Comparing simultaneously the effects of extra-dyadic and intra-dyadic experiences on relationship outcomes

References

• Acitelli, L. K. (1992). Gender differences in relationship awareness and marital satisfaction among young married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 102–110. doi:10.1177/0146167292181015
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Belle, D. E. (1983). The impact of poverty on social networks and supports. Marriage & Family Review, 5, 89–103. doi:10.1300/J002v05n04_06
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping - a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren [Stress and coping in couples]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches coping inventar. Manual. Bern: Hans Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., & Cina, A. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 44, 71–89. doi:10.1300/J087v44n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., Hilpert, P., Nussbeck, F. W., & Bradbury, T. N. (2014). Enhancement of couples’ communication and dyadic coping by a self-directed approach: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 580–591. doi:10.1037/a0036356
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., Ledermann, T., & Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships, 14, 551–569. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00171.x
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Bradbury, T., Gmelch, S., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Stress and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of trait anger and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 408–424. doi:10.1177/0265407510361616
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping, marital quality and well-being: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485
   Google Scholar
• Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 175–183. doi:10.2307/352378
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. (Ed.). (1984). Thinking and communicating about personal relationships: Some sex differences. Paper presented at the second International Conference on Personal Relationships, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. (1987). Reflection in personal relationships. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. C. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation and knowledge (pp. 74–93). London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (2010). The flourishing literature on flourishing relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 25–35. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00034.x
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. S., & Monin, J. K. (2006). Giving and receiving communal responsiveness as love. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 200–221). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, D. (2006). How a supportive partner may increase relationship satisfaction. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34, 117–131. doi:10.1080/03069880500483141
   Google Scholar
• Dindia, K. (2002). Self-disclosure research: Knowledge through meta-analysis. In M. Allen, R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, & N. A. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–199. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.2791609
   Google Scholar
• Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Dyadic coping in Latino couples: Validity of the Spanish version of the dyadic coping inventory. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 26, 447–466. doi:10.1080/10615806.2012.699045
   Google Scholar
• Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
   Google Scholar
• Gable, S. L., Gosnell, C. L., Maisel, N. C., & Strachman, A. (2012). Safely testing the alarm: Close others’ responses to personal positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 963–981. doi:10.1037/a0029488
   Google Scholar
• Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2006). Intimacy and the self: An iterative model of the self and close relationships. In P. Noller & J. Feeney (Eds.), Close relationships: Functions forms, and processes (pp. 211–225). Hove England: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2010). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 195–257. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42004-3
   Google Scholar
• Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Graber, E. C., Laurenceau, J.-P., Miga, E., Chango, J., & Coan, J. (2011). Conflict and love: Predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 541–550. doi:10.1037/a0024507
   Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. The Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.19379625
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L. (2006). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 249–265. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.249
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg, P. Y. (2013). Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 26, 136–153. doi:10.1080/10615806.2012.655726
   Google Scholar
• Hilpert, P., Bodenmann, G., Nussbeck, F. W., & Bradbury, T. N. (2013). Predicting relationship satisfaction in distressed and non-distressed couples based on a stratified sample: A matter of conflict, positivity, or support?. Family Science, 4, 110–120. doi:10.1080/19424620.2013.830633
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J., Rauer, A. J., & Volling, B. L. (2013). A dyadic view of support in marriage: The critical role of men’s support provision. Sex Roles, 68, 427–438. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0256-x
   Google Scholar
• Kalin, R., & Lloyd, C. A. (1985). Sex role identity, sex-role ideology and marital adjustment. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Karney, B. R., Story, L. B., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Marriages in context: Interactions between chronic and acute stress among newlyweds. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 13–32). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. B., & DeLongis, A. (2014). When couples disconnect: Rumination and withdrawal as maladaptive responses to everyday stress. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 460–469. doi:10.1037/a0037160
   Google Scholar
• Kurdeck, L. A. (1994). Conflict resolution styles in gay, lesbian, heterosexual nonparent, and heterosexual parent couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 705–722. doi:10.2307/352880
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C. A. (1994). Capitalizing on and coping with daily-life events: Expressive responses to positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1112–1125. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1112
   Google Scholar
• Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Rudaz, M., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations, 59, 195–206. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00595.x
   Google Scholar
• Maisel, N. C., Gable, S. L., & Strachman, A. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00201.x
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, J. F. (2004). Husbands’ and wives’ marital quality: The role of adult attachment orientations, depressive symptoms, and conflict resolution behaviors. Attachment & Human Development, 6, 99–112. doi:10.1080/14616730310001659575
   Google Scholar
• Merz, C. A., Meuwly, N., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2014). Engaging in dyadic coping: Buffering the impact of everyday stress on prospective relationship satisfaction. Family Science, 5, 30–37. doi:10.1080/19424620.2014.927385
   Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miner, A. G., Glomb, T. M., & Hulin, C. (2005). Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 171–193. doi:10.1348/096317905X40105
   Google Scholar
• Murstein, B. I., & Williams, P. D. (1985). Assortative matching for sex-role and marriage adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 195–201. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90109-6
   Google Scholar
• Noller, P., & Venardos, C. (1986). Communication awareness in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 31–42. doi:10.1177/0265407586031003
   Google Scholar
• Papp, L. M., & Witt, N. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 551–559. doi:10.1037/a0020836
   Google Scholar
• Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T. (2012). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing theme for the study of relationships and well-being. In L. Campbell & T. J. Loving (Eds.), Interdisciplinary research on close relationships: The case for integration (pp. 27–52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck, D. F. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes, & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Repetti, R. L. (1989). Effects of daily workload on subsequent behavior during marital interaction: The roles of social withdrawal and spouse support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 651–659. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.651
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Sierau, S., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2012). Conflict resolution as a dyadic mediator: Considering the partner perspective on conflict resolution. European Journal of Personality, 26, 221–232. doi:10.1002/per.828
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. A. P., Franks, M. M., & Atienza, A. A. (1997). Where two roles intersect: Spillover between parent care and employment. Psychology and Aging, 12, 30–37. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.30
   Google Scholar
• Story, L. B., & Repetti, R. (2006). Daily occupational stressors and marital behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 690–700. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.690
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., Johnson, M. J., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Social support, problem-solving, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 631–644. doi:10.1037/a0017578
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Verhofstadt, L. L., Buysse, A., & Ickes, W. (2007). Social support in couples: An examination of gender differences using self-report and observational methods. Sex Roles, 57, 267–282. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9257-6
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience: Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 108–130. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00035-6
   Google Scholar
• White, K. M., Speisman, J. C., Jackson, D., Bartis, S., & Costos, D. (1986). Intimacy maturity and its correlates in young married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 152–162. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.152.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2004). The association of experienced spousal support with marital satisfaction: Evaluating the moderating effects of sex, ethnic culture, and type of support. The Journal of Family Communication, 4, 123–145. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0402_3
   Google Scholar