. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomela, A. (2009). How methodology became a toolbox- and how it escapes from that box. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 45–66). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007). Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J., Molenaar, P. C. M., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Chaudhary, N. (Eds.). (2009). Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Geert, P. (1998). We almost had a great future behind us: The contribution of non-linear dynamics to developmental-science-in-the-making. Developmental Science, 1(1), 143–159. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K. J. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640–672). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Geert, P., & Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2005). A dynamic systems approach to family assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 240–248. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.21.4.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25, 408–442. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, F. (2006). Strengthening family resilience (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witherington, D. C. (2011). Taking emergence seriously: The centrality of circular causality for dynamic systems approaches to development. Human Development, 54, 66–92. doi:10.1159/000326814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witherington, D. C., & Margett, T. E. (2011). How conceptually unified is the dynamic systems approach to the study of psychological development? Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 286–290. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, L. (1984). The epigenesis of relational systems: A model for understanding family development. Family Process, 23, 297–318. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00297.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar