Relationship partners have shared scripts for conversations about the relationship: A replication and extension

References

• Acitelli, L. K. (1988). When spouses talk to each other about their relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 185–199. doi:10.1177/026540758800500204
   Google Scholar
• Acitelli, L. K. (1992). Gender differences in relationship talk and marital satisfaction among young married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 102–110.
   Google Scholar
• Acitelli, L. K. (2001). Maintaining and enhancing a relationship by attending to it. In J. H. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on maintenance and enhancement (pp. 153–167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.461
   Google Scholar
• Birnie, C., McClure, M. J., Lydon, J. E., & Holmberg, D. (2009). Attachment avoidance and commitment aversion: A script for relationship failure. Personal Relationships, 16, 79–97. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01211.x
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., and Randall, A. K. (2012). Common factors in the enhancement of dyadic coping. Behavior Therapy, 43, 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 3–22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cate, R. M., Koval, J. E., Lloyd, S. A., & Wilson, G. (1995). The assessment of relationship thinking in dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 2, 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. (2010). A unified protocol for couple therapy. In K. Hahlweg, M. Grawe-Gerber & D. H. Baucom (Eds.), Enhancing couples. The shape of couple therapy to come (pp. 33–34). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Demorest, A. P., & Alexander, I. E. (1992). Affective scripts as organizers of personal experience. Journal of Personality, 60, 645–663. doi:10.1111/jopy.1992.60.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Derlega, V., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, B., Baldwin, M., Collins, L., Patterson, S., & Benditt, R. (1999). Anger in close relationships: An interpersonal script analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 299–312. doi:10.1177/0146167299025003003
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (2008). Happy and close, but sad and effective? Affective influences on relationship judgments and behaviors. In J. P. Forgas & J. Fitness (Eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 203–218). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, W. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Effects of relationship education on maintenance of couple relationship satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 512–525. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, D., & MacKenzie, S. (2002). So far so good: Scripts for romantic relationship development as predictors of relational well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 777–796. doi:10.1177/0265407502196003
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D., Kashy, D., & Cook, D. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (2003). Manifestations of relationship conceptualizations in conversation. Human Communication Research, 29, 482–515. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00853.x
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, L. K., Solomon, D. H., & Theiss, J. A. (2006). The role of intimacy in the production and perception of relationship talk within courtship. Communication Research, 33, 211–241. doi:10.1177/0093650206289148
   Google Scholar
• Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–500. doi:10.1177/019251300021004004
   Google Scholar
• Laurenceau, J., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86
   Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513
   Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E. (1991). Gender and relationships: A reprise. American Psychologist, 46, 538–539. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.5.538
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Nakagawa, S. (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 925–937. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.925
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. H., & Ryder, R. G. (1977). The inventory of marital conflict procedure manual. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Planalp, S. (1987). Interplay between relational knowledge and events. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation, and knowledge (pp. 175–191). London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. (2013). SAS documentation ( Version 9.4). Cary, NC: SAS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In R. S. Wyer, Jr (Ed.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13, 496–502.
   Google Scholar